Discourse, political space and the politics of citizenship

References

• Benford, R.D. & Snow, D.A. 2000. Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology 26, 611–639. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornwall, A. 2004. Introduction: New democratic spaces? The politics and dynamics of institutionalised participation. IDS Bulletin 35, 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, R.J. 2008. Citizenship norms and the expansion of political participation. Political Studies 56, 76–98. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00718.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diani, M. 1996. Linking mobilization frames and political opportunities: Insights from regional populism in Italy. American Sociological Review 61, 1053–1069. doi: 10.2307/2096308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dikeç, M. 2012. Space as a mode of political thinking. Geoforum 43, 669–676. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2012.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drainville, A.C. 1995. Of social spaces, citizenship, and the nature of power in the world economy. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 20, 51–79. doi: 10.1177/030437549502000102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esmark, A., Laustsen, C.B. & Andersen, N.Å. 2005. Socialkonstruktivistiske analysestrategier – en introduktion. Esmark, A., Laustsen, C.B. & Andersen, N.Å. (eds.) Socialkonstruktivistiske analysestrategier, 7–30. Fredriksberg: Roskilde Universitetsforlag.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1972. The Archaeology of Knowledge. London: Tavistock.
   Google Scholar
• Gamson, W.A. & Meyer, D.S. 1996. Framing political opportunity. McAdam, D., McCarthy, J.D. & Zald, M.N. (eds.) Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings, 275–290. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giugni, M. 2009. Political opportunities: From Tilly to Tilly. Swiss Political Science Review 15, 361–367. doi: 10.1002/j.1662-6370.2009.tb00136.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleiss, M.S. 2014. How Chinese labour NGOs legitimize their identity and voice. China Information 28, 362–381. doi: 10.1177/0920203X14550376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleiss, M.S. 2015. Speaking up for the suffering (br)other: Weibo activism, discursive struggles, and minimal politics in China. Media, Culture & Society 37, 513–529. doi: 10.1177/0163443714566897
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleiss, M.S. 2016. From being a problem to having problems: Discourse, governmentality and Chinese migrant workers. Journal of Chinese Political Science 21, 39–55. doi: 10.1007/s11366-015-9356-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, J. & Jasper, J.M. 1999. Caught in a winding, snarling vine: The structural bias of political process theory. Sociological Forum 14, 27–54. doi: 10.1023/A:1021684610881
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, S. 1997. The work of representation. Hall, S. (ed.) Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices, 13–74. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hildebrandt, T. 2011. The political economy of social organization registration in China. The China Quarterly 208, 970–989. doi: 10.1017/S0305741011001093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holston, J. 1999. Spaces of insurgent citizenship. Holston, J. (ed.) Cities and Citizenship, 155–173. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Isin, E.F. 2009. Citizenship in flux: The figure of the activist citizen. Subjectivity 29, 367–388. doi: 10.1057/sub.2009.25
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B., Brenner, N. & Jones, M. 2008. Theorizing sociospatial relations. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 26, 389–401. doi: 10.1068/d9107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jørgensen, M. & Phillips, L. 2002. Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kang, X. & Han, H. 2008. Graduated controls: The state-society relationship in contemporary China. Modern China 34, 36–55. doi: 10.1177/0097700407308138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koopmans, R. & Statham, P. 1999. Ethnic and civic conceptions of nationhood and the differential success of the extreme right in Germany and Italy. Giugni, M., McAdam, D. & Tilly, C. (eds.) How Movements Matter, 225–251. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. 1990. New Reflections on the Revolution of Our Time. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. & Mouffe, C. 1990. Post-marxism without apologies. Laclau, E. (ed.) New Reflections on the Revolution of Our Time, 97–132. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. & Mouffe, C. 2001. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. 2003. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levitt, P. & Merry, S. 2009. Vernacularization on the ground: Local uses of global women’s rights in Peru, China, India and the United States. Global Networks 9, 441–461. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0374.2009.00263.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAdam, D. 1994. Culture and social movements. Laraña, E., Johnston, H. & Gusfield, J.R. (eds.) New Social Movements: From Ideology to Identity, 36–57. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McAdam, D. 1996. Conceptual origins, current problems, future directions. McAdam, D., McCarthy, J.D. & Zald, M.N. (eds.) Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings, 23–40. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McAdam, D., McCarthy, J.D. & Zald, M.N. 1996. Introduction: Opportunities, mobilizing structures, and framing processes – toward a synthetic, comparative perspective on social movements. McAdam, D., McCarthy, J.D. & Zald, M.N. (eds.) Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements. Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings, 1–20. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Melucci, A. 1989. Nomads of the Present: Social Movements and Individual Needs in Contemporary Society. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meng, B. 2011. From steamed bun to grass mud horse: E gao as alternative political discourse on the Chinese Internet. Global Media and Communication 7, 33–51. doi: 10.1177/1742766510397938
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, D.S. & Staggenborg, S. 1996. Movements, countermovements, and the structure of political opportunity. The American Journal of Sociology 101, 1628–1660. doi: 10.1086/230869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miraftab, F. & Wills, S. 2005. Insurgency and spaces of active citizenship: The story of Western Cape anti-eviction campaign in South Africa. Journal of Planning Education and Research 25, 200–217. doi: 10.1177/0739456X05282182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Bureau of Statistics of China. 2014. Statistical Communiqué of the People’s Republic of China on the 2013 National Economic and Social Development. http://www.stats.gov.cn/english/PressRelease/201402/t20140224_515103.html (accessed 2 April 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Polletta, F. 1999. Snarls, quacks, and quarrels: Culture and structure in political process theory. Sociological Forum 14, 63–70. doi: 10.1023/A:1021688711790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polletta, F. 2004. Culture is not just in your head. Goodwin, J. & Jasper, J.M. (eds.) Rethinking Social Movements: Structure, Meaning, and Emotion, 95–110. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Saward, M. 2010. The Representative Claim. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J.C. 1990. Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, N. & Katz, C. 1993. Grounding metaphor: Towards a spatialized politics. Keith, M. & Pile, S. (eds.) Place and the Politics of Identity, 67–83. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stokke, K. & Erdal, M.B. 2017. Political geographies of citizenship. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift–Norwegian Journal of Geography 71, 189–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarrow, S. 1998. Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Teets, J.C. 2013. Let many civil societies bloom: The rise of consultative authoritarianism in China. The China Quarterly 213, 19–38. doi: 10.1017/S0305741012001269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teets, J.C. 2015. The evolution of civil society in Yunnan Province: Contending models of civil society management in China. Journal of Contemporary China 24, 158–175. doi: 10.1080/10670564.2014.918417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Heijden, H.-A. 2014a. Introduction: Linking political citizenship and social movements. van der Heijden, H.-A. (ed.) Handbook of Political Citizenship and Social Movements, 1–22. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• van der Heijden, H.A. (ed.) 2014b. Handbook of Political Citizenship and Social Movements. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, R.H. 2004. The cultural contexts of collective action: Constraints, opportunities, and the symbolic life of social movements. Snow, D.A., Soule, S.A. & Kriesi, H. (eds.) The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, 91–115. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, R., de Cillia, R., Reisigl, M. & Liebhart, K. 2009. The Discursive Construction of National Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, F. & Chan, K.-M. 2012. Graduated control and beyond: The evolving government-NGO relations. China Perspectives 3, 9–17.
   Google Scholar
• Yan, H. 2003. Neoliberal governmentality and neohumanism: Organizing suzhi/value flow through labor recruitment networks. Cultural Anthropology 18, 493–523. doi: 10.1525/can.2003.18.4.493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L. & Wang, G.X. 2010. Urban citizenship of rural migrants in reform-era China. Citizenship Studies 14, 145–166. doi: 10.1080/13621021003594809
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar