Effect of rice bran and microorganism as additives in pearl millet silage

References

• Arriola KG, Kim SC, Adesogan AT. 2011. Effect of applying inoculants with heterolactic or homolactic and heterolactic bacteria on the fermentation and quality of corn silage. Journal of Dairy Science. 94(3):1511–1516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernardes TF, Rêgo AC. 2014. Study on the practices of silage production and utilization on Brazilian dairy farms. Journal of Dairy Science. 97(3):1852–1861.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beukes PC, McCarthy S, Wims CM, Gregorini P, Romera AJ. 2018. Regular estimates of herbage mass can improve profitability of pasture-based dairy systems. Animal Production Science. 59(2):359–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borreani G, Tabacco E, Schmidt RJ, Holmes BJ, Muck RE. 2018. Silage review: factors affecting dry matter and quality losses in silages. Journal of Dairy Science. 101(5):3952–3979.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casali AO, Detmann E, Valadares Filho SC, Pereira JC, Henriques LT, Freitas SG, Paulino MF. 2008. Influence of incubation time and particles size on indigestible compounds contents in cattle feeds and feces obtained by in situ procedures. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia. 37(2):335–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherney JH, Cherney DJR. 2003. Assessing silage quality. In: Buxton DR, editor. Silage Science and Technology. Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America; p. 141–198.
   Google Scholar
• Comassetto DS, Rodrigues CR, Dornelles RR, Faleiro EA, Pinto AG, Castagnara DD, Oaigen RP, Del Valle TA, Azevedo EB. 2020. Effects of cutting height managements on yield and composition of different annual pastures. Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animal. 21:e2121282020.
   Google Scholar
• De Carvalho GGP, de Freitas PMD, Santos EM, Araújo GGL, de Oliveira JS, Rodrigues TCGC, de Araujo MLGML, de Assis DYC, Roça RO, Delbem NLC, et al. 2018. Effects of pearl millet silage ammoniation with urea on carcass and meat quality of lambs. Journal Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition. 102(5):1154–1166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del Valle TA, Zenatti TF, Antonio G, Campana M, Gandra JR, Zilio EMC, Mattos LFA, Morais JPG. 2018. Effect of chitosan on the preservation quality of sugarcane silage. Grass and Forage Science. 73(3):630–638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EMBRAPA. Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária. 2013. Brazilian system of soils classification. Rio de Janeiro, RJ: EMBRAPA. Portuguese.
   Google Scholar
• Filya I. 2003. The effect of Lactobacillus buchneri, with or without homofermentative lactic acid bacteria, on the fermentation, aerobic stability and ruminal degradability of wheat, sorghum and maize silages. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 95(5):1080–1086.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo Y, Han H, Luo R, Zhao F. 2018. Determining the ensiling characteristics of potato vine silage supplemented with rice bran and corn and evaluating their ruminal fermentation potential in vitro. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research. 63(2):179–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassanat F, Mustafa AF, Seguin P. 2007. Effects of inoculation on ensiling characteristics, chemical composition and aerobic stability of regular and brown midrib millet silages. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 139(1-2):125–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holden LA. 1999. Comparison of methods of in vitro matter digestibility for ten feeds. Journal of Dairy Science. 82(8):1791–1794.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jobim CC, Nussio LG, Reis RA, Schmidt P. 2007. Methodological advances in evaluation of preserved forage quality. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia. 36(Suppl):101–119.
   Google Scholar
• Kleinschmit DH, Kung Jr. L. 2006. A meta-analysis of the effects of Lactobacillus buchneri on the fermentation and aerobic stability of corn and grass and small-grain silages. Journal of Dairy Science. 89(10):4005–4013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kung Jr. L, Shaver RD, Grant RJ, Schmidt RJ. 2018. Silage review: interpretation of chemical, microbial, and organoleptic components of silages. Journal of Dairy Science. 101(5):4020–4033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowilai P, Kabata K, Okamoto C, Kikuchi M. 1993. Effects of cassava roots on water hyacinth silage. Journal of Japanese Society of Grassland Science. 39(2):263–266.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald P, Henderson AR, Heron SJE. 1991. The biochemistry of silage, 2nd ed. Marlow: Chalcomb.
   Google Scholar
• McDougall EI. 1948. Studies on ruminant saliva, I. The composition and output of sheep’s saliva. Biochemical Journal. 43(1):99–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milke LM, Campana M, Antonio G, Morais JPG, Zilio EMC, Santos JAA, Del Valle TA. 2018. Nutritional evaluation of millet at different seeding rates and cutting heights. Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science. 55(1):1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Monteiro IJG, Abreu JG, Cabral LS, Almeida RG, Reis RHP, Behling Neto A, Cabral CEA, Barros LV, Avelino ACD, Penso S. 2016. Ensiling of elephant grass with soybean hulls or rice bran. Semina: Ciências Agrárias. 37(6):4203–4211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno JÁ. 1961. Rio Grande do Sul weather. Boletim Geográfico do Rio Grande do Sul. 11:49–83. Portuguese.
   Google Scholar
• Muck RE. 2010. Silage microbiology and its control through additives. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia. 39(Suppl):183–191.
   Google Scholar
• NASEM - National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle: eighth revised edition. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25806.
   Google Scholar
• Pahlow G, Muck RE, Driehuis F, Oude-Elferink SJWH, Spoelstra SF. 2003. Microbiology of ensiling. In: Buxton D. R., Muck R. E., Harrison J. H, editors. Silage science and technology. Madison, WI, USA: American Society of Agronomy; p. 31–93.
   Google Scholar
• Pryce JDA. 1969. A modification of the barker-summerson method for the determination of latic acid. The Analyst. 94(1125):1151–1152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranjit NK, Kung Jr. L. 2000. The effect of lactobacillus buchneri, lactobacillus plantarum, or a chemical preservative on the fermentation and aerobic stability of corn silage. Journal of Dairy Science. 83(3):526–535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rêgo AC, Siqueira GR, Almeida GBS, Signoretti RD, Resende FD. 2016. Effect of particle size and bacterial inoculant on the temperature, density and pH of pearl millet silages. Revista Caatinga. 29(4):984–995.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Ortega T, Oteros-Rozas E, Ripoll-Bosch R, Tichit M, Martín-López B, Bernués A. 2014. Applying the ecosystem services framework to pasture-based livestock farming systems in Europe. Animal. 8(8):1361–1372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santamaría-Fernández M, Karkov-Ytting N, Lübeck M. 2019. Influence of the development stage of perennial forage crops for the recovery yields of extractable proteins using lactic acid fermentation. Journal of Cleaner Production. 218(1):1055–1064.
   Google Scholar
• Santos AO, Ávila CLS, Pinto JC, Carvalho BF, Dias DR, Schwan RF. 2015. Fermentative profile and bacterial diversity of corn silages inoculated with new tropical lactic acid bacteria. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 120(2):266–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sofyan A, Yusiati LM, Widyastuti Y, Utomo R. 2011. Microbiological characteristic and fermentability of king grass (Pennisetum hybrid) silage treated by lactic acid bacteria yeast inoculants consortium combined with rice bran addition. Journal of the Indonesian Tropical Animal Agriculture. 36(4):265–272.
   Google Scholar
• Udén P, Robinson PH, Mateos GG, Blank G. 2012. Use of replicates in statistical analyses in papers submitted for publication in Animal Feed Science and Technology. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 171(1):1–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Undersander D, Mertens DR, Theix N. 1992. Forage analysis. Page 139 in: National Forage Testing Association, USA. National Forage Testing Association, Omaha.
   Google Scholar
• Van Milgen J, Murphy MR, Berger LL. 1991. A compartmental model to analyze ruminal digestion. Journal of Dairy Science. 74(8):2515–2529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yokota H, Fujii Y, Ohshima M. 1998. Nutritional quality of Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum Schum.) silage supplemented with molasses and rice bran by goats. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences. 11(6):697–701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar