REFERANSER

• Baumeister, R. F. (1982). A self-presentational view of social phenomena. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 3–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumeister, R. F. (1986). Identity: Cultural change and the struggle for self. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baumeister, R. F. & Newman, L. S. (1994). How stories make sense of personal experiences: Motives that shape autobiographical narratives. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 676–690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. & Lennox, R. (1991). Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 305–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borkenau, P. (1992). Implicit personality theory and the five-factor model. Journal of Personality, 60, 295–327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bromley, D. B. (1993). Reputation, image and impression management. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. (1994). The “remembered self”. I U. Neisser & R. Fivush (Eds.), The remembering self: Construction and accuracy in the self-narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buss, D. M. & Craik, K. H. (1984). Acts, dispositions, and personality. Progress in Experimental Personality Research, 13, 241–301.
   Google Scholar
• Buss, D. M. (1991). Evolutionary psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 45, 459–491.
   Google Scholar
• Buss, D. M. (1995). Evolutionary psychology: A new paradigm for psychological science. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 1–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheek, J. M. (1982). Aggregation, moderator variables, and the validity of personality tests: A peer-rating study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 1254–1269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, J. M. (1995). Socialization: The “Highest Good”. Paper presented at 10th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Orlando, Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Costa, P. T. & McCrae, R. R. (1978). Objective personality assessment. I M. Storandt, I. C. Siegler& M. F. Elias (Eds.), The clinical psychology of aging. New York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Costa, P. T. & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory. Odessa, Florida: Psychological Assessment Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Craik, K. H. (1986). Personality research methods: An historical perspective. Journal of Personality, 54, 18–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, D. (1980). The material mind. I D. Davidson: Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dawes, R. M. (1994). House of cards: Psychology and psychotherapy built on myth. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duijsens, I. J. & Diekstra, R. F. (1996). DSM-3-R and ICD-10 personality disorders and their relationship with the big five dimensions of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 21, 119–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elster, J. (1983). Explaining technical change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elster, J. (1991). Argumenter og forhandlinger. Om strategisk bruk av kommunikativ atferd. Bergen: Los-senter Notat 91/42.
   Google Scholar
• Engvik, H. (1993). Personbeskrivelser: 5PF. Oslo: Universitetet i Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, S. (1973). The self-concept revisited: Or a theory of a theory. American Psychologist, 28, 404–416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein, S. & O'Brien, E. J. (1985). The person—situation debate in historical and current perspective. Psyhological Bulletin, 98, 513–537.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiske, D. W. (1986). The trait concept and the personality questionnaire. I Angleitner, A. & J. S. Wiggins (Eds.), Personality assessment via questionnaires. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Føllesdal, D. (1985). Causation and explanation: A problem in Davidson's view on action and mind. I E. LePore & B. P. McLaughlin (Eds.), Actions and events. Perspectives on the philosophy of Donald Davidson. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, L. R. (1993). The structure of phenotypic traits. American Psychologist, 48, 25–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottfredson, G. D., Jones, E. M. & Holland, J. L. (1993). Personality and vocational interests: The relation of Holland's six interest dimensions to five robust dimensions of personality. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 40, 518–524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guba, E. G. & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. I N. K. Denzin og Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, W. B. & MacKinnon, D. W. (1969). Personality inventories as predictors of creativity among architects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 53, 322–326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harkness, A. R. & Hogan, R. (1995). The theory and measurement of traits: Two views. I J. N. Butcher (Ed.), Clinical personality assessment: Practical approaches. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstee, W. K. B. (1994a). Will the true trait theorist please stand up? Psychological Inquiry, 5, 134–137.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstee, W. K. B. (1994b). Who should own the definition of personality. European Journal of Personality, 8, 149–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogan, R. (1987). Personality psychology: Back to basics. I J. Aronoff, A. I. Rabin& R. A. Zucker (Eds.), The emergence of personality. New York: Springer Publsihing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Hogan, R. (1991). Personality and personality measurement. I M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Vol. 2. Ralo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hogan, R. (1996). A socioanalytic perspective on the five-factor model. I J. S. Wiggins (Ed.), The five-factor model of personality. New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hogan, R., Jones, W. H. & Cheek, J. M. (1985). Socioanalytic theory: An alternative to Armadillo psychology. I B. R. Schlenker (Ed.), The self in social life. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
   Google Scholar
• Hogan, R. & Briggs, S. (1986). A socioanalytic interpretation of the public and the private selves. I R. F. Baumeister (Ed.), Public self and private self. New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Hogan, R. & Hogan, J. (1992). Hogan personality inventory manual. Tulsa, Oklahoma: Hogan Assessment Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Hogan, R., Hogan, J. & Brinkmeyer, K. (1994). Technical manual for the Hogan personality inventory management development report. Tulsa, Oklahoma: Hogan Assessment Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Hogan, R., Hogan, J. & Roberts, B. W. (1996). Personality measurement and employment decisions. American Psychologist, 51, 469–477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hough, L. M., Eaton, N. K., Dunnette, M. D., Kamp, J. D. & McCloy, R. A. (1990). Criterion-related validities of personality constructs and the effect of response distortion on those validities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 581–595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakson, D. N. & Paunonen, S. V. (1985). Construct validity and the predictability of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 554–570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John, O. P., Angleitner, A. & Ostendorf, F. (1988). The lexical approach to personality: A historical review of trait taxonomic research. European Journal of Personality, 2, 171–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John, O. P. & Robins, R. W. (1994). Accuracy and bias in self-perception: individual differences in self-enhancement and the role of narcissism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 206–219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. A. (1981). The “Self-Disclosure” and “Self-Presentation” views of item response dynamics and personality scale validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 761–769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J. (1985). Psychophysical laws. I E. LePore & B. P. McLaughlin (Eds.), Actions and events. Perspectives on the philosophy of Donald Davidson. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Leary, M. R. & Kowalski, R. M. (1990). Impression management: A literature review and two-component model. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 34–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loehlin, J. C. (1992). Genes and environment in personality development. Newbury Park, California: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Loevinger, J. (1957). Objective tests as instruments of psychological theory. Psychological Reports, 3, 635–694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacCorquodale, K. & Meehl, P. E. (1948). On a distinction between hypothetical constructs and intervening variables. Psychological Review, 55, 95–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markus, H. & Wurf, E. (1987). The dynamic self-concept: A social psychological perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 299–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, G. N., Wortman, C. B., Vickers, R. R., Kusulas, J. W. & Hervig, L. K. (1994). The five-factor model of personality as a framework for personality-health research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 78–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAdams, D. P. (1987). A life-story model of identity. Perspectives in Personality, 2, 15–50.
   Google Scholar
• McRae, R. R. & Costa, P. T. (1995). Trait explanations in personality. European Journal of Personality, 9, 231–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrae, R. R. & Costa, P. T. (1996). Toward a new generation of personality theories: Theoretical contexts for the five-factor model. I J. S. Wiggins (Ed.): The five-factor model of personality. New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• McGowan, J. & Gormly, J. (1976). Validation of personality traits: A multicriteria approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 791–795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meehl, P. E. (1948). The dynamics of “structured” personality tests. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1, 296–303.
   Google Scholar
• Messick, S. (1981). Constructs and their vicissitudes in educational and psychological measurement. Psychological Bulletin, 89, 575–588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, C. & Hogan, R. (1978). A role theoretical interpretation of personality scale item responses. Journal of Personality, 46, 778–785.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mischel, W. (1968). Personality and assessment. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Moxnes, P. (1993). Dyproller: Helter, hekser, horer og andre mytologiske roller i organisasjonen. Oslo: Paul Moxnes.
   Google Scholar
• Neisser, U. (1994). Self-narrative: True and false. I U. Neisser & R. Fivush (Eds.), The remembering self: Construction and accuracy in the self-narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, L. S. (1991). Why are traits inferred spontaneously? A developmental approach. Social Cognition, 9, 221–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, L. S. & Uleman, J. S. (1993). When are you what you did? Behavior identification and dispositional inference in person memory, attribution, and social judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 513–525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsen, D. & Campbell, D. P. (1993). Self-observer rating discrepancies: Once an overrater, always an overrater. Human Resource Management, 32, 265–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman, W. T. (1963). Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributions: Replicated factor structure in peer nomination of personality ratings. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66, 574–583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olweus, D. (1980). The consistency issue in personality revisited—with special reference to aggression. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19, 377–390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozer, D. J. & Reise, S. P. (1994). Personality assessment. Annual Review of Psychology, 45, 357–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulhus, D. L., Bruce, M. N. & Trapnell, P. D. (1995). Effects of self-presentation strategies on personality profiles and their structure. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 100–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revelle, M. B. (1994). The self in social contexts. Annual Review of Psychology, 45, 297–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanderson, C. & Clarkin, J. F. (1994). Use of the NEO-Pl in differential treatment planning. I P. T. Costa & T. A. Widiger (Eds.), Personality disorders and the five-factor model of Personality. Washington, DC.: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Saucier, C. & Goldberg, L. (1996). The language of personality: Lexical perspectives on the five-factor model. I J. S. Wiggins (Ed.), The five-factor model of personality. New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schlenker, B. R. (1986). Self-identification: Toward an integration of the private and public self. I R. F. Baumeister (Ed.), Public self and private self. New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, D. J. (1981). Tactical self-presentations: Toward a borader conception. I J. T. Tedeschi (Ed.), Impression management and social psychological research. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, R. J. & Hough, L. M. (1995). Personality and industrial/organizational psychology. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 10, 75–129.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, T. W. & Williams, P. G. (1992). Personality and health: Advantages and limitations of the five-factor model. Journal of Personality, 60, 395–423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swann, W. B. (1987). Identity negotiation: Where the two roads meet. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1038–1051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, S. (1989). Positive illusions. Creative self—deception and the healthy mind. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Tedeschi, J. T. & Riess, M. (1981). Identities, the phenomenal self, and laboratory research. I J. T. Tedeschi (Ed.), Impression management theory and social psychological research. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tedeschi, J. T. (1986). Private and public experiences and the self. I R. F. Baumeister (Ed.), Public self and private self. New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Tellegen, A. (1982). Brief manual for the multidimensional personality questionnaire. Upublisert manuskript. University of Minnesota.
   Google Scholar
• Tellegen, A. (1988). The analysis of consistency in personality assessment. Journal of Personality, 56, 621–663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tellegen, A. (1991). Personality traits: Issues of definition, evidence, and assessment. I W. M. Grove & D. Cichetti (Eds.), Thinking clearly about psychology. Vol. 2: Personality and Psychopathology. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tellegen, A. & Waller, N. G. (I trykk). Exploring personality through test construction: Development of the multidimensional personality questionnaire. I S. R. Briggs & J. M. Cheek (Eds.), Personality measures: Development and evaluation. Vol. 1. Greenwich, CN: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trope, Y. & Higgins, E. T. (1993). The what, when, and how of dispositional inference: New answers and new questions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 493–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Troye, S. V. (1994). Teori—og forskningsevaluering: Et kritisk realistisk perspektiv. Otta: TANO.
   Google Scholar
• Tupes, E. C. & Christal, R. E. (1961). Recurrent personality factors based on trait ratings. (ASD-TR-61-97). Lackland Air Force Base, Texas: Aeronautical Systems Division, Personnel Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Westen, D. (1995). A clinical—empirical model of personality: Life after the Mischelian Ice Age and the NEO—Lithic Era. Journal of Personality, 63, 495–524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widiger, T. A., Trull, T. J., Clarkin, J. F., Sanderson, C. & Costa, P. T. (1994). A description of the DSM-III-R and DSM-IV personality disorders with the five-factor model of personality. I P. T. Costa & T. A. Widiger (Eds.), Personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality. Washington, DC.: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Wittgenstein, L. (1958). Philosophical investigations. 3rd Edition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Wymer, W. E. & Penner, L. A. (1985). Moderator variables and different types of predictability: Do you have a match. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1002–1015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar