Multifunctional agriculture as an integral part of rural development: Spatial concentration and distribution in Czechia

References

• Antrop, M. 2004. Landscape change and the urbanization process in Europe. Landscape and Urban Planning 67, 9–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bičík, I. & Jančák, V. 2005. Transformační procesy v českém zemědělství po roce 1990. Praha: Katedra sociální geografie a regionálního rozvoje, Přírodovědecká fakulta, Univerzita Karlova v Praze.
   Google Scholar
• Brandth, B. & Haugen, M. S. 2010. Farm diversification into tourism – implications for social identity? Journal of Rural Studies 27, 35–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brožová, I. 2005. Organic agriculture as one of aspects of multifunctional agriculture. Agricultural Economics (Czech Republic) 51, 51–56.
   Google Scholar
• Busck, A.G., Kristensen, S.P., Præstholm, S., Reenberg, A. & Primdahl, J. 2006. Land system changes in the context of urbanisation: Examples from the peri-urban area of Greater Copenhagen. Geografisk Tidsskriftt–Danish Journal of Geography 106, 21–34.
   Google Scholar
• Cairol, D., Coudel, E., Knickel, K., Caron, P. & Kruger, M. 2009. Multifunctionality of agriculture and rural areas as reflected in policies: The importance and relevance of the territorial view. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 11, 269–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czech Statistical Office. 2011. Agrocensus 2010 Regions – Farm Structure Survey and Survey on Agricultural Production Methods – 2010. https://www.czso.cz/csu/czso/agrocensus-2010-regions-farm-structure-survey-and-survey-on-agricultural-production-methods-2010-8szag53hke (accessed September 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Czech Statistical Office. 2014. Farm Structure Survey – Regions - 2013. https://www.czso.cz/csu/czso/farm-structure-survey-regions-2013-676t9wjj4i (accessed September 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Czech Statistical Office. 2004. Strukturální šetření v zemědělství – regiony 2003. Praha: Český statistický úřad.
   Google Scholar
• Czech Statistical Office. 2006. Strukturální šetření v zemědělství – regiony 2005. Praha: Český statistický úřad.
   Google Scholar
• Czech Statistical Office. 2008. Strukturální šetření v zemědělství – regiony 2007. Praha: Český statistický úřad.
   Google Scholar
• CzBA. 2014. Seznam bioplynových stanic. České Budějovice: Česká bioplynová asociace.
   Google Scholar
• Darnhofer, I. 2005. Organic farming and rural development: Some evidence from Austria. Sociologia Ruralis 45, 308–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dibden, J., Potter, C. & Cocklin, C. 2009. Contesting the neoliberal project for agriculture: Productivist and multifunctional trajectories in the European Union and Australia. Journal of Rural Studies 25, 299–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dömeová, L. & Jindrová, A. 2014. Rural tourism and its contribution to the development of countryside. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis 59, 59–64.
   Google Scholar
• Durydiwka, M. 2003. Tourism as a factor of the activation the rural areas in Poland. AUC Geographica 38, 53–58.
   Google Scholar
• Dvořák, P., Martinát, S., van der Horst, D., Frantál, B. & Turečková, K. 2017. Renewable energy investment and job creation: A cross-sectoral assessment for the Czech Republic with reference to EU benchmarks. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 69, 360–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. n.d. Less Favoured Areas Scheme. https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/rural-development-previous/2007-2013/less-favoured-areas-scheme_en (accessed 31 August 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. 2018. Farm Structure – 2008 Legislation. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/agriculture/data/database (accessed June 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Feagan, R. 2007. The place of food: Mapping out the ‘local’ in local food systems. Progress in Human Geography 31, 23–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feehan, J. & O’Connor, D. 2009. Agriculture and multifunctionality in Ireland. McDonagh J. & Varley, T. (eds.) A Living Countryside? The Politics of Sustainable Development in Rural Ireland, 123–138. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Fialová, D. & Vágner, J. 2014. The owners of second homes as users of rural space in Czechia. AUC Geographica 49, 21–28.
   Google Scholar
• Foret, M., Konečný, O. & Klusáček, P. 2014. Viticulture – challenge for tourism development (Znojmo case study area). Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis 62, 339–346.
   Google Scholar
• Frantál, B. & Martinát, S. 2013. Market adaptations, competitiveness and diversification trends of post-socialistic farmers. Frantál, B. & Martinát, S. (eds.) New Rural Spaces: Towards Renewable Energies, Multifunctional Farming, and Sustainable Tourism, 86–98. Brno: ÚGN.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, D. 2004. Rural Europe redux? Reflections on alternative agro-food networks and paradigm change. Sociologia Ruralis 44, 3–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granvik, M., Lindberg, G., Stigzelius, K.-A., Fahlbeck, E. & Surry, Y. 2012. Prospects of multifunctional agriculture as a facilitator of sustainable rural development: Swedish experience of Pillar 2 of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift–Norwegian Journal of Geography 66, 155–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, A. & Mogyorody, V. 2001. Organic farmers in Ontario: An examination of the conventionalization argument. Sociologia Ruralis 41, 399–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammer, M., Bonow, M. & Petersson, M. 2017. The role of horse keeping in transforming peri-urban landscapes: A case study from metropolitan Stockholm, Sweden. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift–Norwegian Journal of Geography 71, 146–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassink, J., Grin, J. & Hulsink, W. 2013. Multifunctional agriculture meets health care: Applying the multi-level transition sciences perspective to care farming in the Netherlands. Sociologia Ruralis 53, 223–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoggart, K. & Paniagua, A. 2001. What rural restructuring? Journal of Rural Studies 17, 41–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes, J. 2012. Cape York Peninsula, Australia: A frontier region undergoing a multifunctional transition with indigenous engagement. Journal of Rural Studies 28, 252–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hrabalová, A. & Zander, K. 2006. Organic beef farming in the Czech Republic: Structure, development and economic performance. Agricultural Economics (Czech Republic) 52, 89–100.
   Google Scholar
• Ilbery, B.W. & Bowler, I.R. 1998. From agricultural productivism to post-productivism. Ilbery, B. (ed.) The Geography of Rural Change, 57–84. Harlow: Addison Wesley Longmann.
   Google Scholar
• Ilbery, B. & Kneafsey, M. 2000. Producer constructions of quality in regional speciality food production: A case study from south west England. Journal of Rural Studies 16, 217–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilbery, B. & Maye, D. 2011. Clustering and the spatial distribution of organic farming in England and Wales. Area 43, 31–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilbery, B., Morris, C., Buller, H., Maye, D. & Kneafsey, M. 2005. Product, process and place: An examination of food marketing and labelling schemes in Europe and North America. European Urban and Regional Studies 12, 116–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilbery, B., Kirwan, J. & Maye, D. 2016. Explaining regional and local differences in organic farming in England and Wales: A comparison of south west Wales and south east England. Regional Studies 50, 110–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinsella, J., Wilson, S., De Jong, F. & Renting, H. 2000. Pluriactivity as a livelihood strategy in Irish farm households and its role in rural development. Sociologia Ruralis 40, 481–496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kizos, T. 2010. Multifunctionality of farm households in Greece. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift–Norwegian Journal of Geography 64, 105–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kizos, T., Marin-Guirao, J.I., Georgiadi, M.E., Dimoula, S., Karatsolis, E., Mpartzas, A., Mpelali, A. & Papaioannou, S. 2011. Survival strategies of farm households and multifunctional farms in Greece. The Geographical Journal 177, 335–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konečný, O. 2014. Geographical perspectives on agritourism in the Czech Republic. Moravian Geographical Reports 22, 15–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konečný, O. 2017. Spatial polarization of agriculture of Czechia during the integration into the European Union. Geografie 122, 257–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konečný, O. & Hrabák, J. 2016. Česká a slovenská geografie zemědělství: transformace, vstup do Evropské unie … a dál? Multifunkcionalita? Geografický časopis 68, 151–169.
   Google Scholar
• Kunc, J., Petr, O., Šauer, M., Tonev, P. & Vystoupil, J. 2013. Selected function-space aspects of rural tourism (case of the Czech Republic). Frantál, B. & Martinát, S. (eds.) New Rural Spaces: Towards Renewable Energies, Multifunctional Farming, and Sustainable Tourism, 119–130. Brno: ÚGN.
   Google Scholar
• Lange, A., Piorr, A., Siebert, R. & Zasada, I. 2013. Spatial differentiation of farm diversification: How rural attractiveness and vicinity to cities determine farm households’ response to the CAP. Land Use Policy 31, 136–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsden, T. 1998. New rural territories: Regulating the differentiated rural spaces. Journal of Rural Studies 14, 107–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinát, S., Dvořák, P., Frantál, B., Klusáček, P., Kunc, J., Kulla, M., Mintálová, T., Navrátil, J. & van der Horst, D. 2013. Spatial consequences of biogas production and agricultural changes in the Czech Republic after EU accession: Mutual symbiosis, coexistence or parasitism? AUPO Geographica 44, 75–92.
   Google Scholar
• Martinát, S., Navrátil, J., Dvořák, P., van der Horst, D., Klusáček, P., Kunc, J. & Frantál, B. 2016. Where AD plants wildly grow: The spatio-temporal diffusion of agricultural biogas production in the Czech Republic. Renewable Energy 95, 85–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mather, A.S., Hill, G. & Nijnik, M. 2006. Post-productivism and rural land use: Cul de sac or challenge for theorization? Journal of Rural Studies 22, 441–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J. 2005. Rural geography: Multifunctional rural geographies – reactionary or radical? Progress in Human Geography 29, 773–782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNally, S. 2001. Farm diversification in England and Wales – What can we learn from the farm business survey? Journal of Rural Studies 17, 247–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meraner, M., Heijman, W., Kuhlman, T. & Finger, R. 2015. Determinants of farm diversification in the Netherlands. Land Use Policy 42, 767–780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministerstvo zemědělství. 2014. Celkový seznam osob podnikajících v EZ 2013. Praha: Ministerstvo zemědělství. http://eagri.cz/public/web/mze/zemedelstvi/ekologicke-zemedelstvi/seznamy-podnikatelu/celkovy-seznam-podnikatelu/ (accessed May 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Ministerstvo zemědělství. 2015a. Akční plán ČR: pro rozvoj ekologického zemědělství v letech 2016–2020/Czech Action Plan: For Economic Development of Organic Farming 2016–2020. Praha: Ministerstvo zemědělství. http://eagri.cz/public/web/file/442986/Akcni_plan_CR_pro_rozvoj_EZ_Czech_Action_Plan_for_Development_of_OF.pdf (accessed May 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Ministerstvo zemědělství. 2015b. Ročenka/Yearbook 2014: Ekologické zemědělství v České republice/Organic Farming in the Czech Republic. Praha: Ministerstvo zemědělství. http://eagri.cz/public/web/file/434549/Roc_enka_EZ_2014_net.pdf (accessed May 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Murdoch, J., Lowe, P., Ward, N. & Marsden, T. 2003. The Differentiated Countryside. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor, D. & Dunne, W. 2009. Conceptualizing multifunctionality in the Irish policy context—Issues for policy formulation, implementation and evaluation. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 11, 333–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2001. Multifunctionality: Towards an Analytical Framework. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Parrott, N., Wilson, N. & Murdoch, J. 2002. Spatializing quality: Regional protection and the alternative geography of food. European Urban and Regional Studies 9, 241–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pělucha, M. & Květoň, V. 2017. The role of EU rural development policy in the neo-productivist agricultural paradigm. Regional Studies 51, 1860–1870.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkins, H.C. 2006. Commodification: Re-resourcing rural areas. Cloke, P., Marsden, T. & Mooney, P.H. (eds.) Handbook of Rural Studies, 243–257. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pölling, B. & Mergenthaler, M. 2017. The location matters: Determinants for ‘deepening’ and ‘broadening’ diversification strategies in Ruhr Metropolis’ urban farming. Sustainability 9, 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter, C. & Tilzey, M. 2005. Agricultural policy discourses in the European post-Fordist transition: Neoliberalism, neomercantilism and multifunctionality. Progress in Human Geography 29, 581–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Primdahl, J. 2014. Agricultural landscape sustainability under pressure: Policy developments and landscape change. Landscape Research 39, 123–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Primdahl, J. & Kristensen, L.S. 2011. The farmer as a landscape manager: Management roles and change patterns in a Danish region. Geografisk Tidsskrift–Danish Journal of Geography 111, 107–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Primdahl, J., Andersen, E., Swaffield, S. & Kristensen, L. 2013a. Intersecting dynamics of agricultural structural change and urbanisation within European rural landscapes: Change patterns and policy implications. Landscape Research 38, 799–817.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Primdahl, J., Kristensen, L.S. & Busck, A.G. 2013b. The farmer and landscape management: Different roles, different policy approaches. Geography Compass 7, 300–314.
   Google Scholar
• Rizzo, L.S. 2015. Exploring multifunctional agriculture in the Veneto: A focus on broadening processes. Semestrale di Studi e Ricerche di Geografia 1, 93–104.
   Google Scholar
• Renting, H., Marsden, T.K. & Banks, J. 2003. Understanding alternative food networks: Exploring the role of short food supply chains in rural development. Environment and Planning A 35, 393–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renting, H., Rossing, W.H., Groot, J.C.J., van der Ploeg, J.D., Laurent, C., Perraud, D., Stobbelaar, D.J. & van Ittersum, M.K. 2009. Exploring multifunctional agriculture: A review of conceptual approaches and prospects for an integrative transitional framework. Journal of Environmental Management 90, 112–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizov, M. 2006. Rural development perspectives in enlarging Europe: The implications of CAP reforms and agricultural transition in accession countries. European Planning Studies 14, 219–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sklenicka, P., Janovska, V., Salek, M., Vlasak, J. & Molnarova, K. 2014. The farmland rental paradox: Extreme land ownership fragmentation as a new form of land degradation. Land Use Policy 38, 587–593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spilková, J. & Perlín, R. 2013. Farmers’ markets in Czechia: Risks and possibilities. Journal of Rural Studies 32, 220–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spilková, J., Fendrychová, L. & Syrovátková, M. 2013. Farmers’ markets in Prague: A new challenge within the urban shoppingscape. Agriculture and Human Values 30, 179–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Symes, D. 1992. Agriculture, the state and rural society in Europe: Trends and issues. Sociologia Ruralis 32, 193–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syrovátková, M. 2016. The adoption of a local food concept in post-communist context: Farm shops in Czechia. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift–Norwegian Journal of Geography 70, 24–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syrovátková, M., Hrabák, J. & Spilková, J. 2015. Farmers’ markets’ locavore challenge: The potential of local food production for newly emerged farmers’ markets in Czechia. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 30, 305–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Ploeg, J.D. & Roep, D. 2003. Multifunctionality and rural development: The actual situation in Europe. Van Huylenbroeck, G. & Durand, G. (eds.) Multifunctional Agriculture: A New Paradigm for European Agriculture and Rural Development, 37–53. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• van der Ploeg, J.D., Renting, H., Brunori, G., Knickel, K., Mannion, J., Marsden, T., Roest, K., Sevilla-Guzmán, E. & Ventura, F. 2000. Rural development: From practices and policies towards theory. Sociologia Ruralis 40, 391–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walford, N. 2003. A past and a future for diversification on farms? Some evidence from large-scale, commercial farms in south east England. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography 85, 51–62.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, A.M. & Baláž, V. 2002. The Czech and Slovak Republics: Conceptual issues in the economic analysis of tourism in transition. Tourism Management 23, 37–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, G.A. 2001. From productivism to post-productivism … and back again? Exploring the (un)changed natural and mental landscapes of European agriculture. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 26, 77–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, G.A. 2007. Multifunctional Agriculture: A Transition Theory Perspective. Cambridge: CABI.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, G.A. 2008. From ‘weak’ to ‘strong’ multifunctionality: Conceptualising farm-level multifunctional transitional pathways. Journal of Rural Studies 24, 367–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, G.A. 2009. The spatiality of multifunctional agriculture: A human geography perspective. Geoforum 40, 269–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, G.A. 2010. Multifunctional ‘quality’ and rural community resilience. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 35, 364–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiskerke, J.S. 2009. On places lost and places regained: Reflections on the alternative food geography and sustainable regional development. International Planning Studies 14, 369–387.
   Google Scholar
• Woods, M. 2005. Rural Geography: Processes, Responses and Experiences in Rural Restructuring. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Zagata, L. 2007. Bio cash-cow? Context and content of Czech organic farming. Agricultural Economics (Czech Republic) 53, 45–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zasada, I. 2011. Multifunctional peri-urban agriculture—A review of societal demands and the provision of goods and services by farming. Land Use Policy 28, 639–648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zasada, I., Fertner, C., Piorr, A. & Nielsen, T. S. 2011. Peri-urbanisation and multifunctional adaptation of agriculture around Copenhagen. Geografisk Tidsskrift–Danish Journal of Geography 111, 59–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zdráhal, I. & Bečvářová, V. 2013. The Size Structure of Agriculture Holdings – Factors, Trends and Background. Brno: Mendel University.
   Google Scholar