Accounting for Latent Covariates in Average Effects from Count Regressions

References

• Arbuckle, J. L. (1996). Full information estimation in the presence of incomplete data. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling (pp. 243–277). Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Azzalini, A., & Valle, A. D. (1996). The multivariate skew-normal distribution. Biometrika, 83(4), 715–726. doi:10.1093/biomet/83.4.715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, K., Berch, D. B., Helmers, K. F., Jobe, J. B., Leveck, M. D., Marsiske, M., … Willis, S. L. (2002). Effects of cognitive training interventions with older adults. JAMA, 288(18), 2271. doi:10.1001/jama.288.18.2271
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentler, P. M. (1980). Multivariate analysis with latent variables: Causal modeling. Annual Review of Psychology, 31(1), 419–456. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.31.020180.002223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equation modeling with latent variables. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, R. J., Ruppert, D., Stefanski, L. A., & Crainiceanu, C. M. (2010). Measurement error in nonlinear models: A modern perspective. Chapman and Hall/CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Cascione, M., Tenenbaum, N., Wendt, J., Meng, X., Schofield, L., & Cree, B. A. (2018). Treatment retention on fingolimod compared with injectable multiple sclerosis therapies in African-American patients: A subgroup analysis of a randomized phase 4 study. Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders, 25, 50–56. doi:10.1016/j.msard.2018.07.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cree, B. A. C., Arnold, D. L., Cascione, M., Fox, E. J., Williams, I. M., Meng, X., Schofield, L., & Tenenbaum, N. (2018). Phase IV study of retention on fingolimod versus injectable multiple sclerosis therapies: A randomized clinical trial. Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders, 11, 175628641877433. doi:10.1177/1756286418774338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977). Maximum Likelihood from incomplete data via EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 39(1), 1–38. doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devlieger, I., Mayer, A., & Rosseel, Y. (2016). Hypothesis testing using factor score regression: A comparison of four methods. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 76(5), 741–730. doi:10.1177/0013164415607618
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enders, C. (2010). Applied missing data analysis. Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, S. B., Doyle, S. R., Peavy, K. M., Wells, E. A., Owens, M. D., Shores-Wilson, K., DiCenzo, J., & Donovan, D. M. (2018). Age differences in outcomes among patients in the “stimulant abuser groups to engage in 12-step” (STAGE-12) intervention. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 84, 21–29. doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2017.10.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geneletti, S., & Dawid, A. P. (2011). Defining and identifying the effect of treatment on the treated. In P. M. Illari, F. Russo, & J. Williamson (Eds.), Causality in the Sciences (pp. 728–749). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199574131.003.0034
   Google Scholar
• Greene, W. (2007). Econometric analysis (6th ed.). Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Greenland, S., Robins, J. M., & Pearl, J. (1999). Confounding and collapsibility in causal inference. Statistical Science, 14(1), 29–46. doi:10.1214/ss/1009211805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilbe, J. M. (2011). Negative binomial regression (2nd ed.). Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Hittner, J. B., Owens, E. C., & Swickert, R. J. (2016). Influence of social settings on risky sexual behavior. SAGE Open, 6(1), 2158244016629187. doi:10.1177/2158244016629187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollis, S., & Campbell, F. (1999). What is meant by intention to treat analysis? survey of published randomised controlled trials. BMJ, 319(7211), 670–674. doi:10.1136/bmj.319.7211.670
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imbens, G. W., & Rubin, D. B. (2015). Causal inference in statistics, social, and biomedical sciences. Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9781139025751
   Google Scholar
• Jobe, J. B., Smith, D. M., Ball, K., Tennstedt, S. L., Marsiske, M., Willis, S. L., Rebok, G. W., Morris, J. N., Helmers, K. F., Leveck, M. D., & Kleinman, K. (2001). ACTIVE: A cognitive intervention trial to promote independence in older adults. Controlled Clinical Trials, 22(4), 453–479. doi:10.1016/S0197-2456(01)00139-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Karrison, T., & Kocherginsky, M. (2018). Restricted mean survival time: Does covariate adjustment improve precision in randomized clinical trials? Clinical Trials, 15(2), 178–188. doi:10.1177/1740774518759281
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelava, A., & Nagengast, B. (2012). A Bayesian model for the estimation of latent interaction and quadratic effects when latent variables are non-normally distributed. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 47(5), 717–742. doi:10.1080/00273171.2012.715560
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelava, A., Nagengast, B., & Brandt, H. (2014). A nonlinear structural equation mixture modeling approach for nonnormally distributed latent predictor variables. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 21(3), 468–481. doi:10.1080/10705511.2014.915379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiefer, C., & Mayer, A. (2019). Average effects based on regressions with a logarithmic link function: A new approach with stochastic covariates. Psychometrika, 84(2), 422–446. doi:10.1007/s11336-018-09654-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kukush, A., Schneeweis, H., & Wolf, R. (2004). Three estimators for the Poisson regression model with measurement errors. Statistical Papers, 45(3), 351–368. doi:10.1007/BF02777577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lachman, M. E., Baltes, P., Nesselroade, J. R., & Willis, S. L. (1982). Examination of personality-ability relationships in the elderly: The role of the contextual (interface) assessment mode. Journal of Research in Personality, 16(4), 485–501. doi:10.1016/0092-6566(82)90007-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, W. (2013). Agnostic notes on regression adjustments to experimental data: Reexamining Freedman’s critique. The Annals of Applied Statistics, 7(1), 295–318. doi:10.1214/12-AOAS583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohman, M. C., Rebok, G. W., Spira, A. P., Parisi, J. M., Gross, A. L., & Kueider, A. M. (2013). Depressive symptoms and memory performance among older adults. Journal of Aging and Health, 25(8_suppl), 209S–2229. doi:10.1177/0898264312460573
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord, D. (2006). Modeling motor vehicle crashes using Poisson-gamma models: Examining the effects of low sample mean values and small sample size on the estimation of the fixed dispersion parameter. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 38(4), 751–766. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2006.02.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O., Nagengast, B., Morin, A. J. S., & von Davier, M. (2013). Why item parcels are (almost) never appropriate: Two wrongs do not make a right –camouflaging misspecification with item parcels in CFA models. Psychological Methods, 18(3), 257–284. doi:10.1037/a0032773
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, A., Dietzfelbinger, L., Rosseel, Y., & Steyer, R. (2016). The EffectLiteR approach for analyzing average and conditional effects. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 51(2-3), 374–391. doi:10.1080/00273171.2016.1151334
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, A., Nagengast, B., Fletcher, J., & Steyer, R. (2014). Analyzing average and conditional effects with multigroup multilevel structural equation models. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, A., Umbach, N., Flunger, B., & Kelava, A. (2017). Effect analysis using nonlinear structural equation mixture modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 24(4), 556–570. doi:10.1080/10705511.2016.1273780
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazerolle, L., Bennett, S., Antrobus, E., Cardwell, S. M., Eggins, E., & Piquero, A. R. (2019). Disrupting the pathway from truancy to delinquency: A randomized field trial test of the longitudinal impact of a school engagement program. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 35(4), 663–689. doi:10.1007/s10940-018-9395-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier, P. (1991). Compliance as an explanatory variable in clinical trials: Comment. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 86(413), 19–22. doi:10.2307/2289709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miratrix, L. W., Sekhon, J. S., & Yu, B. (2013). Adjusting treatment effect estimates by post-stratification in randomized experiments. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology)), 75(2), 369–396. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9868.2012.01048.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén. B. O, (1998–2015). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• Neighbors, C., Rodriguez, L. M., Rinker, D. V., Gonzales, R. G., Agana, M., Tackett, J. L., & Foster, D. W. (2015). Efficacy of personalized normative feedback as a brief intervention for college student gambling: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 83(3), 500–511. doi:10.1037/a0039125
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nusser, L., & Weinert, S. (2017). Appropriate test-taking instructions for students with special educational needs. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 16(3), 227–240. doi:10.1891/1945-8959.16.3.227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parisi, J. M., Franchetti, M. K., Rebok, G. W., Spira, A. P., Carlson, M. C., Willis, S. L., & Gross, A. L. (2014). Depressive symptoms and inductive reasoning performance: Findings from the ACTIVE reasoning training intervention. Psychology and Aging, 29(4), 843–851. doi:10.1037/a0037670
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D Scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1(3), 385–401. doi:10.1177/014662167700100306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichardt, C. (2019). Quasi-Experimentation: A guide to design and analysis. Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, L. D., & Jewell, N. P. (1991). Some surprising results about covariate adjustment in logistic regression models. International Statistical Review / Revue Internationale de Statistique, 59(2), 227. doi:10.2307/1403444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. doi:10.1093/biomet/70.1.41
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, D. B. (1974). Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66(5), 688–701. doi:10.1037/h0037350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sagarin, B. J., West, S. G., Ratnikov, A., Homan, W. K., Ritchie, T. D., & Hansen, E. J. (2014). Treatment noncompliance in randomized experiments: Statistical approaches and design issues. Psychological Methods, 19(3), 317–333. doi:10.1037/met0000013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaumberg, R. L., & Flynn, F. J. (2017). Clarifying the link between job satisfaction and absenteeism: The role of guilt proneness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(6), 982–992. doi:10.1037/apl0000208
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schennach, S. M. (2016). Recent advances in the measurement error literature. Annual Review of Economics, 8(1), 341–377. doi:10.1146/annurev-economics-080315-015058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sengewald, M.-A., & Pohl, S. (2019). Compensation and amplification of attenuation bias in causal effect estimates. Psychometrika, 84(2), 589–610. doi:10.1007/s11336-019-09665-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sengewald, M.-A., Steiner, P. M., & Pohl, S. (2019). When does measurement error in covariates impact causal effect estimates? Analytic derivations of different scenarios and an empirical illustration. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 72(2), 244–270. doi:10.1111/bmsp.12146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheiner, L. B., & Rubin, D. B. (1995). Intention-to-treat analysis and the goals of clinical-trials. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 57(1), 6–15. doi:10.1016/0009-9236(95)90260-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterba, S. K., & Rights, J. D. (2016). Accounting for parcel-allocation variability in practice: Combining sources of uncertainty and choosing the number of allocations. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 51(2–3), 296–313. doi:10.1080/00273171.2016.1144502
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steyer, R., Mayer, A., & Fiege, C. (2014). Causal inference on total, direct, and indirect effects. In A. C. Michalos (Ed.), Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research (pp. 606–631). Springer. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_295
   Google Scholar
• Steyer, R., & Nagel, W. (2017). Probability and conditional expectation. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Wolinsky, F. D., Vander Weg, M. W., Martin, R., Unverzagt, F. W., Willis, S. L., Marsiske, M., Rebok, G. W., Morris, J. N., Ball, K. K., & Tennstedt, S. L. (2010). Does cognitive training improve internal locus of control among older adults? The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 65B(5), 591–598. doi:10.1093/geronb/gbp117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahodne, L. B., Meyer, O. L., Choi, E., Thomas, M. L., Willis, S. L., Marsiske, M., Gross, A. L., Rebok, G. W., & Parisi, J. M. (2015). External locus of control contributes to racial disparities in memory and reasoning training gains in ACTIVE. Psychology and Aging, 30(3), 561–572. doi:10.1037/pag0000042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar