The local impact of increased numbers of state employees on start-ups in Norway

References

• Abadie, A., Diamond, A. & Hainmueller, J. 2015. Comparative politics and the synthetic control method. American Journal of Political Science 59(2), 495–510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acs, Z. & Armington, C. 2004. Employment growth and entrepreneurial activity in cities. Regional studies 38(8), 911–927.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbo, P. & Benneworth, P. 2007. Understanding the Regional Contribution of Higher Education Institutions: A Literature Review. OECD Education Working Papers 9. doi: 10.1787/161208155312
   Google Scholar
• Audretsch, D.B. 1995. Innovation and Industry Evolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Audretsch, D.B. & Fritsch, M. 1994. The geography of firm births in Germany. Regional Studies 28(4), 359–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audretsch, D.B. & Fritsch, M.J.R.S. 2002. Growth regimes over time and space 36(2), 113–124.
   Google Scholar
• Barro, R. J. 2001. Human capital and growth. American Economic Review 91(2), 12–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benneworth, P. & Nieth, L. 2018. The Persistent Problems of Universities’ Contributions to Regional Development. RSA Regions. doi: 10.1080/13673882.2018.00001007
   Google Scholar
• Berry, C.R. & Glaeser, E.L. 2005. The divergence of human capital levels across cities. Papers in Regional Science 84(3), 407–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, S.E. & Lynch, L.M. 1996. Human-capital investments and productivity. American Economic Review 86(2), 263–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brakman, S., Garretsen, H. & van Marrewijk, C. 2009. The New Introduction to Geographical Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brett, A.M., Gibson, D.V. & Smilor, R.W. 1991. University Spin-off Companies. Savage, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Burdett, K. 2012. Towards a theory of the labor market with a public sector. Labour Economics 19(1), 68–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2011.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Candell, A.B. & Jaffe, A.B. 1999. The regional economic impact of public research funding: A case study of Massachusetts. Branscomb, L.M. & Kodama, F. (eds.) Industrializing Knowledge: University-Industry Linkages in Japan and the United States, 510–530. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carree, M.A. & Thurik, A.R. 2010. The impact of entrepreneurship on economic growth. Acs, Z.J. & Audretsch, D.B. (eds.) Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research: In Interdisciplinary Survey and Introduction, 2nd ed., 557–594. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Caves, R. 1998. Industrial organization and new findings on the turnover and mobility of firms. Journal of Economic Literature 36(4), 1947–1982.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidsson, P., Delmar, F. & Wiklund, J. 2006. Entrepreneurship and the Growth of Firms. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Diener, E. & Suh, E. 1997. Measuring quality of life: Economic, social, and subjective indicators. Social Indicators Research 40(1–2), 189–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drucker, J. & Goldstein, H. 2007. Assessing the regional economic development impacts of universities: A review of current approaches. International Regional Science Review 30(1), 20–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckstein, H. 2000. Case study and theory in political science. Hammersley, M., Floster, P. & Gomm, R. (eds.) Case Study Method, 119–164). London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Egeberg, M. & Trondal, J. 2011. Agencification and location: Does agency site matter? Public Organization Review 11(2), 97–108.
   Google Scholar
• Elenius, L., Tjelmeland, H., Lähteenmäki, M. & Golubev, A. 2015. The Barents Region: A Transnational History of Subarctic Northern Europe. Oslo: Pax Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson, R., Lindgren, U. & Malmberg, G. 2008. Agglomeration mobility: Effects of localisation, urbanisation, and scale on job changes. Environment and Planning A, 40(10), 2419–2434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H. & Leydesdorff, L. 2000. The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and ‘Mode 2’ to a triple helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy 29(2), 109–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faggio, G. 2019. Relocation of public sector workers: Evaluating a place-based policy. Journal of Urban Economics 111, 53–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faggio, G. & Overman, H. 2014. The effect of public sector employment on local labour markets. Journal of Urban Economics 79, 91–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feller, I., Ailes, C.P. & Roessner, J.D. 2002. Impacts of research universities on technological innovation in industry: Evidence from engineering research centers. Research Policy 31(3), 457–474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florida, R. 2005. Cities and the Creative Class. Brooklyn, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Foray, D., David, P.A. & Hall, B. 2009. Smart specialisation – the concept. Knowledge Economists Policy Brief 9. http://ec.europa.eu/invest-in-research/pdf/download_en/kfg_policy_brief_no9.pdf (accessed July 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Fornyingsdepartementet. 2009. Evaluering av utflytting av statlig virksomhet. https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/evaluering-av-utflytting-av-statlig-virk/id566795/ (accessed July 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Fulsås, N. 1993. Universitetet i Tromsø 25 år. Tromsø: Universitetet i Tromsø.
   Google Scholar
• Gabaix, X. & Ioannides, Y.M. 2004. The evolution of city size distributions. Henderson, J.V. & Thisse, J. (eds.) Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics 4, 2341–2378. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• George, A.L. & Bennett, A. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gerring, J. 2004. What is a case study and what is it good for? American Political Science Review 98(2), 341–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goddard, J. & Chatterton, P. 1999. Regional development agencies and the knowledge economy: Harnessing the potential of universities. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 17(6), 685–699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoyman, M. & Faricy, C. 2009. It takes a village: A test of the creative class, social capital, and human capital theories. Urban Affairs Review 44(3), 311–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iammarino, S., Rodriguez-Pose, A. & Storper, M. 2018. Regional inequality in Europe: Evidence, theory and policy implications. Journal of Economic Geography 19(2), 273–298. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lby021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jennings, W. & Stoker, G. 2016. The bifurcation of politics: Two Englands. The Political Quarterly 87(3), 372–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane, T.J. 2010. The importance of startups in job creation and job destruction. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1646934 (accessed July 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Kiland, C. & Trondal, J. 2010. Byråkrati og geografi – Geografisk relokalisering av norsk sentralforvaltning. Norsk statsvitenskapelig tidsskrift 25(4), 331–355.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, N., Morris, K. & Kemeny, T. 2018. Immobility and the Brexit vote. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 11(1), 143–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leydesdorff, L. 2012. The triple helix, quadruple helix, … , and an N-tuple of helices: Explanatory models for analyzing the knowledge-based economy? Journal of the Knowledge Economy 3(1), 25–35.
   Google Scholar
• Lijphart, A. 1979. Religious vs. linguistic vs. class voting: The ‘crucial experiment’ of comparing Belgium, Canada, South Africa, and Switzerland. American Political Science Review 73(2), 442–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipset, S. & Rokkan, S. 1967. Cleavage Structures, Party Systems, and Voter Alignments: An Introduction. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lyons, S.M. 2004. Well Placed to Deliver? Shaping the Pattern of Government Service: Independent Review of Public Sector Relocation. London: HM Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Maskell, P. 2001. Towards a knowledge-based theory of the geographical cluster. Industrial and Corporate Change 10(4), 921–943.
   Google Scholar
• McCann, P. & Ortega-Argilés, R. 2011. Smart specialisation, regional growth and applications to EU cohesion policy. IEB Working Paper 2011/14. https://danube-inco.net/object/document/1517/attach/s3_mccann_ortega.pdf (accesssed July 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Mellander, C. & Florida, R. 2011. Creativity, talent, and regional wages in Sweden. The Annals of Regional Science 46(3), 637–660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meld. St. 18 (2016–2017). Berekraftige byar og sterke distrikt. Kommunal- og moderniseringsdepartementet. https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/meld.-st.-18-20162017/id2539348 (accessed July 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Moretti, E. 2010. Local multipliers. American Economic Review 100(2), 373–377. doi: 10.1257/aer.100.2.373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moretti, E. & Thulin, P. 2013. Local multipliers and human capital in the United States and Sweden. Industrial and Corporate Change 22(1), 339–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman, V.D. & Venables, A.J. 2004. Industrial clusters: Equilibrium, welfare and policy. Economica 71(284), 543–558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NSD. n.d.,a. Forvaltningsdatabasen. http://www.nsd.uib.no/polsys/forvaltning/ (accessed 1 September 2018).
   Google Scholar
• NSD. n.d.,b. Forvaltningsdatabasen: Landsoversikt – statsansatte. http://www.nsd.uib.no/polsys/data/forvaltning/ansatte/land (accessed July 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Pike, A., Rodríguez-Pose, A. & Tomaney, J. 2007. What kind of local and regional development and for whom? Regional Studies 41(9), 1253–1269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinheiro, J., Bates, D., DebRoy, S., Sarkar, D. & Team, R.C. 2013. nlme: Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R Package Version 3(1), 111. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/nlme/index.html (accessed July 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M.E. 1998. Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review 76(6), 77–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, M.E. 2000. Location, competition, and economic development: Local clusters in a global economy. Economic Development Quarterly 14(1), 15–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reve, T. 2009. Norway – a Global Maritime Knowledge Hub. Research Report 5/2009. Oslo: BI Norwegian School of Management & Centre for Maritime Competitiveness.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A. 2018. The revenge of the places that don’t matter (and what to do about it). Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 11(1), 189–209.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A. & Ketterer, T. 2019. Institutional change and the development of lagging regions in Europe. Regional Studies. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2019.1608356
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rokkan, S. 1987. Centre-periphery Structures in Europe: An ISSC Workbook in Comparative Analysis. Frankfurt Am Main: Campus Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Rokkan, S. & Urwin, D.W. 1983. Economy, Territory, Identity: Politics of West European Peripheries. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Saba, K. 2011. Koste hva det koste vil? Oppsummering av to relokaliseringsprosesser. Trondal, J. (ed.) Byråkrati og geografi: geografisk relokalisering av norsk sentraladministrasjon, 27–58. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, A. J. & Storper, M. 2005. Pathways to Industrialization and Regional Development. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sheppard, E. 2011. Geography, nature, and the question of development. Dialogues in Human Geography 1(1), 46–75.
   Google Scholar
• Sjöstedt Landén, A. 2012. Moved by Relocation: Professional Identification in the Decentralization of Public Sector Jobs in Sweden. PhD Thesis. Umeå: Umeå universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Skodvin, O.-J. 1997. The reorganisation of non-university higher education in Norway: Problems and potentials. Tertiary Education and Management 3(4), 317–324.
   Google Scholar
• Smilor, R.W., Gibson, D.V. & Dietrich, G.B. 1990. University spin-out companies: Technology start-ups from UT-Austin. Journal of Business Venturing 5(1), 63–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• St.meld. nr. 17 (2002–2003). Om statlige tilsyn. Arbeidsdepartementet. https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/stmeld-nr-17-2002-2003-/id134860 (accessed July 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Statistisk Sentralbyrå. 2019. Enterprises. https://www.ssb.no/en/statbank/table/06104/?rxid=97ff0130-0c29-43eb-93bc-3da7011cb804 (accessed 1 September 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Steffensen, M., Rogers, E. M. & Speakman, K. 2000. Spin-offs from research centers at a research university. Journal of Business Venturing 15(1), 93–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stegmueller, D. 2013. How many countries for multilevel modeling? A comparison of frequentist and Bayesian approaches. American Journal of Political Science 57(3), 748–761.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein, J. (2019). The striking similarities between Northern Norway and Northern Sweden. Arctic Review on Law and Politics 10, 79–102. doi: 10.23865/arctic.v10.1247
   Google Scholar
• Sætren, H. 1983. Iverksetting av offentlig politikk: En studie av utflytting av statsinstitusjoner fra Oslo 1960–1981. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Sætren, H. 2011. Fra ord til handling. Trondal, J. (ed.) Byråkrati og geografi: geografisk relokalisering av norsk sentraladministrasjon, 27–58. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Teigen, H. 2011. Distriktspolitikkens historie: Frå nasjonal strategi til regional fragmentering? Plan 43(6), 48–54. http://www.idunn.no/plan/2011/06/art08 (accessed July 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Trondal, J. 2011. Byråkrati og geografi: geografisk relokalisering av norsk sentraladministrasjon. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Westlund, H. 2004. Regional Effects of Universities and Higher Education: A Knowledge Overview of Swedish, Scandinavian and International Experiences. Stockholm: E. Gotab.
   Google Scholar
• Wikhall, M. 2001. Universiteten och kompetenslandskapet: Effekter av den högre utbildningens tillväxt och regionala spridning i Sverige. Lund: Department of Social and Economic Geography, Lund University.
   Google Scholar