Simple use of BIC to Assess Model Selection Uncertainty: An Illustration using Mediation and Moderation Models

References

• Alfaro, M. E., & Huelsenbeck, J. P. (2006). Comparative performance of Bayesian and AIC-based measures of phylogenetic model uncertainty. Systematic Biology, 55(1), 88–96. doi:10.1080/10635150500433565
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, J. L., & Yuen, K. V. (2004). Model selection using response measurements: Bayesian probabilistic approach. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 130(2), 192–203. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2004)130:2(192)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238–246. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A., Harden, J. J., Ray, S., & Zavisca, J. (2014). BIC and alternative Bayesian information criteria in the selection of structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 21(1), 1–19. doi:10.1080/10705511.2014.856691
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boukaert, R. R., & Drummond, A. J. (2017). bModelTest: Bayesian phylogenetic site model averaging and model comparison. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 17, 42. doi:10.1186/s12862-017-0890-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with Amos: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, S. (2017). Goal orientation, self-control, and academic delay of gratification. Unpublished M.Ed. thesis, University of Macau, Macau.
   Google Scholar
• Chipman, H., George, E. I., McCulloch, R. E., Clyde, M., Foster, D. P., & Stine, R. A. (2001). The practical implementation of Bayesian model selection. Lecture Notes-Monograph Series, p65 134.
   Google Scholar
• Chou, C.-P., & Huh, J. (2012). Model modification in structural equation modeling. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 233–246). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, P. (2017). Asymptotics of AIC, BIC, and RMSEA for model selection in structural equation modeling. Psychometrika, 82(2), 407–426. doi:10.1007/s11336-017-9572-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeffreys, H. (1935). Some tests of significance, treated by the theory of probability. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 31(02), 203–222. doi:10.1017/S030500410001330X
   Google Scholar
• Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34(2), 183–202. doi:10.1007/BF02289343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, D., & Depaoli, S. (2012). Bayesian structural equation modeling. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 650–673). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Konishi, S., Ando, T., & Imoto, S. (2004). Bayesian information criteria and smoothing parameter selection in radial basis function networks. Biometrika, 91(1), 27–43. doi:10.1093/biomet/91.1.27
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, L. C., Huang, P. H., & Weng, L. J. (2017). Selecting path models in SEM: A comparison of model selection criteria. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 24, 1–15. doi:10.1080/10705511.2017.1363652
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, Z., Chow, S., & Loken, E. (2017). A comparison of Bayesian and frequentist model selection methods for factor analysis models. Psychological Methods, 22(2), 361–381. doi:10.1037/met0000145
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubke, G. H., & Campbell, I. (2016). Inference based on the best-fitting model can contribute to the replication crisis: Assessing model selection uncertainty using a bootstrap approach. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 23(4), 479–490. doi:10.1080/10705511.2016.1141355
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubke, G. H., Campbell, I., McArtor, D., Miller, P., Luningham, J., & van denBerg, S. M. (2017). Assessing model selection uncertainty using a bootstrap approach: An update. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 24(2), 230–245. doi:10.1080/10705511.2016.1252265
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing Moderated Mediation Hypotheses: Theory, Methods, and Prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(1), 185–227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., & Merkle, E. C. (2012). The problem of model selection uncertainty in structural equation modeling. Psychological Methods, 17(1), 1–14. doi:10.1037/a0026804
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raftery, A. E. (1993). Bayesian model selection in structural equation models. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 163–180). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayesian model selection in social research. Sociological Methodology, 25, 111–163. doi:10.2307/271063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, D., Song, H., Liao, X., Terry, R., & Snyder, L. A. (2017). Bayesian SEM for specification search problems in testing factorial invariance. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 52(4), 430–444. doi:10.1080/00273171.2017.1306432
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasserman, L. (2000). Bayesian model selection and model averaging. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 44, 91–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, S. G., Taylor, A. B., & Wu, W. (2012). Model fit and model selection in structural equation modeling. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 209–231). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar