The role of horse keeping in transforming peri-urban landscapes: A case study from metropolitan Stockholm, Sweden

References

• Albrechts, L., Gallent, N., Bianconi, M. & Andersson, J. 2006. Planning on the edge: England’s rural – urban fringe and the spatial-planning agenda. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 33, 457–476. doi: 10.1068/b31171
   Google Scholar
• Andersson, K. & Eklund, E. 2011. HÄSTSAM Konturerna av en ny hästhushållning. Skrifter Nr 29. Helsingfors: Svenska social- och kommunalhögskolan, Helsingfors universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson, K., Eklund, E. & Lehtola, M. 2009. Farmers, businessmen or green entrepreneurs? Producers of new rural goods and services in rural areas under urban pressure. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 11, 29–43. doi: 10.1080/15239080902774960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonson, H. & Jansson, U. 2011. Jordbruk och skogsbruk i Sverige sedan år 1900 – studier av de areella näringarnas geografi och historia. Stockholm: Kungl. Skogs-och Lantbruksakademien.
   Google Scholar
• Antrop, M. 2004. Landscape change and the urbanization process in Europe. Landscape and Urban Planning 67, 9–26. doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046(03)00026-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beever, E.A. & Brussard, P.F. 2000. Examining ecological consequences of feral horse grazing using exclosures. Western North American Naturalist 60, 236–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkes, F., Colding, J. & Folke, C. (eds.) 2003. Navigating Social-ecological Systems: Building Resilience for Complexity and Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bomans, K., Dewaelheyns, V. & Gulinck, H. 2011. Pastures for horses: An underestimated land use class in an urbanized and multifunctional area. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning 6, 195–211. doi: 10.2495/SDP-V6-N2-195-211
   Google Scholar
• Boström, M. 2012. A missing pillar? Challenges in theorizing and practicing social sustainability: Introduction to the special issue. Sustainability: Science, Practice & Policy 8, 3–14.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, K.M.A., Satterfield, T. & Goldstein, J. 2012a. Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values. Ecological Economics 74, 8–18. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.11.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, K.M.A., Guerry, A.D., Balvanera, P., Klain, S., Satterfield, T., Basurto, X., Bostrom, A., Chuenpagdee, R., Gould, R., Halpern, B.S., Hannahs, N., Levine, J., Norton, B., Ruckelshaus, M., Russell, R., Tam, J. & Woodside, U. 2012b. Where are cultural and social in ecosystem services? A framework for constructive engagement. Bioscience 62, 744–756. doi: 10.1525/bio.2012.62.8.7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council of Europe. 2000. European Landscape Convention. European Treaty Series No. 176. http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/0900001680080621 (accessed 19 May 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Daily, G. (ed.) 1997. Nature’s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Daniel, T.C., Muhar, A., Arnberger, A., Aznar, O., Boyd, J.W., Chan, K.M., Costanza, R., Elmqvist, T., Flint, C.G., Gobster, P.H., Grêt-Regamey, A., Lave, R., Muhar, S., Penker, M., Ribe, R.G., Schauppenlehner, T., Sikor, T., Soloviy, I., Spierenburg, M., Taczanowska, K., Tam, J. & von der Dunk, A. 2012. Contributions of cultural ecosystem services to the ecosystem services agenda. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) 109, 8812–8819. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1114773109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S. 2012. Climate risk and security: New meanings of ‘the Environment’ in the English planning system. European Planning Studies 20, 49–69. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2011.638491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Groot, R.S., Alkemade, R., Braat, L., Hein, L. & Willemende, L. 2010. Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecological Complexity 7, 260–272. doi: 10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekerö kommun. 2005. Översiktsplan för Ekerö kommun, Antagen 2005-12-13. Ekerö: Ekerö kommun.
   Google Scholar
• Ekerö kommun. 2010. Hästar i Ekerö kommun, PM 2008-02-15, rev. 2010-10-20. Ekerö: Ekerö kommun.
   Google Scholar
• Elgåker, H. 2012. The new equine sector and its influence on multifunctional land use in peri-urban areas. GeoJournal 77, 591–613. doi: 10.1007/s10708-010-9398-y
   Google Scholar
• Elgåker, H. & Wilton, B. 2008. Horse farms as a factor for development and innovation in the urban-rural fringe with examples from Europe and Northern America. Tanvig, H.W. (ed.) Innovation Systems and Rural Development: Proceedings from 10th Annual Conference, Nordic-Scottish University for Rural and Regional Development, 43–55. Forest & Landscape Working Papers 27–2008. Hørsholm: Forest & Landscape Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Elgåker, H., Pinzke, S., Nilsson, C. & Lindholm, G. 2012. Horse riding posing challenges to the Swedish Right of Public Access. Land Use Policy 29, 274–293. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enhäll, J. 2011. Hästar och anläggningar med häst 2010: Resultat från en intermittent undersökning. Statistiska meddelanden JO 24 SM 1101. [place of publication not given]: Statens Jordbruksverket.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2011. Our Life Insurance, Our Natural Capital: An EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020. COM (2011) 244 final. Brussels: European Parliament.
   Google Scholar
• Fagerholm, N., Käyhkö, N., Ndumbaro, F. & Khamis, M. 2012. Community stakeholders’ knowledge in landscape assessments – mapping indicators for landscape services. Ecological Indicators 18, 421–433. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feld, C.K., da Silva, P.M., Sousa, J.P., de Bello, F., Bugter, R., Grandin, U., Hering, D., Lavorel, S., Mountford, O., Pardo, I., Partel, M., Rombke, J., Sandin, L., Jones, K.B. & Harrison, P. 2009. Indicators of biodiversity and ecosystem services: A synthesis across ecosystems and spatial scales. Oikos 118, 1862–1871. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.17860.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folke, C. 2006. Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analyses. Global Environmental Change 16, 253–267. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gobster, P.H., Nassauer, J.I., Daniel, T.C. & Fry, G. 2007. The shared landscape: What does aesthetics have to do with ecology? Landscape Ecology 22, 959–972. doi: 10.1007/s10980-007-9110-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkes, J. 2001. The Fourth Pillar of Sustainability: Culture’s Essential Role in Public Planning. Melbourne: Common Ground P/L.
   Google Scholar
• Hedenborg, S. 2011. The Swedish equine sector in the 20th century. NASSS 2011 Conference Revolutionizing Sporting Bodies: Technologies in Practice (Minneapolis, 2–5 November 2011). https://dspace.mah.se/handle/2043/13047?show=full (accessed 2 May 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Howley, P., Donoghue, C.O. & Hynes, S. 2012. Exploring public preferences for traditional farming landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning 104, 66–74. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson, D., Andersson, H. & Hedberg, A. 2004. Hästnäringens samhällsekonomiska betydelse i Sverige. Institutionen för ekonomi Rapport 155:2004. Uppsala: Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet.
   Google Scholar
• Keaveney, S.M. 2008. Equines and their human companions. Journal of Business Research 61, 444–454. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.07.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvale, E. 1996. Interviews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Liljenstolpe, C. 2009. Horses in Europe. EU Equus 2009 report. Uppsala: Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. http://www.wbfsh.org/files/EU%20Equus%202009.pdf (accessed 2 May 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Loucougaray, G., Bonis, A. & Bouzillé, J.-B. 2004. Effects of grazing by horses and/or cattle on the diversity of coastal grasslands in western France. Biological Conservation 116, 59–71. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3207(03)00177-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-being. Washington D.C.: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Orsini, S. 2013. Landscape polarisation, hobby farmers and a valuable hill in Tuscany: Understanding landscape dynamics in a peri-urban context. Geografisk Tidsskrift–Danish Journal of Geography 113, 53–64. doi: 10.1080/00167223.2013.770633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parvage, M.M. 2013. A survey of soil phosphorus (P) and nitrogen (N) in Swedish horse paddocks. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 178, 1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2013.06.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parvage, M.M., Ulén, B. & Kirchmann, H. 2015. Are horse paddocks threatening water quality through excess loading of nutrients? Journal of Environmental Management 147, 306–313. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.09.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poeplau, C., Bolinder, M.A., Eriksson, J., Lundblad, M. & Kätterer, T. 2015. Positive trends in organic carbon storage in Swedish agricultural soils due to unexpected socio-economic drivers. Biogeosciences 12, 3241–3251. doi: 10.5194/bg-12-3241-2015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potschin, M & Haines-Young, R. 2006. ‘Rio+10’, sustainability science and landscape ecology. Landscape and Urban Planning 75, 162–174. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Primdahl, J. 2010. Globalisation and the local agricultural landscape: Current change patterns and public policy interventions. Primdahl, J. & Swaffield, S. (eds.) Globalisation and Agricultural Landscapes: Change Patterns and Policy Trends in Developed Countries, 149–167. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Quetier, F. & Gordon, J. 2003. ‘Horsiculture’: How important a land use change in Scotland? Scottish Geographical Journal 119, 153–158. doi: 10.1080/00369220318737168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qviström, M. 2013. Searching for an open future: Planning history as a means of peri-urban landscape analysis. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 56, 1549–1569. doi: 10.1080/09640568.2012.734251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raudsepp-Hearne, C., Peterson, G.D. & Bennet, E.M. 2010. Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) 107, 5242–5247. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0907284107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rössler, M. 2006. World Heritage cultural landscapes: A UNESCO flagship programme 1992–2006. Landscape Research 31, 333–353. doi: 10.1080/01426390601004210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rook, A.J., Dumont, B., Isselstein, J., Osoro, K., Wallis DeVries, M.F., Parente, G. & Mills, J. 2004. Matching type of livestock to desired biodiversity outcomes in pastures – a review. Biological Conservation 119, 137–150. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2003.11.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RUFS. 2010. Regional Development Plan for the Stockholm Region: RUFS 2010. R 2010:5 Stockholm: Stockholms läns landsting.
   Google Scholar
• Schaich, H., Bieling, C. & Plieninger, T. 2010. Linking ecosystem services with cultural landscape research. GAIA 19, 269–277. doi: 10.14512/gaia.19.4.9
   Google Scholar
• Sörlin, S. 2012. Environmental humanities: Why should biologists be interested in the environment take the humanities seriously? Bioscience 62, 788–789. doi: 10.1525/bio.2012.62.9.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soini, K. & Birkeland, I. 2014. Exploring the scientific discourse on cultural sustainability. Geoforum 51, 213–223. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SOU 2013:68. Synliggöra värdet av ekosystemtjänster – Åtgärder för välfärd genom biologisk mångfald och ekosystemtjänster. Stockholm: Miljö-och energidepartementet, Regeringen.
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Sweden. 2013. Statistikdatabasen. http://www.statistikdatabasen.scb.se (accessed 17 December 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Tadaki, M., Salmond, J., Le Heron, R. & Brierley, G. 2012. Nature, culture, and the work of physical geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers New Series 37, 547–562. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2011.00495.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tengberg, A., Fredholm, S., Eliasson, I., Knez, I., Saltzman, K. & Wetterberg, O. 2012. Cultural ecosystem services provided by landscapes: Assessment of heritage values and identity. Ecosystem Services 2, 14–26. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Termorshuizen, J.W. & Opdam, P. 2009. Landscape services as bridge between landscape ecology and sustainable development. Landscape Ecology 24, 1037–1052. doi: 10.1007/s10980-008-9314-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Törn, A., Tolvanen, A., Norokorpi, Y., Tervo, R. & Siikamäki, P. 2009. Comparing the impacts of hiking, skiing and horse riding on trail and vegetation in different types of forest. Journal of Environmental Management 90, 1427–1434. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.08.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Upplands-Bro kommun. 2014. Förslag till fördjupad översiktsplan för landsbygden i Upplands-Bro, samrådshandling, reviderad 2014-06-25. Upplands-Bro: Upplands-Bro kommun.
   Google Scholar
• Upplands-Bro kommun. 2015. Rid och körvägar i Upplands-Bro kommun. Förslag Vision och strategi, Samrådshandling. Del 1. Vision och mål., Dnr. 2014-000392. Upplands-Bro: Upplands-Bro kommun.
   Google Scholar
• van Zanten, B.T., Zasada, I., Koetse, M.J., Ungaro, F., Häfner, K. & Verburg, P.H. 2016. A comparative approach to assess the contribution of landscape features to aesthetic and recreational values in agricultural landscapes. Ecosystem Services 17, 87–98. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.11.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vejre, H., Søndergaard Jensen, F. & Jellesmark Thorsen, B. 2010. Demonstrating the importance of intangible ecosystem services from peri-urban landscapes. Ecological Complexity 7, 338–348. doi: 10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vos, W. & Meekes, H. 1999. Trends in European cultural landscape development: Perspectives for a sustainable future. Landscape and Urban Planning 46, 3–14. doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046(99)00043-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, D.L. 2009. The effects of animals on human health and well-being. Journal of Social Issues 65, 523–543. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01612.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zasada, I., Berges, R., Hilgendorf, J. & Piorr, A. 2013. Horse keeping and the peri-urban development in the Berlin Metropolitan Region. Journal of Land Use Science 8, 199–214. doi: 10.1080/1747423X.2011.628706
   Google Scholar