Phylogeny and taxonomy of Echinodontium and related genera

LITERATURE CITED

• Aoshima K, Lentz PL, McKay HH. 1961. Stereum taxodii in Japan and Formosa. Mycologia 53:145–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernicchia A, Piga A. 1998. A new species of Echinodontium from Italy. Mycotaxon 68:483–491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binder M, Hibbett DS. 2002. Higher-level phylogenetic relationships of Homobasidiomycetes (mushroom-forming fungi) inferred from four rDNA regions. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 22:76–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binder M, Hibbett DS, Larsson K-H, Larsson E, Langer E. 2005. The phylogenetic distribution of resupinate forms in the homobasidiomycetes. Systematics and Biodiversity 3:113–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boidin J, Mugnier J, Canales R. 1998. Taxonomic molecular des Aphyllophorales. Mycotaxon 66:445–491.
   Google Scholar
• Chamuris G. 1988. The non-stipitate stereoid fungi in the northeastern United States and adjacent Canada. Mycologia Memoir 14:1–247.
   Google Scholar
• Chen JJ, Cui BK, Dai YC. 2016. Global diversity and molecular systematics of Wrightoporia s.l. (Russulales, Basidiomycota). Persoonia 37:21–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson RW, Chien CY. 1976. Three decays of cypress in Taiwan. Mycologia 68:1152–1161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson RW, Lentz PL, McKay HH. 1960. The fungus causing pecky cypress. Mycologia 52:260–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donk MA. 1961. Four new families of Hymenomycetes. Persoonia 1:405–407.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson J, Ryvarden L. 1976. The Corticiaceae of North Europe 4. Hyphodermella–Mycoacia. Oslo, Norway: Fungiflora. p. 787–794.
   Google Scholar
• Felsenstein J. 1985. Confidence intervals on phylogenetics: an approach using bootstrap. Evolution 39:783–791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginns JH, Lefebvre MNL. 1993. Lignicolous corticioid fungi (Basidiomycota) of North America. Systematics, distribution, and ecology. Mycologia Memoir 19:1–247.
   Google Scholar
• Gross HL. 1964. The Echinodontiaceae. Mycopathologia et Mycologia Applicata 24: 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Hall TA. 1999. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series 41:95–98.
   Google Scholar
• Hattori T, Ryvarden L. 1994. Type studies in the Polyporaceae. 25. Species described from Japan by R. Imazeki & A. Yasuda. Mycotaxon 50:27–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hibbett DS, Binder M. 2002. Evolution of complex fruiting body morphologies in homobasidiomycetes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 269:1963–1969.
   Google Scholar
• Hibbett DS, Donoghue MJ. 2001. Analysis of correlations among wood decay mechanisms, mating systems, and substrate ranges in homobasidiomycetes. Systematic Biology 50:215–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hibbett DS, Gilbert L-B, Donoghue MJ. 2000. Evolutionary instability of ectomycorrhizal symbioses in basidiomycetes. Nature 407:506–508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imazeki R. 1935. Studies on Echinodontium E. & E. Japanese Journal of Botany 11:514–521.
   Google Scholar
• Katoh K, Toh H. 2008. Recent developments in the MAFFT multiple sequence alignment program. Briefings in Bioinformatics 9:286–298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornerup A, Wanscher JH. 1978. Methuen handbook of colour. 3rd ed. London, UK: Eyre Methuen. 252 p.
   Google Scholar
• Kotlaba F, Pouzar Z. 1957. Notes on classification of European pore fungi. Ceská Mykologie 11:152–170.
   Google Scholar
• Larsson E, Larsson K-H. 2003. Phylogenetic relationships of russuloid basidiomycetes with emphasis on aphyllophoralean taxa. Mycologia 95:1037–1065.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller SL, Larsson E, Larsson K-H, Verbeken A, Nuytinck J. 2006. Perspectives in the new Russulales. Mycologia 98:960–970.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakasone KK. 1990. Cultural studies and identification of wood-inhabiting Corticiaceae and selected Hymenomycetes from North America. Mycologia Memoir 15:1–412.
   Google Scholar
• Núñez M, Ryvarden L. 2001. East Asian polypores 2. Synopsis Fungorum 14:170–522.
   Google Scholar
• Nylander JAA. 2004. MrModeltest 2.2. Program distributed by the author. Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Parmasto E. 1968. Conspectus systematis corticiacearum. Tartu, Estonia: Institutum Zoologicum et Botanicum Academiae Scientiarum RPSS Estonicae. 261 p.
   Google Scholar
• Pouzar Z. 1959. New genera of higher fungi 3. Ceská Mykologie 13:10–19.
   Google Scholar
• Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19:1572–1574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryvarden L, Tutka S. 2014. Perplexostereum Ryvarden & Tutka nov. gen. Synopsis Fungorum 32:72–75.
   Google Scholar
• Stalpers JA. 1996. The aphyllophoraceous fungi 2. Keys to the species of the Hericiales. Studies in Mycology 40:1–185.
   Google Scholar
• Stamatakis A. 2006. RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 22:2688–2690.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swofford DL. 2002. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4.0b10. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Tabata M, Harrington TC, Chen W, Abe Y. 2000. Molecular phylogeny of species in the genera Amylostereum and Echinodontium. Mycoscience 41:585–593.
   Google Scholar
• White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor JW. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ, eds. PCR protocols: a guide to the methods and applications. New York, New York: Academic Press. p. 315–322.
   Google Scholar