In Colombia the Eurasian fungus Amanita muscaria is expanding its range into native, tropical Quercus humboldtii forests

LITERATURE CITED

• Agerer R. 2006. Fungal relationships and structural identity of their ectomycorrhizae. Mycological Progress 5:67–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avella A., Cárdenas LM. 2010. Conservación y uso sostenible de los bosques de roble en el corredor de conservación Guantiva-La Rusia-Iguaque, departamentos de Santander y Boyacá, Colombia. Colombia Forestal 13:5–25.
   Google Scholar
• Bagley SJ, Orlovich DA. 2004. Genet size and distribution of Amanita muscaria in a suburban park, Dunedin, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Botany 42:939–947.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahram M, Kõljalg U, Kohout P, Mirshahvaladi S, Tedersoo L. 2013. Ectomycorrhizal fungi of exotic pine plantations in relation to native host trees in Iran: evidence of host range expansion by local symbionts to distantly related host taxa. Mycorrhiza 23:11–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baraloto C, Hardy OJ, Paine CET, Dexter KG, Cruaud C, Dunning LT, Gonzalez MA, Molino JF, Sabatier D, Savolainen V, Chave J. 2012. Using functional traits and phylogenetic trees to examine the assembly of tropical tree communities: assembly of tropical tree communities. Journal of Ecology 100:690–701, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2012.01966.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bougher NL. 1996. Diversity of ectomycorrhizal fungi associated with eucalypts in Australia. In: Brundrett M, Dell B, Malajczuk N, Minquin G, eds. Mycorrhizas for plantation forestry in Asia. Canberra, Australia: Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research. p. 8–15.
   Google Scholar
• Brundrett M, Bougher N, Dell B, Grove T, Malajczuk N. 1996. Working with mycorrhizas in forestry and agriculture. ACIAR Monograph 32. Canberra, Australia: Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research. 374 p.
   Google Scholar
• Camelo L, Díaz A, Díaz J. 2012. Acacia melanoxylon. In: Díaz-Espinosa AM, Díaz-Triana JE, Vargas O, eds. Catálogo de plantas invasoras de los humedales de Bogotá. Bogotá, Colombia: Grupo de restauración ecológica de la Universidad Nacional de Colombia y Secretaría distrital de ambiente. p. 98.
   Google Scholar
• Caro A, Díaz-Espinosa AM, Díaz J. 2012. Pinus patula. In: Diáz-Espinosa AM, Díaz-Triana JE, Vargas O, eds. Catálogo de plantas invasoras de los humedales de Bogotá. Bogotá, Colombia: Grupo de restauración ecológica de la Universidad Nacional de Colombia y Secretaría distrital de ambiente. p. 143–146.
   Google Scholar
• Cavelier C, Tobler A. 1998. The effect of abandoned plantations of Pinus patula and Cupressus lusitanica on soils and regeneration of a tropical montane rain forest in Colombia. Biodiversity and Conservation 7:335–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Céspedes-Payret C, Pineiro G, Achkar M, Gutierrez O, Panario D. 2009. The irruption of new agro-industrial technologies in Uruguay and their environmental impacts on soil, water supply and biodiversity: a review. International Journal of Environment and Health 3:175–197.
   Google Scholar
• Cowan RS, Maslin BR. 2001. Acacia melanoxylon. Flora of Australia Online. Australian Biological Resources Study, Canberra, Australia. [cited 2008 Mar 13]. Available from: http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/abrs/online-resources/flora/main/index.html
   Google Scholar
• De Meijer AR. 2001. Mycological work in the Brazilian state of Paraná. Nova Hedwigia 72:105–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deacon J. 1986. Human settlement in South Africa and archaeological evidence from alien plants and animals. In: MacDonalsd IA, Kruger FJ, Ferrar AA, eds. The ecology and management of biological invasions in southern Africa. Cape Town, South Africa: Oxford University Press. p. 4–19.
   Google Scholar
• Dettman JR, Jacobson DJ, Taylor JW. 2003. A multilocus genealogical approach to phylogenetic species recognition in the model eukaryote Neurospora. Evolution 57:2703–2720.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickie IA, Johnston P. 2008. Invasive fungi research priorities, with a focus on Amanita muscaria. Landcare Research Contract Report: LC0809/027. Lincoln, New Zealand: Landcare Research. 22 p.
   Google Scholar
• Dickie IA, Bennett BM, Burrows LE, Nuñez MA, Peltzer DA, Porté A, Richardson DM, Rejmánek M, Rundel PW, Van Wilgen BW. 2014. Conflicting values: ecosystem services and invasive tree management. Biological Invasions 16:705–719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickie IA, Bolstridge N, Cooper JA, Peltzer DA. 2010. Co-invasion by Pinus and its mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytologist 187:475–484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickie IA, Nuñez MA, Pringle A, Lebel T, Tourtellot SG, Johnston PR. 2016. Towards management of invasive ectomycorrhizal fungi. Biological Invasions 18:3383–3395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Díez J. 2005. Invasion biology of Australian ectomycorrhizal fungi introduced with eucalypt plantations into the Iberian Peninsula. Biological Invasions 7:3–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ducousso M, Duponnois R, Thoen D, Prin Y. 2012. Diversity of Ectomycorrhizal Fungi Associated with Eucalyptus in Africa and Madagascar. International Journal of Forestry Research 2012:1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Edgar R. 2004. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Research 32:1792–1797.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [FAO] Food and Agriculture Organization. 2010. Global Forest Resources Assessment. FAO Forestry Paper 163. [cited 2015 Jul 22]. Available from: www.fao.org/docrep/013/i1757e/i1757e.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Franco-Molano AE, Aldana-Gómez R, Halling R. 2000. Setas de Colombia (Agaricales, Boletales y otros hongos)—Guía de campo. Medellín, Colombia: Colciencias, Universidad de Antioquia. 156 p.
   Google Scholar
• Fuhrer BA, Robinson RM. 1992. Rainforest Fungi of Tasmania and South-East Australia. Melbourne, Australia: Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Melbourne and the Forestry Commission. 95 p.
   Google Scholar
• Fundación Natura. 2007. Elementos conceptuales para la conservación y uso sostenible de los bosques de roble negro (Colombobalanus excelsa) y roble común (Quercus humboldtii), en jurisdicción de CAS y CORPOBOYACÁ. Bogotá, Colombia: Fundación Natura. 16 p.
   Google Scholar
• Garrido N. 1986. Survey of ectomycorrhizal fungi associated with exotic forest trees in Chile. Nova Hedwigia Kryptogamenkd 43:423–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geml J, Laursen GA, O’Neill K, Nusbaum HC, Taylor DL. 2006. Beringian origins and cryptic speciation events in the fly agaric (Amanita muscaria): phylogeography of Amanita muscaria. Molecular Ecology 15:225–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geml J, Tulloss RE, Laursen GA, Sazanova NA, Taylor DL. 2008. Evidence for strong inter- and intracontinental phylogeographic structure in Amanita muscaria, a wind-dispersed ectomycorrhizal basidiomycete. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 48:694–701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geml J, Tulloss RE, Laursen GA, Sazanova NA, Taylor DL. 2010. Phylogeographic analyses of a Boreal-Temperate ectomycorrhizal basidiomycete, Amanita muscaria, suggest forest refugia in Alaska during the last glacial maximum. In: Habel JC, Assmann T, eds. Relict species: phylogeography and conservation biology. Berlin and Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag. p. 173–186.
   Google Scholar
• Giachini AJ, Oliveira VL, Castellano MA, Trappe JM. 2000. Ectomycorrhizal fungi in Eucalyptus and Pinus plantations in southern Brazil. Mycologia 92:1166–1177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giachini AJ, Souza LAB, Oliveira VL. 2004. Species richness and seasonal abundance of ectomycorrhizal fungi in plantations of Eucalyptus dunnii and Pinus taeda in southern Brazil. Mycorrhiza 14:375–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall N, Johnston RD, and Chippendale GM. 1975. Forest trees of Australia. Canberra, Australia: Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Timber Bureau. 334 p.
   Google Scholar
• Harley JL, Smith SE. 1983. Mycorrhizal symbiosis. London: Academic Press. 483 p.
   Google Scholar
• Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F. 2001. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics 17:754–755.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jairus T, Mpumba R, Chinoya S, Tedersoo L. 2011. Invasion potential and host shifts of Australian and African ectomycorrhizal fungi in mixed eucalypt plantations. New Phytologist 192:179–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller R, Geist J, Jeschke JM, Kühn I. 2011. Invasive species in Europe: ecology, status, and policy. Environmental Sciences Europe 23:23.
   Google Scholar
• Kim CS, Jo JW, Kwag YN, Oh J, Shrestha B, Sung GH, Han SK. 2013. Four Newly Recorded Amanita Species in Korea: Amanita sect. Amanita and sect. Vaginatae. Mycobiology 41:131–138, doi:10.5941/MYCO.2013.41.3.131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kral R. 1993. Pinus. In: Flora of North America Editorial Committee, eds. Flora of North America north of Mexico. Vol. 2. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 352–398.
   Google Scholar
• Ladrach WE, Lambeth C. 1991. Growth and heritability estimates for a seven-year-old open-pollinated Pinus patula progeny test in Colombia. Silvae Genética 40:169–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Maitre DC. 1998. Pines in cultivation: a global view. In: Richardson D, ed. Ecology and biogeography of Pinus. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. p. 407–425.
   Google Scholar
• Le Maitre DC, Versfeld DB, Chapman RA. 2000. Impact of invading alien plants on surface water resources in South Africa: a preliminary assessment. Water South Africa 26:397–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine JM, D’Antonio CM. 2003. Forecasting biological invasions with increasing international trade. Conservation Biology 17:322–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López J, De La Torre F, Cubbage F. 2010. Effect of land prices, transportation costs, and site productivity on timber investment returns for pine plantations in Colombia. New Forests 39:313–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundquist JE. 1986. Fungi associated with Pinus in South Africa, part I. The Transvaal. South African Forestry Journal 138:1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Malvárez G, Major G, Curbelo V, Frioni L. 1997. Hongos ectomicorrícicos en Eucalyptus grandis. Agrociencia, Universidad de la República-Facultad de Agronomía 1:38–43.
   Google Scholar
• Marais LJ, Kotzé JM. 1977. Notes on ectotrophic mycorrhizae of Pinus patula in South Africa. South African Forestry Journal 100:61–71.
   Google Scholar
• Mikola P. 1970. Mycorrhizal inoculation in afforestation. In: Romberger H, Mikola P, eds. International review of forest research. New York: Academic Press. p. 123–196.
   Google Scholar
• Miller MA, Pfeiffer W, Schwartz T. 2010. Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. In: Proceedings of the 2010 Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE), New Orleans, LA. 14 Nov 2010. New Orleans, LA: IEEE. p. 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Mirov NT. 1967. The genus Pinus. New York: The Ronald Press Company. 602 p.
   Google Scholar
• Moeller HV, Dickie IA, Peltzer DA, Fukami T. 2015. Mycorrhizal co-invasion and novel interactions depend on neighborhood context. Ecology 96:2336–2347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monacell JT, Carbone I. 2014. Mobyle SNAP Workbench: a Web-based analysis portal for population genetics and evolutionary genomics. Bioinformatics 30:1488–1490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montoya F, Arias D, Betancur-Agudelo M. 2005. Contribución al conocimiento de los hongos Macromicetos del resguardo indígena Nuestra Señora de la Candelaria de la Montaña Riosucio, Caldas. Boletín Científico (Centro de Museos) Museo de Historia Natural 9:19–30.
   Google Scholar
• Mooney H, Drake J. 1989. Biological invasions: a SCOPE program overview. In: Drake JA, Mooney HA, di Castri F, Groves RH, Kruger FJ, Rejmánek M, Williamson M, eds. Biological invasions: a global perspective. SCOPE. [cited 2015 Sep 3]. Available from: http://www.scopenvironment.org/downloadpubs/scope37/scope37-ch22.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Moran VC, Hoffmann JH, Donnelly D, Zimmermann HG, Van Wilgen BW, Spencer NR. 2000. Biological control of alien, invasive pine trees (Pinus species) in South Africa. In: Spencer NR, eds. Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds; Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana; 4–14 July 1999. Bozeman, MT: Montana State University.
   Google Scholar
• Nasi M. 1977. Los hongos superiores de la Sabana de Bogotá y alrededores: descripción botánica, consideraciones ecológicas y bioquímicas, métodos de recolección e identificación, posibilidades de aprovechamiento en Colombia [tesis (Magister en Biología)]. Bogotá, Colombia: Universidad de los Andes.
   Google Scholar
• Nouhra E, Palfner G, Kuhar F, Pastor N, Smith M. 2019. Ectomycorrhizal fungi in South America: their diversity in past, present and future research. In: Pagano M, Lugo M, eds. Mycorrhizal fungi in South America. Fungal Biology. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature Switzerland. p. 73–95.
   Google Scholar
• Nullvalue 1996. Los pinos y eucaliptos, un bosque peligroso. Alguna vez ha pensado qué ocurriría si lleva varios camellos del desierto de Sahara a los fríos páramos andinos? El Tiempo. [cited 2015 Jan 20]. Available from: http://www.eltiempo.com/archivo/documento/MAM-299903
   Google Scholar
• Nuñez MA, Dickie IA. 2014. Invasive belowground mutualists of woody plants. Biological Invasions 16:645–661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nuñez MA, Horton TR, Simberloff D. 2009. Lack of belowground mutualisms hinders Pinaceae invasions. Ecology 90:2352–2359.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nuñez MA, Pauchard A. 2010. Biological invasions in developing and developed countries: does one model fit all? Biological Invasions 12: 707–714.
   Google Scholar
• Oda T, Tanaka C, Tsuda M. 2004. Molecular phylogeny and biogeography of the widely-distributed Amanita species, A. muscaria and A. pantherina. Mycological Research 108:885–896.
   Google Scholar
• Orlovich DA, Cairney JW. 2004. Ectomycorrhizal fungi in New Zealand: current perspectives and future directions. New Zealand Journal of Botany 42:721–738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orwa C, Mutua A, Kindt R, Jamnadass R, Simons A. 2009. Agroforestree Database: a tree reference and selection guide version 4.0. [cited 2011 May 31]. Available from: http://www.worldagroforestry.org/af/treedb/
   Google Scholar
• Ospina CM, Hernández RJ, Rincon EA, Sánchez FA, Urrego JB, Rodas CA, Ramírez CA, Riaño NM. 2011. El Pino pátula. Guías silviculturales para el manejo de especies forestales con miras a la producción de madera en la zona andina colombiana. Manizales, Colombia: FNC-Cenicafé. 104 p.
   Google Scholar
• Overbeek W, Kröger M, Gerber JF. 2012. An overview of industrial tree plantations in the global south. EJOLT Report No. 03. 100 p.  [cited 2015 Nov 10]. Available from: http://www.ejolt.org/2012/06/an-overview-of-industrial-tree-plantations-in-the-global-south-conflicts-trends-and-resistance-struggles/.
   Google Scholar
• Pauchard A, Nuñez MA, Raffaele E, Bustamante RO, Ledgard N, Relva MA, Simberloff D. 2010. Symposium summary: Introduced conifer invasions in South America: an update. Frontiers of Biogeography 2:34–36.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson J. 2001. Pinus taeda L. In: Pines of silvicultural importance. New York: CABI Publishing. p. 470–478.
   Google Scholar
• Posada D. 2008. jModelTest: phylogenetic model averaging. Molecular Biology and Evolution 25:1253–1256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poyton RJ. 1961. A guide to the characteristics and uses of the trees and shrubs quoted in the price list of the Forest Department. Republic of South Africa: Bulletin of the Department of Forestry No. 39. Pretoria, South Africa: The Government Printer. 50 p.
   Google Scholar
• Price EW, Carbone I. 2005. SNAP: workbench management tool for evolutionary population genetic analysis. Bioinformatics 21:402–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pringle A, Wolfe B, Vellinga E. 2011. Mycorrhiza. In: Simberloff D, Rejmánek M, eds. Encyclopedia of biological invasions. Berkeley, California: University of California Press. p. 468–471.
   Google Scholar
• Pulido M. 1983. Estudios en Agaricales Colombianos: los hongos de Colombia IX. Instituto de Ciencias Naturales, Museo de Historia Natural. Bogotá, Colombia: Universidad Nacional de Colombia. 143 p.
   Google Scholar
• Rambaut A, Drummond A. 2009. Tracer version 1.5 [computer program]. [cited 2015 Sep 2]. Available from: http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk
   Google Scholar
• Ramírez S. 2009. Reseña histórica de la administración forestal. In: Leguízamo A, ed. Historia y aportes de la ingeniería forestal en Colombia. Bogotá, Colombia: Asociación Colombiana de Ingenieros Forestales. p. 145–170.
   Google Scholar
• Ramírez JA, León-Peláez JD, Craven D, Herrera DA, Zapata CM, González-Hernández MI, Gallardo-Lancho J, Osorio W. 2014. Effects on nutrient cycling of conifer restoration in a degraded tropical montane forest. Plant and Soil 378:215–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Read D. 1998. The Mycorrhizal status of Pines. In: Richardson DM, ed. Ecology and biogeography of Pinus. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. p. 324–337.
   Google Scholar
• Reid DA, Eicker A. 1991. South African fungi: the genus Amanita. Mycological Research 95:80–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rejmánek M, Richardson DM, Babour M. 2002. Biological invasions: politics and the discontinuity of ecological terminology. ESA Bulletin 83: 131–133.
   Google Scholar
• RichardsonDM, Higgins SI. 1998. Pines as invaders in the Southern Hemisphere. In: Richardson DM, ed. Ecology and biogeography of Pinus. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. p. 450–470.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson DM, Hui C, Nuñez MA, Pauchard A. 2014. Tree invasions: patterns, processes, challenges and opportunities. Biological Invasions 16:473–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson DM, Macdonald IA, Hoffmann JH, Henderson L. 1997. Alien plant invasions. In: Cowling RM, Richardson DM, Pierce SM, eds. Vegetation of southern Africa. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. p. 534–535.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson DM, Pyšek P, Rejmánek M, Barbour MG, Panetta FD, West CJ. 2000. Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions. Diversity and distributions 6:93–107.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson DM, Rejmánek M. 2004. Conifers as invasive aliens: a global survey and predictive framework. Diversity and Distributions 10:321–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson DM, Rundel P. 1998. Ecology and biogeography of Pinus: an introduction. In: Richardson DM, ed. Ecology and biogeography of Pinus. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. p. 3–40.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson DM, Van Wilgen BW, Nuñez MA. 2008. Alien conifer invasions in South America: short fuse burning? Biological Invasions 10: 573–577.
   Google Scholar
• Rivera H, Vega E, Herrera G. 1998. Guia para plantaciones forestales comerciales—Caldas. Serie documental No. 32. Bogotá, Columbia: Corporación Nacional de Investigación y Fomento. 41 p.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson R. 2010. First record of Amanita muscaria in Western Australia. Australasian Mycologist 29:4–6.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Correa H, Oyama K, MacGregor-Fors I, González-Rodríguez A. 2015. How are oaks distributed in the Neotropics? A perspective from species turnover, areas of endemism, and climatic niches. International Journal of Plant Sciences 176:222–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP. 2003. MRBAYES 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19:1572–1574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RStudio. 2018. RStudio: integrated development environment for R (Version 1. 1.442)[computer software]. Boston, Massachusetts. [cited 2018 Feb 2]. Available from: http://www.rstudio.org/
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer J. 1993. Plantation in the tropics: environmental concerns. In: The IUCN Forest Conservation Programme. Gland, Switzerland: UNEP/WWF. 83 p.
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer NA, Chambers SM, Cairney JW. 2001. Distribution and persistence of Amanita muscaria genotypes in Australian P. radiata plantations. Mycological Research 105:966–970.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepherd CJ, Totterdell CJ. 1988. Mushrooms and toadstools of Australia. Melbourne, Australia: Inkata Press. 162 p.
   Google Scholar
• Shroomery. 2015. Amanita muscaria in a magic forest in Sumapaz Colombia. [cited 2015 Sep 3]. Available from: http://www.shroomery.org/6675/Amanita-muscaria-in-a-magic-forest-in-Sumapaz
   Google Scholar
• Sicard L, Suarez A. 1998. Efectos de plantaciones forestales sobre suelo y agua. Serie Técnica No. 40. Bogotá, Colombia: Corporación Nacional de Investigación y Fomento, Ministerio del Medio Ambiente.
   Google Scholar
• Simberloff D, Nuñez MA, Ledgard NJ, Pauchard A, Richardson DM, Sarasola M, Van Wilgen BW, Zalba SM, Zenni RD, Bustamante R, Peña E, Ziller SR. 2010. Spread and impact of introduced conifers in South America: lessons from other Southern Hemisphere regions. Austral Ecology 35:489–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simberloff D, Souza L, Nunez MA, Barrios-Garcia MN, Bunn W. 2012. The natives are restless, but not often and mostly when disturbed. Ecology 93:598–607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz MW, Hoeksema JD, Gehring CA, Johnson NC, Klironomos JN, Abbott LK, Pringle A. 2006. The promise and the potential consequences of the global transport of mycorrhizal fungal inoculum. Ecology Letters 9:501–515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobestiansky G. 2005. Contribution to a macromycete survey of the States of Rio Grande do Sul and Santa Catarina in Brazil. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology 48:437–457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stijve T, de Meijer AA. 1993. Macromycetes from the state of Paraná, Brazil. 4. The psychoactive species. Arquivos de Biologia e Tecnologia 36:313–329.
   Google Scholar
• Turnbull JW, Pryor LD. 1984. Choice of species and seed sources. In: Hillis WE. Brown AG, eds. Eucalyptus for wood production. Melbourne, Australia: Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Academic Press. p. 20–22.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Westhuizen GC, Eicker A. 1987. Some Fungal Symbionts of Ectotrophic Mycorrhizae of Pines in South Africa. South African Forestry Journa1 143:20–24.
   Google Scholar
• Vargas N, Bernal A, Sarria V, Franco-Molano AE, Restrepo S. 2011. Amatoxin and phallotoxin composition in species of the genus Amanita in Colombia: a taxonomic perspective. Toxicon 58:583–590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vargas N, Pardo de la Hoz C, Franco-Molano AE, Jimenez P, Restepo S, Grajales A. 2017. Defining the phylogenetic position of Amanita species in Colombia. Mycologia 109:261–276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasco-Palacios AM, Franco-Molano AE. 2013. Diversity of Colombian macrofungi (Ascomycota-Basidiomycota). Mycotaxon 121:48.
   Google Scholar
• Vellinga EC, Wolfe BE, Pringle A. 2009. Global patterns of ectomycorrhizal introductions. New Phytologist 181:960–973.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Christen H, Ortiz N, de las Salas G. 1998. Los recursos forestales de Colombia y perspectivas para su desarrollo económico. Bogotá, Columbia: Editorial Antares Editores. 136 p.
   Google Scholar
• Wells MJ, Poynton RJ, Balsinhas AA, Musil KJ, Joffe H, Van Hoepen E. 1986. The history of introduction of invasive alien plants to southern Africa. In: MacDonald IA, Kruger FJ, Ferrar AA, eds. The ecology and management of biological invasions in southern Africa. Cape Town, South Africa: Oxford University Press. p. 21–35.
   Google Scholar
• White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ, eds. PCR protocols a guide to methods and applications. New York: Academic Press. p. 315–322.
   Google Scholar
• Wormald TJ. 1975. P. patula. Tropical Forestry Papers No. 7. Oxford, UK: Department of Forestry, Commonwealth Forestry Institute, University of Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Wright JA, Jameel H, Dvorak W. 1996. Laboratory kraft pulping of juvenile tropical pines P. patula, P. tecunumanii, P. maximinoi and P. chiapensis. Tappi 79:187–199.
   Google Scholar
• Wright JE, Albertó E. 2002. Guía de hongos de la Region Pampeana I. Hongos con lamillas. Buenos Aires, Argentina: LOLA. 279 p.
   Google Scholar