Filling a gap in the taxonomy of phyllachoroid fungi: Proposition of Neopolystigma, gen. nov., and the new family Neopolystigmataceae

LITERATURE CITED

• Cannon PF. 1991. A revision of Phyllachora and some similar genera on the host family Leguminosae. Mycol Pap. 163:1–302.
   Google Scholar
• Cannon PF. 1996a. Systematics and diversity of the Phyllachoraceae associated with Rosaceae, with a monograph of Polystigma. Mycol Res. 100(12):1409–1427.
   Google Scholar
• Cannon PF. 1996b. IMI descriptions of Fungi and Bacteria No. 1281. Mycopathologia. 135:39–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cannon PF, Evans HC. 1999. Biotrophic species of Phyllachoraceae associated with the angiosperm family Erythroxylaceae. Mycol Res. 103:577–590.
   Google Scholar
• Carbone I, Kohn L. 1999. A method for designing primer sets for speciation studies in filamentous ascomycetes. Mycologia. 91(3):553–556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clements FC, Shear CL. 1931. The Genera of Fungi. 2nd ed. New York: H.W. Wilson Co.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke MC. 1888. Australasian fungi. Grevillea. 16:113–14.
   Google Scholar
• Darriba D, Taboada G, Doallo R, Posada D. 2012. jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nat Methods. 9(8):772.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dayarathne MC, Maharachchikumbura SSN, Jones EBG, Goonasekara ID, Bulgakov TS, Al-Sadi AM, Hyde KD, Lumyong S, McKenzie EHC. 2017. Neophyllachora gen nov. (Phyllachorales), three new species of Phyllachora from Poaceae and resurrection of Polystigmataceae (Xylariales). Mycosphere. 8(10):1598–1625. doi:10.5943/mycosphere/8/10/2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Candolle M. 1815. Flore française ou descriptions de the toute le plantes. Medico-chirurgical trans. 6:1–662.
   Google Scholar
• Farr DF, Rossman AY. 2022. Fungal databases, U.S. National Fungus collections, ARS, USDA. [ accessed 2022 January 26]. https://nt.ars-grin.gov/fungaldatabases/
   Google Scholar
• Furlanetto C. 1995. Fungos associados a flora nativa do Cerrado, MSc Dissertation. Brasília: University of Brasília.
   Google Scholar
• Gouy M, Tannier E, Comte N, Parsons DP. 2021. Seaview version 5: a multiplatform software for multiple sequence alignment, Molecular Phylogenetic analyses, and tree reconciliation. Methods Mol Biol. 2231:241–260.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Habibi A, Banihashemi Z, Mostowfizadeh-Ghalamfarsa R. 2015. Phylogenetic analysis of Polystigma and its relationship to Phyllachorales. Phytopathol Mediterr. 54:45–54. doi:10.14601/Phytopathol_Mediterr-14738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katoh K, Standley DM. 2013. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol. 30(4):772–780.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A, Stones-Havas S, Cheung M, Sturrock S, Buxton S. 2012. Geneious basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinf. 28(12):1647–1649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson A. 2014. AliView: a fast and lightweight alignment viewer and editor for large data sets. Bioinf. 30(22):3276–3278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lumbsch HT, Huhndorf SM. 2007. Outline of Ascomycota – 2007. Myconet. 13:1–58. [ accessed 2021 October 8]. http://archive.fieldmuseum.org/myconet/outline.asp#subclassXylar
   Google Scholar
• Mardones M, Trampe-Jaschik T, Oster S, Elliott M, Urbina H, Schmitt I, Piepenbring M. 2017. Phylogeny of the order Phyllachorales (Ascomycota, Sordariomycetes): among and within order relationships based on five molecular loci. Persoonia: Mol Phylog Evol Fungi. 39(1):74–90.
   Google Scholar
• Mardones M, Trampe-Jaschik T, Hofmann TA, Mangelsdorff RD, and Piepenbring M. 2018a. New neotropical species of Phyllachorales based on molecular, morphological, and ecological data. Mycologia. 110(5):835–859.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mardones M, Trampe-Jaschik T, Hofmann TA, Piepenbring M. 2018b. Contribution to the phylogeny and a new species of Coccodiella (Phyllachorales). Mycol Prog. 17(1–2):205–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mardones M, Trampe-Jaschik T, Piepenbring M. 2020. Phylogenetics and taxonomy of Telimenaceae (Phyllachorales) from Central America. Mycol Prog. 19(12):1587–1599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller MA, Pfeifer W, and Schwartz T. 2011. The CIPRES Science Gateway: a community resource for phylogenetic analyses. In Proceedings of the 2011 TeraGrid Conference: Extreme Digital Discovery, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, 1–8. doi:10.1145/2016741.2016785
   Google Scholar
• Persoon CH. 1800. Observationes Mycologicae 2: i-xii, 1-106, 6 plates. Germany (Leipzig; Gesnerus): Usterius & Wolfius. 113. [ accessed 2021 September October]. https://books.google.com.br/books?hl=pt-BR&lr=&id=W0AjYcShS7EC&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=Persoon+CH.+1800.+Observationes+mycologicae:+shttps://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k973699/f2.item
   Google Scholar
• Petrak F. 1934. Mykologische Notizen. XII. Ann Mycologici. 32:317–447. http://www.cybertruffle.org.uk/cyberliber/
   Google Scholar
• Raciborski M. 1900. Parasitische Algen und Pilze Java’s. Staatsdruckerei. 1:1–39.
   Google Scholar
• Rambaut A. 2012. Figtree v1.4. http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/
   Google Scholar
• Rehm H. 1907. Ascomycetes novi. Ann Mycologici. 5:516–546.
   Google Scholar
• Rehner SA, Buckley E. 2005. A Beauveria phylogeny inferred from nuclear ITS and EF1-α sequences: evidence for cryptic diversification and links to Cordyceps teleomorphs. Mycologia. 97(1):84–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roger AJ, Sandblom O, Doolittle WF, Philippe H. 1999. An evaluation of elongation factor 1 alpha as a phylogenetic marker for eukaryotes. Mol Biol Evol. 16(2):218–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP. 2003. MrBayes 3: bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinf. 19(12):1572–1574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saccardo PA, Sydow P. 1902. Silloge Fungorum vol. XVI. Supplementum universale Pars V. Berlin: R. Friedländer & Sohn; p. 1291.
   Google Scholar
• Santos MDM, Fonseca MEN, Boiteux LS, Câmara PEAS, Dianese JC. 2016. ITS phylogeny and taxonomy of Phyllachora species on native Myrtaceae from the Brazilian Cerrado. Mycologia. 108(6):1141–1164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivanesan A. 1987. Telimena, Telimenopsis, and a new ascomyvete genus Telimenochora of the Phyllachorales. Trans British Mycol Soc. 88(4):473–477.
   Google Scholar
• Stamatakis A. 2014. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinf. 30(9):1312–1313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens FL. 1917. Porto Rican fungi, old and new. Trans Illinois Acad Sci. 10:162–218.
   Google Scholar
• Sydow H, Sydow P. 1904. Novae fungorum species. Ann Mycol. 2:162–174.
   Google Scholar
• Sydow H, Sydow P. 1916. Fungi amazonici a cl E. Ule lecti. Ann Mycol. 14:65–97.
   Google Scholar
• Vilgalys R, Hester M. 1990. Rapid genetic identifcation and mapping of enzymatically amplifed ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. J Bacteriol. 172(8):4238–4246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Arx JA, Müller E. 1954. Die Gattungen der amerosporen Pyrenomyceten. Beiträge zur Kryptogamenflora der Schweiz. 11:1–434.
   Google Scholar
• White TJ, Bruns T, Lee SJWT, Taylor J. 1990. Amplifcation and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ, editors. PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. New York: Academic Press; p. 315–322.
   Google Scholar