Industrial specialization and economic performance: A case of Czech microregions

References

• Affuso, A., Capello, R. & Fratesi, U. 2011. Globalization and competitive strategies in European vulnerable regions. Regional Studies 45, 657–675.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asheim, B.T. & Coenen, L. 2005. Knowledge bases and regional innovation systems: Comparing Nordic clusters. Research Policy 34, 1173–1190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asheim, B.T., Boschma, R. & Cooke, P. 2011. Constructing regional advantage: Platform policies based on related variety and differentiated knowledge bases. Regional Studies 45, 893–904.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin, J. & Brown, W. 2004. Regional manufacturing employment volatility in Canada: The effects of specialisation and trade. Papers in Regional Science 83, 519–541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bathelt, H. 2009. Re-bundling and the development of hollow clusters in the East German chemical industry. European Urban and Regional Studies 16, 363–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bathelt, H. 2013. Post-reunification restructuring and corporate re-bundling in the Bitterfeld-Wolfen chemical industry, East Germany. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 37, 1456–1485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bathelt, H. & Boggs, J.S. 2003. Towards a reconceptualization of regional development paths: Is Leipzig's media cluster a continuation of or a rupture with the past? Economic Geography 79, 265–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, D., Pütz, M. & Seidl, I. 2013. What kind of entrepreneurship drives regional development in European non-core regions? A literature review on empirical entrepreneurship research. European Planning Studies 21, 1095–1127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaudry, C. & Schiffauerova, A. 2009. Who's right, Marshall or Jacobs? The localization versus urbanization debate. Research Policy 38, 318–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blažek, J. 2012. Regionální inovační systémy a globální produkční sítě: dvoji optika na zdroje konkurenceschopnosti v současném světě? Geografie 117, 209–233.
   Google Scholar
• Blažek, J. & Csank, P. 2005. The West–East gradient and regional development: The case of the Czech Republic. Acta Universitatis Carolinae 1-2, 89–108.
   Google Scholar
• Blažek, J. & Netrdová, P. 2011. Regional unemployment impacts of the global financial crisis in the new member states of the EU in Central and Eastern Europe. European Urban and Regional Studies 19, 42–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blažek, J. & Netrdová, P. 2012. Aktuální tendence lokální diferenciace vybraných socioekonomických jevů v Česku: směřuje vývoj k větší mozaikovitosti prostorového uspořádání? Geografie 117, 266–288.
   Google Scholar
• Blažek, J., Žížalová, P., Rumpel, P. & Skokan, K. 2011. Where does the knowledge for knowledge-intensive industries come from? The case of biotech in Prague and ICT in Ostrava. European Planning Studies 19, 1277–1303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolcha, P. & Zemplinerová, A. 2012. Dopad investičních pobídek na objem investic v České republice. Politická ekonomie 60, 81–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. 2005. Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies 39, 61–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R.A. & Lambooy, J.G. 1999. Evolutionary economics and economic geography. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 9, 411–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brambor, T., Clark, W.R. & Golder, M. 2005. Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analysis. Political Analysis 14, 63–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J. & Fleisher, B.M. 1996. Regional income inequality and economic growth in China. Journal of Comparative Economics 22, 141–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinitz, B. 1961. Contrasts in agglomeration: New York and Pittsburgh. The American Economic Review 51, 279–289.
   Google Scholar
• Combes, P.P., Duranton, G., Gobillon, L., Puga, D. & Roux, S. 2012. The productivity advantages of large cities: Distinguishing agglomeration from firm selection. Econometrica 80, 2543–2594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CSO. 1987. Pracovníci a mzdové fondy socialistického sektoru národního hospodářství (bez JZD) v krajích a okresech podle odvětví národního hospodářství v ČSR za rok 1987. Prague: Czech Statistical Office.
   Google Scholar
• CSO. 2009a. Register of Economic Subjects in Selected Production Industries. Prague: Czech Statistical Office.
   Google Scholar
• CSO. 2009b. Počet obyvatel v SO ORP [Demographic statistics]. Czech Statistical Office. http://vdb.czso.cz/vdbvo/tabparam.jsp?voa=tabulka&cislotab=DEM9010PC_OR&q_rezim=1&vo=null&q_text=&stranka=1 ( accessed January 2015).
   Google Scholar
• CSO. 2009c. Ekonomické subjekty podle počtu zaměstnanců [Firm size structure]. Czech Statistical Office. http://vdb.czso.cz/vdbvo/tabparam.jsp?voa=tabulka&cislotab=ORG9010UC&q_rezim=1&vo=null&q_text=&stranka=2 ( accessed January 2015).
   Google Scholar
• CzechInvest. 2013. Statistika tuzemských a přímých zahraničních investic [Database of investment incentives]. http://www.czechinvest.org/podpora-investic ( accessed January 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Damijan, J.P., Knell, M., Majcen, B. & Rojec, M. 2003. Technology Transfer Through FDI in Top-10 Transition Countries: How Important Are Direct Effects, Horizontal and Vertical Spillovers? William Davidson Institute Working Paper No. 549. Ann Arbor, NI: William Davidson Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Doloreux, D. & Dionne, S. 2008. Is regional innovation system development possible in peripheral regions? Evidence from the case of La Pocatiere. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 20, 259–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doloreux, D., Isaksen, A., Karlsen, J. & Dionne, S. 2012. Constructing regional advantage in non-metropolitan regions: A comparison between La Pocatière (Canada) and Tromsø (Norway). Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift–Norwegian Journal of Geography 66, 144–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drahokoupil, J. 2009. After transition: Varieties of political-economic development in Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union. Comparative European Politics 7, 279–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drucker, J. & Feser, E. 2012. Regional industrial structure and agglomeration economies: An analysis of productivity in three manufacturing industries. Regional Science and Urban Economics 42, 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duranton, G. & Puga, D. 2000. Diversity and specialisation in cities: Why, where and when does it matter? Urban Studies 37, 533–555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duranton, G. & Puga, D. 2001. Nursery cities. American Economic Review 91, 1454–1475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duranton, G. & Puga, D. 2004. Micro-foundations of urban agglomeration economies. Henderson, V. & Thisse, J.F. (eds.) Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, 2063–2117. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Essletzbichler, J. 2007. Diversity, stability and regional growth in the United States, 1975–2002. Frenken, K. (ed.) Applied Evolutionary Economics and Economic Geography, 203–229. Utrecht: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. 2010. Eurostat Regional Yearbook 2010. Luxembourg: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Frenken, K., van Oort, F.G. & Verburg, T. 2007. Related variety, unrelated variety and regional economic growth. Regional Studies 41, 685–697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gál, Z. & Ptáček, P. 2011. The role of mid-range universities in knowledge transfer in non-metropolitan regions in Central Eastern Europe. European Planning Studies 19, 1669–1690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaeser, E., Kallal, H., Scheinkman, J. & Shleifer, A. 1992. Growth in cities. Journal of Political Economy 100, 1126–1152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabher, G. 1994a. Lob der Verschwendung: Redundanz in der Regionalentwicklung: Ein sozioökonomisches Plädoyer. Berlin: Edition Sigma.
   Google Scholar
• Grabher, G. 1994b. The disembedded regional economy: The transformation of East German industrial complexes into Western enclosures. Ash, A. & Thrift, N. (eds.) Globalization, Institutions, and Regional Development in Europe, 177–195. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hampl, M. 2005. Geographical Organization of Czech Society: Transformation Processes and Their General Context. Prague: DemoArt.
   Google Scholar
• Hampl, M. 2007. Regionální diferenciace současného socioekonomického vývoje v České republice. Sociologický časopis 43, 889–910.
   Google Scholar
• Hanousek, J., Kočenda, E. & Maurel, M. 2011. Direct and indirect effects of FDI in emerging European markets: A survey and meta-analysis. Economic Systems 35, 301–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassink, R. 2005. How to unlock regional economies from path dependency? From learning region to learning cluster. European Planning Studies 13, 521–535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hausmann, R., Hidalgo, C.A., Bustos, S., Coscia, M., Chung, S., Jimenez, J., Simoes, A. & Yildirim, M.A. 2011. The Atlas of Economic Complexity. Cambridge, MA: Puritan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heindenreich, M. 1994. Die mitteleuropäische Großindustrie im Transformationsprozeß. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 23, 3–21.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, V. 1997. Medium size cities. Regional Science and Urban Economics 27, 583–612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, V. 2003. Marshall's scale economies. Journal of Urban Economics 53, 1–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, V., Kuncoro, A. & Turner, M. 1995. Industrial development in cities. Journal of Political Economy 103, 1067–1085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henning, M., Stam, E. & Wenting, R. 2013. Path dependence research in regional economic development: Cacophony or knowledge accumulation? Regional Studies 47, 1348–1362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornych, Ch. & Schwartz, M. 2009. Industry concentration and regional innovative performance: Empirical evidence for Eastern Germany. Post-Communist Economies 21, 513–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A. & Karlsen, J. 2013. Can small regions construct regional advantages? The case of four Norwegian regions. European Urban and Regional Studies 20, 243–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jindra, B., Giroud, A. & Scott-Kennel, J. 2009. Subsidiary roles, vertical linkages and economic development: Lessons from transition economies. Journal of World Business 44, 167–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemeny, T. & Storper, M. 2012. Specialization and Regional Economic Development. SERC Discussion Papers 0121. London: Spatial Economic Research Centre, LSE.
   Google Scholar
• Kofroň, J. 2012. Kvalitativní metody jako nástroj nomotetického poznání, aneb má se česká geografie co učit? Geografie 117, 308–328.
   Google Scholar
• Kornai, J. 1982. Growth, Shortage and Efficiency. London: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Koutský, J. 2011. Staré průmyslové regiony – vývojové tendence, možnosti rozvoje. PhD thesis. Ústí nad Labem: University of J.E. Purkyně.
   Google Scholar
• Krätke, S. 1997. Regionalstrukturen Ostmitteleuropas im Transformationsprozeß. Prokla: Zeitschrift für kritische Sozialwissenschaft 27, 291–316.
   Google Scholar
• Kunc, J. 2006. Historie a současnost průmyslové výroby na Moravě – regionální aspekt ekologického ohrožení krajiny. Národohospodářský obzor VI, 42–49.
   Google Scholar
• Lessmann, Ch. 2013. Foreign direct investment and regional inequality: A panel data analysis. China Economic Review 24:C, 129–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, D. 2012. Beyond strategic coupling: Reassessing the firm-region nexus in global production networks. Journal of Economic Geography 12, 227–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malmberg, A., Malmberg, B. & Lundequist, P. 2000. Agglomeration and firm performance: Economies of scale, localisation, and urbanisation among Swedish export firms. Environment and Planning A 32, 305–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mareš, J. 1988. Industrializace Československa – její klady a zápory. Geografie-Sborník ČGS 93, 183–198.
   Google Scholar
• Markusen, A. 1996. Sticky places in slippery space: A typology of industrial districts. Economic Geography 72, 293–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R. 2006. Pfadabhängigkeit und die ökonomische Landschaft. Berndt, Ch. & Glückler, J. (eds.) Denkanstöße zu einer anderen Geographie der Ökonomie, 47–76. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, R. 2010. Rethinking regional path dependence: From lock-in to evolution. The 2009 Roepke Lecture in Economic Geography. Economic Geography 86, 1–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R. 2012. Regional economic resilience, hysteresis and recessionary shocks. Journal of Economic Geography 12, 1–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R. & Sunley, P. 2006. Path dependence and regional economic evolution. Journal of Economic Geography 6, 395–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maskell, P., Eskelinen, H., Hannibalsson, I., Malmberg, A. & Vatne, E. 1998. Competitiveness, Localised Learning, and Regional Development: Specialisation and Prosperity in Small Open Economies. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• MINRD. 2006. Regional Development Strategy of the Czech Republic. Prague: Ministry of Regional Development of the Czech Republic.
   Google Scholar
• MLSA. 2013. Integrovaný portál Ministerstva práce a sociálních věcí. Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs. http://portal.mpsv.cz ( accessed June 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Musil, J. 1993. Changing urban systems in post-communist societies in Central Europe: Analysis and prediction. Urban Studies 30, 899–905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mykhnenko, V. & Turok, I. 2008. East European cities – patterns of growth and decline, 1960–2005. International Planning Studies 13, 311–342.
   Google Scholar
• Nölke, A. & Vliegenthart, A. 2009. Enlarging the varieties of capitalism: The emergence of dependent market economies in East Central Europe. World Politics 61, 670–702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• North, D.J. & Smallbone, D. 2000. Innovative activity in SMEs and rural economic development: Some evidence from England. European Planning Studies 8, 87–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onsager, K., Isaksen, A., Fraas, M. & Johnstadt, T. 2007. Technology cities in Norway: Innovating in glocal networks. European Planning Studies 15, 549–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parr, J.B. 2002. Missing elements in the analysis of agglomeration economies. International Regional Science Review 25, 151–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavlínek, P. 2004. Regional development implications of foreign direct investment in Central Europe. European Urban and Regional Studies 11, 47–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkmann, R. 2006. Extraregional linkages and the territorial embeddedness of multinational branch plants: Evidence from the South Tyrol Region in Northeast Italy. Economic Geography 82, 421–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radosevic, S. 2011. Science–industry links in Central and Eastern Europe and the commonwealth of independent states: Conventional policy wisdom facing reality. Science and Public Policy 38, 365–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A. & Fitjar, R.D. 2013. Buzz, archipelago economies and the future of intermediate and peripheral areas in a spiky world. European Planning Studies 21, 355–372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schamp, E.W. 2000. Vernetzte Produktion: Industriegeographie aus institutioneller Perspektive. New York: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
   Google Scholar
• Širák, M. & Řehák, S. 2005. Slovakia. OECD (ed.) Business Clusters: Promoting Enterprise in Central and Eastern Europe, 85–110. New York: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Sonn, J.W. & Lee, D. 2012. Revisiting the branch plant syndrome: Review of literature on foreign direct investment and regional development in Western advanced economies. International Journal of Urban Sciences 16, 243–259.
   Google Scholar
• Suorsa, K. 2007. Regionality, innovation policy and peripheral regions in Finland, Sweden and Norway. Fennia 185, 15–29.
   Google Scholar
• Szent-Iványi, B. & Vigvári, G. 2012. Spillovers from foreign direct investment in Central and Eastern Europe. An index for measuring a country's potential to benefit from technology spillovers. Society and Economy 34, 51–72.
   Google Scholar
• Therrien, P. 2005. City and innovation: Different size, different strategy. European Planning Studies 13, 853–877.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tödtling, F. & Trippl, M. 2005. One size fits all? Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach. Research Policy 34, 1203–1219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsenkova, S. 2006. Beyond transitions: Understanding urban change in postsocialist. Tsenkova. S. & Nedović-Budić, Z. (eds.) The Urban Mosaic of Post-Socialist Europe, 21–50. Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• van der Panne, G. 2004. Agglomeration externalities: Marshall versus Jacobs. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 14, 593–604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Virkkala, S. 2007. Innovation and networking in peripheral areas – a case study of emergence and change in rural manufacturing. European Planning Studies 15, 511–529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts, H. 1981. The Branch Plant Economy: A Study of External Control. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Ženka, J. & Čadil, V. 2009. Regional distribution of technology-intensive manufacturing industries in the Czech Republic with an accent on risk of delocalization. Prague Economic Papers 1, 61–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Žížalová, P. 2010. Geography of knowledge based collaboration in a post-communist country: Specific experience or generalized pattern? European Planning Studies 18, 791–814.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ženka, J., Novotný, J. & Csank, P. 2014. Regional competitiveness in Central Europe: In search of a useful conceptual framework. European Planning Studies 22, 164–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar