185
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research articles

Estimation of dry matter intake by lambs managed on different leaves allowance of Brachiaria-grass using internal and external markers

, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, , , , , , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & show all
Pages 498-512 | Received 29 Oct 2022, Accepted 12 Jan 2023, Published online: 22 Jan 2023

References

  • Ali O, Junges L, Gomes ENO, Batistoti JO, Candido AR, de Kássia Gomes F, de Oliveira Lima R, da Silva AP, da cruz Siqueira J, Ítavo LCV, Coelho EM. 2022. Ruminal kinetics and nutritive value of Zuri grass silage harvested at different ages and added with powder molasses. Tropical Animal Health and Production. 54(4):231.
  • Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC). 2005. Official methods of analysis. 13th ed. Washington: AOAC.
  • Barbosa NGS, Lana RP, Jhan GN, Borges AC, Mancio AB, Pereira JC, Oliveira JS. 2001. Feed intake and ruminal fermentation of proteins as a function of energetic and proteic food supplementation of steers. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia. 30(5):1558–1565.
  • Baumont R, Cohen-Salmão D, Prache S, Sauvant D. 2004. A mechanistic model of intake and grazing behaviour in sheep integrating sward architecture and animal decisions. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 112(1–4):5–28.
  • Bergman EN. 1990. Energy contributions of volatile fatty acids from the gastrointestinal tract in various species. Physiological Reviews. 70(2):567–590.
  • Canesin RC, Fiorentini G, Berchielli TT. 2012. Inovações e desafios na avaliação de alimentos na nutrição de ruminantes. Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animal. 13(4):938–953.
  • Caramelar LS, Ribeiro CB, Morais MG, Carvalho TA, Costa TG, Oliveira LOF. 2021. Caulim: Características físicas e químicas de um marcador de consumo ideal. Archivos de Zootecnia. 70(270):200–213.
  • Carvalho PCF, Kozloski GV, Ribeiro Filho HMN, Reffatti MV, Genro TCM, Euclides VPB. 2007. Avanços metodológicos na determinação do consumo de ruminantes em pastejo. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia. 36(special supplement):151–170.
  • Carvalho PCF. 2013. Harry Stobbs memorial lecture: can grazing behavior support innovations in grassland management? Tropical Grasslands - Forrajes Tropicales. 1(2):137–155.
  • Costa MCM, Ítavo LCV, Ítavo CCBF, Dias AM, dos Santos Difante G, Buschinelli de Goes RHDT, de Souza Leal E, Nonato LM, Kozerski ND, de Moraes GJ, Niwa MVG. 2021. Natural intoxication caused by protodioscin in lambs kept in Brachiaria pastures. Tropical Animal Health and Production. 53(3):336.
  • Costa MCM, Ítavo LCV, Ítavo CCBF, Dias AM, Petit HV, Reis FA, Gomes RC, Leal ES, Niwa MVG, Moraes GJ. 2018. Evaluation of internal and external markers to estimate faecal output and feed intake in sheep fed fresh forage. Animal Production Science. 59(4):741–748.
  • Da Silva SC, Nascimento Júnior D. 2007. Avanços na pesquisa com plantas forrageiras tropicais em pastagens: características morfofisiológicas e manejo do pastejo. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia. 36:121–138.
  • Difante GS, Nascimento Junior D, Euclides VBP, Da Silva SC, Barbosa RA, Gonçalves WV. 2009. Sward structure and nutritive value of Tanzania guineagrass subjected to rotational stocking managements. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia. 38(1):9–19.
  • Euclides VPB, Lopes FC, Nascimento Junior D, Da Silva SC, Difante GS, Barbosa RA. 2015. Steer performance on Panicum maximum (cv. Mombaça) pastures under two grazing intensities. Animal Production Science. 56(11):1849–1856.
  • Euclides VPB, Macedo MCM, Oliveira MP. 1992. Evaluation of different sampling methods for estimating forage nutritive value under grazing. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia. 21(4):691–702.
  • Euclides VPB, Montagner DB, Barbosa RA, Valle CB, Nantes NN. 2016. Animal performance and sward characteristics of two cultivars of Brachiaria brizantha (BRS Paiaguás and BRS Piatã). Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia. 45(3):85–92.
  • Euclides VPB, Montagner DB, Macedo MCM, Araújo AR, Difante GS, Barbosa RA. 2019. Grazing intensity affects forage accumulation and persistence of Marandu palisadegrass in the Brazilian savannah. Grass and Forage Science. 75(3):450–462.
  • Faria TFR, Pinese F, Gimenes FMA, Demarchi JJAA, Campos FP, Premazzi LM, Mattos WTE, Gerdes L. 2020. Chemical composition of commercial corn silage produced in Brazil. Archivos de Zootecnia. 69(266):256–265.
  • Ferreira MA, Valadares Filho SV, Marcondes MI, Paixão ML, Paulino MF, Valadares RFD. 2009. Prediction of individual dry matter intake in group-fed lactating dairy cows. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia. 38(8):1568–1573.
  • Ganzera M, Bedir E, Khan IA. 2001. Determination of steroidal saponins in tribulus terrestris by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography and evaporative light scattering detection. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 90(11):1752–1758.
  • Goes RHTB, Mancio AB, Lana RP, Filho V, Cecon SC, Queiroz PR, Costa AC, M R. 2003. Quality evaluation of the Tanner Grass (Brachiaria arrecta) pasture, by three different collection methods. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia. 32(1):64–69.
  • Gonçalves RP, Bremm C, Moojen FG, Marchi D, Zubricki G, Caetano LAM, Barth Neto L, Carvalho PCF. 2018. Grazing down process: the implications of sheep’s ingestive behavior for sward management. Livestock Science. 214(1):202–208.
  • Gorniak T, Meyer U, Hackelsperger F, Dänicke S. 2014. Effects of a Brown-midrib corn hybrid on nutrient digestibility in wethers and on dry matter intake, performance, rumen and blood variables in dairy cows. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition. 98(2):300–309.
  • Goulart SR, Ítavo LCV, Santos GT, Ítavo CCBF, Oliveira LCS, Favaro SP, Dias AM, Torres Junior RAA, Bittar CMM. 2011. Volatile fatty acids in rumen of cows fed different concentrate levels diets. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia. 63(6):1479–1486.
  • Gurgel ALC, Difante GS, Neto E, Santana JV, Fernandes JCS, Santos PF, Dias GT, Ítavo AM, Ítavo LCV, Medeiros CCBF, R H. 2021. Prediction of dry matter intake by meat sheep on tropical pastures. Tropical Animal Health and Production. 53(5):479.
  • Heimbach NDS, Ítavo CCBF, Ítavo LCV, Dias AM, Difante GDS, Borges FDA, Gurgel ALC, Monteiro KDS, Frangiotti CDO, Arco TDS, da Costa MCM. 2020. Productive and reproductive performance of ewes at 60 and 90 days postpartum treated by different weaning system. Tropical Animal Science Journal. 43(3):248–253.
  • Hodgson J. 1975. The influence of grazing pressure and stocking rate on herbage intake and animal performance. University College of Wales, Aberystwyth. Hodgson J, Jackson DK, editors. 1975. Proceedings of the Occasional Symposium, 8; Aberystwyth. Anais … Brit. Grass. Soc. 93–103.
  • Holden LA. 1999. Comparison of methods of in vitro dry matter digestibility for ten feeds. Journal of Dairy Science. 82(8):1791–1794.
  • Ítavo LCV, Santos GT, Jobim CC, Voltolini TV, Ferreira CCB. 2000. Evaluation of orange peel silage with different additives by rumen fermentation parameters and energy contribution from volatile fatty acids. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia. 29(5):1491–1497.
  • Ítavo LCV, Valadares Filho SC, Silva FF, Valadares RFD, Paulino MF, Ítavo CCBF, Moraes EHBK. 2002. Comparison of markers and collection methodology for fecal production and digesta flow estimates in bovine. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia. 31(4):1833–1839.
  • Ítavo LCV, Soares CM, Ítavo CCBF, Dias AM, Petit HV, Leal ES, Souza ADS. 2015. Calorimetry, chemical composition and in vitro digestibility of oilseeds. Food Chemistry. 185:219–225.
  • Johnson AD. 1978. Sample preparation and chemical analysis of vegetation. In: t´Mannetje L., editor. Measurement of grassland vegetation and animal production. Aberystwyth: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux; p. 96–102.
  • Kanani J, Phillipp D, Coffey KP, Kegley EB, West CP, Gadberry S, Jennings J, Young AN, Rhein RT. 2014. Comparison of acid-detergent lignin, alkaline-peroxide lignin, and acid-detergent insoluble ash as internal markers for predicting fecal output and digestibility by cattle offered bermudagrass hays of varying nutrient composition. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology. 5(1):1–8.
  • Karls CW, Combs DK, Liou M, Schaefer DM. 2022. Alfalfa biotypes with putative enhanced cell wall digestibility and effects on performance of growing beef steers. Transl Anim Sci. 6(2):1–10.
  • Kohn RA, Kalscheur KF, Hanigan M. 1998. Evaluation of models for balancing the protein requirements of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 81(12):3402–3414.
  • Leal ES, Ítavo LCV, Valle CB, Ítavo CCBF, Dias AM, Barbosa-Ferreira M, Soares CM, Melo GKA, Melo GKA, Ferreira VBN. 2016. Anti-nutritional potential of protodioscin and kinetics of degradation in Urochloa grasses. Semina: Ciências Agrárias. 37(4):2247–2258.
  • Leal ES, Ítavo LCV, Valle CB, Ítavo CCBF, Dias AM, Difante GS, Barbosa-Ferreira M, Nonato LM, Melo GKA, Gurgel ALC. 2020. Influence of protodioscin content on digestibility and in vitro degradation kinetics in Urochloa brizantha cultivars. Crop and Pasture Science. 71(3):278–284.
  • Lima FG, Haraguchi M, Pfister JA, Guimaraes VY, Diogo DF. 2012. Weather and plant age affect the levels of steroidal saponin and Pithomyces chartarum spores in Brachiaria grass main forage source for ruminants. Int J Poisonous Plant Res. 2:45–53.
  • Lippke H. 2002. Estimation of forage intake by ruminants on pasture. Crop Science. 42(3):869–872.
  • Lista FN, Silva JFC, Vásquez HM, Detmann E, Domingues FN, Ferolla FS. 2007. Evaluation of sampling methods for quality evaluation of tropical forages under rotational stocking. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia. 36(5):1413–1418.
  • McDougall EI. 1948. Studies on ruminant saliva. 1. The composition and output of sheep’s saliva. Biochemical Journal. 43(1):99–109.
  • Melo GKA, Ítavo CCBF, Ítavo LCV, Borges FA, Dias AM, Morais MG, Silva JA, Silva PCG, Ferelli KLS, Reis FA. 2019a. Performance, ingestive behavior and gastrointestinal helminths control of suckling lambs supplemented in creep-fed and not supplemented in tropical pastures. J Agric Stud. 7(4):87–106.
  • Melo GKA, Silva WJ, Pupin RC, Heckler RF, Nonato LM, Ítavo CCBF, Ferreira VBN, Lemos RAA. 2019b. Comparison of two collection methods to determine protodioscin concentrations in Brachiaria spp. and to monitor Brachiaria spp. Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira. 39(9):710–714.
  • Nantes NN, Euclides VPB, Montagner DB, Lempp B, Barbosa RA, Gois PO. 2013. Animal performance and sward characteristics of piatã palisade grass pastures subjected to different grazing intensities. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira. 48(1):114–121.
  • Roberto FFS, Difante GS, Zaros LG, Souza JS, Gurgel ALC, Costa PR, Medeiros HR, Silva CG, Borges FA, Ribeiro NL. 2020. The effect of Brachiaria brizantha cultivars on host-parasite-environment interactions in sheep naturally infected with gastrointestinal nematodes. PLoS One. 15(8):e0238228.
  • Rodrigues PHM, Gomes RC, Siqueira RF, Meyer PM, Rodrigues RR. 2010. Acurácia, precisão e robustez das estimativas da digestibilidade aparente da matéria seca determinada com o uso de indicadores em ovinos. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia. 39(5):1118–1126.
  • Saliba EOS, Faria EP, Rodriguez NM, Moreira GR, Sampaio IBM, Saliba JS, Gonçalves LC, Borges I, Borges ALCC. 2015. Use of infrared spectroscopy to estimate fecal output with marker Lipe®. International journal of food sciences and nutrition. 4(1):1–10.
  • Schofield P, Pitt RE, Pell AN. 1994. Kinetics of fiber digestion from in vitro gas production. Journal of Animal Science. 72(11):2980–2991.
  • Sert NP, Hurst V, Ahluwalia A, Alam S, Avey MT, Baker M, Browne WJ, Clark A, Cuthill IC, Dirnagl U, Emerson M. 2020. The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: updated guidelines for reporting animal research. PLOS Biology. 18(7):e3000410.
  • Silva FF, Sá JF, Schio AR, Ítavo LCV, Silva RR, Mateus RG. 2009. Grazing supplementation: availability and quality x supplementation levels x performance. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia. 38(supl. especial):371–389.
  • Silva MGT, Costa MG, Medeiros MC, Difante GS, Azevedo PS, Gurgel ALC, Emerenciano Neto JV, Veras ELL, Ítavo LCV. 2021. Use of spineless cactus associated with legume hay in the feedlot-finishing of lambs in semi-arid regions. PLoS One. 16(12):e0261554.
  • Silva PCG, Ítavo CCBF, Ítavo LCV, Gomes MNB, Feijó GLD, Ferelli KLSM, Heimbach NS, Silva JA, Melo GKA, Pereira MWF. 2020. Carcass traits and meat quality of Texel lambs raised in Brachiaria pasture and feedlot system. Animal Science Journal. 91(1):e13394.
  • Souza ADV, Ítavo LCV, Favaro SP, Ítavo CCBF, Petit HV, Dias AM, Morais MG, Reis FA, Roscoe R. 2018. Thermal decomposition, chemical composition, in vitro digestibility and gas production and in situ degradability of oilseed residues from the biofuel industry. Animal Science Journal. 89(1):79–87.
  • Souza NKP, Pina DS, Detmann E. 2012. Avaliação do cromo em amostras fecais. In: Detmann E, Souza MA, Valadares Filho SC, Queiroz AC, Berchielli TT, Saliba EOS, Cabral LS, Pina DS, Ladeira MM, Azevêdo JAG, editor. Métodos para análise de alimentos. Visconde do Rio Branco, Minas Gerais, Brasil: Suprema; p. 179–192.
  • Stobbs TH. 1973. The effect of plant structure on the intake of tropical pastures. I. Variation in the bite size of grazing cattle. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research. 24(6):809–819.
  • Tilley JMA, Terry RA. 1963. A two stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. Grass and Forage Science. 18(2):104–111.
  • Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science. 74(10):3583–3597.
  • Van Soest PJ. 1994. Nutritional ecology of the ruminant. Cornell university press. Ithaca, New York: United States of America.
  • Vieira PAS, Pereira LGR, Azevêdo JAG, Neves ALA, Chizzotti ML, Santos RD, Araújo GGL, Mistura C, Chaves AV. 2013. Development of mathematical models to predict dry matter intake in feedlot Santa Ines rams. Small Ruminant Research. 112(1–3):78–84.
  • Zeoula LM, Prado IN, Dian PHM, Geron LJV, Caldas Neto SF, Maeda EM, Peron PDP, Marques JA, Falcão AJS. 2002. Fecal recuperation of internal markers in assay with ruminants. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia. 31(4):1865–1874.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.