The cultural role played by the ethnomycological knowledge of wild mushrooms for the peoples of highlands and lowlands in Tlaltenango, Zacatecas, Mexico

LITERATURE CITED

• Albuquerque UP, Monteiro JM, Alves Ramos M, de Amorim Elc, de Amorim ELC. 2007. Medicinal and magic plants from public market in northeastern Brazil. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 110(1):76–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albuquerque UP, de Medeiros P, Casas A. 2015. Evolutionary ethnobiology. In: Albuquerque UP, de Medeiros P, Casas A, editors. Evolutionary ethnobiology. Cham (Switzerland): Springer; p. 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Alday JG, de Aragón J M, de-Miguel S, Bonet JA. 2017. Mushroom biomass and diversity are driven by different spatio-temporal scales along Mediterranean elevation gradients. Scientific Reports. 7(1):45824.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alonso-Aguilar LE, Montoya A, Kong A, Estrada-Torres A, Garibay-Orijel R. 2014. The cultural significance of wild mushrooms in san mateo huexoyucan, tlaxcala, Mexico. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine. 10(1):27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arias Toledo B, Galetto L, Colantonio S. 2009. Ethnobotanical knowledge in rural communities of Cordoba (Argentina): the importance of cultural and biogeographical factors. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine. 5(1):40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aswani S, Vaccaro I. 2008. Lagoon ecology and social strategies: habitat diversity and ethnobiology. Human Ecology. 36(3):325–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aswani S, Lemahieu A, Sauer WHH. 2018. Global trends of local ecological knowledge and future implications. PLoS ONE. 13(4):e0195440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bello-Cervantes E, Correa-Metrio A, Montoya A, Trejo I, Cifuentes-Blanco J. 2019. Variation of ethnomycological knowledge in a community from Central Mexico. Journal of Fungal Diversity. 1:6–26.
   Google Scholar
• Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C. 2000. Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management. Ecological Applications. 10(5):1251–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernard HR. 2002. Research methods in anthropology: qualitative and quantitative methods. Walnut Creek (California): Altamira Press; p. 282–85.
   Google Scholar
• Bernard HR. 2006. Interviewing: unstructured and semistructured. In: Bernard HR, editor. Research methods in anthropology. Walnut Creek (California): Altima Press; p. 210–50.
   Google Scholar
• Blancas J, Casas A, Pérez-Salicrup D, Caballero J, Vega E. 2013. Ecological and socio-cultural factors influencing plant management in Náhuatl communities of the Tehuacán Valley, Mexico. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine. 9(1):39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnard P. 1991. A method of analyzing interview transcripts in qualitative research. Nurse Educational Today. 11(6):461–66.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Byg A, Balslev H. 2001. Diversity and use of palms in Zahamena, eastern Madagascar. Biodiversity and Conservation. 10(6):951–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cano Contreras EJ, Medinaceli A, Sanabria Diago OL, Argueta Villamar A. editors. 2016. Código de ética para la investigación, la investigación-acción y la colaboración etnocientífica en América Latina. Versión aprobada por la Asamblea General de la SOLAE 1 de octubre, 2016 Popayán, Cauca, Colombia. Etnobiología. 14(Supl. 1):5–31.
   Google Scholar
• Castro-Sánchez EI, Moreno-Calles AI, Meneses-Eternod S, Farfán-Heredia B, Blancas J, Casas A. 2019. Management of wild edible fungi in the Meseta Purépecha region, Michoacán, México. Sustainability. 11(14):3779.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cifuentes Blanco J, Villegas Ríos M, Pérez-Ramírez L. 1986. Manual del herbario. Administración y manejo de colección, técnicas de recolección y preparación de ejemplares botánicos. In: Hongos ( Lot A, Chang F, comp). Mexico City (Mexico): Consejo Nacional de la Flora de México. p. 55–64.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen N, Arieli T. 2011. Field research in conflict environments: methodological challenges and snowball sampling. Journal of Peace Research. 48(4):423–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colombres A. 2009. Teoría de la cultura y arte popular. Una visión crítica. México DF: CONACULTA. Colección Intersecciones. 22:241.
   Google Scholar
• [CONABIO] Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad. 2019. [accessed 2021 May 16]. https://www.gob.mx/conabio
   Google Scholar
• Estomba D, Ladio A, Lozada M. 2006. Medicinal wild plant knowledge and gathering patterns in a Mapuche community from North-western Patagonia. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 103(1):109–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franco FM, Hidayati S, Abdul Ghani BA, Ranaivo-Malancon B. 2015. Ethnotaxonomic systems can reflect the vitality status of indigenous language and traditional knowledge. Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge. 14:175–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garibay-Orijel R, Cifuentes J, Estrada-Torres A, Caballero J. 2006. People using macro-fungal diversity in Oaxaca, Mexico. Fungal Diversity. 21:41–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garibay-Orijel R, Caballero J, Estrada-Torres A, Cifuentes J. 2007. Understanding cultural significance, the edible mushrooms case. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine. 3(1):4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garibay-Orijel R, Ramírez-Terrazo A, Ordaz-Velázquez M. 2012. Women care about local knowledge, experiences from ethnomycology. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine. 8(1):25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garibay-Orijel R, Argüelles-Moyao A, Álvarez-Manjarrez J, Ángeles-Argáiz RE, García-Guzmán OM, Hernández-Yáñez H. 2020. Diversity and importance of edible mushrooms in ectomycorrhizal communities in Mexican neotropics. In: Pérez-Moreno J, Guerin-Laguette A, Flores-Arzú R, Yu FQ, editors. Mushrooms, humans and nature in a changing world. Cham (Switzerland): Springer; p. 407–24.
   Google Scholar
• Gómez-Baggethun E, Reyes-García V. 2013. Reinterpreting change in traditional ecological knowledge. Human Ecology. 41(4):643–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez-Hernández M, Williams-Linera G. 2011. Diversity of macromycetes determined by tree species, vegetation structure, and microenvironment in tropical cloud forests in Veracruz, Mexico. Botany. 89(3):203–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzmán G. 2008. Diversity and use of traditional Mexican medicinal fungi. A review. International Journal of Medicinal Mushrooms. 10(3):209–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haro-Luna MX, Ruan-Soto F, Guzmán-Dávalos L. 2019. Traditional knowledge, uses, and perceptions of mushrooms among the Wixaritari and mestizos of Villa Guerrero, Jalisco, Mexico. IMA Fungus. 10(1):16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haro-Luna MX, Guzmán-Dávalos L, Ruan-Soto F. 2020. Mycophilic degree among the Wixaritari and mestizos in Villa Guerrero, Jalisco, Mexico. Ethnobiology and Conservation. 9:6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernández Santiago F, Pérez Moreno J, Xoconostle Cázares B, Almaráz Suárez JJ, Ojeda Trejo E, Mata Montes de Oca G, Díaz Aguilar I. 2016. Traditional knowledge and use of wild mushrooms by Mixtecs or Ñuu savi, the people of the rain, from Southeastern Mexico. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine. 12(1):35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunn E. 1982. The utilitarian factor in folk biological classification. American Anthropologist. 84:830–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [INEGI] Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía. 2010. [accessed 2021 May 16]. Available online at http://www.inegi.org.mx.
   Google Scholar
• [INEGI] Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía. 2015. Panorama Sociodemográfico del Estado de Zacatecas. [accessed 2021 May 16]. Available online at http://www.inegi.org.mx.
   Google Scholar
• [INEGI] Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía. 2019. [accessed 2021 May 16]. Available online at http://www.inegi.org.mx.
   Google Scholar
• [INIFAP] Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias. 2019. [accessed 2021 Feb 22]. Available online at http://www.gob.mx/inifap.
   Google Scholar
• Janovcová M, Rádlová S, Polák J, Sedlácková K, Peléšková Š, Žampachová B, Frynta D, Landová E. 2019. Human attitude toward reptiles: a relationship between fear, disgust, and aesthetic preferences. Animals. 9(5):238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotowski MA, Pietras M, Ł Ł. 2019. Extreme levels of mycophilia documented in Mazovia, a region of Poland. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine. 15:12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladio AH, Lozada M. 2004. Patterns of use and knowledge of wild edible plants in distinct ecological environments: a case study of a Mapuche community from northwestern Patagonia. Biodiversity and Conservation. 13(6):1153–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mariaca Méndez R, Ruan-Soto F, Cano-Contreras EJ. 2008. Conocimiento tradicional de Ustilago maydis en cuatro grupos mayenses del sureste de México. Etnobiología. 6:9–23.
   Google Scholar
• Martínez-Ballesté A, Martorell C, Caballero J. 2006. Cultural or ecological sustainability? The effect of cultural change on sabal palm management among the lowland Maya of Mexico. Ecology and Society. 11(2):27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarter J, Gavin MC, Baereleo S, Love M. 2014. The challenges of maintaining indigenous ecological knowledge. Ecology and Society. 19(3):39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medeiros PM, Soldati GT, Alencar NL, Vandebroek I, Pieroni A, Hanazaki N, Albuquerque UP. 2012. The use of medicinal plants by migrant people: adaptation, maintenance, and replacement. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine Article. ID:807452.
   Google Scholar
• Medeiros PM, Almeida ALS, Lucena RFP, Souto FJB, Albuquerque UP. 2014. Use of visual stimuli in ethnobiological research. In: Albuquerque UP, Cunha LVFC, Lucena RFP, Alves RRN, editors. Methods and techniques in ethnobiology and ethnoecology. New York, NY: Springer Protocols Handbooks. Humana Press-Springer; p. 87–98.
   Google Scholar
• Moreno-Fuentes A. 2014. Nomenclatura tradicional de los hongos: un ejemplo de su aporte soterrado a la nomenclatura científica binomial. In: Cuevas-Cardona C, González-Rodríguez KA, editors. Los rostros ocultos de la ciencia. Pachuca de Soto (Mexico): Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo; p. 92–102.
   Google Scholar
• Mueller GM, Schmit JP, Leacock PR, Buyck B, Cifuentes J, Desjardin DE, Halling RE, Hjortstam K, Iturriaga T, Larsson K-H, et al. 2007. Global diversity and distribution of macrofungi. Biodiversity and Conservation. 16(1):37–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norðdahl K, Einarsdóttir J. 2015. Children’s views and preferences regarding their outdoor environment. Journal of Adventure Education & Outdoor Learning. 15(2):152–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olmos HA. 2004. Cultura: el sentido del desarrollo. Mexico City, Mexico: CONACULTA-Instituto Mexiquense de Cultura.
   Google Scholar
• Olson EA. 2013. Anthropology and traditional ecological knowledge: a summary of quantitative approaches to traditional knowledge, market participation, and conservation. Culture, Agriculture, Food and Environment. 35(2):140–51.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeiffer JM, Butz RJ. 2005. Assessing cultural and ecological variation in ethnobiological research: the importance of gender. Journal of Ethnobiology. 25(2):240–78.
   Google Scholar
• Pieroni A. 2001. Evaluation of the cultural significance of wild food botanicals traditionally consumed in northwestern Tuscany, Italy. Journal of Ethnobiology. 21:89–104.
   Google Scholar
• Ramírez Carrillo LA. 2006. Impacto de la globalización en los mayas yucatecos. Estudios de Cultura Maya. 27:73–97.
   Google Scholar
• Reyes-García V, Guèze M, Luz AC, Paneque-Gálvez J, Macía MJ, Orta-Martínez M, Pino J, Rubio-Campillo X. 2013. Evidence of traditional knowledge loss among a contemporary indigenous society. Evolution and Human Behavior. 34:249–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robles-García D, Suzán-Azpiri H, Montoya-Esquivel A, García-Jiménez J, Esquivel-Naranjo EU, Yahia E, Landeros-Jaime F. 2018. Ethnomycological knowledge in three communities in Amealco, Quéretaro, México. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine. 14(1):7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Robayo KJ, Méndez-López ME, Molina-Villegas A, Juárez L. 2020. What do we talk about when we talk about milpa? A conceptual approach to the significance, topics of research and impact of the mayan milpa system. Journal of Rural Studies. 77:47–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruan-Soto F, Garibay-Orijel R, Cifuentes J. 2004. Conocimiento micológico tradicional en la planicie costera del Golfo de México. Revista Mexicana de Micología. 19:57–70.
   Google Scholar
• Ruan-Soto F, Cifuentes J, Mariaca R, Limón F, Pérez-Ramírez L, Sierra S. 2009. Uso y manejo de hongos silvestres en dos comunidades de la Selva Lacandona, Chiapas, México. Revista Mexicana de Micología. 29:61–72.
   Google Scholar
• Ruan-Soto F, Caballero J, Martorell C, Cifuentes J, González-Esquinca AR, Garibay-Orijel R. 2013. Evaluation of the degree of mycophilia-mycophobia among highland and lowland inhabitants from Chiapas, Mexico. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine. 9(1):36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruan-Soto F. 2018. Sociodemographic differences in the cultural significance of edible and toxic mushrooms among Tsotsil towns in the Highlands of Chiapas, Mexico. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine. 14(1):32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruan-Soto F, Cifuentes J, Garibay-Orijel R, Caballero J. 2021. Comparación de la disponibilidad de hongos comestibles en tierras altas y bajas de Chiapas, Mexico, y sus implicaciones en estrategias tradicionales de aprovechamiento. Acta Botanica Mexicana. 128:e1731.
   Google Scholar
• Ruán-Soto F, Garibay-Orijel R, Cifuentes J. 2006. Process and dynamics of traditional selling wild edible mushrooms in tropical Mexico. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine. 2(1):3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan GW, Nolan JM, Yoder PS. 2000. Successive free listing: using multiple free lists to generate explanatory models. Field Methods. 12(2):83–107.
   Google Scholar
• Saslis-Lagoudakis CH, Hawkins JA, Greenhill SJ, Pendri CA, Watson MF, Tuladhar-Douglas W, Baral SR, Savolainen V 2014. The evolution of traditional knowledge: environment shapes medicinal plant use in Nepal. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 281( 1780):20132768.
   Google Scholar
• Saynes-Vásquez A, Caballero J, Meave JA, Chiang F. 2013. Cultural change and loss of ethnoecological knowledge among the isthmus Zapotecs of Mexico. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine. 9:40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [SEDESOL] Secretaría de Desarrollo Social. 2017. [accessed 2021 Feb 22]. Available online at http://www.sedesol.gob.mx.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson LR. 2004. Anticolonial strategies for the recovery and maintenance of indigenous knowledge. The American Indian Quarterly. 28(3):373–84.
   Google Scholar
• Souto T, Ticktin T. 2012. Understanding interrelationships among predictors (age, gender, and origin) of local ecological knowledge. Economic Botany. 66(2):149–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stelaphruk C, Price LL. 2007. Children’s traditional ecological knowledge of wild food resources: a case study in a rural village in Northeast Thailand. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine. 3:33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tardío J, Pardo-de-Santayana M. 2008. Cultural importance indices: a comparative analysis based on the useful wild plants of Southern Cantabria (Northern Spain). Economic Botany. 62(1):24–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tedersoo L, Bahram M, Põlme S, Kõljalg U, Yorou NS, Wijesundera R, Villarreal Ruiz L, Vasco-Palacios AM, Thu PQ, Suija A, et al. 2014. Global diversity and geography of soil fungi. Science. 346(6213):1256688.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner NJ. 1988. “The importance of a rose”: evaluating the cultural significance of plants in thompson and lillooet interior Salish. American Anthropologist. 90(2):272–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weckerle CS, Huber FK, Yongping Y, Weibang S. 2006. Plant knowledge of the Shuhi in the Hengduan Mountains, Southwest China. Economic Botany. 60:3–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zariquiey R. 2018. Naming strategies and ethnobiological nomenclature in Kakataibo (Panoan, Peru). Liames. 18:7–26.
   Google Scholar
• Zent S. 2001. Acculturation and ethnobotanical knowledge loss among the Piaroa of Venezuela, a demonstration of a quantitative method of the empirical study of traditional environmental knowledge change. In: Maffi L, editor. On biocultural diversity, linkage language, knowledge, and the environment. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press; p. 190–211.
   Google Scholar
• Zent EL, Zent S. 2011. A primer on ethnobiological methods for ethnomycological research: studying folk biological classification systems. In: Cunningham AB, Yang X, editors. Mushrooms in forests and woodlands. Resource management, values and local livelihoods. London, UK: Earthscan; p. 39–60.
   Google Scholar