Pollen morphology and its taxonomic utility in the Southern Hemisphere bracteate-prostrate forget-me-nots (Myosotis, Boraginaceae)

References

• Brandon AM. 2001. Breeding systems and rarity in New Zealand Myosotis [Unpublished PhD thesis]. Palmerston North, New Zealand: Massey University. 183 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Chacón J, Luebert F, Hilger HH, Ovchinnikova S, Selvi F, Cecchi L, Guilliams CM, Hasenstab-Lehman K, Sutorý K, Simpson MG, Weigend M. 2016. The borage family (Boraginaceae s. str.): a revised infrafamilial classification based on new phylogenetic evidence, with emphasis on the placement of some enigmatic genera. Taxon. 65:523–546. doi: 10.12705/653.6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coutinho AP, Castro S, Carbajal R, Ortiz S, Serrano M. 2012. Pollen morphology of the genus Omphalodes Mill (Cynoglosseae, Boraginaceae). Grana. 51:194–205. doi: 10.1080/00173134.2012.665943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cranwell LM. 1942. New Zealand pollen studies: 1. Key to the pollen grains of families and genera in the native flora. Rec of Ak Inst Mus. 2:280–308.
   Google Scholar
• de Candolle AP. 1846. Prodromus Systematis Naturalis Regni Vegetabilis. Vol. 10. Paris: Treuttel et Würtz.
   Google Scholar
• Díez MJ, Valdés B. 1991. Pollen morphology of the tribes Eritrichieae and Cynoglosseae (Boraginaceae) in the Iberian Peninsula and its taxonomic significance. Bot J Linn Soc. 107:49–66. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8339.1991.tb00214.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Ghazali GE, Krzywinski K. 1989. An attempt to clarify the term heterocolpate. Grana. 28:179–186. doi: 10.1080/00173138909427429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraley C, Raftery AE. 2002. Model-based clustering, discriminant analysis and density estimation. J Am Stat Assoc. 97:611–631. doi: 10.1198/016214502760047131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraley C, Raftery AE, Murphy TB, Scrucca L. 2012. Mclust version 4 for R: Normal mixture modeling for model-based clustering, classification, and density estimation. Technical Report no. 597, Department of Statistics, University of Washington.
   Google Scholar
• Grau J, Leins P. 1968. Pollenkorntypen und Sektionegliederung der Gattung Myosotis. Berichte der Deutschen Botanischen Gesellschaft. 81:107–115.
   Google Scholar
• Grau J, Schwab A. 1982. Mikromerkmale der Blüte zur Gliederung der Gattung Myosotis. Mitteilungen der Botanischen Staatssammlung München. 18:9–58.
   Google Scholar
• Hargrove L, Simpson MG. 2003. Ultrastructure of heterocolpate pollen in Cryptantha (Boraginaceae). Int J Plant Sci. 164:137–151. doi: 10.1086/344548
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesse M, Halbritter H, Zetter R, et al. 2009. Pollen terminology: an illustrated handbook. Vienna, Austria: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Koutecky P. 2015. MorphTools: a set of R functions for morphometric analysis. Plant Syst Evol. 301:1115–1121. doi: 10.1007/s00606-014-1153-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehnebach C. 2012. Two new species of forget-me-nots (Myosotis, Boraginaceae) from New Zealand. Phytokeys. 16:53–64. doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.16.3602
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luebert F, Cecchi L, Frohlich MW, Gottschling M, Guilliams CM, Hasenstab-Lehman KE, Hilger HH, Miller JS, Mittelbach M, Nazaire M, et al. 2016. Familial classification of the Boraginales. Taxon. 65:502–522. doi: 10.12705/653.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maechler M, Rousseeuw P, Struyf A, Hubert M, Hornik K. 2015. Cluster: cluster analysis basics and extensions. R package version 2.0.1.
   Google Scholar
• Meudt HM, Prebble JM, Lehnebach CL. 2015. Native New Zealand forget-me-nots (Myosotis, Boraginaceae) comprise a Pleistocene species radiation with very low genetic divergence. Plant Syst Evol. 301:1455–1471. doi: 10.1007/s00606-014-1166-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moar NT. 1993. Pollen grains of New Zealand Dicotyledonous Plants. Lincoln, New Zealand: Maanaki Whenua Press. 200 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Moar NT, Wilmshurst JM, McGlone MS. 2011. Standardizing names applied to pollen and spores in New Zealand Quaternary palynology. N Z J Bot. 49:201–229. doi: 10.1080/0028825X.2010.526617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore LB. 1961. Boraginaceae. In: Allan H, editor. Flora of New Zealand. Vol. 1. Wellington, New Zealand: PD Hasselberg, Government Printer; p. 806–833.
   Google Scholar
• Nikiforova OD. 2002. Palynomorphological study of the genus Myosotis and some related genera (Boraginaceae). Botanicheskii Zhurnal. 87:44–53.
   Google Scholar
• Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, et al. 2015. vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.3–0. Available from: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan
   Google Scholar
• Prebble JM, Tate JA, Meudt HM, Symonds VV. 2015. Microsatellite markers for the New Zealand endemic Myosotis pygmaea species group (Boraginaceae) amplify across species. Appl Plant Sci. 3(6):1500027. doi:10.3732/apps.1500027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasband, WS. 1997–2016. ImageJ, U.S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA, http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/.
   Google Scholar
• RCore Team. 2015. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available from: http://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Reitsma TJ. 1969. Size modification of recent pollen grains under different treatments. Rev Palaeobot Palyno. 9:175–202. doi: 10.1016/0034-6667(69)90003-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson A. 1989. Evolution and pollination of New Zealand Myosotis (Boraginaceae) [Unpublished PhD thesis]. Christchurch, New Zealand: University of Canterbury. 160 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson AW, Lloyd DG. 1991. Herkogamy, dichogamy and self-pollination in six species of Myosotis (Boraginaceae). Evol Trend Plant. 5:53–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RStudio Team. 2015. RStudio: Integrated Development for R. RStudio, Inc., Boston, MA URL Available from: http://www.rstudio.com/
   Google Scholar
• Thiers B. [continuously updated]. Index Herbariorum: A global directory of public herbaria and associated staff. New York Botanical Garden's Virtual Herbarium. Available from: http://sweetgum.nybg.org/science/ih/
   Google Scholar
• Volkova OA, Severova EE, Polevova SV. 2013. Structural basis of harmomegathy: evidence from Boraginaceae pollen. Plant Syst Evol. 299:1769–1779. doi: 10.1007/s00606-013-0832-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weigend M, Luebert F, Selvi F, Brokamp G, Hilger HH. 2013. Multiple origins for hound’s tongues (Cynoglossum L.) and navel seeds (Omphalodes Mill.)–the phylogeny of the borage family (Boraginaceae s. str.). Mol Phylogenet Evol. 68:604–618. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2013.04.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weigend M, Selvi F, Thomas DC, Hilger HH. 2016. Boraginaceae. In: Kadereit JW, Bittrich V, editors. Flowering plants. Eudicots. The families and genera of vascular plants. Vol. 14. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; p. 41–102.
   Google Scholar
• Winkworth RC, Grau J, Robertson AW, Lockhart PJ. 2002. The origins and evolution of the genus Myosotis L.(Boraginaceae). Mol Phylogenet Evol. 24:180–193. doi: 10.1016/S1055-7903(02)00210-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wrońska-Pilarek D, Jagodziński AM, Bocianowski J, Janyszek M. 2015. The optimal sample size in pollen morphological studies using the example of Rosa canina L. (Rosaceae). Palynology. 39:56–75. doi: 10.1080/01916122.2014.933748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar