Integrating covariates into circumplex structures: an extension procedure for Browne’s circular stochastic process model

References

• Alden, L. E., Wiggins, J. S., & Pincus, A. L. (1990). Construction of circumplex scales for the inventory of interpersonal problems. Journal of Personality Assessment, 55(3-4), 521–536. doi: 10.1080/00223891.1990.9674088
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, P. I., Day, S. X., McVay, J. P., & Rounds, J. (2008). Holland's RIASEC model as an integrative framework for individual differences. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 55(1), 1–18. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.55.1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Back, M. D., Küfner, A. C., Dufner, M., Gerlach, T. M., Rauthmann, J. F., & Denissen, J. J. (2013). Narcissistic admiration and rivalry: Disentangling the bright and dark sides of narcissism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105(6), 1013–1037. doi: 10.1037/a0034431
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batschelet, E. (1981). Circular statistics in biology. London, UK: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238–246. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne, M. W. (1992). Circumplex models for correlation matrices. Psychometrika, 57(4), 469–497. doi: 10.1007/BF02294416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne, M. W. (1995). CIRCUM: Notes on usage. Columbus, OH: Browne.
   Google Scholar
• Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• DeGeest, D. S., & Schmidt, F. (2015). A rigorous test of the fit of the circumplex model to Big Five personality data: Theoretical and methodological issues and two large sample empirical tests. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50(3), 350–364. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2015.1004568
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeYoung, C. G., Weisberg, Y. J., Quilty, L. C., & Peterson, J. B. (2013). Unifying the aspects of the Big Five, the interpersonal circumplex, and trait affiliation. Journal of Personality, 81(5), 465–475. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowgwillo, E. A., & Pincus, A. L. (2017). Differentiating dark triad traits within and across interpersonal circumplex surfaces. Assessment, 24(1), 24–44. doi: 10.1177/1073191116643161
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, G. A., Heise, D. R., Bohrnstedt, G. W., & Lucke, J. F. (1985). Evidence for extending the circumplex model of personality trait language to self-reported moods. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(1), 233–242. doi. 10.1037/0022-3514.49.1.233
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grassi, M., Luccio, R., & Di Blas, L. (2010). CircE: An R implementation of Browne’s circular stochastic process model. Behavior Research Methods, 42(1), 55–73. doi: 10.3758/BRM.42.1.55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurtman, M. B. (1992a). Construct validity of interpersonal personality measures: The interpersonal circumplex as a nomological net. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(1), 105–118. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.63.1.105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurtman, M. B. (1992b). Trust, distrust, and interpersonal problems: A circumplex analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(6), 989–1002. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.62.6.989
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurtman, M. B. (1994). The circumplex as a tool for studying normal and abnormal personality: A methodological primer. In S. Strack & M. Lorr (Eds.), Differentiating normal and abnormal personality (pp. 243–263). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gurtman, M. B., & Balakrishnan, J. D. (1998). Circular measurement redux: The analysis and interpretation of interpersonal circle profiles. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 5(3), 344–360. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2850.1998.tb00154.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurtman, M. B., & Pincus, A. L. (2000). Interpersonal adjective scales: Confirmation of circumplex structure from multiple perspectives. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(3), 374–384. doi: 10.1177/0146167200265009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurtman, M. B., & Pincus, A. L. (2003). The circumplex model: Methods and research applications. In I. B. Weiner (Series Ed.), I. A. Schinka, & W. F. Velicer (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Vol. 2. Research methods in psychology (pp. 407–428). New York: Wiley. doi: 10.1002/0471264385.wei0216
   Google Scholar
• Guttman, L. (1954). A new approach to factor analysis: The radex. In P. F. Lazarsfeld (Ed.), Mathematical thinking in the social sciences (pp. 258–348). Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hau, K.-T., & Marsh, H. W. (2004). The use of item parcels in structural equation modelling: Non-normal data and small sample sizes. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 57(2), 327–351. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8317.2004.tb00142.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstee, W. K. B., de Raad, B., & Goldberg, L. R. (1992). Integration of the big five and circumplex approaches to trait structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(1), 146–163. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.63.1.146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, I., & Scholl, W. (2005). Interpersonale Adjektivliste (IAL) [Interpersonal Adjective List (IAL): An empirical realization of theoretical circumplex concepts for the assessment of interpersonal style]. Diagnostica, 51, 145–155. doi: 10.1026/0012-1924.51.3.145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). New features in LISREL 8. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
   Google Scholar
• Kolenikov, S. (2011). Biases of parameter estimates in misspecified structural equation models. Sociological Methodology, 41(1), 119–157. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9531.2011.01236.x
   Google Scholar
• Küfner, A. C., Nestler, S., & Back, M. D. (2013). The two pathways to being an (un‐) popular narcissist. Journal of Personality, 81(2), 184–195. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2012.00795.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leary, T. (1957). Interpersonal diagnosis of personality. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Cai, L. (2006). Testing differences between nested covariance structure models: Power analysis and null hypotheses. Psychological Methods, 11(1), 19–35. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.11.1.19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J. D., Price, J., Gentile, B., Lynam, D. R., & Campbell, W. K. (2012). Grandiose and vulnerable narcissism from the perspective of the interpersonal circumplex. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(4), 507–512. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2012.04.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, B. (1984). A general structural equation model with dichotomous, ordered categorical and continuous latent variable indicators. Psychometrika, 49(1), 115–132. doi: 10.1007/BF02294210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2010). Mplus User’s Guide. Sixth Edition. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén
   Google Scholar
• Nagy, G., Brunner, M., Lüdtke, O., & Greiff, S. (2017). Extension procedures for confirmatory factor analysis. The Journal of Experimental Education, 85(4), 574–596. doi: 10.1080/00220973.2016.1260524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagy, G., Marsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O., & Trautwein, U. (2009). Representing the circles in our minds: Confirmatory factor analysis of circumplex structures and profiles. In Structural equation modeling in educational research: Concepts and applications (pp. 287–315). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Nagy, G., Trautwein, U., & Lüdtke, O. (2010). The structure of vocational interests in Germany: Different methodologies, different conclusions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 76(2), 153–169. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2007.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neale, M. C., Hunter, M. D., Pritikin, J. N., Zahery, M., Brick, T. R., Kirkpatrick, R. M., … Boker, S. M. (2016). OpenMx 2.0: Extended structural equation and statistical modeling. Psychometrika, 81(2), 535–549. doi:10.1007/s11336-014-9435-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauthmann, J. F., & Kolar, G. P. (2013). Positioning the Dark Triad in the interpersonal circumplex: The friendly-dominant narcissist, hostile-submissive Machiavellian, and hostile-dominant psychopath? Personality and Individual Differences, 54(5), 622–627. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2012.11.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theory and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. Zanna (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1–65). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shepard, R. N. (1978). The circumplex and related topological manifolds in the study of perception. In S. Shye (Ed.), Theory construction and data analysis in the behavioral sciences. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Šverko, I., Babarović, T., & Međugorac, V. (2014). Pictorial assessment of interests: Development and evaluation of pictorial and descriptive interest inventory. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 84(3), 356–366. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2014.02.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tracey, T. J. G. (2000). Analysis of circumplex models. In H. E. A. Tinsley & S. Browne (Eds.), Handbook of applied multivariate statistics and mathematical modelling (pp. 641–664). San Diego: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tracey, T. J. G., & Rounds, J. B. (1993). Evaluating Holland’s and Gati’s vocational interest models: A structural meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 113(2), 229–246. Doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.113.2.229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, D., Wiese, D., Vaidya, J., & Tellegen, A. (1999). Two general activation systems of affect: Structural findings, evolutionary considerations, and psychobiological evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(5), 820–838. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.76.5.820
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiggins, J. S. (1995). Interpersonal adjective scales: Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Wiggins, J. S. (2003). Paradigms of personality assessment. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yik, M. S., & Russell, J. A. (2001). Predicting the Big Two of affect from the Big Five of personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 35(3), 247–277. doi: 10.1006/jrpe.2001.2322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yik, M. S. M., & Russel, J. A. (2004). On the relationship between circumplexes: Affect and Wiggins’ IAS. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(2), 203–230. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr3902_4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yik, M. S., Russell, J. A., Oceja, L. V., & Dols, J. M. F. (2000). Momentary affect in Spanish: Scales, structure, and relationship to personality. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 16(3), 160. doi: 10.1027//1015-5759.16.3.160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, K.-H., Marshall, L. L., & Bentler, P. M. (2003). Assessing the effect of model misspecifications on parameter estimates in structural equation models. Sociological Methodology, 33(1), 241–265. doi:10.1111/j.0081-1750.2003.00132.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yung, Y. F., Browne, M. W., & Zhang, W. (2015). Fitting direct covariance structures by the MSTRUCT modeling language of the CALIS procedure. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 68(1), 178–193. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmermann, J., & Wright, A. G. (2017). Beyond description in interpersonal construct validation: Methodological advances in the circumplex structural summary approach. Assessment, 24(1), 3–23. doi: 10.1177/1073191115621795
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar