Evolutionary relationships of nonsexual lichenized fungi: molecular phylogenetic hypotheses for the genera Siphula and Thamnolia from SSU and LSU rDNA

LITERATURE CITED

• Asahina Y. 1937. Lichenologische Notizen (IX). J Jap Bot 13: 315–321.
   Google Scholar
• Berbee ML. 1996. Loculoascomycete origins and evolution of filamentous ascomycete morphology based on 18S rRNA gene sequence data. Mol Biol Evol 13: 462–470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berbee ML., Taylor JW. 1993. Ascomycete relationships: dating the origin of asexual lineages with 18S ribosomal RNA gene sequence data. In: Reynolds Dr, Taylor JW, eds. The fungal holomorph: mitotic, meiotic and pleomorphic speciation in fungal systematics. Wallingford, UK: CAB International, p 67–78.
   Google Scholar
• Bremer K. 1988. The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. Evolution 42: 795–803.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruns TD, Vilgalys R, Barns SM, Gonzalez D, Hibbett DS, Lane DJ, Simon L, Stickel S, Szaro TM, Weisburg WG, Sogin ML. 1992. Evolutionary relationships within the fungi: analyses of nuclear small subunit rRNA sequences. Mol Phylogenet Evol 1: 231–241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chadefaud M. 1960. Les végétaux no vasculaires. In: Chadefaud M, Emberger L, eds. Traité de botanique systématique. Paris, p 429–696.
   Google Scholar
• Culberson CF, Culberson WL, Johnson A. 1988. Gene flow in lichens. Am J Bot 75: 1135–1139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Culberson WL. 1963. The lichen genus Thamnolia. Brittonia 15: 140–144.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl E, Krog H. 1973. Macrolichens of Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget. 184 p.
   Google Scholar
• Dennis RWG. 1960. British cup fungi and their allies. London: Ray Society. 585 p.
   Google Scholar
• Dodge CW. 1973. Lichen flora of the antarctic continent and adjacent islands. Canaan, New Hampshire: Phoenix Publishing. 399 p.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson OE, Hawksworth DL. 1996. Notes on ascomycete systematics—nos. 2024–2139. Syst Ascomycetum 14: 106–107.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson T. 1998. AutoDecay version 4.0. Stockholm: Stockholm University, Department of Botany. Program distributed by the author.
   Google Scholar
• Felsenstein J. 1981. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 17: 368–376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felsenstein J.. 1984. Distance methods for inferring phylogenies: a justification. Evolution 38: 16–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galloway DJ. 1985. Flora of New Zealand lichens. New Zealand: PD Hasselberg Government Printer. 662 p.
   Google Scholar
• Gardes M, Bruns TD. 1993. ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes—application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Mol Ecol 2: 113–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gargas A, DePriest PT. 1996. A nomenclature for fungal PCR primers with examples from intron-containing SSU rDNA. Mycologia 88: 745–748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gargas A, DePriest PT., Grube M, Tehler A. 1995. Multiple origins of lichen symbioses in fungi suggested by SSU rDNA phylogeny. Science 268: 1492–1495.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gargas A, DePriest PT., Grube M, Tehler A., Taylor JW. 1992. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) primers for amplifying and sequencing nuclear 18S rDNA from lichenized fungi. Mycologia 84: 589–592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gierl C, Kalb K. 1993. Die flechtengattung Dibaeis. Eine übersicht über die rosafrüchtigen arten von Baeomyces sens. lat. nebst Anmerkungen zu Phyllobaies gen. nov. Herzogia 9: 593–645.
   Google Scholar
• Greuter W, Barrie FR, Budet HM, Chaloner WG, Demoulin V, Hawksworth DL, Jørgensen PM, Nicholson DH, Silva PC, Trehane P, McNeill J, eds. 1994. International code of botanical nomenclature. Regnum vegetabile. Vol. 131. Königstein, Germany: Koeltz Scientific. 389 p.
   Google Scholar
• Guadet J, Julien J, Lafay JF, Brygoo Y. 1989. Phylogeny of some Fusarium species, as determined by large-subunit rRNA sequence comparison. Mol Biol Evol 6: 227–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafellner J. 1988. Principles of classification and main taxonomic groups. In: Galun M, ed. Handbook of lichenology. Vol. III. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press. p 41–52.
   Google Scholar
• Hale ME. 1983. The biology of lichens. Ed. 3. London: Edward Arnold. 190 p.
   Google Scholar
• Hawksorth DL. 1988. The variety of fungal-algal symbioses, their evolutionary significance, and the nature of lichens. Bot J Linn Soc 96: 3–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawksorth DL., Hill DJ. 1984. The lichen-forming fungi. Glasgow: Blackie. 158 p.
   Google Scholar
• Hawksorth DL., Hill DJ., Kirk PM, Sutton BC, Pegler DN. 1995. Ainsworth & Bisby's dictionary of the fungi. 8th ed. Wallingford, UK: CAB International. 616 p.
   Google Scholar
• Henssen A, Jahns HM. 1973. Lichenes, eine einfürung in die Flechtenkunde. Stuttgart: Thieme Verlag. 467 p.
   Google Scholar
• Hillis DM, Bull JJ. 1993. An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Syst Biol 42: 182–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honegger R 1983. The ascus apex in lichenized fungi IV. Baeomyces and Icmadophila in comparison with Cladonia (Lecanorales) and the non-lichenized Leotia (Helotiales). Lichenologist 15: 57–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kantvilas G. 1987. Siphula jamesii, a new lichen from southwestern Tasmania. Nordic J Bot 7: 585–588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kantvilas G.. 1994. Siphula elixii, a new lichen from Tasmania and New Zealand. New Zealand J Bot 32: 17–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karnefelt EI, Thell A. 1995. Genotypical variation and reproduction in natural populations of Thamnolia. Biblioth Lichenol 58: 213–234.
   Google Scholar
• Kendrick B. 1989. “Subdivision Deuteromycotina”—a fungal chimera. Sydowia 41: 6–14.
   Google Scholar
• Kishino H, Hasegawa M. 1989. Evaluation of the maximum likelihood estimate of the evolutionary tree topologies from DNA sequence data, and the branching order of Hominoidea. J Mol Evol 29: 170–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korf RP, Hennebert GL. 1993. A disasterous decision to suppress the terms anamorph and teleomorph. Mycotaxon 48: 539–542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krog H, Østhagen H, Tønsberg T. 1980. Lavflora, Norges buskog bladlav. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget. 312 p.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhls K, Lieckfeldt E, Samuels GJ, Meyer W, Kubicek CP, Borner T. 1997. Revision of Trichoderma sect. Longibrachiatumm including related teleomorphs based on analysis of ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer sequences. Mycologia 89: 442–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutzoni F, Vilgalys R. 1995. Omphalina (Basidiomycota, Agaricales) as a model system for the study of coevolution in lichens. Cryptog Bot 5: 82–97.
   Google Scholar
• Maddison WP, Maddison DR. 1992. MacClade: analysis of phylogeny and character evolution. Version 3.0. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Magnusson AH, Zahlbruckner A. 1945. Hawaiian lichens III. The families Usneaceae to Physciaceae. Index. Arkiv Bot 32A: 1–89.
   Google Scholar
• Mathey A. 1974. Contribution à l'étude du genre Siphula(Lichens) en Afrique. Nova Hedw 22: 795–878.
   Google Scholar
• Nimis PL. 1993. The lichens of Italy: an annotated catalogue. Monografia XII. Torino: Museo Regionale de Scienze Naturali. 897 p.
   Google Scholar
• Ogawa H, Yoshimura A, Sugiyama J. 1997. Polyphyletic origins of species of the anamorphic genus Geosmithia and the relationships of the cleistothecial genera: evidence from 18S, 5S, and 28S rDNA sequence analyses. Mycologia 89: 756–771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozenda P, Clauzade G. 1970. Les Lichens, etude biologique et flore illustree. Paris: Masson et Cie. 801 p.
   Google Scholar
• Page RDM. 1996. TREEVIEW: An application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computers. Comp Appl Biosci 12: 357–358.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pfister DH. 1997. Castor, Pollux and life histories of fungi. Mycologia 89: 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Platt JL, Spatafora JW. 1997. Evolution of the lichen symbiosis in the Leotiales; evidence from molecular data. Inoculum 48: 31.
   Google Scholar
• Platt JL, Spatafora JW.. 1998. Lichens, earth tongues and endophytes; molecular phylogenetic hypotheses of the Leotiales. Inoculum 49: 43.
   Google Scholar
• Platt JL, Spatafora JW.. 1999. A re-examination of generic concepts of baeomycetoid lichens based on phylogenetic analyses of nuclear SSU and LSU ribosomal DNA. Lichenologist 31: 409–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poelt J. 1969. Bestimmungsschlüssel europäischer flechten. Lehre: J. Cramer. 757 p.
   Google Scholar
• Poelt J.. 1974. Classification. In: Ahmadjian V, Hale ME, eds. The lichens. New York: Academic Press. p 599–632.
   Google Scholar
• Poelt J., Vezda A. 1981. Bestimmungsschlüssel europäischer Flechten. Ergänzungsheft II. Biblioth Lieh 16: 1–390.
   Google Scholar
• Purvis OW, Coppins BJ, Hawksworth DL, James PW, Moore DM. 1992. The lichen flora of Great Britain and Ireland. London, UK: Natural History Museum Publications in association with the British Lichen Society. 710 p.
   Google Scholar
• Rambold G, Triebel D, Hertel H. 1993. Icmadophilaceae, a new family in the Leotiales. Biblioth Lich 53: 217–240.
   Google Scholar
• Rehner SA, Samuels GJ. 1994. Taxonomy and phylogeny of Gliocladium analysed from nuclear large subunit ribosomal DNA sequences. Mycol Res 98: 625–634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rehner SA, Samuels GJ.. 1995. Molecular systematics of the Hypocreales: a teleomorph gene phylogeny and the status of their anamorphs. Can J Bot 73(Suppl 1): S816–S823.
   Google Scholar
• Santesson R. 1967. Chemical studies on lichens 6. The chemistry of the genus Siphula. II. Acta Chem Scand 21: 1–241.
   Google Scholar
• Santesson R.. 1993. The lichens and lichenicolous fungi of Sweden and Norway. Lund, Norway: SBT-förlaget, Btj tryck. 240 p.
   Google Scholar
• Sato M. 1963. Mixture ratio of the lichen genus Thamnolia. Nova Hedw 5: 149–155.
   Google Scholar
• Sato M.. 1965. Mixture ratio of the lichen genus Thamnolia in New Zealand. Bryologist 68: 320–324.
   Google Scholar
• Sato M.. 1968. The mixture ratio of the lichen genus Thamnolia in Tasmmania and New Guinea. J Jap Bot 43: 328–334.
   Google Scholar
• Seifert KA, Wingfield BD, Wingfield MJ. 1995. A critique of DNA sequence analysis in the taxonomy of filamentous ascomycetes and ascomycetous anamorphs. Can J Bot 73(Suppl 1): S760–S767.
   Google Scholar
• Sheard JW. 1977. Paleogeography, chemistry, and taxonomy of the lichenized Ascomycetes Dimelaena and Thamnolia. Bryologist 80: 100–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spatafora JW. 1995. Ascomal evolution of filamentious ascomycetes; evidence from molecular data. Can J Bot 73(Suppl 1): S811–S815.
   Google Scholar
• Spatafora JW., Lutzoni F, Armaleo D, Mahoney B, LaGreca S, Johnson J, Clerc P, Culberson WL. 1995. The integration of lichenized and nonlichenized ascomycetes in molecular systematics. Fifth International Mycological Congress (Abstract). Vancouver, BC. 130 p.
   Google Scholar
• Stenroos SK, DePriest PT. 1998. SSU rDNA phylogeny of cladoniiform lichens. Am J Bot 85: 1548–1559.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swofford D. 1997. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (* and other methods). Version 4.0d57 test version. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer.
   Google Scholar
• Tehler A. 1983. The genera Dirina and Roccellina (Roccellaceae). Opera Bot 70: 1–86.
   Google Scholar
• Tehler A.. 1996. Systematics, phylogeny and classification. In: Nash TH, ed. Lichen biology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. p 217–239.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG. 1997. The ClustalX windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucl Acids Res 24: 4876–4882.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vilgalys R, Sun BL. 1994. Ancient and recent patterns of geographic speciation in the oyster mushroom Pleurotus revealed by phylogenetic analysis of ribosomal DNA sequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91: 4599–4603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar