Phylogeny of the genus Fuscoporia and taxonomic assessment of the F. contigua group

LITERATURE CITED

• Anonymous. 1969. Flora of British fungi. Colour identification chart. London: Her Majesty´s Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Baltazar JM, Gibertoni TB. 2010. New combinations in Phellinus s.l. and Inonotus s.l. Mycotaxon 111:205–208.
   Google Scholar
• Baltazar JM, Trierveiler-Pereira L, Loguercio-Leite C, Ryvarden L. 2009. Santa Catarina Island mangroves 3: a new species of Fuscoporia. Mycologia 100:859–863.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen JJ, Cui BK, Dai YC. 2016. Global diversity and molecular systematics of Wrightoporia s. l. (Russulales, Basidiomycota). Persoonia 37:21–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Q, Yuan Y. 2017. A new species of Fuscoporia (Hymenochaetales, Basidiomycota) from southern China. Mycosphere 8:1238–1245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corfixen P. 1990. A new species of Inonotus (Hymenochaetaceae) from Scandinavia. Nordic Journal of Botany 10:451–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corner EJH. 1991. Ad Polyporaceas 7. The xanthochroic polypores. Nova Hedwigia 101:1–175.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham GH. 1948. New Zealand Polyporaceae 2. The genus Fuscoporia. Bulletin of the New Zealand Department of Industrial Research 73:1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Dai YC. 1995. Changbai wood-rotting fungi 3. The genus Phellinidium (Basidiomycetes) and a new species, P. aciferum. Annales Botanicci Fennici 32:63–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai YC. 1999. Phellinus sensu lato (Aphyllophorales, Hymenochaetaceae) in East Asia. Acta Botanica Fennica 166:1–115.
   Google Scholar
• Dai YC. 2000. A checklist of polypores from Northeast China. Karstenia 40:23–29.
   Google Scholar
• Dai YC. 2010. Hymenochaetaceae (Basidiomycota) in China. Fungal Diversity 45:131–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai YC, Cui BK, Si J, He SH, Hyde KD, Yuan HS, Liu XY, Zhou LW. 2015. Dynamics of the worldwide number of fungi with emphasis on fungal diversity in China. Mycological Progress 14:62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donk MA. 1960. The generic names proposed for Polyporaceae. Persoonia 1:173–302.
   Google Scholar
• Felsenstein J. 1985. Confidence intervals on phylogenetics: an approach using bootstrap. Evolution 39:783–791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiasson JL, Niemelä T. 1984. The Hymenochaetales: a revision of the European poroid taxa. Karstenia 24:14–28.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbertson RL, Ryvarden L. 1987. North American polypores 2. Megasporoporia-Wrightoporia. Oslo, Norway: Fungiflora. pp. 437–876.
   Google Scholar
• Groposo C, Loguercio-Leite C, Góes-Neto A. 2007. Fuscoporia (Basidiomycota, Hymenochaetales) in southern Brazil. Mycotaxon 101:55–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahn H. 1987. Die resupinaten Phellinus-arten in Mitteleuropa. Westfal Pilzbriefe 6:37–106.
   Google Scholar
• Kotlaba F. 1968. Phellinus pouzarii sp. nov. Ceská Mykologie 22:24–31.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen MJ, Cobb-Poulle LA. 1990. Phellinus (Hymenochaetaceae). A survey of the world taxa. Synopsis Fungorum 3:1–206.
   Google Scholar
• Larsson KH, Parmasto E, Fischer M, Langer E, Nakasone KK, Redhead SA. 2006. Hymenochaetales: a molecular phylogeny for the hymenochaetoid clade. Mycologia 98:926–936.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowe JL. 1966. Polyporaceae of North America. The genus Poria. State University College of Forestry at Syracuse University Technology Publication 90:1–183.
   Google Scholar
• Murrill WA. 1907. Polyporaceae 1. North American Flora 9:1–72.
   Google Scholar
• Niemelä T. 2005. Polypores, lignicolous fungi. Norrlinia 13:1–320.
   Google Scholar
• Niemelä T, Wagner T, Fischer M, Dai YC. 2001. Phellopilus gen. nov. and its affinities within Phellinus s. lato and Inonotus s. lato (Basidiomycetes). Annales Botanici Fennici 38:51–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Núñez M, Ryvarden L. 2000. East Asian polypores 1. Ganodermataceae and Hymenochaetaceae. Synopsis Fungorum 13:1–168.
   Google Scholar
• Nylander J. 2004. MrModeltest v2. Program distributed by the author. Uppsala, Sweden: Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University.
   Google Scholar
• Overholts LD. 1953. The Polyporaceae of the United States, Alaska and Canada. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press. 139 p.
   Google Scholar
• Patouillard NT. 1922. Quelques espèces nouvelles de champignons. Bulletin de la Société. Mycologique de France 38:83–87.
   Google Scholar
• Petersen JH. 1996. Farvekort. The Danish Mycological Society’s colour-chart. Greve, Denmark: Foreningen til Svampekundskabens Fremme. 6 p.
   Google Scholar
• Pires RM, Motatovásquez V, De Gugliotta AM. 2015. Fuscoporia atlantica sp. nov., a new polypore from the Brazilian Atlantic Rainforest. Mycotaxon 130:843–855.
   Google Scholar
• Posada D, Crandall KA. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817–818.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajchenberg M. 1987. Type study of Polyporaceae (Aphyllophorales) described by J. Rick. Nordic Journal of Botany 7:553–568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymundo T, Valenzuela R, Bautista-Hernández S, Esqueda M, Cifuentes J, Pacheco L. 2013a. The genus Fuscoporia (Hymenochaetales, Basidiomycota) in Mexico. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 84:50–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymundo T, Valenzuela R, Esqueda M. 2013b. Hymenochaetaceae from Mexico 6. A new Fuscoporia species from the Sonoran Desert. Mycotaxon 125:37–43.
   Google Scholar
• Rehner SA, Buckley E. 2005. A Beauveria phylogeny inferred from nuclear ITS and EF1-a sequences: evidence for cryptic diversification and links to Cordyceps teleomorphs. Mycologia 97:84–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rick J. 1960. Basidiomycetes Eubasidii in Rio Grande do Sul Brasilia. 4. Meruliaceae, Polyporaceae, Boletaceae. Iheringia Série Botânica 7:193–295.
   Google Scholar
• Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19:1572–1574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryvarden L. 1983. Type studies in the Polyporaceae 14. Species described by Patouillard, either alone or with other authors. Occasional Papers of the Farlow Herbarium of Cryptogamic Botany 18:1–39.
   Google Scholar
• Ryvarden L. 2004. Neotropical polypores 1. Introduction, Hymenochaetaceae and Ganodermataceae. Synopsis Fungorum 19:1–227.
   Google Scholar
• Ryvarden L, Gilbertson RL. 1994. European polypores 2. Synopsis Fungorum 7:394–743.
   Google Scholar
• Ryvarden L, Melo I. 2017. Poroid fungi of Europe, 2nd edition. Synopsis Fungorum 37:1–431.
   Google Scholar
• Silvestro D, Michalak I. 2012. raxmlGUI: a graphical front-end for RAxML. Organisms Diversity and Evolution 12:335–337.
   Google Scholar
• Song J, Cui BK. 2017. Phylogeny, divergence time and historical biogeography of Laetiporus (Basidiomycota, Polyporales). BMC Evolutionary Biology 17:102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spegazzini C. 1909. Mycetes Argentinenses. Series 4. Anales del Museo Nacional de Historia Natural Buenos Aires 19:257–458.
   Google Scholar
• Stamatakis A. 2006. RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 22:2688–2690.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swofford DL. 2002. PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4.0b10. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Thiers B. [continuously updated]. Index Herbariorum: a global directory of public herbaria and associated staff. New York Botanical Garden’s Virtual Herbarium. [cited 2018 Dec]. Available from: http://sweetgum.nybg.org/science/ih/
   Google Scholar
• Vilgalys R, Hester M. 1990. Rapid genetic identification and map- ping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. Journal of Bacteriology 172:4238–4246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner T, Fischer M. 2002. Proceedings towards a natural classification of the worldwide taxa Phellinus s.l. and Inonotus s.l., and phylogenetic relationships of allied genera. Mycologia 94:998–1016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner T, Fischer M. 2001. Natural groups and a revised system for the European poroid Hymenochaetales (Basidiomycota) supported by nLSU rDNA sequence data. Mycological Research 105:773–782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White TJ, Bruns TD, Lee S, Taylor J. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ, eds. PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. New York: Academic Press. p. 315–322.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou LW, Vlasák J, Dai YC. 2016. Taxonomy and phylogeny of Phellinidium (Hymenochaetales, Basidiomycota): a redefinition and the segregation of Coniferiporia gen. nov. for forest pathogens. Fungal Biology 120:988–1001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zmitrovich IV, Malysheva VF. 2014. Studies on Oxyporus I. Segregation of Emmia and general topology of phylogenetic tree. Mycology and Phytopathology 48:161–171.
   Google Scholar