Nuclear rDNA phylogeny of the Sclerotiniaceae

LITERATURE CITED

• Bellemère, A. 1977. L'apparail apical de l'asque chez quelques Discomycètes: étude ultrastructurale comparative. Rev. Mycol. 41: 233–264.
   Google Scholar
• Boudier, J. L. E. 1885. Nouvelle classification naturelle des Discomycètes charnus connus généralement sous le nom de Pézizes. Bull. Soc. Mycol. France 1: 91–121.
   Google Scholar
• Boudier, J. L. E.. 1907. Histoire et classification des Discomycètes d'Europe. P. Klincksieck, Paris. 222 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Bremer, K. 1988. The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. Evolution 42: 795–803.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruns, T. D., R. Vilgalys, S. M. Barns, D. Gonzales, D. S. Hibbett, D. J. Lane, L. Simon, S. Stickel, T. M. Szaro, W. G. Weisburg, and M. L. Sogin. 1992. Evolutionary relationships within the Fungi: analyses of nuclear small subunit rRNA sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 1: 231–241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchwald, N. F. 1949. Studies in the Sclerotiniaceae. I. Taxonomy of the Sclerotiniaceae. Kongel. Veterin. Landbohøjskoles Årsskrift 1949: 75–191.
   Google Scholar
• Carbone, I., and L. M. Kohn. 1993. Ribosomal DNA sequence divergence within internal transcribed spacer 1 of the Sclerotiniaceae. Mycologia 85: 415–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapela, I. H., S. A. Rehner, T. R. Schultz, and U. G. Mueller. 1994. Evolutionary history of the symbiosis between fungus-growing ants and their fungi. Science 266: 1691–1697.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennis, R. W. G. 1956. A revision of the British Helotiaceae in the herbarium of the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, with notes on related European species. Mycological Papers no. 62, Commonwealth Mycological Institue, Kew. 216 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Dennis, R. W. G.. 1978. British Ascomycetes. J. Cramer, Vaduz, Switzerland. 585 pp.
   Google Scholar
• De Rijk, P., Y. Van de Peer, S. Chapelle, and R. De Wachter. 1994. Database on the structure of large ribosomal subunit RNA. Nucl. Acids Res. 22: 3495–3501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon, J. R. 1975. Chlorosplenium and its segregates. II. The genera Chlorociboria and Chlorencoelia. Mycotaxon 1: 193–237.
   Google Scholar
• Donoghue, M. J., R. G. Olmstead, J. F. Smith, and J. D. Palmer. 1992. Phylogenetic relationships of Dipsacales based on rbcL sequences. Ann. Miss. Bot. Gard. 79: 333–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumont, K. P. 1975. Sclerotiniaceae IX. Coprotinia. Mycologia 67: 320–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson, O. E., and D. L. Hawksworth. 1993. Outline of the Ascomycetes—1993. Syst. Ascomycetum 12: 51–257.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson, T. 1995. AutoDecay. Version 3.0. Distributed by the author. Department of Botany, University of Stockholm, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Felsenstein, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783–791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felsenstein, J.. 1995. PHYLIP (Phytogeny Inference Package). Version 3.57c. Distributed by the author. Department of Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle.
   Google Scholar
• Georgiev, O. I., N. Nikolaev, A. A. Hadjiolov, K. G. Skryabin, V. M. Zakharyev, and A. A. Bayev. 1981. The structures of the yeast ribosomal RNA genes. 4. Complete sequence of the 25S rRNA gene from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucl. Acids Res. 9: 6953–6958.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu, X., and W.-H. Li. 1995. The size distribution of insertions and deletions in Human and Rodent pseudogenes suggests the logarithmic gap penalty for sequence alignment. J. Molec. Evol. 40: 464–473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guadet, J., J. Julien, J. F. Lafay, and Y. Brygoo. 1989. Phylogeny of some Fusarium species, as determined by large-subunit RNA sequence comparison. Molec. Biol. Evol. 6: 227–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamby, R. K., and E. A. Zimmer. 1988. Ribosomal RNA sequences for inferring phylogeny within the grass family (Poaceae). Pl. Syst. Evol. 160: 29–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillis, D. M. 1996. Inferring complex phylogenies. Nature 383: 130–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holst-Jensen, A., L. M. Kohn, K. S. Jakobsen, and T. Schumacher. 1997. Molecular phylogeny and evolution of Monilinia (Sclerotiniaceae) based on coding and non coding rDNA sequences. Amer. J. Bot. 84: 686–701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juzwik, J., and T. E. Hinds. 1984. Ascospore germination, mycelial growth, and microconidial anamorphs of Encoelia pruinosa in culture. Canad. J. Bot. 62: 1916–1919.
   Google Scholar
• Kishino, H., and M. Hasegawa. 1989. Evaluation of the maximum likelihood estimate of the evolutionary tree topologies from DNA sequence data, and the branching order in Hominoidea. J. Molec. Evol. 29: 170–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohn, L. M. 1979. A monographic revision of the genus Sclerotinia. Mycotaxon 9: 365–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohn, L. M.. 1995. The clonal dynamic in wild and agricultural plant-pathogen populations. Canad. J. Bot. 73(Suppl. 1): S1231–S1240.
   Google Scholar
• Kohn, L. M., and D. J. Grenville. 1989a. Anatomy and histochemistry of stromatal anamorphs in the Sclerotiniaceae. Canad. J. Bot. 67: 371–393.
   Google Scholar
• Kohn, L. M., and D. J. Grenville. 1989b. Ultrastructure of stromatal anamorphs in the Sclerotiniaceae. Canad. J. Bot. 67: 394–406.
   Google Scholar
• Kohn, L. M., and D. J. Grenville, and T. Schumacher. 1984. Two counter-proposals for the conservation of Rutstroemia (Fungi). Taxon 34: 507–509.
   Google Scholar
• Korf, R. P., and L. M. Kohn. 1976. Notes on Phibalis, type genus of the Encoelioideae (Discomycetes). Mem. New York Bot. Gard. 28: 109–118.
   Google Scholar
• Maddison, D. R. 1991. The discovery and importance of multiple islands of most-parsimonious trees. Syst. Zool. 40: 315–328.
   Google Scholar
• Maddison, W. P., and D. R. Maddison. 1993. MacClade: Analysis of phylogeny and character evolution. Version 3.04. Distributed by Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
   Google Scholar
• Nannfeldt, J. A. 1932. Studien über die Morphologie und Systematik der nicht-lichenisierten inoperculaten Discomyceten. Nova Acta Reg. Soc. Sci. Ups. Ser. IV., 8: 1–368.
   Google Scholar
• Novak, L. A., and L. M. Kohn. 1991. Electrophoretic and immunological comparisons of developmentally regulated proteins in members of the Sclerotiniaceae and other sclerotial fungi. Appl. Environm. Microbiol. 57: 525–534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramamurthi, C. S., R. P. Korf, and L. R. Batra. 1958 [1957]. A revision of the North American species of Chlorociboria. Mycologia 49: 854–863.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rehm, H. 1896 [1887–1896], Rabenhorst's Kryptogamen-Flora von Deutschlands, Österreich und der Schweiz II, 1, (3 Abth.). Eduard Kummer, Leipzig. 1275 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Rubtsov, P. M., M. M. Musakhanov, V. M. Zakharyev, A. S. Krayev, K. G. Skryabin, and A. A. Bayev. 1980. The structure of the yeast ribosomal RNA genes. I. The complete nucleotide sequence of the 18S ribosomal RNA gene from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucl. Adds Res. 8: 5779–5794.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumacher, T. 1997. Sclerotiniaceae. In: Nordic macromycetes I. Eds., L. Hansen, and H. Knudsen. Nordsvamp, Copenhagen, Denmark. (In press).
   Google Scholar
• Schumacher, T., and A. Holst-Jensen. 1997. A synopsis of the genus Scleromitrula (= Verpatinia) (Ascomycotina: Helotiales: Sclerotiniaceae). Mycoscience 38: 55–69.
   Google Scholar
• Schumacher, T., and A. Holst-Jensen, and L. M. Kohn. 1985. A monographic revision of the genus Myriosclerotinia. Canad. J. Bot. 63: 1610–1640.
   Google Scholar
• Seaver, F. J. 1951. The North American Cup-fungi. Vol. 2: Inoperculates. Reprint 1978. Lubrecht & Cramer, Monticello, N.Y.
   Google Scholar
• Swofford, D. L. 1993. PAUP (Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony). Version 3.1.1. Distributed by the Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign, Illinois.
   Google Scholar
• Templeton, A. R. 1994. The role of molecular genetics in speciation studies. Pp. 455–477. In: Molecular Ecology and Evolution: Approaches and Applications. Eds., B. Schierwater, B. Streit, G. P. Wagner, and R. DeSalle. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Torkelsen, A.-E., and F.-E. Eckblad. 1977. Encoelioideae (Ascomycetes) of Norway. Norw. J. Bot. 24: 133–149.
   Google Scholar
• Verkley, G. J. M. 1995. Ultrastructure of the ascus apical apparatus in species of Cenangium, Encoelia, Claussenomyces and Ascocoryne. Mycol. Res. 99: 187–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whetzel, H. H. 1944. A new genus of the Sclerotiniaceae. Farlowia 1: 483–488.
   Google Scholar
• Whetzel, H. H.. 1945. A synopsis of the genera and species of the Sclerotiniaceae, a family of stromatic inoperculate discomycetes. Mycologia 37: 648–714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, T. J., T. Bruns, S. Lee, and J. Taylor. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. Pp. 315–322. In: PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. Eds., M. A. Innis, D. H. Gelfand, J. J. Sninsky, and T. J. White. Academic Press, San Diego, California.
   Google Scholar
• Wilmotte, A., Y. Van de Peer, A. Goris, S. Chapelle, R. De Baere, B. Nelissen, J. M. Neefs, G. L. Hennebert, and R. De Wachter. 1993. Evolutionary relationships among higher fungi inferred from small ribosomal subunit RNA sequence analysis. Syst. and Applied Microbiol. 16: 436–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar