Determinants of responsible innovation for sustainability transition in a developing country: Contested narratives for transition in the Sri Lankan power sector

References

• Asian Development Bank. 2019. Sri Lanka Energy Sector Assessment, Strategy, and Road Map. https://www.adb.org/documents/sri-lanka-energy-assessment-strategy-road-map (accessed 20 September 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Bergek, A., Jacobsson, S., Carlsson, B., Lindmark, S. & Rickne, A. 2008. Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis. Research Policy 37, 407–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsson, B. & Stankiewicz, R. 1991. On the nature, function and composition of technological systems. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 1, 93–118.
   Google Scholar
• Central Bank of Sri Lanka 2020. Central Bank of Sri Lanka Annual Report of the Monetary Board to the Hon. Minister of Finance fot the Year 2020. https://www.cbsl.gov.lk/en/publications/economic-and-financial-reports/annual-reports/annual-report-2020 (accessed 20 September 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Ceylon Electricity Board 2019. Long Term Generation Expansion Plan 2020–2039 (Draft). [Colombo]: Transmission and Generation Planning Branch, Ceylon Electricity Board.
   Google Scholar
• Ceylon Electricity Board 2021. Long Term Generation Expansion Plan 2022–2041. [Colombo]: Transmission and Generation Planning Branch, Ceylon Electricity Board.
   Google Scholar
• Edsand, H.E. 2019. Technological innovation system and the wider context: A framework for developing countries. Technology in Society 58: Article 101150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farla, J., Markard, J., Raven, R. & Coenen, L. 2012. Sustainability transitions in the making: A closer look at actors, strategies and resources. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 79, 991–998.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fløysand, A. & Jakobsen, S.E. 2017. Industrial renewal: Narratives in play in the development of green technologies in the Norwegian salmon farming industry. Geographical Journal 183, 140–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fløysand, A., Lindfors, E.T., Jakobsen, S.-E. & Coenen, L. 2021. Place-based directionality of innovation: Tasmanian salmon farming and responsible innovation. Sustainability 13: Article 62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fusch, P.I. & Ness, L.R. 2015. Are we there yet? Data saturation in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report 20. Article 1408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F.W. 2002. Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy 31, 1257–1274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gül, T. 2020. Special Report on Clean Energy Innovation: Accelerating Technology Progress for a Sustainable Future. International Energy Agency (IEA) report. http://mission-innovation.net/2020/07/08/iea-special-report-on-clean-energy-innovation-highlights-the-need-for-countries-to-work-together-to-accelerate-technology-progress/ (accessed 20 September 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Hekkert, M.P., Suurs, R.A., Negro, S.O., Kuhlmann, S. & Smits, R.E. 2007. Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 74, 413–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herman, K.S. 2021. Green growth and innovation in the Global South: A systematic literature review. Innovation and Development. DOI: 10.1080/2157930X.2021.1909821
   Google Scholar
• Komendantova, N. 2021. Transferring awareness into action: A meta-analysis of the behavioral drivers of energy transitions in Germany, Austria, Finland, Morocco, Jordan and Iran. Energy Research & Social Science 71: Article 101826.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kooijman, M., Hekkert, M.P., van Meer, P.J., Moors, E.H. & Schellekens, H. 2017. How institutional logics hamper innovation: The case of animal testing. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 118, 70–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lachman, D. 2013. Wanted: Energy system transition research in developing countries. Ramazzotti, A. & Gravina, W. (eds.) Developing Countries: Political, Economic and Social Issues, 207–213. New York: Nova Science.
   Google Scholar
• Macnaghten, P., Owen, R., Stilgoe, J., Wynne, B., Azevedo, A., de Campos, A., Chilvers, J., Dagnino, R., Di Giulio, G. & Frow, E. 2014. Responsible innovation across borders: Tensions, paradoxes and possibilities. Journal of Responsible Innovation 1, 191–199.
   Google Scholar
• Markard, J. & Truffer, B. 2008. Technological innovation systems and the multi-level perspective: Towards an integrated framework. Research Policy 37, 596–615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Njøs, R., Sjøtun, S.G., Jakobsen, S.-E. & Fløysand, A. 2020. Expanding analyses of path creation: Interconnections between territory and technology. Economic Geography 96, 266–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD & International Energy Agency 2011. OECD Green Growth Studies: Energy. https://www.oecd.org/greengrowth/greening-energy/49157219.pdf (accessed 20 September 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Owen, R. & Pansera, M. 2019. Responsible Innovation and Responsible Research and Innovation. Handbook on Science and Public Policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, R., Pansera, M., Macnaghten, P. & Randles, S. 2021. Organisational institutionalisation of responsible innovation. Research Policy 50: Article 104132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Presidential Expert Committee. 2019. Sustainable Sri Lanka: 2030 Vision and Strategic Path. https://www.presidentsoffice.gov.lk/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Final-v2.4-Typeset-MM-v12F-Cov3.pdf (accessed 20 September 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Reusswig, F., Komendantova, N. & Battaglini, A. 2018. New governance challenges and conflicts of the energy transition: Renewable electricity generation and transmission as contested socio-technical options. Scholten, D. (ed.) The Geopolitics of Renewables, 231–256. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rödl, M.B., Boons, F. & Spekkink, W. 2022. From responsible to responsive innovation: A systemic and historically sensitive approach to innovation processes. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 174. Article: 121231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saculsan, P.G. & Mori, A. 2020. Why developing countries go through an unsustainable energy transition pathway? The case of the Philippines from a political economic perspective. Journal of Sustainability Research 2: Article e200012.
   Google Scholar
• Sovacool, B.K. 2014. What are we doing here? Analyzing fifteen years of energy scholarship and proposing a social science research agenda. Energy Research & Social Science 1, 1–29.
   Google Scholar
• Stahl, B.C., Akintoye, S., Bitsch, L., Bringedal, B., Eke, D., Farisco, M., Grasenick, K., Guerrero, M., Knight, W. & Leach, T. 2021. From responsible research and innovation to responsibility by design. Journal of Responsible Innovation 8, 175–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stilgoe, J., Owen, R. & Macnaghten, P. 2013. Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Research Policy 42, 1568–1580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theiventhran, G.M. 2022. Energy as a geopolitical battleground in Sri Lanka. Asian Geographer. DOI: 10.1080/10225706.2022.2098507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations. n.d. Ensure Access to Affordable, Reliable, Sustainable and Modern Energy for All. Department of Economic and Social Affairs Sustainable Development, United Nations. https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal7 (accessed 18 May 2022).
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. n.d. The Paris Agreement. https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement/the-paris-agreement (accessed 7 October 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Vasen, F. 2017. Responsible innovation in developing countries: An enlarged agenda. Asveld, L., van Dam-Mieras, R. Swierstra, T., Lavrijssen, S., Linse, K. & van den Hoven. J. (eds.) Responsible Innovation 3: A European Agenda, 93–109. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Veland, S., Scoville-Simonds, M., Gram-Hanssen, I., Schorre, A.K., El Khoury, A., Nordbø, M.J., Lynch, A.H., Hochachka, G. & Bjørkan, M. 2018. Narrative matters for sustainability: The transformative role of storytelling in realizing 1.5°C futures. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 31, 41–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Schomberg, R. 2013. A vision of responsible innovation. Owen, R., Bessant, J. & Heintz, M. (eds.) Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society, 51–74. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, B. & Hallegatte, S. 2019. Socioeconomic Resilience in Sri Lanka: Natural Disaster Poverty and Wellbeing Impact Assessment. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/32423/WPS9015.pdf?sequence=4&isAllowed=y (accessed 20 September 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Wang, X. & Lo, K. 2021. Just transition: A conceptual review. Energy Research & Social Science 82: Article 102291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2019. Sri Lanka Energy InfraSAP: Final Report. AUS0000803. https://www.bioenergysrilanka.lk/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Sri-Lanka-Energy-Infrastructure-Sector-Assessment-Program-Executive-Summary.pdf (accessed 7 October 2022).
   Google Scholar