Isolation source matters: sclerotia and ectomycorrhizal roots provide different views of genetic diversity in Cenococcum geophilum

LITERATURE CITED

• Andrews S. 2011. FastQC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. [cited 2015 Jan 01]. Available from: http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc
   Google Scholar
• Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. 2014. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics btu170v3.
   Google Scholar
• Bruns TD, Peay KG, Boynton PJ, Grubisha LC, Hynson NA, Nguyen NH, Rosenstock NP. 2009. Inoculum potential of Rhizopogon spores increases with time over the first 4 yr of a 99-yr spore burial experiment. New Phytologist 181:463–470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camacho C, Coulouris G, Avagyan V, Ma N, Papadopoulos J, Bealer K, Madden TL. 2008. BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics 10:421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colwell RK. 2013. EstimateS: statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Version 9. Available from: http://viceroy.eeb.uconn.edu/estimates/
   Google Scholar
• Douhan GW, Huryn KL, Douhan LI. 2007. Significant diversity and potential problems associated with inferring population structure within the Cenococcum geophilum species complex. Mycologia 99:812–819.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douhan GW, Rizzo DM. 2005. Phylogenetic divergence in a local population of the ectomycorrhizal fungus Cenococcum geophilum. New Phytologist 166:263–271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douhan GW, Vincenot L, Gryta H, Selosse MA. 2011. Population genetics of ectomycorrhizal fungi: from current knowledge to emerging directions. Fungal Biology 115:569–597.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faircloth BC. 2008. Msatcommander: detection of microsatellite repeat arrays and automated, locus-specific primer design. Molecular Ecology Resources 8:92–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez CW, McCormack ML, Hill JM, Pritchard SG, Koide RT. 2013. On the persistence of Cenococcum geophilum ectomycorrhizas and its implications for forest carbon and nutrient cycles. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 65:141–143, doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.05.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fries E. 1829. Systema Mycologicum III. Gryphiswaldae (Greifswald): Sumtibus Ernesti Mauritii. 259 p.
   Google Scholar
• Glassman SI, Peay KG, Talbot JM, Smith DP, Chung JA, Taylor JW, Vilgalys R, Bruns TD. 2015. A continental view of pine-associated ectomycorrhizal fungal spore banks: a quiescent functional guild with a strong biogeographic pattern. New Phytologist 205:1619–1631.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonçalves SC, Portugal A, Gonçalves MT, Vieira R, Martins-Loução MA, Freitas H. 2007. Genetic diversity and differential in vitro responses to Ni in Cenococcum geophilum isolates from serpentine soils in Portugal. Mycorrhiza 17:677–686.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grenville DJ, Peterson RL, Piché Y. 1985a. The development, structure, and histochemistry of sclerotia of ectomycorrhizal fungi. I. Pisolithus tinctorius. Canadian Journal of Botany 63:1402–1411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grenville DJ, Peterson RL, Piché Y. 1985b. The development, structure, and histochemistry of sclerotia of ectomycorrhizal fungi. II. Paxillus involutus. Canadian Journal of Botany 63:1412–1417.
   Google Scholar
• Grenville DJ, Piché Y, Peterson RL. 1985c. Sclerotia as viable sources of mycelia for the establishment of ectomycorrhizae. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 31:1085–1088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammer Ø, Harper DAT, Ryan PD. 2001. PAST: palaeontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica 4:9.
   Google Scholar
• Huang J, Nara K, Zong K, Lian C. 2015. Soil propagule banks of ectomycorrhizal fungi along forest development stages after mining. Microbial Ecology 69:768–777.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jany JL, Garbaye J, Martin F. 2002. Cenococcum geophilum populations show a high degree of genetic diversity in beech forests. New Phytologist 154:651–659.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katoh K, Standley DM. 2013. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30:772–780.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kernaghan G, Patriquin G. 2015. Diversity and host preference of fungi co-inhabiting Cenococcum mycorrhizae. Fungal Ecology 17:84–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LoBuglio KF. 1999. Cenococcum. In: Cairney JWG, John WG, Chambers SM, eds. Ectomycorrhizal fungi key genera in profile. Germany, Berlin: Springer. p. 287–309.
   Google Scholar
• LoBuglio KF, Berbee ML, Taylor JW. 1996. Phylogenetic origins of the asexual mycorrhizal symbiont Cenococcum geophilum Fr. and other mycorrhizal fungi among the Ascomycetes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 6:287–294.
   Google Scholar
• LoBuglio KF, Rogers SO, Wang CJK. 1991. Variation in ribosomal DNA among isolates of the mycorrhizal fungus Cenococcum geophilum. Canadian Journal of Botany 69:2331–2343.
   Google Scholar
• Massicotte HB, Trappe JM, Peterson RL, Melville LH. 1992. Studies on Cenococcum geophilum. II. Sclerotium morphology, germination, and formation in pure culture and growth pouches. Canadian Journal of Botany 70:125–132.
   Google Scholar
• Matsuda Y, Takeuchi K, Obase K, Ito S. 2015. Spatial distribution and genetic structure of Cenococcum geophilum in coastal pine forests in Japan. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 91:fiv108.
   Google Scholar
• Matsuda Y, Yamakawa M, Inaba T, Obase K, Ito S. 2017. Intraspecific variation in mycelial growth of Cenococcum geophilum isolates in response to salinity gradients. Mycoscience 58:369–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marx DH. 1969. The influence of ectotrophic mycorrhizal fungi on the resistance of pine roots to pathogenic infections. Part I. Antagonism of mycorrhizal fungi to root pathogenic fungi and soil bacteria. Phytopathology 59:153–163.
   Google Scholar
• Miller SL, Torres P, McClean TM. 1994. Persistence of basidiospores and sclerotia of ectomycorrhizal fungi and Morchella in soil. Mycologia 86:89–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Münzenberger B, Bubner B, Wöllecke J, Sieber TN, Bauer R, Fladung M, Hüttl RF. 2009. The ectomycorrhizal morphotype Pinirhiza sclerotia is formed by Acephala macrosclerotiorum sp. nov., a close relative of Phialocephala fortinii. Mycorrhiza 19:481–492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagasaki H, Mochizuki T, Kodama Y, Saruhashi S, Morizaki S, Sugawara H, Ohyanagi H, Kurata N, Okubo K, Takagi T, Kaminuma E, Nakamura Y. 2013. DDBJ read annotation pipeline: a cloud computing-based pipeline for high-throughput analysis of next-generation sequencing data. DNA Research 20:383–390, doi:10.1093/dnares/dst017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obase K, Cha JY, Lee JK, Lee SY, Lee JH, Chun KW. 2009. Ectomycorrhizal fungal communities associated with Pinus thunbergii in the eastern coastal pine forests of Korea. Mycorrhiza 20:39–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obase K, Douhan GW, Matsuda Y, Smith ME. 2014. Culturable fungal assemblages growing within Cenococcum sclerotia in forest soils. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 90:708–717.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obase K, Douhan GW, Matsuda Y, Smith ME. 2016. Revisiting phylogenetic diversity and cryptic species of Cenococcum geophilum sensu lato. Mycorrhiza 26:529–540.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obase K, Douhan GW, Matsuda Y, Smith ME. 2017. Progress and challenges in understanding the biology, diversity, and biogeography of Cenococcum geophilum. Ecological Studies 230:299–317.
   Google Scholar
• Obase K, Lee JK, Lee SK, Lee SY, Chun KW. 2010. Variation in sodium chloride resistance of Cenococcum geophilum and Suillus granulatus isolates in liquid culture. Mycobiology 38:225–228.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Obase K, Lee JK, Lee SY, Chun KW. 2011. Diversity and community structure of ectomycorrhizal fungi in Pinus thunbergii coastal forests in the eastern region of Korea. Mycoscience 52:383–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panaccione DG, Sheets NL, Miller SP, Cumming JR. 2001. Diversity of Cenococcum geophilum isolates from serpentine and non-serpentine soils. Mycologia 93:645–652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peel MC, Finlayson BL, McMahon TA. 2007. Updated world map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 11:1633–1644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peter M, Kohler A, Ohm RA, Kuo A, Krützmann J, Morin E, Arend M, Barry KW, Binder M, Choi C, Clum A, Copeland A, Grisel N, Haridas S, Kipfer T, LaButti K, Lindquist E, Lipzen A, Maire R, Meier B, Mihaltcheva S, Molinier V, Murat C, Pöggeler S, Quandt CA, Sperisen C, Tritt A, Tisserant E, Crous PW, Henrissat B, Nehls U, Egli S, Spatafora JW, Grigoriev IV, Martin FM. 2016. Ectomycorrhizal ecology is imprinted in the genome of the dominant symbiotic fungus Cenococcum geophilum. Nature Communications 7:12662.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portugal A, Martinho P, Vieira R, Freitas H. 2001. Molecular characterization of Cenococcum geophilum isolates from an ultramafic soil in Portugal. South African journal of Science 97:617–619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith ME, Henkel TW, Rollins JA. 2015. How many fungi make sclerotia? Fungal Ecology 13:211–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith ME, Pfister DH. 2009. Tuberculate ectomycorrhizae of angiosperms: the interaction between Boletus rubropunctus (Boletaceae) and Quercus species (Fagaceae) in the United States and Mexico. American Journal of Botany 96:1665–1675.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spatafora JW, Owensby CA, Douhan GW, Boehm EWA, Schoch CL. 2012. Phylogenetic placement of the ectomycorrhizal genus Cenococcum in Gloniaceae (Dothideomycetes). Mycologia 104:758–765.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor DL, Bruns TD. 1999. Community structure of ectomycorrhizal fungi in a Pinus muricata forest: minimal overlap between the mature forest and resistant propagule communities. Molecular Ecology 8:1837–1850.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trappe JM. 1962. Cenococcum graniforme—its distribution, ecology, mycorrhiza formation, and inherent variation [PhD dissertation]. Seattle, Washington: University of Washington. 606 p.
   Google Scholar
• Trappe JM. 1964. Mycorrhizal host and distribution of Cenococcum graniforme. Lloydia 27:100–106.
   Google Scholar
• Trappe JM. 1969. Studies on Cenococcum graniforme. I. An efficient method for isolation from sclerotia. Canadian journal of Botany 47:1389–1390.
   Google Scholar
• Wu B, Nara K, Hogetsu T. 2005. Genetic structure of Cenococcum geophilum populations in primary successional volcanic deserts on Mount Fuji as revealed by microsatellite markers. New Phytologist 165:285–293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar