Assessing dairy farming eco-efficiency in New Zealand: a two-stage data envelopment analysis

References

• Aldonando-Ochoa AM, Casasnovas-Oliva VL, Almansa-Sáez MC. 2017. Cross-constrained measuring the cost-environment efficiency in material balance based frontier models. Ecological Economics. 142:46–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali A, Seiford L. 1993. The mathematical programming approach to efficiency analysis. In: Fried H., Lovell C.A.K., Schmidt S, editor. The measurement of productive efficiency: techniques and applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press; p. 120–159.
   Google Scholar
• Askin D, Askin V. 2012. Financial budget manual 2012. Lincoln (New Zealand): Lincoln University.
   Google Scholar
• Ballingall J, Pambudi D. 2017. Dairy trade’s economic contribution to New Zealand. New Zealand Institute of Economic Research report to Dairy Companies Association of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand, 34 p.
   Google Scholar
• Bommarco R, Vico G, Hallin S. 2018. Exploiting ecosystem services in agriculture for increased food security. Global Food Security. 17:57–63.
   Google Scholar
• Brown MA, Clarkson BD, Barton J, Joshi C. 2013. Ecological compensation: an evaluation of regulatory compliance in New Zealand. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal. 31(1):34–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E. 1978. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research. 2(6):429–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelli T, Lauwers L, Vam Huylenbroeck G. 2007. Environmental efficiency measurement and the materials balance condition. Journal of Productivity Analysis. 28:3–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelli TJ, Rao DSP, O’Donnell CJ, Battese GE. 2005. An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis. New York (NY): Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Daigneault A, Greenhalgh S, Samarasinghe O. 2017. Economic impacts of multiple agro-environmental policies on New Zealand land use. Environmental and Resource Economics. 69(4):763–785.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Koeijer TJ, Wossink GAA, Struik PC, Renkema JA. 2002. Measuring agricultural sustainability in terms of efficiency: the case of Dutch sugar beet growers. Journal of Environmental Management. 66:9–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Djanibekov U, Soliman T, Flood S, Greenhalgh S, Stroombergen A. 2018. Assessing the nationwide economic impacts of farm-level biological GHG emission mitigation options. MWLR Contract Report LC3181 for the The Biological Emissions Reference Group (Project No. 18399).
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez MA, Daigneault A. 2017. Erosion mitigation in the Waikato District, New Zealand: economic implications for agriculture. Agricultural Economics. 48(3):341–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming D, Kerr S, Lou E. 2019. Cows, cash and climate: low stocking rates, high-performing cows, emissions and profitability across New Zealand farms. Motu Working Paper 19-11. Motu Economic and Public Policy Research.
   Google Scholar
• Foley JA, Defries R, Asner GP, Barford C, Bonan G, Carpenter SR, Chapin FS, Coe MT, Daily GC, Gibbs HK, et al. 2005. Global consequences of land use. Science. 309(5734):570–574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grayling W. 2008. Benchmarking best practice for irrigation productivity in Canterbury Dairy Farming [doctoral dissertation]. Lincoln (New Zealand): Lincoln University.
   Google Scholar
• Henry L, Lou E, Fleming D. 2017. New Zealand Monitor Farm Data. Technical Paper, Motu Economic and Public Policy Research, 9 p.
   Google Scholar
• Ho TQ, Hoang V-N, Wilson C, Nguyen T-T. 2018. Eco-efficiency analysis of sustainability-certified coffee production in Vietnam. Journal of Cleaner Production. 183:251–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoang V-N, Nguyen TT. 2013. Analysis of environmental efficiency variations: a nutrient balance approach. Ecological Economics. 86:37–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaforullah M, Whiteman J. 1999. Scale efficiency in the New Zealand dairy industry: a non-parametric approach. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics. 43:523–541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang N, Sharp B. 2014. Cost efficiency of dairy farming in New Zealand: a stochastic frontier analysis. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review. 43(3):406–418.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang N, Sharp B. 2015. Technical efficiency and technological gap of New Zealand dairy farming: a stochastic meta-frontier model. Journal of Productivity Analysis. 44(1):39–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kao C, Lin PH. 2011. Qualitative factors in data envelopment analysis: a fuzzy number approach. European Journal of Operational Research. 211(3):586–593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kehoe L, Romero-Muñoz A, Polaia E, Estes L, Kreft H, Kuemmerle T. 2017. Biodiversity at risk under future cropland expansion and intensification. Natural Ecology and Evolution. 1(8):1129–1135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komarek AM, De Pinto A, Smith VH. 2020. A review of types of risks in agriculture: what we know and what we need to know. Agricultural Systems. 178:102738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koohafkan P, Altieri MA, Gimenez EH. 2012. Green agriculture: foundations for biodiverse, resilient and productive agricultural systems. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability. 10(1):61–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuosmanen T, Kortelainen M. 2005. Measuring eco-efficiency of production with data envelopment analysis. Journal of Industrial Ecology. 9(4):59–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauwers L. 2009. Justifying the incorporation of the materials balance principle into frontier-based eco-efficiency models. Ecological Economics. 68:1605–1614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynn IH, Manderson AK, Page MJ, Harmsworth GR, Eyles GO, Douglas GB, Mackay AD, Newsome PJF. 2009. Land use capability survey handbook – a New Zealand handbook for the classification of land.. Hamilton (New Zealand): AgResearch.
   Google Scholar
• Ma W, Bicknell K, Renwick A. 2019. Feed use intensification and technical efficiency of dairy farms in New Zealand. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics. 63(1):20–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma W, Renwick A, Bicknell K. 2018. Higher intensity, higher profit? Empirical evidence from dairy farming in New Zealand. Journal of Agricultural Economics. 69:739–755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDowell RW, Wilcock B, Hamilton DP. 2013. Assessment of strategies to mitigate the impact or loss of contaminants from agricultural land to fresh waters. Unpublished report, Ministry for the Environment, Wellington, New Zealand, RE500/2013/066.
   Google Scholar
• MFE (Ministry for the Environment). 2017. Climate Change Response Act 2002. Wellington (New Zealand): Ministry for the Environment. http://www.mfe.govt.nz/more/acts-and-regulations/climate-change-response-act-2002.
   Google Scholar
• Monaghan RM, Wilcock RJ, Smith LC, Tikkisetty B, Thorrold BS, Costall D. 2007. Linkages between land management activities and water quality in an intensively farmed catchment in southern New Zealand. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 118(1):211–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MPI (Ministry for Primary Industries). 2013. Farm monitoring report. Wellington (New Zealand): MPI Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Neverman A, Djanibekov U, Soliman T, Walsh P, Spiekermann R, Basher L. 2019. Impact testing of a proposed suspended sediment attribute: identifying erosion and sediment control mitigations to meet proposed sediment attribute bottom lines and the costs and benefits of those mitigations. Landcare Research Contract Report LC3574 prepared for the Ministry for the Environment.
   Google Scholar
• NIWA (National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research). 2012. New Zealand national climate summary 2011: a year of extremes. National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Wellington, New Zealand, NIWA media release, 39 p. https://www.niwa.co.nz/sites/niwa.co.nz/files/ann2011_summary_final.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Nkonya E, Mirzabaev A, von Braun J. 2016, editors. Economics of land degradation and improvement – a global assessment for sustainable development. Dordrecht: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development). 1998. Eco-efficiency, Paris, France. https://read.oecd-ilibrary.org/environment/eco-efficiency_9789264040304-en#page1.
   Google Scholar
• Pereira J, Misselbrook TH, Chadwick DR, Coutinho J, Trindade H. 2012. Effects of temperature and dairy cattle excreta characteristics on potential ammonia and greenhouse gas emissions from housing: a laboratory study. Biosystems Engineering. 112(2):138–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picazo-Tadeo AJ, Gómez-Limón JA, Reig-Martínez E. 2011. Assessing farming eco-efficiency: a data envelopment analysis approach. Journal of Environmental Management. 92(4):1154–1164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team (2013). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna (Austria): R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Reinhard S, Lovell C, Thijssen G. 1999. Econometric estimation of technical and environmental efficiency: an application to Dutch dairy farms. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 81:44–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouse P, Chen L, Harrison JA. 2009. Benchmarking the performance of dairy farms using data envelopment analysis. Performance Measurement Association Conference, Dunedin, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Simar L, Wilson PW. 2007. Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes. Journal of Econometrics. 136(1):31–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soliman T, Lim FKS, Lee JSH, Carrasco LR. 2016. Closing oil palm yield gaps among Indonesian smallholders through industry schemes, pruning, weeding and improved seeds. Royal Society Open Science. 3(8):160–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistics New Zealand (StatNZ) 2016. Agricultural and horticultural land use, 2002-16. www.stats.govt.nz
   Google Scholar
• Urdiales MP, Lansink AO, Wall A. 2016. Eco-efficiency among dairy farmers: the importance of socio-economic characteristics and farmer attitudes. Environmental and Resource Economics. 64(4):559–574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verthoeven JTA, Arheimer B, Yin C, Hefting MM. 2006. Regional and global concerns over wetlands and water quality. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 21(2):96–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West JW. 2003. Effects of heat-stress on production in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science. 86(6):2131–2144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheeler DM. 2018. Climate. OVERSEER® Technical manual. ISSN: 2253-461X. 49 p. https://assets.ctfassets.net/bo1h2c9cbxaf/7p7b1bvLHUfjOD9PjhOFhM/10c1cb7a7493b54db2a9683b29fdad72/TMC_Climate_v6.3_June_2018.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang Y. 2002. The impacts of economic reform on the efficiency of silviculture: a non-parametric approach. Environment and Development Economics. 7(1):107–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou P, Ang BW, Poh KL. 2008. A survey of data envelopment analysis in energy and environmental studies. European Journal of Operational Research. 189:1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou H, Yang Y, Chen Y, Zhu J. 2018. Data envelopment analysis application in sustainability: the origins, development and future directions. European Journal of Operational Research. 264(1):1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar