REFERANSER

• APA (1985). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington: APA.
   Google Scholar
• Azer, B. (1995). Which traits predict job performance? Monitor (juli).
   Google Scholar
• Boyle, G. & Smári, J. (1997). De fem stora ock personlighetspsykologins mätningsproblem, Nordisk Psykologi, 49(1), 12–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, D.T. (1981). Perspectives on a scholary Career. I E.S. Overman (Ed.) (1988), Methodology and epistemology for social science selected papers Donald T. Campbell Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, D.T. (1995). The Postpositivist, Nonfoundational, Hermeneutic Epistemology Exemplified in the Works of Donald W. Fiske. I P.E. Shrout & S.T. Fiske (Eds.), Personality research, methods, and theory, (ss. 13–27). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, D.T. & Fiske, D.W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cattell, R.B. (1943). The description of personality: Basic traits resolved into clusters. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 38, 476–506.
   Google Scholar
• Cattell, R.B. (1965). The scientific analysis ot personality. Baltimore: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, A.L. & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development, Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 309–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conley, J.J. (1985). Longitudinal stability of personality traits: A multitrait—multimethod—multioccation analysis, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(5), 1266–1282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, P.T. & McCrac, R.R. (1995). Primary Traits of Eysenck's P-E-N System: Three- and Five-Factor Solutions, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(2), 308–317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, P.T. & Widiger, T. (Eds.) (1993). Personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality, Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L.J. & Mcehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281–302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeRaad, B., Hendricks, A.A.J., Hofstee, W.K.B. (1992). Towards a refined structure of personality traits, European journal of Personality, 6, 301–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeRaad, B., Hendriks, A.A., & Hofstee, W.K.B. (1994). The Big Five: A top of the iceberg of individual differences, I C.F. Halverson Jr., G.A. Kohnstamm, & R.P. Martin (Eds.), The developing structure of temperament and personality from infancy to adulthood, Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Digman, J.M. (1990), Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model, Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 41 7–440.
   Google Scholar
• Engvik, H. (1994). Personality Research Form -B: En norsk versjon av PRF. Psykologisk institutt, Universitetet i Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Engvik, H. (1997). Femfaktormodellen for personlighet: Hva står faktorene for og hva skal de hete? Psykologisk institutt, Universitetet i Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, S. (1979). The stability of behavior I: On predicting most of the people much of the time, journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1097–1126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eysenck, H. (1994). The big five or giant three: Criteria for a paradigm, I C. F. Halverson Jr, G.A. Kohnstamm, R.P Martin (Eds.), The developing structure of temperament and personality from infancy to adulthood, (ss. 37–51). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Funder, D.C. & Colvin, C.R. (1988). Friends and strangers: Acquaintanceship, agreement, and the accuracy, of personality judgement, journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(1), 149–158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, L.R. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits, American Psychologist, 48(1), 26–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, L.R. (1994). Basic research on personality structure: Implications of the emerging consensus for applications to selection and classification. I M.G. Rumsey, C.B. Walker, J.H. Harris (Eds.), Personnel Selection and Classification. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, L.R. (1995). What the hell took so long? Donald W. Fiske and the big-five factor structure i P.E. Shrout & S.T. Fiske (Eds.), Personality research, methods, and theory, (ss. 29–43). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, L.R & Rosolock, T.K. (1994). The big five factor structure as an integrative framework: An empirical comparison with Eysencks P-E-N Model. I C. F. Halverson Jr, G.A. Kohnstamm, R.P. Martin (Eds.), The developing structure of temperament and personality from infancy to adulthood, (ss. 7–35). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstee, W.K.B. (1994). Who should own the definition of personality? European journal of Personality, 8, 149–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstee, W.K.B., De Raad, B. & Goldberg, L.R. (1992). Integration of the big five and circumplex model approaches to trait structure, journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 146–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogan, R. (1994). What we know about leadership, American Psychologist, 49(6), 493–504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hougaard, E. (1992). Personlighet og psykopatologi: Relasjonen mellom personlighetsforstyrrelser og trækpsykologiske modeller, Psykologisk institutt, Århus Universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, D.N., Paunonen, S., Fraboni, M., & Goffin, R.D. (1996). A five-factor versus six-factor model of personality structure. Personality and Individuel Differences, 20(1), 33–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John, O.P. (1990). The »big five« factor taxonomy: Dimensions of personality in the natural language and in questionaires. I Pervin, L.A. (Ed.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research, New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, J.A. (1994). Clarification of factor five with the help of the AB5C Model. European Journal of Personality. 8, 311–334.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, J.A. & Ostendorf, F. (1993). Clarification of the five factor model with the abridged big five dimensional circumplex. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 563–576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenny, D.A. (1994). Interpersonal perception. A social relation analysis, New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kline, P. (1993). The handbook of psychological testing. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kreitler, S. & Kreitler, H. (1990). The cognitive foundations of personality traits. New York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krug, S.E. (1994). Personality: A Cattellian perspective. I S. Strack & M. Lorr (Eds.), Differentiating normal and abnormal personality. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Loehlin, J.C. (1992). Genes and environment in personality development. London: Sage Publ., Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Loevinger, J. (1957). Objective tests as instruments of psychological theory. Psychological Reports, 3, 635–694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrae, R.R. & Costa, P.T. (1990). Personality in adulthood. New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Messick, S. (1994). Foundation of validity: Meaning and consequences in psychological assessment. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 10, 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsen, S.M. (1995). Personlighet og suksess som leder: En systematisering i forhold til femfaktormodellen. Tidsskrift for organisasjonspsykologi, 3(1), 3–19.
   Google Scholar
• Nordvik, H. (1995). Stabilitet i den voksne personlighet, Tidsskrift for Norsk Psykologforening, 82(1)22–28.
   Google Scholar
• Ozer, D.J. og Reise, S.P. (1994). Personality assessment. Annual Review of Psychology, 45, 357–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Passini, F.T. & Norman, W.T. (1966). A universal conception of personality structure, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4(1), 44–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paunonen, S. (1989). Consensus in personality judgements: Moderation effects of target-rater accuaintanceship and behavioral observability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(5), 823–833.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ray, J.J. (1988). Semantic overlap between scale items may be a good thing: Reply to Smedslund. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 29, 145–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, D.J. (1973). Implicit personality theory: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 79(5), 294–309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shweder, R.A. & D'Andrade, R.G. (1980). The systematic distortion hypothesis, I Richard A Shweder (Ed.), New directions for methology of social and behavioral science. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Smedslund, J. (1987). The epistemic status of inter-item correlations in Eysencks personality questionale: the a priory versus the empirical in psychological data. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 28, 42–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smedslund, J. (1989). What is measured by a psychological measure? Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 29, 148–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stumph, H. (1993). The factor structure of the personality research form: A cross-national evaluation. Journal of Personality, 61(1), 27–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiggins, J.S. (1996) (Ed.). The five-factor model of personality. Theoretical perspectives. New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar