Effects of homofermentative lactic acid bacteria and powdered molasses on fermentative losses, chemical composition and aerobic stability in whole-plant soybean silage

References

• Alli I, Fairbairn R, Noroozi E, Baker BE. 1984. The effects of molasses on the fermentation of chopped whole-plant leucaena. J Sci Food Agric. 35(3):285–289. [accessed 2022 Jul 25]. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/jsfa.2740350307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvares CA, Stape JL, Sentelhas PC, de Moraes Gonçalves JL, Sparovek G. 2013. Köppen’s climate classification map for Brazil. Meteorol Zeitschrift. 22(6):711–728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AOAC International. 2000. Official methods of analysis. 7th ed. Arlington, VA: Association of Official Analytical Chemists.
   Google Scholar
• Bai J, Ding Z, Ke W, Xu D, Wang M, Huang W, Zhang Y, Liu F, Guo X. 2021. Different lactic acid bacteria and their combinations regulated the fermentation process of ensiled alfalfa: ensiling characteristics, dynamics of bacterial community and their functional shifts. Microb Biotechnol. 14(3):1171. [accessed 2022 Jul 24]. /pmc/articles/PMC8085944/.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernardes TF, Do Rêgo AC. 2014. Study on the practices of silage production and utilization on Brazilian dairy farms. J Dairy Sci. 97(3):1852–1861.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broderick GA, Kang JH. 1980. Automated simultaneous determination of ammonia and total amino acids in Ruminal Fluid and In Vitro Media. J Dairy Sci. 63(1):64–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buxton DR, Redfearn DD. 1997. Plant limitations to fiber digestion and utilization. J Nutr. 127(5):814S–818S. [accessed 2022 Jul 25]. https://academic.oup.com/jn/article/127/5/814S/4724072.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Casali AO, Detmann E, Valadares Filho SDC, Pereira JC, Henriques LT, De Freitas SG, Paulino MF. 2008. Influência do tempo de incubação e do tamanho de partículas sobre os teores de compostos indigestíveis em alimentos e fezes bovinas obtidos por procedimentos in situ. Rev Bras Zootec. 37(2):335–342.
   Google Scholar
• Devine TE, Hatley EO. 1998. Registration of ‘Donegal’ Forage Soybean. Crop Sci. 38(6):1719–1720. [accessed 2022 Feb 16]. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.2135/cropsci1998.0011183X003800060063x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fehr WR, Caviness CE. 1977. Stage of soybean development. Special report 80. Ames, Iowa.
   Google Scholar
• Gandra JR, Del Valle TA, Pause AGdaS, Pedrini CA, Oliveira ERde, Goes RHdeTeBde, Oliveira KMPde, Batista JDdeO, Antonio G, Noia IZ, Acosta A. 2022. Whole-plant soybean ensiling with chitosan and homolactic microbial inoculant: fermentative profile, aerobic stability, and sheep intake and digestibility. Rev Bras Saúde e Produção Anim. 23:e2220502022. [accessed 2022 Feb 15]. http://www.scielo.br/j/rbspa/a/nqR7jQW7k6Hgsr39BsKnrqr/.
   Google Scholar
• Gandra JR, Takiya CS, Del Valle TA, Oliveira ER, de Goes RHTB, Gandra ERS, Batista JDO, Araki HMC. 2018. Soybean whole-plant ensiled with chitosan and lactic acid bacteria: microorganism counts, fermentative profile, and total losses. J Dairy Sci. 101(9):7871–7880. [accessed 2020 Aug 12]. DOI:10.3168/jds.2017-14268
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gobetti STC, Neumann M, Oliveira MR, Oliboni R. 2011. Produção e utilização da silagem de planta inteira de soja (glicine max) para ruminantes. Ambiência. 7:603–616.
   Google Scholar
• Jobim CC, Nussio LG, Reis RA, Schmidt P. 2007. Avanços metodológicos na avaliação da qualidade da forragem conservada. Rev Bras Zootec. 36(suppl):101–119. [accessed 2021 Aug 25]. http://www.scielo.br/j/rbz/a/cGcwzhYPxNb5mwmw9SJgZgm/?lang=pt.
   Google Scholar
• Kaneda T. 1991. Iso- and anteiso-fatty acids in bacteria: biosynthesis, function, and taxonomic significance. Microbiol Rev. 55(2):288–302. [accessed 2022 Feb 7]. https://journals.asm.org/doi/abs/10.1128/mr.55.2.288-302.1991.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kenward MG, Roger JH. 1997. Small sample inference for fixed effects from restricted maximum likelihood. Biometrics. 53(3):983.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kung L Jr. 2010. Aerobic stability of silage. Proceedings, Calif Alfalfa Forage Symp Corn/Cereal Silage Conf. Visalia, CA; p. 14.
   Google Scholar
• Kung L Jr. 2018. Silage fermentation and additives. Arch Latinoam Prod Anim. 26(3–4):1–19. [accessed 2021 Jul 14]. https://ojs.alpa.uy/index.php/ojs_files/article/view/2677.
   Google Scholar
• Kung L Jr, Shaver RD, Grant RJ, Schmidt RJ. 2018. Silage review: interpretation of chemical, microbial, and organoleptic components of silages. J Dairy Sci. 101:4020–4033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leibensperger RY, Pitt RE. 1987. A model of clostridial dominance in ensilage. Grass Forage Sci. 42(3):297–317. [accessed 2022 Jul 25]. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1365-2494.1987.tb02118.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lima R, Lourenço M, Díaz RF, Castro A, Fievez V. 2010. Effect of combined ensiling of sorghum and soybean with or without molasses and lactobacilli on silage quality and in vitro rumen fermentation. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 155(2–4):122–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAllister TA, Hristov AN. 2000. The fundamentals of making good quality silages. Adv Dairy Technol. 12:381–399.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald P, Henderson AR, Heron SJE. 1991. The biochemistry of silage, 2nd ed. Kent: Chalcombe Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Muck RE, Nadeau EMG, McAllister TA, Contreras-Govea FE, Santos MC, Kung L. 2018. Silage review: recent advances and future uses of silage additives. J Dairy Sci. 101(5):3980–4000.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ni K, Wang F, Zhu B, Yang J, Zhou G, Pan Y, Tao Y, Zhong J. 2017. Effects of lactic acid bacteria and molasses additives on the microbial community and fermentation quality of soybean silage. Bioresour Technol. 238:706–715.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nkosi BD, Meeske R, Langa T, Motiang MD, Modiba S, Mkhize NR, Groenewald IB. 2016. Effects of ensiling forage soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) with or without bacterial inoculants on the fermentation characteristics, aerobic stability and nutrient digestion of the silage by Damara rams. Small Rumin Res. 134:90–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira AS, Weinberg ZG, Ogunade IM, Cervantes AAP, Arriola KG, Jiang Y, Kim D, Li X, Gonçalves MCM, Vyas D, Adesogan AT. 2017. Meta-analysis of effects of inoculation with homofermentative and facultative heterofermentative lactic acid bacteria on silage fermentation, aerobic stability, and the performance of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 100(6):4587–4603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Playne MJ, McDonald P. 1966. The buffering constituents of herbage and of silage. J Sci Food Agric. 17(6):264–268. [accessed 2021 Sep 8]. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/jsfa.2740170609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pryce JD. 1969. A modification of the Barker-Summerson method for the determination of lactic acid. Analyst. 94(1125):1151–1152. [accessed 2021 Jul 13]. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/1969/an/an9699401151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosa LO, Pereira OG, Ribeiro KG, Valadares Filho SC, Cecon PR. 2018. Fermentation profile and microbial population in soybean silages with inoculant and powdered molasses. Arq Bras Med Vet e Zootec. 70(5):1586–1594.
   Google Scholar
• Scherer R, Gerlach K, Südekum KH. 2015. Biogenic amines and gamma-amino butyric acid in silages: formation, occurrence and influence on dry matter intake and ruminant production. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 210:1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheaffer CC, Orf James H, Devine TE, Jewett JG, Sheaffer CC, Orf JH, Jewett JG. 2001. Yield and quality of forage soybean. Agron J. 93(1):99–106. [accessed 2022 Feb 16]. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.2134/agronj2001.93199x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stagnari F, Maggio A, Galieni A, Pisante M. 2017. Multiple benefits of legumes for agriculture sustainability: an overview. Chem Biol Technol Agric. 4(1):1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobía C, Villlalobos E, Rojas A, Soto H, Moore KJ. 2008. Effect of additions on ensiling and microbial community of senesced wheat straw. Livest Res Rural Dev. 20:1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Undersander D, Mertens DR, Thiex N. 1993. Forage analyses procedures. Omaha, USA: National Forage Testing Association.
   Google Scholar
• Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci. 74(10):3583–3597.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vargas-Bello-Pérez E, Mustafa AF, Seguin P. 2008. Effects of feeding forage soybean silage on milk production, nutrient digestion, and ruminal fermentation of lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 91(1):229–235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinberg ZG, Ashbell G, Hen Y, Azrieli A. 1993. The effect of applying lactic acid bacteria on the aerobic stability of silages. J Appl Bacteriol. 75:512–518.
   Google Scholar
• Yang L, Yuan X, Li J, Dong Z, Shao T. 2019. Dynamics of microbial community and fermentation quality during ensiling of sterile and nonsterile alfalfa with or without Lactobacillus plantarum inoculant. Bioresour Technol. 275:280–287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar