Phylogeny and taxonomy of the genera of Erysiphaceae, part 3: Cystotheca

LITERATURE CITED

• Abadi S, Azouri D, Mayrose I, Pupko T. 2019. Model selection may not be a mandatory step for phylogeny reconstruction. Nat Commun. 10(1):1–11. doi:10.1038/s41467-019-08822-w.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afshan N, Zafar I, Jabeen M, Liaqat N, Khalid AN. 2022. New records of powdery mildews on oak trees in Pakistan. Nova Hedwigia. 115(1–2):79–88. doi:10.1127/nova_hedwigia/2022/0696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmad N, Agarwal DK, Bambawal OM, Puzari KC. 2007. Erysiphaceae of India. Monographic treatment. New Delhi (India): Venus Printers and Publishers. p. 108.
   Google Scholar
• Amano K. 1986. Host range and geographical distribution of the powdery mildew fungi. 2nd ed. Tokyo (Japan): Scientific Societies Press. p. 741.
   Google Scholar
• Berkeley MJ, Curtis MA. 1860. Characters of new fungi, collected in the North Pacific exploring expedition by Charles Wright. Proc Amer Acad Arts Sci. 4:111–130.
   Google Scholar
• Bilgrami KS, Jamaluddin S, Rizwi MA. 1991. Fungi of India. List and References (second revised enlarged and brought upto date edition). New Delhi (India): Today & Tomorrow’s Printers and Publishers. p. 798.
   Google Scholar
• Blumer S. 1933. Die Erysiphaceen Mitteleuropas unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Schweiz. Beitr Kryptogamenfl Schweiz. 7:1–483.
   Google Scholar
• Bradshaw M, Braun U, Götz M, Pfister DH. 2022a. Phylogeny and taxonomy of the genera of Erysiphaceae, part 2: neoerysiphe. Mycologia (Online First). doi:10.1080/00275514.2022.2115419.
   Google Scholar
• Bradshaw M, Braun U, Pfister DH. 2022b. Phylogeny and taxonomy of the genera of Erysiphaceae, part 1: golovinomyces. Mycologia. 114(6):964–993. doi:10.1080/00275514.2022.2115419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradshaw M, Guan GX, Nokes L, Braun U, Liu SY, Pfister D. 2022c. Secondary DNA barcodes (CAM, GAPDH, GS, and RPB2) to characterize species complexes and strengthen the powdery mildew phylogeny. Frontiers Ecol Evol. 10:918908. doi:10.3389/fevo.2022.918908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradshaw M, Tobin P. 2020. Sequencing herbarium specimens of a common detrimental plant pathogen (powdery mildew). Phytopathology. 110:1248–1254. doi:10.1094/PHYTO-04-20-0139-PER.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun U. 1987. A monograph of the Erysiphales (powdery mildews). Beih Nova Hedwigia. 89:1–700.
   Google Scholar
• Braun U, Cook RTA. 2012. Taxonomic manual of the Erysiphales (Powdery mildews). CBS Biodivers Ser. 11:1–707.
   Google Scholar
• Braun U, Cook RTA, Inman AJ, Shin HD. 2002. The taxonomy of the powdery mildew fungi. In: Bélanger R, Dik AJ, Bushnell WR, editors. The powdery mildews: a comprehensive treatise. St. Paul (USA): APS Press. p. 13–54.
   Google Scholar
• Braun U, Takamatsu S. 2000. Phylogeny of Erysiphe, Microsphaera, Uncinula (Erysipheae) and Cystotheca, Podosphaera, Sphaerotheca (Cystotheceae) inferred from rDNA ITS sequences – some taxonomic consequences. Schlechtendalia. 4:1–33.
   Google Scholar
• Cho SE, Takamatsu S, Lee SH, Shin HD. 2018. Cystotheca kusanoi comb. nov.: a redescription with new morphological observations. Mycotaxon. 133(3):401–414. doi:10.5248/133.401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook RTA, Inman AJ, Billings C. 1997. Identification and classification of powdery mildew anamorphs using light and scanning electron microscopy and host range data. Mycol Res. 101:975–1002. doi:10.1017/S095375629700364X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunnington JH, Takamatsu S, Lawrie AC, Pascoe IG. 2003. Molecular identification of anamorphic powdery mildews (Erysiphales). Australas Plant Pathol. 32(3):421–428. doi:10.1071/AP03045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felsenstein J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution. 39:783e791. doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb00420.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gäumann E. 1922. Über die Entwicklungsgeschichte von Lanomyces, einer neuen Perisporiaceen-Gattung. Ann Jard Bot Buitenzorg. 32:43–63.
   Google Scholar
• Gernhard T. 2008. The conditioned reconstructed process. J Theor Biol. 253:769–778. doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.04.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guan G-X, Liu SY, Murray TD, Tang S-R. 2022. Occurrence of powdery mildew caused by Cystotheca kusanoi on Oak trees in China. Forest Pathol. 52:e12761. doi:10.1111/efp.12761.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirata T, Cunnington JH, Paksiri K, Limkaisang S, Shishkoff N, Grigaliūnaitė B, Sato Y, Takamatsu S. 2000. Evolutionary analysis of subsection Magnicellulatae of Podosphaera section Sphaerotheca (Erysiphales) based on the rDNA internal transcribed spacer sequences with special reference to host plants. Canad J Bot. 78:1521–1530. doi:10.1139/b00-124.
   Google Scholar
• Hirata T, Takamatsu S. 1996. Nucleotide sequence diversity of rDNA internal transcribed spacers extracted from conidia 1115 and cleistothecia of several powdery mildew fungi. Mycoscience. 37(3):283–288. doi:10.1007/BF02461299.
   Google Scholar
• Höhnel FV. 1912. Über die Berechtigung der Gattungen Cystotheca und Thyrococcum. Z Gährungsphysiol. 1:45–48.
   Google Scholar
• Homma Y. 1937. Erysiphaceae of Japan. J Fac Agric Hokkaido Univ. 38:183–461.
   Google Scholar
• Hosagoudar VB, Braun U, Rabindran R. 1992. Oidium murrayae spec. nov. Int J Mycol Lichenol. 5(3):213–215.
   Google Scholar
• Katumoto K. 1973. Notes on the genera Lanomyces Gäum. and Cystotheca Berk. et Curt. Rep Tottori Mycol Inst. 10:437–446.
   Google Scholar
• Kobayashi T. 2007. Index of fungi inhabiting woody plants in Japan. Host, distribution and literature. Tokyo (Japan): Zenkoku-Noson-Kyoiku Kyokai Publishing Co., Ltd. p. 1227.
   Google Scholar
• La YJ, Lee SK, Shin CH, Cho SE, Shin HD. 2014. First report of powdery mildew caused by Cystotheca wrightii on Quercus glauca in Korea. Plant Dis. 98(6):850. doi:10.1094/PDIS-10-13-1071-PDN.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meeboon J, Hidayat I, Kramadibrata K, Nurcahyanto D, Siahaan SA, Takamatsu S. 2012. Cystotheca tjibodensis (Erysiphaceae, Ascomycota): rediscovery in Java after 90 years and first finding of anamorph. Mycoscience. 53(5):386–390. doi:10.1007/S10267-011-0176-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meeboon J, Hidayat I, Takamatsu S. 2013. Setoidium castanopsidis, a new species of anamorphic Cystotheca (Ascomycota, Erysiphales) from Indonesia. Mycoscience. 54:274–278. doi:10.1016/j.myc.2012.10.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mori Y, Sato Y, Takamatsu S. 2000. Molecular phylogeny and radiation time of Erysiphales inferred from the nuclear ribosomal DNA sequences. Mycoscience. 41:437–447. doi:10.1007/BF02461662.
   Google Scholar
• Nomura Y. 1997. Taxonomical study of Erysiphaceae of Japan. Tokyo (Japan): Yokendo. p. 281.
   Google Scholar
• Otani Y. 1988. Seiya Ito’s Mycological Flora of Japan. Vol. 3, Ascomycotina, No. 2, Onygenales, Eurotiales, Ascosphaeriales, Microascales, Ophiostomales, Elaphomycetales, Erysiphales. Tokyo (Japan): Yokendo. p. 310.
   Google Scholar
• Pande A. 2008. Ascomycetes of Peninsular India. Jodpur (India): Scientific Publishers. p. 580.
   Google Scholar
• Paul YS, Thakur K. 2006. Indian Erysiphaceae. Jodhpur (India): Scientific Publishers. p. 134.
   Google Scholar
• Pawar AB, Patil MS, Hosagoudar VB. 1985. Plectomycetes of Maharashtra. Geobios New Rep. 4:65–69.
   Google Scholar
• Rambaut A. 2009. Fig Tree ver. 1.3.1. http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree.
   Google Scholar
• Salmon E. 1900. A monograph of the Erysiphaceae. Mem Torrey Bot Club. 9:1–292.
   Google Scholar
• Shin HD. 1991. The anamorphic feature of Cystotheca lanestris (Erysipheaceae). Korean J Plant Pathol. 7(1):55–58.
   Google Scholar
• Shin HD. 2000. Erysiphaceae of Korea. Plant Pathog Korea. 2:1–320.
   Google Scholar
• Silvestro D, Michalak I. 2012. RaxmlGUI: a graphical front-end for RAxML. Org Divers Evol. 12:335–337. doi:10.1007/s13127-011-0056-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suchard MA, Lemey P, Baele G, Ayres DL, Drummond AJ, Rambaut A. 2018. Bayesian phylogenetic and phylodynamic data integration using BEAST 1.10. Virus Evolution. 4: Vey016.
   Google Scholar
• Takamatsu S, Hirata T, Sato Y. 2000. A parasitic transition from trees to herbs occurred at least twice in tribe Cystotheceae (Erysiphaceae): evidence from nuclear ribosomal DNA. Mycol Res. 104:1304–1311. doi:10.1017/S0953756200003014.
   Google Scholar
• Tamura K, Stecher G, Kumar S. 2021. MEGA11: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 11. Mol Biol Evol. 38(7):3022–3027. doi:10.1093/molbev/msab120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turland N, Kusber W-H, Wiersema JH, Barrie FR, Greuter W, Hawksworth DL, Herendeen PS, Marhold K, McNeill J. 2018. International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Shenzhen Code). Glashütten (Germany): Koeltz Botanical Books; p. 254.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh PS, Metzger DA, Higuchi R. 1991. Chelex 100 as a medium for simple extraction of DNA for PCR–based typing from forensic material. Biotechniques. 10(4):506–513.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wijayawardene NN, Hyde KD, Rajeshkumar KC, Hawksworth DL, Madrid H, Kirk PM, Braun U, Singh RV, Crous PW, Kukwa M, et al. 2017. Notes for genera – Ascomycota. Fungal Divers. 86:1–594. doi:10.1007/s13225-017-0386-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yukawa Y, Katumoto K, Takahashi H. 1971. Scanning electron microscopy of Cystotheca wrightii Berk. et Curt. and its hyperparasite. Bull Fac Agric Yamaguchi Univ. 22:181–196.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng R-Y, Yu Y-N, Eds. 1987. Flora Fungorum Sinicorum. Vol. 1. Erysiphales. Beijing (China): Science Press. p. 552.
   Google Scholar