Epiphyte diversity on host trees in an urban environment, eThekwini Municipal Area, South Africa

References

• Adhikari YP 2013. Distribution pattern, micro-site conditions, host tree characteristics and utilization of epiphytic orchids in the central Himalayas. PhD thesis. München, Germany, Technical University of Munich.
   Google Scholar
• Adhikari YP, Fischer SH, Fischer A 2012. Host tree utilization by epiphytic orchids in different land-use intensities in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. Plant Ecology 213: 1393–1412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Affeld K 2008. Spatial complexity and microclimatic responses of epiphyte communities and their invertebrate fauna in the canopy of northern rata (Metrosideros robusta A. Cunn.: Myrtaceae) on the West Coast of the South Island, New Zealand. PhD thesis. Christchurch, Lincoln University.
   Google Scholar
• Affeld K, Sullivan J, Worner SP, Didham RK 2008. Can spatial variation in epiphyte diversity and community structure be predicted from sampling vascular epiphytes alone? Journal of Biogeography 35: 2274–2288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akinsoji A 1990. Studies on epiphytic flora of a tropical rain forest in Southwestern Nigeria I: the vascular epiphytes. Vegetatio 88: 87–92.
   Google Scholar
• Alvarenga LDP, Porto KC, De Oliveira J 2010. Habitat loss effects on spatial distribution of non-vascular epiphytes in a Brazilian Atlantic forest. Biodiversity and Conservation 19: 619–635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartels SF, Chen HYH 2012. Mechanisms regulating epiphytic plant diversity. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 31: 391–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batke S 2012. Epiphytes: a study of the history of forest canopy research. The Plymouth Student Scientist 5: 253–268.
   Google Scholar
• Benzing DH 1990. Vascular epiphytes. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 354 p.
   Google Scholar
• Benzing DH 1998. Vulnerabilities of tropical forests to climate change: the significance of resident epiphytes. Climatic Change 39: 519–540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benzing DH 2004. Vascular epiphytes. In: Lowman MD, Rinker HB eds. Forest canopies. 2nd edition. London, Elsevier Academic Press. Pp. 175–211.
   Google Scholar
• Brown DA 1990. El epifitismo en las selvas montanas del Parque Nacional “El Rey” Argentina: Composición florística y padrón de distribución. Revista de Biologia Tropical 38: 155–166.
   Google Scholar
• Bullock CH 2008. Valuing urban green space: hypothetical alternatives and the status quo. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 51: 15–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns KC, Zotz G 2010. A hierarchical framework for investigating epiphyte assemblages: networks, meta-communities, and scale. Ecology 91: 377–385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burrows J, Burrows S 2003. Figs of Southern and South-Central Africa. Hatfield, South Africa, Umdaus Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cannon JFM 1978. Araliaceae. In: Robert LE ed. Flora Zambesiaca. Volume 4. Glasgow, MacLehose and Co. Ltd. Pp. 62–632.
   Google Scholar
• Cardelús CL, Chazdon RL 2005. Inner-crown microenvironments of two emergent tree species in a lowland wet forest. Biotropica 37: 238–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cascante-Marin AJ, Von Mijenfeldt N, Hanneke MH, De Leeuwa JHD, Wolf J, Oostermeijera GB et al. 2009. Dispersal limitation in epiphytic bromeliad communities in a Costa Rican fragmented Montane landscape. Journal of Tropical Ecology 25: 63–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cilliers SS, Siebert J 2012. Urban ecology in Cape Town: South African comparisons and reflections. Ecology and Society 17: 33.
   Google Scholar
• Crouch NR, Klopper RR, Burrows JE, Burrows SM 2011. Ferns of Southern Africa, a comprehensive guide. Cape Town, South Africa, Struik Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Cummings J, Martin M, Rogers A 2006. Quantifying the abundance of four large epiphytic fern species in remnant complex notophyll vine forest on the Atherton Tableland, north Queensland, Australia. Cunninghamia 9: 521–527.
   Google Scholar
• Díaz IA, Sieving KE, Pena-Foxon M, Armesto JJ 2012. A field experiment links forest structure and biodiversity: epiphytes enhance canopy invertebrates in Chilean forests. Ecosphere 3: 1–17. 10.1890/ES11-00168.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis CJ, Coppins BJ 2007. 19th century woodland structure controls stand-scale epiphyte diversity in present-day Scotland. Diversity and Distributions 13: 84–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ethekwini Municipality 2007. Durban biodiverity report. Durban, South Africa, eThekwini Municipality.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez Monteiro JA, Zotz G, Körner C 2009. Tropical epiphytes in a CO2-rich atmosphere. Acta Oecologica 35: 60–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freiberg M 1996. Spatial distribution of vascular epiphytes on three emergent canopy trees in French Guiana. Biotropica 28: 345–355. 10.2307/2389198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fudali E 2007. Bryophyte dynamic tendencies in urban parks—a case study of Wrocław. Annales Silesiae 35: 11–20.
   Google Scholar
• Fudali E 2012. Recent tendencies in distribution of epiphytic bryophytes in urban areas: a Wrocław case study (south-west Poland). Polish Botanical Journal 57: 231–241.
   Google Scholar
• Gentry AH, Dodson CH 1987. Diversity and biogeography of Neotropical vascular epiphytes. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 74: 205–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gradstein SR 2008. Epiphytes of tropical montane forests—impact of deforestation and climate change. Biodiversity Ecological Series 2: 51–65.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison ER 1981. Epiphytic orchids of Southern Africa. Durban, South Africa, Wildlife Society of Southern Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison RD, Hamid AA, Kenta T, Lafrankie J, Lee HS, Nagamasu H et al. 2003. The diversity of hemi-epiphytic figs (Ficus; Moraceae) in a Bornean lowland rain forest. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 78: 439–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilliard OM 1977. Compositae in Natal. Pietermaritzberg, University of Natal Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hirata A, Kamijo T, Saito S 2009. Host trait preferences and distribution of vascular epiphytes in a warm-temperate forest. Plant Ecology 201: 247–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstede RGM, Dickinson KJM, Mark AF 2001. Distribution, abundance and biomass of epiphyte-lianoid communities in a New Zealand lowland Nothofagus-podocarp temperate rain forest: tropical comparisons. Journal of Biogeography 28: 1033–1049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jovan S, McCune B 2006. Using epiphytic macrolichen communities for biomonitoring ammonia in forests of the greater Sierra Nevada, California. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution 170: 69–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keppel G, Watling D 2011. Ticking time bombs—current and potential future impacts of four invasive plant species on the biodiversity of lowland tropical rainforests in south-east Viti Levu, Fiji. The South Pacific Journal of Natural and Applied Sciences 29: 43–45.
   Google Scholar
• Kersten RA, Borgo M, Silva SM 2009. Diversity and distribution of vascular epiphytes in an insular Brazilian coastal forest. Revista de Biologia Tropical 57: 749–759.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreier HP, Schneider H 2006. Phylogeny and biogeography of the staghorn fern genus Platycerium (Polypodiaceae, Polypodiidae). American Journal of Botany 93: 217–225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kress WJ 1989. The systematic distribution of vascular epiphytes. In: Lüttge U ed. Vascular plants as epiphytes, evolution and ecophysiology. Ecological studies. Heidelberg, Springer Verlag. Pp. 234–261.
   Google Scholar
• Larreaa ML, Werner FA 2010. Response of vascular epiphyte diversity to different land-use intensities in a neotropical montane wet forest. Forest Ecology and Management 260: 1950–1955.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laube S, Zotz G 2006. Neither host-specific nor random: vascular epiphytes on three tree species in a Panamanian lowland forest. Annals of Botany 97: 1103–1114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lie MH, Arup U, Grytnes JA, Ohlson M 2009. The importance of host tree age, size and growth rate as determinants of epiphytic lichen diversity in boreal spruce forests. Biodiversity and Conservation 18: 3579–3596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linder HP, Kurzweil H 1999. Orchids of Southern Africa. Rotterdam, AA Balkema Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Lopez-Villalobos A, Flores-Palacios A, Ortiz-Pulido R 2008. The relationship between bark peeling rate and the distribution and mortality of two epiphyte species. Plant Ecology 198: 265–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowman MD, Rinker HB 2004. Forest canopies. 2nd edition. London, Elsevier Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Madison M 1977. Vascular epiphytes: their systematic occurrence and salient features. Selbyana 2: 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Male TD, Roberts GE 2005. Host associations of the strangler fig Ficus watkinsiana in a subtropical Queensland rain forest. Austral Ecology 30: 229–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMurtry D, Grobler L, Grobler J, Burns, S 2008. Field guide to the orchids of Northern South Africa and Swaziland. Hatfield, Umdaus Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nadkarni NM 1984. Biomass and mineral capital of epiphytes in an Acer macrophyllum community of a temperate moist coniferous forest, Olympic Peninsula, Washington State. Canadian Journal of Botany 62: 2223–2228.
   Google Scholar
• Nieder J, Prosperi J, Michaloud G 2001. Epiphytes and their contribution to canopy diversity. Plant Ecology 153: 51–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pemberton RW 2003. The common staghorn fern, Platycerium bifurcatum, naturalizes in Southern Florida. American Fern Journal 93: 203–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter S, Schütze P, Bruelheide H 2009. Modelling epiphytic bryophyte vegetation in a urban landscape. Journal of Bryology 31: 159–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts DC 1993. The vegetation ecology of municipal Durban, Natal. Floristic classification. Bothalia 23: 271–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roux JP 2001. Conspectus of southern African Pteridophyta. South African Botanical Diversity Network Report No. 13. Pretoria, South Africa, SABONET.
   Google Scholar
• Savard JPL, Clergeau P, Mennechez G 2000. Biodiversity concepts and urban ecosystems. Landscape and Urban Planning 48: 131–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuettpelz E, Trapnell DW 2006. Exceptional epiphyte diversity on a single tree in Costa Rica. Selbyana 27: 65–71.
   Google Scholar
• Simberloff D, Von Holle B 1999. Positive interactions of nonindigenous species: invasional meltdown? Biological Invasions 1: 21–32.
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson PB, Fisher JB, Halle F, Villalobos I 2005. Development of woody branch attachments in Schefflera (Araliaceae or Apiaceae). American Journal of Botany 92: 1765–1773.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanderpoorten A, Sotiaux A, Engels P 2004. Trends in diversity and abundance of obligate epiphytic bryophytes in a highly managed landscape. Ecography 27: 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werner FA, Gradstein SR 2009. Diversity of dry forest epiphytes along a gradient of human disturbance in the tropical Andes. Journal of Vegetation Science 20: 59–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams CB, Sillett SC 2007. Epiphyte communities on redwood (Sequoia sempervirens) in northwestern California. The Bryologist 110: 420–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods C 2013. Factors influencing the distribution and structure of tropical vascular epiphyte communities at multiple scales. PhD thesis. Clemson, SC, Clemson University.
   Google Scholar
• Wyatt-Smith J 1953. The vegetation of Jarak Island, Straits of Malacca. Journal of Ecology 41: 207–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyse S, Burns B 2011. Do host bark traits influence trunk epiphyte communities? New Zealand Journal of Ecology 35: 296–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zotz G 2005. Vascular epiphytes in the temperate zones—a review. Plant Ecology 176: 173–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar