Riparian management affects instream habitat condition in a dairy stream catchment

References

• Allan DJ. 2004. Landscapes and riverscapes: the influence of land use on stream ecosystems. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics. 35:257–284. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.120202.110122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allouche S. 2002. Nature and functions of cover for riverine fish. Bulletin Francais De La Peche Et De La Pisciculture. 365:297–324. doi: 10.1051/kmae:2002037
   Google Scholar
• Ayllón D, Almodóvar A, Nicola GG, Elvira B. 2010. Modelling brown trout spatial requirements through physical habitat simulations. River Research Applications. 26:1090–1102. doi: 10.1002/rra.1315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bash JS, Ryan CM. 2002. Stream restoration and enhancement projects: is anyone monitoring? Environ Manage. 29:877–885. doi: 10.1007/s00267-001-0066-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beentjes MP, Boubée JAT, Jellyman DJ, Graynoth E. 2005. Non-fishing mortality of freshwater eels (Anguilla spp.). New Zealand Fisheries Assessment Report, Ministry of Fisheries, No. 34, Wellington.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs BJE, Kilroy C. 2000. Stream preriphyton monitoring manual. NIWA technical report ISBN 0-478-09099-4. Prepared for New Zealand Ministry for Environment. 233p.
   Google Scholar
• Bjornn TC, Brusven MA, Molnau MP, Milligan JH, Klamt RA, Chacho E, Schaye C. 1977. Transport of granitic sediment in streams and its effects on insects and fish. Forest, Wildlife and Range Experiment Station bulletin. Prepared for University of Idaho. 43 p.
   Google Scholar
• Burdon FJ, McIntosh AR, Harding JS. 2013. Habitat loss drives threshold response of benthic invertebrate communities to deposited sediment in agricultural streams. Ecol Appl. 23:1036–1047. doi: 10.1890/12-1190.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chisnall BL, Hicks BJ, Martin ML. 2003. Effect of harvest on size, abundance, and production of freshwater eels Anguilla australis and A. dieffenbachii in a New Zealand stream. In: Dixon DA, editor. Biology, management, and protection of catadromous eels. Bethesda, Maryland: American Fisheries Society, Symposium 33; p. 177–189.
   Google Scholar
• Clapcott JE, Young RG, Harding JS, Matthaei CD, Quinn JM, Death RG. 2011. Sediment assessment methods: protocols and guidelines for assessing the effects of deposited fine sediment on in-stream values. Cawthron Institute, Nelson, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Crisp DT, Carling PA. 1989. Observations on siting, dimensions and structure of salmonid redds. J Fish Biol. 34:119–134. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.1989.tb02962.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeWalle DR. 2010. Modeling stream shade: riparian buffer height and density as important as buffer width. J Am Water Resour Assoc. 46:323–333. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2010.00423.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodd M, Wilcock B, Parminter T. 2009. Review of recent rural catchment-based research in New Zealand. AgResearch and National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research Report, prepared for MAF policy. 121 p.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan SH, Ward JW. 1985. The influence of watershed geology and forest roads on the composition of salmon spawning gravel. Northwest Sci. 59:204–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glova GJ. 2002. Density effects on juvenile shortfinned eel (Anguilla australis) cover preferences in replicate channels. New Zeal J Mar Fresh. 36:483–490. doi: 10.1080/00288330.2002.9517103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glova GJ, Jellyman DJ, Bonnett ML. 1998. Factors associated with the distribution of habitat of eel (Anguilla spp.) in three New Zealand lowland streams. New Zeal J Mar Fresh. 32:255–269. doi: 10.1080/00288330.1998.9516824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant JWA, Kramer DL. 1990. Territory size as a predictor of the upper limit to population-density of juvenile salmonids in streams. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 47:1724–1737. doi: 10.1139/f90-197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood MJ, Harding JS, Niyogi DK, McIntosh AR. 2012. Improving the effectiveness of riparian management for aquatic invertebrates in a degraded agricultural landscape: stream size and land-use legacies. J Appl Ecol. 49:213–222. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.02092.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harding JS, Clapcott JE, Quinn JM, Hayes JW, Joy MK, Greig HS, James T, Beech M, Ozane R, Hay J, et al. 2009. Stream habitat assessment protocols for wadeable rivers and streams of New Zealand. Christchurch: University of Canterbury Press; p. 133.
   Google Scholar
• Hay J. 2004. Survival of trout eggs in relation to sediment composition of redds in Waikakahi Stream. Prepared for Fish & Game New Zealand. Cawthron Report No. 965 p.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes JW. 1988. Mortality and growth of juvenile brown and rainbow trout in a lake inlet nursery stream, New Zealand. New Zeal J Mar Fresh. 22:40–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickey MA, Closs GP. 2006. Evaluating the potential of night spotlighting as a method for assessing species composition and brown trout abundance: a comparison with electrofishing in small streams. J Fish Biol. 69:1513–1523. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2006.01215.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicks BJ, McCaughan HMC. 1997. Land use, associated eel production, and abundance of fish and crayfish in streams in Waikato. New Zeal J Mar Fresh. 31:635–650. doi: 10.1080/00288330.1997.9516795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillman M, Brierley G. 2005. A critical review of catchment-scale stream rehabilitation programmes. Prog Phys Geog. 29:50–76. doi: 10.1191/0309133305pp434ra
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes R, Goodwin E, Hayes JW. 2013. Development of a GIS-based index to assess riparian habitat quality in a dairy best practice catchment. Cawthron Report No. 2350. 32 p.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes R, Hayes JW. 2011. Broad-scale trout habitat mapping for streams (Using Aerial Photography and GIS). Cawthron Report. No. 1979. 40 p.
   Google Scholar
• Jellyman DJ. 2012. The status of longfin eels in New Zealand—an overview of stocks and harvest NIWA client report. Prepared for Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment. No. CHC2012-006. 78 p.
   Google Scholar
• Jellyman DJ, Graynoth E. 2005. The use of fyke nets as a quantitative capture technique for freshwater eels (Anguilla spp.) in rivers. Fisheries Manag Ecol. 12:237–247. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2400.2005.00445.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jellyman DJ, Unwin MJ, James GD. 2003. Anglers’ perceptions of the status of New Zealand lowland rivers and their trout fisheries. National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research Technical Report No. 122.
   Google Scholar
• Jowett IG, Richardson J. 2008. Habitat use by New Zealand fish and habitat suitability models. National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research Technical Report No. 55.
   Google Scholar
• Jowett IG, Richardson J, Boubee JAT. 2009. Effects of riparian manipulation on stream communities in small streams: two case studies. New Zeal J Mar Fresh. 43:763–774. doi: 10.1080/00288330909510040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller CR, Burnham KP. 1982. Riparian fencing, grazing, and trout habitat preference on summit creek, Idaho. N Am J Fish Manage. 2:53–59. doi: 10.1577/1548-8659(1982)2<53:RFGATH>2.0.CO;2
   Google Scholar
• Kondolf GM, Micheli E. 1995. Evaluating stream restoration projects. Environ Manage. 19:1–15. doi: 10.1007/BF02471999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larned ST, Scarsbrook MR, Snelder TH, Norton NJ, Biggs BJF. 2004. Water quality in low elevation streams and rivers of New Zealand: recent state and trends in contrasting land cover classes. New Zeal J Mar Fresh. 38:347–366. doi: 10.1080/00288330.2004.9517243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lester RE, Boulton AJ. 2008. Rehabilitating agricultural streams in Australia with wood: a review. Environ Manage. 42:310–326. doi: 10.1007/s00267-008-9151-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons J, Weigel BM, Paine LK, Undersander DJ. 2000. Influence of intensive rotational grazing on bank erosion, fish habitat quality, and fish communities in south-western Wisconsin trout streams. J Soil Water Conserv. 55:271–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthaei CD, Weller F, Kelly DW, Townsend CR. 2006. Impacts of fine sediment addition to tussock, pasture, dairy and deer farming streams in New Zealand. Freshwater Biol. 51:2154–2172. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2006.01643.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDowall RM. 1994. Game keepers for the nation, 1861–1990. Christchurch, New Zealand: Canterbury University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McDowall RM. 2011. Ikawai. Freshwater fishes in Māori culture and economy. Christchurch, New Zealand: Canterbury University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meredith A, Smith Z, Lavender R. 2003. Waikakahi stream: assessment of water quality and ecosystem monitoring, 1995–2002. Environment Canterbury, Report No. R03/14, Christchurch.
   Google Scholar
• Monaghan RM, Carey PL, Wilcock RJ, Drewry JJ, Houlbrooke DJ, Quinn JM, Thorrold BS. 2009. Linkages between land management activities and stream water quality in a border dyke-irrigated pastoral catchment. Agr Ecosyst Environ. 129:201–211. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2008.08.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mossop B, Bradford MJ. 2006. Using thalweg profiling to assess and monitor juvenile salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.) habitat in small streams. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 63:1515–1525. doi: 10.1139/f06-060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niyogi DK, Koren M, Arbuckle CJ, Townsend CR. 2007. Longitudinal changes in biota along four New Zealand streams: declines and improvements in stream health related to land use. New Zeal J Mar Fresh. 41:63–75. doi: 10.1080/00288330709509896
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsson TI, Persson BG. 1988. Effects of deposited sand on ova survival and alevin emergence in brown trout (Salmo trutta L.). Archiv für Hydrobiologie. 113:621–627.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer MA, Ambrose RF, Poff NL. 1997. Ecological theory and community restoration ecology. Restor Ecol. 5:291–300. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-100X.1997.00543.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkyn SM, Davies-Colley RJ, Halliday NJ, Costley KJ, Croker GF. 2003. Planted riparian buffer zones in New Zealand: do they live up to expectations? Restor Ecol. 11:436–447. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-100X.2003.rec0260.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Platts WS, Wagstaff FJ. 1984. Fencing to control livestock grazing on riparian habitats along streams: is it a viable alternative? N Am J Fish Manage. 4:266–272. doi: 10.1577/1548-8659(1984)4<266:FTCLGO>2.0.CO;2
   Google Scholar
• Pusey BJ, Arthington AH. 2003. Importance of the riparian zone to the conservation and management of freshwater fish: a review. Mar Freshwater Res. 54:1–16. doi: 10.1071/MF02041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn JM. 2000. Effects of pastoral development. In: Collier KJ, Winterbourn MJ, editors. New Zealand stream invertebrates: ecology and implications for management. Christchurch: New Zealand Limnological Society; p. 208–229.
   Google Scholar
• Quinn JM, Cooper AB, Davies-Colley RJ, Rutherford JC, Williamson RB. 1997. Land use effects on habitat, water quality, periphyton, and benthic invertebrates in Waikato, New Zealand, hill-country streams. New Zeal J Mar Fresh. 31:579–597. doi: 10.1080/00288330.1997.9516791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raleigh RF, Zuckerman LD, Nelson PC. 1986. Habitat suitability index models and instream flow suitability curves: brown trout, revised. Technical Report prepared for U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson J, Jowett IG. 2002. Effects of sediment on fish communities in East Cape streams, North Island, New Zealand. New Zeal J Mar Fresh. 36:431–442. doi: 10.1080/00288330.2002.9517098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roni P, Beechie TJ, Bilby RE, Leonetti FE, Pollock MM, Pess GR. 2002. A review of stream restoration techniques and a hierarchical strategy for prioritizing restoration in Pacific Northwest watersheds. N Am J Fish Manage. 22:1–20. doi: 10.1577/1548-8675(2002)022<0001:AROSRT>2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternecker K, Geist J. 2010. The effects of stream substratum composition on the emergence of salmonid fry. Ecol Freshw Fish. 19:537–544. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0633.2010.00432.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens DL, Olsen AR. 2004. Spatially balanced sampling of natural resources. J Am Stat Assoc. 99:262–278. doi: 10.1198/016214504000000250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart GB, Bayliss HR, Showler DA, Sutherland WJ, Pullin AS. 2009. Effectiveness of engineered in-stream structure mitigation measures to increase salmonid abundance: a systematic review. Ecol Appl. 19:931–941. doi: 10.1890/07-1311.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart-Koster B, Bunn SE, MacKay SJ, Poff NL, Naiman RJ, Lake PS. 2010. The use of Bayesian networks to guide investments in flow and catchment restoration for impaired river ecosystems. Freshwater Biol. 55:243–260. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02219.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Summers DW, Giles N, Stubbing DN. 2008. Rehabilitation of brown trout, Salmo trutta, habitat damaged by riparian grazing in an English chalkstream. Fisheries Manage Ecol. 15:231–240. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2400.2008.00604.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutherland AB, Meyer JL, Gardiner EP. 2002. Effects of land cover on sediment regime and fish assemblage structure in four southern Appalachian streams. Freshwater Biol. 47:1791–1805. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2427.2002.00927.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweeney BW, Newbold JD. 2014. Streamside forest buffer width needed to protect stream water quality, habitat and organisms: a literature review. J Am Water Resour As. 50:560–584. doi: 10.1111/jawr.12203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trimble SW, Mendel AC. 1995. The cow as a geomorphic agent—a critical review. Geomorphology. 13:233–253. doi: 10.1016/0169-555X(95)00028-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• US EPA. 2015. United States environmental protection agency web site. Aquatic resource monitoring; [cited 2015 February 25]. Available from: http://www.epa.gov/owow/monitoring/volunteer/stream/stream.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Wahl CM, Neils A, Hooper D. 2013. Impacts of land use at the catchment scale constrain the habitat benefits of stream riparian buffers. Freshwater Biol. 58:2310–2324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waters TF. 1995. Sediment in streams: sources, biological effects and control. American Fisheries Society: Monograph 7. 251 p.
   Google Scholar
• Wentworth CK. 1922. A scale of grade and class terms for clastic sediments. J Geol. 30:377–392. doi: 10.1086/622910
   Google Scholar
• Wilcock RJ, Monaghan RM, Thorrold BS, Meredith AS, Betteridge K, Duncan MJ. 2007. Land-water interactions in five contrasting dairying watersheds: issues and solutions. Land Use and Water Resources Research. 7:2.1–2.10.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcock RJ, Nagels JW, Rodda HJE, O'Connor MB, Thorrold BS, Barnett JW. 1999. Water quality of a lowland stream in a New Zealand dairy farming catchment. New Zeal J Mar Fresh. 33:683–696. doi: 10.1080/00288330.1999.9516911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood PJ, Armitage PD. 1997. Biological effects of fine sediment in the lotic environment. Environ Manage. 21:203–217. doi: 10.1007/s002679900019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood PJ, Armitage PD. 1999. Sediment deposition in a small lowland stream—management implications. Regulated Rivers—Research and Management. 15:199–210. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1646(199901/06)15:1/3<199::AID-RRR531>3.0.CO;2-0
   Google Scholar
• Yuan YP, Bingner RL, Locke MA. 2009. A review of effectiveness of vegetative buffers on sediment trapping in agricultural areas. Ecohydrology. 2:321–336. doi: 10.1002/eco.82
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang XY, Liu XM, Zhang MH, Dahlgren RA, Eitzel M. 2010. A review of vegetated buffers and a meta-analysis of their mitigation efficacy in reducing nonpoint source pollution. J Environ Qual. 39:76–84. doi: 10.2134/jeq2008.0496
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar