The Norwegian Nature Index: Expert evaluations in precautionary approaches to biodiversity policy

References

• Alkemade , R. , van Oorschot , M. , Miles , L. , Nellemann , C. , Bakkenes , M. and ten Brink , B. 2009 . GLOBIO3: A framework to investigate options for reducing global terrestrial biodiversity loss 2009 . Ecosystems , 12 : 374 – 390 . doi: 10.1007/s10021-009-9229-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslaksen , I. , Framstad , E. , Garnåsjordet , P.A. , Nybø , S. and Skarpaas , O. 2012 . Knowledge gathering and communication on biodiversity: Developing the Norwegian Nature Index . Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift–Norwegian Journal of Geography , 66 : 300 – 308 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braat , L. , ten Brink , P. , Bakkes , J. , Bolt , K. , Braeuer , I. , ten Brink , B. , Chiabai , A. , Ding , H. , Gerdes , H. , Jeuken , M. , Kettunen , M. , Kirchholtes , U. , Klok , C. , Markandya , A. , Nunes , P. , van Oorschot , M. , Peralta-Bezerra , N. , Rayment , M. , Travisi , C. & Walpole , M. 2008 . The Cost of Policy Inaction: The Case of Not Meeting the 2010 Biodiversity Target . Institute for European Environmental Policy , Brussels .
   Google Scholar
• Cameron , J. and Abouchar , J. 1991 . The precautionary principle: A fundamental principle of law and policy for the protection of the global environment . Boston College International and Comparative Law Review , 14 : 1 – 28 .
   Google Scholar
• Certain , G. & Skarpaas , O. 2010 . Nature Index: General Framework, Statistical Method and Data Collection for Norway . Nina Rapport 542 . Norsk institutt for naturforskning (NINA) , Trondheim .
   Google Scholar
• Certain , G. , Skarpaas , O. , Bjerke , J.W. , Framstad , E. , Lindholm , M. , Nilsen , J.E. , Norderhaug , A. , Oug , E. , Pedersen , H.C. , Schartau , A.K. , van der Meeren , G.I. , Aslaksen , I. , Engen , S. , Garnåsjordet , P.A. , Kvaløy , P. , Lillegård , M. , Yoccoz , N.G. and Nybø , S. 2011 . The Nature Index: A general framework for synthesizing knowledge on the state of biodiversity . PLoS ONE , 6 : e18930 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018930
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EC . 2000 . Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 Establishing a Framework for the Community Action in the Field of Water Policy . Official Journal L 327 , 22.12.2000 , 1 – 82 . EUR-Lex. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32000L0060:EN:NOT (accessed 1 November 2012).
   Google Scholar
• EEA . 2001 . Late Lessons from Early Warnings: The Precautionary Principle 1896–2000 . EEA Environmental Issue Report No. 22 . European Environmental Agency , Copenhagen .
   Google Scholar
• Funtowicz , S. & Strand , R. 2007 . Models of science and policy . Traavik , T. & Lim , L.C. Biosafety First: Holistic Approaches to Risk and Uncertainty in Genetic Engineering and Genetically Modified Organisms , 263 – 278 . Tapir Academic Press , Trondheim .
   Google Scholar
• Myhr , A.I. 2010 . A precautionary approach to genetically modified organisms: Challenges and implications for policy and science . Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics , 23 : 501 – 525 . doi: 10.1007/s10806-010-9234-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nybø , S. & Skarpaas , O. 2008a . Naturindeks: Utprøving av metode i Midt-Norge . NINA Rapport 425 . Norsk institutt for naturforskning (NINA) , Trondheim .
   Google Scholar
• Nybø , S. & Skarpaas , O. 2008b . Naturindeks: Bakgrunnsdokumenter for utprøving av metode i Midt-Norge . NINA Rapport 426 . Norsk institutt for naturforskning (NINA) , Trondheim .
   Google Scholar
• Nybø , S. 2010 . Naturindeks for Norge 2010 . DN-utredning 3-2010 . Direktoratet for naturforvaltning , Trondheim .
   Google Scholar
• Nybø , S. , Skarpaas , O. , Framstad , E. & Kålås , J.A. 2008 . Naturindeks for Norge – forslag til rammeverk . NINA Rapport 347 . Norsk institutt for naturforskning (NINA) , Trondheim .
   Google Scholar
• Nybø , S. , Certain , G. and Skarpaas , O. 2012 . The Norwegian Nature Index – state and trends of biodiversity in Norway . Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift–Norwegian Journal of Geography , 66 : 241 – 249 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ot.prp. nr. 52 (2008–2009) . Om lov om forvaltning av naturens mangfold (naturmangfoldsloven) . Miljøverndepartementet, Regjeringen , Oslo .
   Google Scholar
• Scholes , R.J. and Biggs , R. 2005 . A biodiversity intactness index . Nature , 434 : 45 – 49 . doi: 10.1038/nature03289
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skarpaas , O. , Certain , G. and Nybø , S. 2012 . The Norwegian Nature Index – conceptual framework and methodology . Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift–Norwegian Journal of Geography , 66 : 250 – 256 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ten Brink , B.J.E. & Tekelenburg , T. 2002 . Biodiversity: How Much Is Left? The Natural Capital Index Framework (NCI) . RIVM , Bilthoven . http://www.globio.info/downloads/269/Natural+Capital+Index+folder.pdf (accessed 4 September 2012) .
   Google Scholar
• St.meld. nr. 42 (2000–2001) . Biologisk mangfold: Sektor ansvar of samordning . Miljøverndepartementet, Regjeringen , Oslo .
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO . 2005 . Report of the Expert Group on the Precautionary Principle of the World Commission on the Ethics of Scientific Knowledge and Technology (COMEST) . UNESCO , Paris .
   Google Scholar
• United Nations . 1992 . Report of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, Rio de Janeiro, 3–14 June 1992. Annex 1. Rio Declaration on Environment and Development . http://www.un.org/documents/ga/conf151/aconf15126-1annex1.htm (accessed 3 October 2012)
   Google Scholar