Nordic innovation models: Why is Norway different?

References

• Abreu, M. 2011. Regional absorptive capacity. Cooke, P., Asheim, B., Boschma, R., Martin, R., Schwartz, D. & Tödtling, F. (eds.) The Handbook of Regional Innovation and Growth, 211–221. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Aspara, J., Lamberg, J., Laukia, A. & Tikkanen, H. 2011. Strategic management of business model transformation: Lessons from Nokia. Management Decision 49, 622–647. doi: 10.1108/00251741111126521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. & Martin, R. 2010. The Handbook of Evolutionary Economic Geography. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Clausen, T. & Rasmussen, E. 2011. Open innovation policy through intermediaries: The industry incubator programme in Norway. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 23, 75–85. doi: 10.1080/09537325.2011.537109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cockburn, I. 2006. Is the pharmaceutical industry in a productivity crisis? Jaffe, A., Lerner, J. & Stern, S. (eds.) Innovation Policy and the Economy, Vol. 7, 1–32. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, P. 2002. Biotechnology clusters as regional, sectoral innovation systems. International Regional Science Review 25, 8–37. doi: 10.1177/016001760202500102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, P. 2011. Food geography and the organic empire: Modern quests for cultural-creative-related variety. Bathelt, H., Feldman, M. & Kogler, D. (eds.) Beyond Territory: Dynamic Geographies of Knowledge Creation, Diffusion and Innovation, 149–167. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, P. 2012. Complex Adaptive Innovation Systems. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, P. 2013. Strange attractors and policy emergence: Complex adaptive innovation. Cooke. P. (ed.) Re-framing Regional Development, 95–122. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, P. 2015. Transversal or linear? Knowledge externalities and the complexity of knowledge interactions. Antonelli, C. & Link. A. (eds.) The Routledge Handbook of the Knowledge Economy, 99–115. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, P., Kaufmann, D., Levin, C. & Wilson, R. 2006. The biosciences knowledge value chain and comparative incubation models. Journal of Technology Transfer 31, 115–129. doi: 10.1007/s10961-005-5025-3
   Google Scholar
• Doloreux, D., Isaksen, A., Karlsen, J. & Dionne, S. 2012. Constructing regional advantage in non-metropolitan regions: A comparison between La Pocatière (Canada) and Tromsø (Norway). Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift–Norwegian Journal of Geography 66, 144–154. doi: 10.1080/00291951.2012.681687
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ejermo, O. & Kander, A. 2006. The Swedish Paradox. Working Paper 2006/1. Lund: Lund University, CIRCLE [Centre for Innovation, Research and Competence in the Learning Economy].
   Google Scholar
• Engen, O. 2009. The development of the Norwegian petroleum innovation system: A historical overview. Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D. & Verspagen, B. (eds.) Innovation, Path Dependency and Policy, 179–207. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. n.d. Individuals’ Level of Computer Skills. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/tgm/table.do;jsessionid=hqsYWc7gUPvrCt85muaPRi1_NWqbv4fdzz442oDyl6en6o0lsF7k!-1437612724?tab=table&plugin=1&language=en&pcode=tsdsc460 (accessed September 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Fløysand, A. & Jakobsen, S.-E. 2001. Regional diversification in the Norwegian fish-processing industry. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift–Norwegian Journal of Geography 55, 17–25. doi: 10.1080/00291950116717
   Google Scholar
• Fløysand, A., Jakobsen, S. & Bjarnar, O. 2012. The dynamism of clustering: Interweaving material and discursive processes. Geoforum 43, 948–958. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2012.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukuyama, F. 2014. Political Order and Political Decay: From the Industrial Revolution to the Globalisation of Democracy. London: Profile.
   Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M. & Trippl, M. 2014. Combining knowledge from different sources, channels and geographical scales. European Planning Studies 22, 2305–2325. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2013.835793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halkier, H. 2010. Tourism knowledge dynamics. Cooke, P., De Laurentis, C., MacNeill, S. & Collinge, C. (eds.) Platforms of Innovation, 233–250. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Harmaakorpi, V. 2006. Regional development platform method as a tool for regional innovation policy. European Planning Studies 14, 1093–1112. doi: 10.1080/09654310600852399
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilson, M. 2008. The Nordic Model: Scandinavia Since 1945. London: Reaktion Books.
   Google Scholar
• Isaksen, I. 1997. Regional clusters and competitiveness: The Norwegian case. European Planning Studies 5, 65–76. doi: 10.1080/09654319708720384
   Google Scholar
• Isaksen, I. & Nilsson, M. 2013. Combined innovation policy: Linking scientific and practical knowledge in innovation systems. European Planning Studies 21, 1919–1936. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.722966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, M., Johnson, B., Lorenz, E. & Lundvall, B. 2007. Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation. Research Policy 36, 680–693. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlsen, J., Isaksen, A. & Spilling, O. 2011. The challenge of constructing regional advantage in peripheral areas: The case of marine biotechnology in Tromsø, Norway. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 23, 235–257. doi: 10.1080/08985620903233945
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karnøe, P. & Garud, R. 2012. Path creation: Co-creation of heterogeneous resources in the emergence of the Danish wind turbine cluster. European Planning Studies 20, 733–752. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.667923
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristensen, P. 1992. Industrial districts in West Jutland. Pyke, F., Becattini, G. & Sengenberger, W. (eds.) Industrial Districts & Inter-Firm Co-operation in Italy, 122–173. Geneva: International Institute for Labour Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Lundquist, P. & Power, D. 2002. Putting Porter into practice? Practices of regional cluster building: Evidence from Sweden. European Planning Studies 10, 685–704. doi: 10.1080/0965431022000003762
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundvall, B. 1992. National Systems of Innovation. London: Frances Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Lundvall, B. & Johnson, B. 1994. The learning economy. Journal of Industry Studies 1, 23–42. doi: 10.1080/13662719400000002
   Google Scholar
• MacGregor, R. 2004. Factors associated with formal networking in regional small business: Some findings from a study of Swedish SMEs. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development 11, 60–74. doi: 10.1108/14626000410519100
   Google Scholar
• Mansfield, E. & Lee, J. 1996. The modern university: Contributor to industrial innovation and recipient of industrial R&D support. Research Policy 25, 1047–1058. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(96)00893-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melkas, H. & Uotila, T. 2013. Foresight and innovation: Emergence and resilience of the cleantech cluster at Lahti, Finland. Cooke, P. (ed.) Re-framing Regional Development, 203–233. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Neffke, F., Svensson-Henning, M. & Boschma, R. 2011. How do regions diversify over time? Industry relatedness and the development of new growth paths in regions. Economic Geography 87, 237–265. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2011.01121.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neffke, F. & Svensson-Henning, M. 2013. Skill-relatedness and firm diversification. Strategic Management Journal 34, 297–316. doi: 10.1002/smj.2014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Njøs, R., Jakobsen, S., Fosse, J. & Engelsen, C. 2014. Challenges to bridging discrepant knowledge bases: A case study of the Norwegian Centre for Offshore Wind Energy. European Planning Studies 22, 2389–2410. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2013.843651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norwegian Ministry of Trade & Industry. 2007. State Ownership Report. Oslo: Norwegian Ministry of Trade & Industry.
   Google Scholar
• Nunes, S. & Lopes, R. 2015. Firm performance, innovation modes and territorial embeddedness. European Planning Studies. DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2015.1021666
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabel, C. 1992. Studied trust: Building new forms of cooperation in a volatile economy. Pyke, F., Becattini, G. & Sengenberger, W. (eds.) Industrial Districts and Inter-Firm Co-operation in Italy, 177–196. Geneva: International Institute for Labour Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Simmie, J. 2012. Path dependence and new technological path creation in the Danish wind power industry. European Planning Studies 20, 753–772. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.667924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storper, M. 2011. Why do regions develop and change? The challenge for geography and economics. Journal of Economic Geography 11, 333–346. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbq033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toole, A. 2012. The impact of public basic research on industrial innovation: Evidence from the pharmaceutical industry. Research Policy 41, 1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2011.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNU-MERIT. 2011. Innovation Union Scoreboard 2010: The Innovation Union's Performance Scoreboard for Research and Innovation. UNU-MERIT – Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology. IU-scoreboard-2010_en.pdf (accesed December 2015).
   Google Scholar
• World Co-operative Monitor. 2014. Exploring the Cooperative Economy. Report 2014. http://ica.coop/sites/default/files/attachments/WCM2014_print.pdf#overlay-context=en/publications/world-co-operative-monitor (accessed November 2015).
   Google Scholar