A Two-level Moderated Latent Variable Model with Single Level Data

References

• Aguinis, H., Beaty, J. C., Boik, R. J., & Pierce, C. A. (2005). Effect size and power in assessing moderating effects of categorical variables using multiple regression: A 30-year review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(1), 94–107. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.1.94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aguinis, H., Petersen, S. A., & Pierce, C. A. (1999). Appraisal of the homogeneity of error variance assumption and alternatives to multiple regression for estimating moderating effects of categorical variables. Organizational Research Methods, 2(4), 315–339. doi:10.1177/109442819924001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Algina, J., & Moulder, B. C. (2001). A note on estimating the Jöreskog–Yang model using LISREL. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 8(1), 40–52. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0801_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arminger, G., & Muthén, B. O. (1998). A Bayesian approach to nonlinear latent variable models using the Gibbs sampler and the Metropolis–Hastings algorithm. Psychometrika, 63(3), 271–300. doi:10.1007/BF02294856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2019). Latent variable interactions using maximum-likelihood and Bayesian estimation for single- and two-level models. Mplus Web Notes, No. (23)May 3, 2019. Retrieved from https://www.statmodel.com/verhistory.shtml
   Google Scholar
• Bast, J., & Reitsma, P. (1998). Analyzing the development of individual differences in terms of Matthew effects in reading: Results from a Dutch longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 34(6), 1373–1399. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.34.6.1373
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohrnstedt, G. W., & Marwell, G. (1978). The reliability of products of two random variables. In K. F. Schuessler (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 254–273). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. doi:10.2307/270812
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, J. V. (1978). Robustness. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 31(2), 144–151. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8317.1978.tb00581.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, S., & Gelman, A. (1998). General methods for monitoring convergence of iterative simulations. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 7, 434–455. doi:10.1.1.299.9544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne, W. J., & Draper, D. (2006). A comparison of Bayesian and likelihood-based methods for fitting multilevel models. Bayesian Analysis, 1(3), 473–514. doi:10.1214/06-BA117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busemeyer, J. R., & Jones, L. E. (1983). Analysis of multiplicative combination rules when the causal variables are measured with error. Psychological Bulletin, 93(3), 549–562. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.93.3.549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cain, M. K., & Zhang, Z. (2019). Fit for a Bayesian: An evaluation of PPP and DIC for structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 26(1), 39–50. doi:10.1080/10705511.2018.1490648
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casella, G., & Berger, R. L. (2001). Statistical inference (2nd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Duxbury.
   Google Scholar
• Charles, E. P. (2005). The correction for attenuation due to measurement error: clarifying concepts and creating confidence sets. Psychological Methods, 10(2), 206–226. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.10.2.206
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, Y., Rabe-Hesketh, S., Dorie, V., Gelman, A., & Liu, J. (2013). A nondegenerate penalized likelihood estimator for variance parameters in multilevel models. Psychometrika, 78(4), 685–709. doi:10.1007/s11336-013-9328-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowen, E. L., & Work, W. C. (1988). Resilient children, psychological wellness and primary prevention. American Journal of Community Psychology, 25, 141–157. doi:10.1007/BF00922773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Fort Worth, TX: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Cummings, E. M., Schermerhorn, A. C., Davies, P. T., Goeke-Morey, M. C., & Cummings, J. S. (2006). Interparental discord and child adjustment: Prospective investigations of emotional security as an explanatory mechanism. Child Development, 77(1), 132–152. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00861.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Depaoli, S., & Clifton, J. P. (2015). A Bayesian approach to multilevel structural equation modeling with continuous and dichotomous outcomes. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 22(3), 327–351. doi:10.1080/10705511.2014.937849
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, X. (2003). Two approaches for correcting correlation attenuation caused by measurement error: Implications for research practice. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63(6), 915–930. doi:10.1177/0013164403251319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, S., & Smith, G. T. (2008). Binge eating, problem drinking, and pathological gambling: Linked by common pathways to impulsive behaviour. Personality and Individual Differences, 44(4), 789–800. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2007.10.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, L. D., & van Belle, G. (1993). Biostatistics: A methodology for the health sciences. New York: Wiley. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19981215)17:23<2805:AID-SIM990>3.0.CO
   Google Scholar
• Flora, D. B., & Curran, P. J. (2004). An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data. Psychological Methods, 9(4), 466–491. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.9.4.466
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garmezy, N., Masten, A. S., & Tellegen, A. (1984). The study of stress and competence in children: A building block for developmental psychopathology. Child Development, 55(1), 97–111. doi:10.2307/1129837
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman, A. (2006). Prior distributions for variance parameters in hierarchical models (comment on article by Browne and Draper). Bayesian Analysis, 1(3), 515–534. doi:10.1214/06-BA117A
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grissom, R. J. (2000). Heterogeneity of variance in clinical data. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68(1), 155–165. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.68.1.155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulliksen, H. (1987). Theory of mental tests. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. doi:10.4324/9780203052150
   Google Scholar
• Hox, J., van de Schoot, R., & Matthijsse, S. (2012). How few countries will do? Comparative survey analysis from a Bayesian perspective. Survey Research Methods, 6(2), 87–93. doi:10.18148/srm/2012.v6i2.5033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L. T., Bentler, P. M., & Kano, Y. (1992). Can test statistics in covariance structure analysis be trusted? Psychological Bulletin, 112(2), 351–362. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.2.351
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, J. N., Wu, J. Y., Kwok, O. M., Villarreal, V., & Johnson, A. Y. (2012). Indirect effects of child reports of teacher–student relationship on achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(2), 350–365. doi:10.1037/a0026339
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaccard, J., & Wan, C. K. (1995). Measurement error in the analysis of interaction effects between continuous predictors using multiple regression: Multiple indicator and structural equation approaches. Psychological Bulletin, 117(2), 348–357. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.2.348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackman, M. G.-A., Leite, W. L., & Cochrane, D. J. (2011). Estimating latent variable interactions with the unconstrained approach: A comparison of methods to form product indicators for large, unequal numbers of items. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 18(2), 274–288. doi:10.1080/10705511.2011.557342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jöreskog, K. G., & Yang, F. (1996). Nonlinear structural equation models: The Kenny–Judd model with interaction effects. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling techniques (pp. 57–87). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Kelava, A., Werner, C., Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., Zapf, D., Ma, Y., … West, S. G. (2011). Advanced nonlinear structural equation modeling: Theoretical properties and empirical application of the LMS and QML estimators. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 18(3), 465–491. doi:10.1080/10705511.2011.582408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenny, D. A., & Judd, C. M. (1984). Estimating the nonlinear and interactive effects of latent variables. Psychological Bulletin, 96(1), 201–210. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.96.1.201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keppel, G. (1991). Design and analysis: A researcher's handbook (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, A., & Moosbrugger, M. (2000). Maximum likelihood estimation of latent interaction effects with the LMS method. Psychometrika, 65(4), 457–474. doi:10.1007/BF02296338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, A. G., & Muthén, B. (2003). Quasi-maximum likelihood estimation of structural equation models with multiple interaction and quadratic effects. Unpublished Manuscript, Graduate School of Education, University of California, Los Angeles.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S. Y. (2007). Structural equation modeling: A Bayesian approach. West Sussex, UK: Wiley. doi:10.1002/9780470024737
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S. Y., & Zhu, H. T. (2002). Maximum likelihood estimation of nonlinear structural equation models. Psychometrika, 67(2), 189–210. doi:10.1007/BF02294842
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, G. C., Wen, Z., Marsh, H. W., & Lin, H. S. (2010). Structural equation models of latent interactions: Clarification of orthogonalizing and double-mean-centering strategies. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 17(3), 374–391. doi:10.1080/10705511.2010.488999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindley, D. V., & Smith, A. F. M. (1972). Bayes estimates for the linear model (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 34, 1–42. doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1972.tb00885.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Link, W. A., & Eaton, M. J. (2011). On thinning of chains in MCMC. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 3(1), 112–115. First published online 17 June 2011. doi:10.1111/j.2041-210X.2011.00131.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, T. D., Bovaird, J. A., & Widaman, K. F. (2006). On the merits of orthogonalizing powered and product terms: Implications for modeling interactions among latent variables. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 13(4), 497–519. doi:10.1207/s15328007sem1304_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, J. S., & Ervin, L. H. (2000). Using heteroscedasticity consistent standard errors in the linear regression model. The American Statistician, 54, 217–224. doi:10.1080/00031305.2000.10474549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lunn, D., Jackson, C., Thomas, A., Best, N., & Spiegelhalter, D. J. (2012). The BUGS book: A practical introduction to Bayesian analysis. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall.
   Google Scholar
• MacCallum, R. C., & Mar, C. M. (1995). Distinguishing between moderator and quadratic effects in multiple regression. Psychological Bulletin, 118(3), 405–421. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.118.3.405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Wen, Z., Nagengast, B., & Hau, K. T. (2012). Structural equation models of latent interaction. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modelling (pp. 436–458). New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Wen, Z., & Hau, K. (2006). Structural equation models of latent interaction and quadratic effects. In G. R. Hancock & R. O. Mueller (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: A second course (pp. 225–265). Greenwich, CT: Information Age. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.9.3.275
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Wen, Z., & Hau, K. T. (2004). Structural equation models of latent interactions: Evaluation of alternative estimation strategies and indicator construction. Psychological Methods, 9(3), 275–300. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.9.3.275
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marin, J. M., & Robert, C. P. (2014). Bayesian essentials with R (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mooijaart, A., & Bentler, P. M. (2010). An alternative approach for modeling nonlinear latent variable models. Structural Equation Modeling, 17(3), 357–373. doi:10.1080/10705511.2010.488997
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, T. M., Reise, S. P., Depaoli, S., & Haviland, M. G. (2015). Iteration of partially specified target matrices: Applications in exploratory and Bayesian confirmatory factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50(2), 149–161. doi:10.1080/00273171.2014.973990
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2017). Mplus: Statistical analysis with latent variables: User’s guide (Version 8). Los Angeles, CA: Authors.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, E. A., & Dannefer, D. (1992). Aged heterogeneity: Fact or fiction? The fate of diversity in gerontological research. The Gerontologist, 32(1), 17–23. doi:10.1093/geront/32.1.17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norets, A. (2015). Bayesian regression with nonparametric heteroskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics, 185(2), 409–419. doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2014.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2011). PISA in focus. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED523057.pdf. doi:10.1787/22260919
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2014). PISA 2012 technical report. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264208780-en
   Google Scholar
• Pelenis, J. (2014). Bayesian regression with heteroscedastic error density and parametric mean function. Journal of Econometrics, 178, 624–638. doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2013.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plummer, M. (2015). JAGS version 4.0.0 user manual. Lyon, France. (Retrieved from http://sourceforge.net/projects/mcmc-jags/)
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. (Retrieved from https://www.R-project.org/)
   Google Scholar
• Sawilowsky, S. S., & Blair, R. C. (1992). A more realistic look at the robustness and Type II error properties of the t test to departures from population normality. Psychological Bulletin, 111(2), 352–360. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.111.2.352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schermelleh-Engel, K., Klein, A., & Moosbrugger, H. (1998). Estimating nonlinear effects using a latent moderated structural equations approach. In R. E. Schumacker & G. A. Marcoulides (Eds.), Interaction and nonlinear effects in structural equation modeling (pp. 203–238). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Song, X. Y., & Lee, S. Y. (2007). Bayesian analysis of latent variable models with non-ignorable missing outcomes from exponential family. Statistics in Medicine, 26(3), 681–693. doi:10.1002/sim.2530
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, X. Y., & Lee, S. Y. (2012). Basic and advanced Bayesian structural equation modeling: With applications in the medical and behavioral sciences. London, UK: Wiley. doi:10.1002/9781118358887
   Google Scholar
• Spiegelhalter, D. J., Best, N. G., Carlin, B. P., & van der Linde, A. (2002). Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 64(4), 583–639. doi:10.1111/1467-9868.00353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomarken, A. J., & Serlin, R. C. (1986). Comparison of ANOVA alternatives under variance heterogeneity and specific noncentrality structures. Psychological Bulletin, 99(1), 90–99. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.99.1.90
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Schoot, R., Winter, S., Ryan, O., Zondervan-Zwijnenburg, M., & Depaoli, S. (2017). A systematic review of Bayesian papers in psychology: The last 25 years. Psychological Methods, 22(2), 217–239. doi:10.1037/met0000100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Erp, S. J., Mulder, J., & Oberski, D. L. (2018). Prior sensitivity analysis in default Bayesian structural equation modeling. Psychological Methods, 23(2), 363–388. doi:10.1037/met0000162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wall, M. M., & Amemiya, Y. (2000). Estimation for polynomial structural equation models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95(451), 929–940. doi:10.1080/01621459.2000.10474283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wall, M. M., & Amemiya, Y. (2001). Generalized appended product indicator procedure for nonlinear structural equation analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 26(1), 1–29. doi:10.3102/10769986026001001
   Google Scholar
• Wall, M. M., & Amemiya, Y. (2003). A method of moments technique for fitting interaction effects in structural equation models. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 56, 47–63. doi:10.1348/000711003321645331
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, L., & Preacher, K. J. (2015). Moderated mediation analysis using Bayesian methods. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 22(2), 249–263. doi:10.1080/10705511.2014.935256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, L., Zhang, Z., McArdle, J. J., & Salthouse, T. A. (2008). Investigating ceiling effects in longitudinal data analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 43(3), 476–496. doi:10.1080/00273170802285941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen, Z., Marsh, H. W., & Hau, K. T. (2010). Structural equation models of latent interactions: An appropriate standardized solution and its scale-free properties. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 17(1), 1–22. doi:10.1080/10705510903438872
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilcox, R. R. (1987). New designs in analysis of variance. Annual Review of Psychology, 38(1), 29–60. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.38.020187.000333
   Google Scholar
• Worthen, B. R., White, K. R., Fan, X., & Sudweeks, R. R. (1999). Measurement and assessment in schools (2nd ed.). New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, M., & Yuan, K.-H. (2016). Robust methods for moderation analysis with a two-level regression model. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 51(6), 757–771. doi:10.1080/00273171.2016.1235965
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, K.-H., & Bentler, P. M. (2000). Inferences on correlation coefficients in some classes of nonnormal distributions. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 72(2), 230–248. doi:10.1006/jmva.1999.1858
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, K.-H., Cheng, Y., & Maxwell, S. (2014). Moderation analysis using a two-level regression model. Psychometrika, 79(4), 701–732. doi:10.1007/s11336-013-9357-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, K.-H., Yang-Wallentin, F., & Bentler, P. M. (2012). ML versus MI for missing data with violation of distribution conditions. Sociological Methods & Research, 41, 598–629. doi:10.1177/0049124112460373
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, Y., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2009). Bayesian mediation analysis. Psychological Methods, 14(4), 301–322. doi:10.1037/a0016972
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Q., & Wang, L. (2017). Moderation analysis with missing data in the predictors. Psychological Methods, 22(4), 649–666. doi:10.1037/met0000104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, M. A., & Arunkumar, R. (1994). Resiliency research: Implications for schools and policy. Social Policy Report, 8(4), 1–18. doi:10.1.1.132.8277
   Google Scholar
• Zondervan-Zwijnenburg, M., Peeters, M., Depaoli, S., & van de Schoot, R. (2017). Where do priors come from? Applying guidelines to construct informative priors in small sample research. Research in Human Development, 14(4), 305–320. doi:10.1080/15427609.2017.1370966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar