Dairy and beef breed effects on beef yield, beef quality and profitability: a review

References

• ARC. 1980. The nutrient requirements of ruminant livestock: technical review by an Agricultural Research Council working party. Slough, UK: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin RL, McLeod KR, Capuco AV. 2004. Visceral tissue growth and proliferation during the bovine lactation cycle. J Dairy Sci. 87:2977–2986. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73429-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton RA. 1971. Growth and carcass characteristics of Angus, Beef Shorthorn, Milking Shorthorn and Friesian steers—Trial V. Sheepfarm Annu. 1971:97–104.
   Google Scholar
• Barton RA. 1972. Beef steer breed comparisons—Trial V1. Sheepfarm Annu. 1972:57–73.
   Google Scholar
• Barton RA, Pleasants AB. 1997. Comparison of the carcass characteristics of steers of different breeds and pre-weaning environments slaughtered at 30 months of age. New Zeal J Agr Res. 40:57–68. doi: 10.1080/00288233.1997.9513230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bass JJ, Carter AH, Johnson DL, Baker RL, Jones KR. 1981. Sire-breed comparison of carcass composition of steers from Angus dams. J Agr Sci. 97:515–522. doi: 10.1017/S0021859600036832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beef + Lamb New Zealand. 2015. Compendium of farm facts. 39th ed. Wellington: Beef + Lamb New Zealand Economic Service.
   Google Scholar
• Berg RT, Butterfield RM. 1976. New concepts of cattle growth. Sydney: Sydney University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bertrand JK, Willham RL, Berger PJ. 1983. Beef, dairy and beef × dairy carcass characteristics. J Anim Sci. 57:1440–1448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branaman GA, Pearson AM, Magee WT, Griswold RM, Brown GA. 1962. Comparison of the cutability and eatability of beef- and dairy-type cattle. J Anim Sci. 21:321–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler-Hogg BW, Morris CA, Baker RL, Bass JJ, Mercer G, Duganzich DM. 1988. The influence of breed on the meat content of beef carcasses for export. Proc New Zeal Soc Anim Prod. 48:57–60.
   Google Scholar
• Cole JW, Ramsey CB, Hobbs CS, Temple RS. 1964a. Effects of type and breed of British, Zebu, and dairy cattle on production, carcass composition, and palatability. J Dairy Sci. 47:1138–1144. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(64)88863-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole JW, Ramsey CB, Hobbs CS, Temple RS. 1964b. Effects of type and breed of British, Zebu, and dairy cattle on production, palatability, and composition. III. Percent wholesale cuts and yield of edible portion as determined by physical and chemical analysis. J Anim Sci. 23:71–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CSIRO. 2007. Nutrient requirements for domesticated ruminants. Melbourne: CSIRO Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• DairyNZ 2012. New Zealand dairy statistics 2011–12. Hamilton: DairyNZ.
   Google Scholar
• Dolezal HG, Tatum JD, Williams FL. 1993. Effects of feeder cattle frame size, muscle thickness, and age class on days fed, weight, and carcass composition. J Anim Sci. 71:2975–2985.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everitt GC. 1972. Lessons from the Charolais trials. Proceedings Ruakura Farmers’ Conference. 77–97.
   Google Scholar
• Everitt GC, Jury KE, Dalton DC, Langridge M. 1980. IV. Growth and carcass composition of straight-bred and beef-cross Friesian steers in several environments. New Zeal J Agr Res. 23:11–20. doi: 10.1080/00288233.1980.10417840
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredeen HT, Martin AH, Weiss GM, Slen SB, Sumption LJ. 1972. Feedlot and carcass performance of young bulls representing several breeds and breed crosses. Can J Anim Sci. 52:241–257. doi: 10.4141/cjas72-027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-de-Siles JL, Ziegler JH, Wilson LL, Sink JD. 1977. Growth, carcass and muscle characters of Hereford and Holstein steers. J Anim Sci. 44:973–984.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett WN. 1971. Energetic efficiency of beef and dairy steers. J Anim Sci. 32:451–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson HE. 1969. Comparative feedlot performance of dairy and beef type steers. Proc Cornell Nutrition Conference for Feed Manufacturers. 31:51–58.
   Google Scholar
• Husaini SA, Deatherage FE, Kunkle LE. 1950. Studies on meat. II. Observations on relation of biochemical factors to changes in tenderness. Food Technol. 4:366–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irshad A, Kandeepan G, Kumar S, Kumar AA, Vishnuraj MR, Shukla V. 2013. Factors influencing carcass composition of livestock: a review. J Anim Prod Adv. 3:177–186.
   Google Scholar
• Judge MD, Martin TG, Bramblett VD, Barton JA. 1965. Comparison of dairy and dual-purpose carcasses with beef-type carcasses from animals of similar and younger ages. J Dairy Sci. 48:509–512. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(65)88266-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keane MG. 2011. Ranking of sire breeds and beef cross breeding of dairy and beef cows. Occasional Series 9, Grange Beef Research Centre, March, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Kempster AJ, Cook GL, Southgate JR. 1988. Evaluation of British Friesian, Canadian Holstein and beef breed × British Friesian steers slaughtered over a commercial range of fatness from 16-month and 24-month beef production systems. Anim Prod. 46:365–378. doi: 10.1017/S0003356100018973
   Google Scholar
• Kempster AJ, Cuthbertson A, Harrington G. 1982. Carcase evaluation in livestock breeding, production and marketing. London: Granada Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kirton AH, Morris CA. 1989. The effect of mature size, sex and breed on patterns of growth and development. In: Purchas RW, Butler-Hogg BW, Davies AS, editors. Meat production and processing. Occasional Publication No. 11. Hamilton: New Zealand Society of Animal Production; p. 73–85.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall DM. 1994. Breed differences and genetic parameters for body composition traits in beef cattle. J Anim Sci. 72:2745–2755.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [MPI] Ministry for Primary Industries. 2015. Agriculture statistics [Internet]. Wellington: Ministry for Primary Industries. Available from: http://www.mpi.govt.nz/news-and-resources/open-data-and-forecasting/agriculture
   Google Scholar
• Muir PD, Deaker JM, Bown MD. 1998. Effects of forage and grain based feeding systems on beef quality: a review. New Zeal J Agr Res. 41:623–635. doi: 10.1080/00288233.1998.9513346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muir PD, Wallace GJ, Dobbie PM, Bown MD. 2000. A comparison of animal performance and carcass and meat quality characteristics in Hereford, Hereford × Friesian, and Friesian steers grazed together at pasture. New Zeal J Agr Res. 43:193–205. doi: 10.1080/00288233.2000.9513421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol AM, Brookes IM. 2007. The metabolisable energy requirements of grazing livestock. In: Rattray PV, Brooks IM, Nicol AM, editors. Pasture and supplements for grazing animals. Occasional Publication 14. Hamilton: New Zealand Society of Animal Production; Chapter 10.
   Google Scholar
• Nour AYM, Thonney ML, Stouffer JR, White Jr, WRC. 1981. Muscle, fat and bone in serially slaughtered large dairy or small beef cattle fed corn or corn silage diets in one of two locations. J Anim Sci. 52:512–521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nour AYM, Thonney ML, Stouffer JR, White Jr, WRC. 1983a. Changes in carcass weight and characteristics with increasing weight of large and small cattle. J Anim Sci. 57:1154–1165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nour AYM, Thonney ML, Stouffer JR, White Jr, WRC. 1983b. Changes in primal cut yield with increasing weight of large and small cattle. J Anim Sci. 57:1166–1172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NRC. 2000. Nutrient requirements of beef cattle. 7th revised ed: update 2000. Melbourne, VIC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• NRC. 2001. Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle. 7th revised ed: update 2001. Melbourne, VIC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Patterson DL, Price MA, Berg RT. 1985. Patterns of muscle, bone and fat accretion in the three biological types of feedlot bulls fed three dietary energy levels. Can J Anim Sci. 65:351–361. doi: 10.4141/cjas85-041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfuhl R, Bellmann O, Kuhn C, Teuscher F, Ender K, Wegner J. 2007. Beef versus dairy cattle: a comparison of feed conversion, carcass composition, and meat quality. Archiv fur Tierzucht. 50:59–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preston TR, Willis MB. 1974. Intensive beef production. 2nd ed. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Purchas R. 2003. Factors affecting carcass composition and beef quality. In: Smeaton DC, editor. Profitable beef production: a guide to beef production in New Zealand. Wellington: New Zealand Beef Council; p. 124–152.
   Google Scholar
• Purchas RW, Barton RA. 1976. The tenderness of meat of several breeds of cattle raised under New Zealand pastoral conditions. New Zeal J Agr Res. 19:421–428. doi: 10.1080/00288233.1976.10420970
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rust SR, Abney CS. 2005. Comparison of dairy versus beef steers. In: Tigner R, Lehmkuhler J, editors. Managing and marketing quality Holstein steers. Madison, WI: Agricultural Service Association; p. 161–174.
   Google Scholar
• Schaefer DM. 2005. Yield and quality of Holstein beef. Managing and marketing quality Holstein steers proceedings. Rochester, MN: University of Minnesota Dairy Extension.
   Google Scholar
• Schaefer DM, Buege DR, Cook DK, Arp SC, Renk BZ. 1986. Concentrate to forage ratios for Holstein steers and effects of carcass quality grade on taste panel evaluation. J Anim Sci. 63(Suppl 1):432.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreurs NM, Hickson RE, Coleman LW, Kenyon PR, Martin NP, Morris ST. 2014. Brief communication: quality of meat from steers born to beef-cross-dairy cows and sired by Hereford bulls. Proc New Zeal Soc Anim Prod. 74:229–232.
   Google Scholar
• Segert A, Lengerken G, Fahr R. 1996. Deposition und mobilisation von Körperfett bei Milchrindern während der Aufzucht und der 1. Laktation. Archiv fur Tierzucht Dummerstorf. 39:557–569.
   Google Scholar
• Shorthose RW, Harris PV. 1991. Effects of growth and composition on meat quality. In: Pearson AM, Dutson TR, editors. Growth regulation in farm animals. Advances in Meat Research 7. London: Elsevier; p. 515–554.
   Google Scholar
• Stiffler DM, Griffin CL, Murphey CE, Smith G, Savell JW. 1985. Characterisation of cutability and palatability attributes among different slaughter groups of cattle. Meat Sci. 13:167–183. doi: 10.1016/0309-1740(85)90056-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor DG. 1982. A comparative study of Hereford and Friesian steers. 2. Carcass characteristics and meat quality. Aust J Agr Res. 33:157–163. doi: 10.1071/AR9820157
   Google Scholar
• Taylor St CS, Murray JI. 1991. Effect of feeding level, breed and milking potential on body tissues and organs of mature, non-lactating cows. Anim Prod. 53:27–38. doi: 10.1017/S0003356100005948
   Google Scholar
• Thonney ML, Nour AYM, Stouffer JR, White Jr WRC. 1984. Changes in primal cuts with increasing carcass weight in large and small cattle. Can J Anim Sci. 64:29–38. doi: 10.4141/cjas84-004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thonney ML, Perry TC, Armbruster G, Beermann DH, Fox DG. 1991. Comparison of steaks from Holstein and Simmental×Angus steers. J Anim Sci. 69:4866–4870.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truscott TG, Lang CP, Tulloh NM. 1976. A comparison of body composition and tissue distribution of Friesian and Angus steers. J Agr Sci. 87:1–14. doi: 10.1017/S0021859600026514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wall AJ, Stevens DR, Thompson BR, Goulter CL. 2012. Winter management practices to optimise early spring pasture production: a review. Proc New Zeal Grassland Assoc. 74:85–90.
   Google Scholar
• Wheeler, TL, Cundiff, LV, Shackelford, SD, Koohmaraie, M. 2004. Characterization of biological types of cattle (Cycle VI): carcass, yield, and longissimus palatability traits. J Anim Sci. 82:1177–1189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziegler, JH, Wilson, LL, Cobble, DS. 1971. Comparisons of certain carcass traits of several breeds and crosses of cattle. J Anim Sci. 32:446–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar