Considering the ‘With Whom’: Differences Between Event- and Signal-Contingent ESM Data of Person-Specific Social Interactions

References

• Achterhof, R., Kirtley, O. J., Schneider, M., Hagemann, N., Hermans, K. S. F. M., Hiekkaranta, A. P., Lecei, A., Decoster, J., Derom, C., De Hert, M., Gülöksüz, S., Jacobs, N., Menne-Lothmann, C., Rutten, B. P. F., Thiery, E., van Os, J., van Winkel, R., Wichers, M., & Myin-Germeys, I. (2022). General psychopathology and its social correlates in the daily lives of youth. Journal of Affective Disorders, 309, 428–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2022.04.147
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akker, O. v d., Weston, S. J., Campbell, L., Chopik, W. J., Damian, R. I., Davis-Kean, P., Hall, A., Kosie, J., Kruse, E., Olsen, J., Ritchie, S. J., Valentine, K. D., Veer, A. v’., & Bakker, M. (2019). Preregistration of secondary data analysis: A template and tutorial. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/hvfmr
   Google Scholar
• Brown, L. H., Strauman, T., Barrantes-Vidal, N., Silvia, P. J., & Kwapil, T. R. (2011). An experience-sampling study of depressive symptoms and their social context. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 199(6), 403–409. https://doi.org/10.1097/NMD.0b013e31821cd24b
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutrona, C. E., & Russell, D. W. (1987). The provisions of social relationships and adaptation to stress. Advances in Personal Relationships, 1(1), 37–67.
   Google Scholar
• Dawood, S., Hallquist, M. N., Pincus, A. L., Ram, N., Newman, M. G., Wilson, S. J., & Levy, K. N. (2020). Comparing signal-contingent and event-contingent experience sampling ratings of affect in a sample of psychotherapy outpatients. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 42(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-019-09766-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimotakis, N., Scott, B. A., & Koopman, J. (2011). An experience sampling investigation of workplace interactions, affective states, and employee well-being. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(4), 572–588. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elmer, T., Geschwind, N., Peeters, F., Wichers, M., & Bringmann, L. (2020). Getting stuck in social isolation: Solitude inertia and depressive symptoms. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 129(7), 713–723. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000588
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2006). Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hilbe, J. M. (2011). Negative binomial regression. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511973420
   Google Scholar
• Himmelstein, P. H., Woods, W. C., & Wright, A. G. C. (2019). A comparison of signal- and event-contingent ambulatory assessment of interpersonal behavior and affect in social situations. Psychological Assessment, 31(7), 952–960. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000718
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaurin, A., Pilkonis, P. A., & Wright, A. G. (2022). Attachment manifestations in daily interpersonal interactions. Affective Science, 3(3), 546–558. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42761-022-00117-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kopala-Sibley, D. C., Zuroff, D. C., Russell, J. J., Moskowitz, D. S., & Paris, J. (2012). Understanding heterogeneity in borderline personality disorder: Differences in affective reactivity explained by the traits of dependency and self-criticism. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 121(3), 680–691. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028513
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leertouwer, I., Cramer, A. O. J., Vermunt, J. K., & Schuurman, N. K. (2021). A review of explicit and implicit assumptions when providing personalized feedback based on self-report EMA data. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 764526. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.764526
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litwin, H., & Stoeckel, K. J. (2013). Social networks and subjective wellbeing among older Europeans: Does age make a difference? Ageing and Society, 33(7), 1263–1281. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X12000645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metricwire Inc. | Real-World Data | Real-Life Impact (2022). Metricwire Inc. Retrieved October 6, 2022, from https://metricwire.com/
   Google Scholar
• Moskowitz, D. S., Suh, E. J., & Desaulniers, J. (1994). Situational influences on gender differences in agency and communion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(4), 753–761. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.66.4.753
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myin-Germeys, I., & Kuppens, P. (2021). The open handbook of experience sampling methodology: A step-by-step guide to designing, conducting, and analyzing ESM studies. Center for Research on Experience Sampling and Ambulatory Methods.
   Google Scholar
• Othman, S. A. (2014). Comparison between models with and without intercept. General Mathematics Notes, 21, 118–127.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, B. L., Pescosolido, B. A., & Borgatti, S. P. (2018). Egocentric network analysis: Foundations, methods, and models. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316443255
   Google Scholar
• Silva, P. J., & Cotter, K. N. (2021). Researching daily life (1st ed.). American Psychological Association; JSTOR. http://www.jstor.org.proxy-ub.rug.nl/stable/j.ctv1jbzccb
   Google Scholar
• Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (2011). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Stadel, M., & Stulp, G. (2022). Balancing bias and burden in personal network studies. Social Networks, 70, 16–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2021.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stadel, M., Langener, A., Elmer, T., Bringmann, L., & Stulp, G. (2022). Testing methods to capture social context. https://osf.io/jqdr9/
   Google Scholar
• Stadel, M., Stulp, G., Langener, A. M., Elmer, T., van Duijn, M. A. J., & Bringmann, L. F. (2023). Feedback about a person’s social context—Personal networks and daily social interactions. Administration and Policy in Mental Health Services Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-023-01293-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suh, E. J., Moskowitz, D. S., Fournier, M. A., & Zuroff, D. C. (2004). Gender and relationships: Influences on agentic and communal behaviors. Personal Relationships, 11(1), 41–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2004.00070.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1994). The PANAS-X: Manual for the positive and negative affect schedule-expanded form. The University of Iowa. https://doi.org/10.17077/48vt-m4t2
   Google Scholar
• Weston, S. J., Ritchie, S. J., Rohrer, J. M., & Przybylski, A. K. (2019). Recommendations for increasing the transparency of analysis of preexisting data sets. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(3), 214–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919848684
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Woods, W. C., Edershile, E. A., Sharpe, B. M., Ringwald, W. R., Himmelstein, P. H., Newman, M. G., Wilson, S. J., Ellison, W. D., Levy, K. N., Pincus, A. L., Creswell, J. D., & Wright, A. G. C. (2022). Psychometric evaluation of a visual interpersonal analogue scale. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/h9bmy
   Google Scholar