Relative abundance of snapper (Chrysophrys auratus) across habitats within an estuarine system

References

• Bailey HKIV, Cowan JH Jr, Shipp RL. 2001. Experimental evaluation of potential effects of habitat size and presence of conspecifics on habitat association by young-of-the-year red snapper. Gulf Mexico Sci. 19:119–131.
   Google Scholar
• Beck MW, Heck KL, Able KW, Childers D, Eggleston D, Gillanders BM, Halpern B, Hays C, Hoshino K, Minello T, et al. 2001. The identification, conservation, and management of estuarine and marine nurseries for fish and invertebrates. BioSci. 51:633–641. doi: 10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0633:TICAMO]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker A, Cowley PD, Whitfield AK. 2010. Use of remote underwater video to record littoral habitat use by fish within a temporarily closed South African estuary. J Exper Mar Biol Ecol. 391:161–168. doi: 10.1016/j.jembe.2010.06.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker A, Whitfield AK, Cowley PD, Jarnegren J, Naesje TF. 2011. An assessment of the size structure, distribution and behaviour of fish populations within a temporarily closed estuary using dual frequency identification sonar (DIDSON). J Fish Biol. 79:761–775. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2011.03057.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blandon A, Ermgassen PSEZ. 2014. Quantitative estimate of commercial fish enhancement by seagrass habitat in southern Australia. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci. 141:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2014.01.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler AJ, Jernakoff P. 2000. Seagrass in Australia: strategic review and development of an R & D plan. Collingwood, Victoria: CSIRO Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlgren CP, Eggleston DB. 2000. Ecological processes underlying ontogenetic habitat shifts in a coral reef fish. Ecology. 81:2227–2240. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[2227:EPUOHS]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorenbosch M, Grol MGG, de Groene A, van der Velde G, Nagelkerken I. 2009. Piscivore assemblages and predation pressure affect relative safety of some back-reef habitats for juvenile fish in a Caribbean bay. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 379:181–196. doi: 10.3354/meps07896
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorenbosch M, van Riel MC, Nagelkerken I, van der Velde G. 2004. The relationship of reef fish densities to the proximity of mangrove and seagrass nurseries. Esuar Coast Shelf Sci. 60:37–48. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2003.11.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis MP. 1994. Growth of juvenile snapper, Pagrus auratus. New Zeal J Mar Freshw Res. 28:201–218. doi: 10.1080/00288330.1994.9516608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis MP. 1995. Spatial and seasonal variation in the abundance of juvenile snapper (Pagrus auratus) in the north-western Hauraki Gulf. New Zeal J Mar Freshw Res. 29:565–579. doi: 10.1080/00288330.1995.9516688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis MP, Morrison MA, Leathwick J, Walsh C. 2011. Predicting patterns of richness, occurrence and abundance of small fish in New Zealand estuaries. Mar Freshw Res. 62:1327–1341. doi: 10.1071/MF11067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis MP, Morrison MA, Leathwick J, Walsh C, Middleton C. 2005. Predictive models of small fish presence and abundance in northern New Zealand harbours. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci. 64:419–435. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2005.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillies CL, Fitzsimons JA, Branigan S, Hale L, Hancock B, Creighton C, Alleway H, Bishop MJ, Brown S, Chamberlain D, et al. 2015. Scaling-up marine restoration efforts in Australia. Ecol Manage Restor. 16:84–85. doi: 10.1111/emr.12159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grol MGG, Nagelkerken I, Rypel AL, Layman CA. 2011. Simple ecological trade-offs give rise to emergent cross-ecosystem distributions of a coral reef fish. Oecologia. 165:79–88. doi: 10.1007/s00442-010-1833-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heck KL Jr, Hays G, Orth RJ. 2003. Critical evaluation of the nursery role hypothesis for seagrass meadows. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 253:123–136. doi: 10.3354/meps253123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hume TM, Snelder T, Weatherland M, Liefting R. 2007. A controlling factor approach to estuary classification. Ocean Coast Manag. 50:905–929. doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2007.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimirei IA, Nagelkerken I, Slooter N, Gonzalez ET, Huijbers CM, Mgaya YD, Rypel AL. 2015. Demography of fish populations reveals new challenges in appraising juvenile habitat values. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 518:225–237. doi: 10.3354/meps11059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingett PD, Choat JH. 1981. Analysis of density and distribution patterns in Chrysophrys auratus (Pisces: Sparidae) within a reef environment: an experimental approach. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 5:283–290. doi: 10.3354/meps005283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundquist CJ, Broekhuizen N. 2012. Predicting suitable shelfish restoration sites in Whangarei Harbour. Larval dispersal modelling and verification. Report prepared for Ministry of Science Innovation Envirolink Fund to Northland Regional Council. [cited 2014 Sept 26]. Available from: http://www.envirolink.govt.nz/PageFiles/806/1024-NLRC134%20LTRACK-Predicting%20suitable%20shellfish%20restoration%20sites%20in%20Whangarei%20harbour.pdf
   Google Scholar
• McDermott CJ, Shima JS. 2006. Ontogenetic shifts in microhabitat preference of the temperate reef fish Forsterygion lapillum: implications for population limitation. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 320:259–266. doi: 10.3354/meps320259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod IM, Parsons DM, Morrison MA, Van Dijken SG, Taylor RB. 2014. Mussel reefs on soft sediments: a severely reduced but important habitat for macroinvertebrates and fishes in New Zealand. New Zeal J Mar Freshw Res. 48:48–59. doi: 10.1080/00288330.2013.834831
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison M, Carbines G. 2006. Estimating the abundance and size structure of an estuarine population of the sparid Pagrus auratus, using a towed camera during nocturnal periods of inactivity, and comparisons with conventional sampling techniques. Fish Res (Amsterdam). 82:150–161. doi: 10.1016/j.fishres.2006.06.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison MA, Lowe M, Parsons DM, Usmar NR, McLeod IM. 2009. A review of land-based effects on coastal fisheries and supporting biodiversity in New Zealand. New Zealand Aquatic Environment and Biodiversity Report No. 37. Wellington: Ministry of Fisheries; [cited 2015 Nov 20]. Available from: http://www.fish.govt.nz/NR/rdonlyres/0BA191BC-FF2D-41A1-AC6A-5DD76C01FF75/0/MorrisonAEBR37_FINALHR.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Morrison MA, Lowe ML, Grant C, Smith PJ, Carbines G, Reed J, Bury SJ, Brown J. 2014. Seagrass meadows as biodiversity and productivity hotspots. New Zealand Aquatic Environment and Biodiversity Report No. 137. Wellington: Ministry for Primary Industries; [cited 2015 Sept 30]. Available from: https://www.mpi.govt.nz/document-vault/4409
   Google Scholar
• Mudrak PA, Szedlmayer ST. 2012. Proximity effects of larger resident fishes on recruitment of age-0 red snapper in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Transa Am Fish Soc. 141:487–494. doi: 10.1080/00028487.2012.667045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagelkerken I, Dorenbosch M, Verberk W, de la Moriniere EC, van der Velde G. 2000. Importance of shallow-water biotopes of a Caribbean bay for juvenile coral reef fishes: patterns in biotope association, community structure and spatial distribution. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 202:175–192. doi: 10.3354/meps202175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagelkerken I, Roberts CM, van der Velde G, Dorenbosch M, van Riel MC, Cocheret de la Morinière E, Nienhuis PH. 2002. How important are mangroves and seagrass beds for coral-reef fish? The nursery hypothesis tested on an island scale. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 244:299–305. doi: 10.3354/meps244299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neill K, D'Archino R, Farr T, Nelson W. 2012. Macroalgal diversity associated with soft sediment habitats in New Zealand. New Zealand Aquatic Environment and Biodiversity Report No. 87. Ministry for Primary Industries; [cited 2015 Oct 14]. Available from: http://fs.fish.govt.nz/Doc/22978/AEBR_87.pdf.ashx
   Google Scholar
• Parsons D, Morrison M, Thrush SF, Middleton C, Smith M, Spong KT, Buckthought D. 2013. The influence of habitat structure on juvenile fish in a New Zealand estuary. Mar Ecol. 34:492–500. doi: 10.1111/maec.12050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons DM, Middleton C, Smith MD, Cole RG. 2014a. The influence of habitat availability on juvenile fish abundance in a northeastern New Zealand estuary. New Zeal J Mar Freshw Res. 48:216–228. doi: 10.1080/00288330.2013.875927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons DM, Middleton C, Spong KT, Mackay G, Smith MD, Buckthought D. 2015. Mechanisms explaining nursery habitat associationL how do juvenile snapper (Chrysophrys auratus) benefit from their nursery habitat? PlosOne. 10(3):e0122137. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0122137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons DM, Sim-Smith CJ, Cryer M, Francis MP, Hartill B, Jones EG, Le Port A, Lowe M, McKenzie J, Morrison M, et al. 2014b. Snapper (Chrysophrys auratus): a review of life history and key vulnerabilities in New Zealand. New Zeal J Mar Freshw Res. 48:256–283. doi: 10.1080/00288330.2014.892013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radford CA, Sim-Smith CJ, Jeffs AG. 2012. Can larval snapper, Chrysophrys auratus, smell their new home? Mar Freshw Res. 63:898–904. doi: 10.1071/MF12118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed J, Schwarz A, Gosai A, Morrison M. 2004. Feasibility study to investigate the replenishment/reinstatement of seagrass beds in Whangarei Harbour—Phase 1. NIWA Client Report to Northland Regional Council; [cited 2014 September 26]. Available from: http://www.nrc.govt.nz/Resource-Library-Summary/Research-and-reports/Coastal/Seagrass-in-Whangarei-Harbour/
   Google Scholar
• Rice J. 2011. Managing fisheries well: delivering the promises of an ecosystem approach. Fish Fish. 12:209–231. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-2979.2011.00416.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross PM, Thrush SF, Montgomery JC, Walker JW, Parsons DM. 2007. Habitat complexity and predation risk determine juvenile snapper (Pagrus auratus) and goatfish (Upeneichthys lineatus) behaviour and distribution. Mar Freshw Res. 58:1144–1151. doi: 10.1071/MF07017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryer CH, Laurel BJ, Stoner AW. 2010. Testing the shallow water refuge hypothesis in flatfish nurseries. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 415:275–282. doi: 10.3354/meps08732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schobernd ZH, Bacheler NM, Conn PB. 2014. Examining the utility of alternative video monitoring metrics for indexing reef fish abundance. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 71:464–471. doi: 10.1139/cjfas-2013-0086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheaves M, Baker R, Nagelkerken I, Connolly RM. 2015. True Value of Estuarine and Coastal Nurseries for Fish: Incorporating Complexity and Dynamics. Estuar Coast. 38:401–414. doi: 10.1007/s12237-014-9846-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sim-Smith CJ, Jeffs AG, Radford CA. 2012. Variation in the growth of larval and early juvenile snapper, Chrysophrys auratus (Sparidae). Mar Freshw Res. 63:1231–1243. doi: 10.1071/MF12176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thrush SF, Schultz D, Hewitt JE, Talley D. 2002. Habitat structure in soft-sediment environments and abundance of juvenile snapper Pagrus auratus. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 245:273–280. doi: 10.3354/meps245273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Usmar NR. 2009. Ontogeny and ecology of snapper (Pagrus auratus) in an estuary, the Mahurangi Harbour [Unpublished PhD thesis]. Auckland: The University of Auckland.
   Google Scholar
• Warren MA, Gregory RS, Laurel BJ, Snelgrove PVR. 2010. Increasing density of juvenile Atlantic (Gadus morhua) and Greenland cod (G. ognac) in association with spatial expansion and recovery of eelgrass (Zostera marina) in a coastal nursery habitat. J Exper Mar Biol Ecol. 394:154–160. doi: 10.1016/j.jembe.2010.08.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitfield AK, Pattrick P. 2015. Habitat type and nursery function for coastal marine fish species, with emphasis on the Eastern Cape region, South Africa. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci. 160:49–59. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2015.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar