Creatively transforming periphery? Artists’ initiatives, social innovation, and responsibility for place

References

• Anderson, N., Potočnik, K. & Zhou, J. 2014. Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of Management 40(5), 1297–1333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• André, I., Abreu, A. & Carmo. A. 2014. Social innovation through the arts in rural areas: The case of Montemor-o-Novo. Moulaert, F., MacCallum, D., Mehmood, A. & Hamdouch, A. (eds.) The International Handbook on Social Innovation: Collective Action, Social Learning and Transdisciplinary Research, 242–255. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Asheim, B. & Hansen, H. K. 2009. Knowledge bases, talents, and contexts: On the usefulness of the creative class approach in Sweden. Economic Geography 85(4), 425–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asheim, B., Coenen, L. & Vang, J. 2007. Face-to-face, buzz, and knowledge bases: Sociospatial implications for learning, innovation, and innovation policy. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 25(5), 655–670.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avelino, F., Wittmayer, J.M., Pel, B., Weaver, P., Dumitru, A., Haxeltine, A., Kemp, R., Jørgensen M.S., Bauler, T., Ruijsink, S. & O’Riordan, T. 2019. Transformative social innovation and (dis)empowerment. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 145, 195–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayob, N., Teasdale, S. & Fagan, K. 2016. How social innovation ‘came to be’: Tracing the evolution of a contested concept. Journal of Social Policy 45(4), 635–653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bathelt, H. & Glückler, J. 2005. Resources in economic geography: From substantive concepts towards a relational perspective. Environment and Planning A 37(9), 1545–1563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benneworth P., Amanatidou, E., Edwards Schachter, M. & Gulbrandsen, M. 2015. Social innovation futures: Beyond policy panacea and conceptual ambiguity. Centre for Technology, Innovation and Culture, University of Oslo, Working Papers on Innovation Studies, No. 20150127. http://ideas.repec.org/s/tik/inowpp.html (accessed 6 December 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Bentz, J. & O’Brien, K. 2019. Art for change: Transformative learning and youth empowerment in a changing climate. Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene 7: Article 52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolz, K. & de Bruin, A. 2019. Responsible innovation and social innovation: Towards an integrative research framework. International Journal of Social Economics 46(6), 742–744.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bromölla kommun. 2022. Befolkning, arbet, statistik. https://www.bromolla.se/kommun-och-politik/kommunfakta/befolkning-arbete-statistik/ (accessed 10 January 2023).
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K., Thornberg, R. & Keane, E. 2018. Evolving grounded theory and social justice inquiry. Denzin, N. & Lincoln, Y. (eds.) The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, 411–433. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Coenen, L. & Morgan, K. 2020. Evolving geographies of innovation: Existing paradigms, critiques and possible alternatives. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift–Norwegian Journal of Geography 74(1), 13–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohendet, P., Grandadam, D., Simon, L. & Capdevila, I. 2014. Epistemic communities, localization and the dynamics of knowledge creation. Journal of Economic Geography 14(5), 929–954.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. 1934. Art as an Experience. New York: Berkley Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Drake, G. 2003. ‘This place gives me space’: Place and creativity in the creative industries. Geoforum 34(4), 511–524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eder, J. 2019. Innovation in the periphery: A critical survey and research agenda. International Regional Science Review 42(2), 119–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitjar, R.D. & Rodríguez-Pose, A. 2011. Innovating in the periphery: Firms, values and innovation in Southwest Norway. European Planning Studies 19(4), 555–574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitjar, R. & Rodríguez-Pose, A. 2013. Firm collaboration and modes of innovation in Norway. Research Policy 42(1), 128–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitjar, R.D. & Jøsendal, K. 2016. Hooked up to the international artistic community: External linkages, absorptive capacity and exporting by small creative firms. Creative Industries Journal 9(1), 29–46.
   Google Scholar
• Fløysand, A. & Jakobsen, S.-E. 2011. The complexity of innovation: A relational turn. Progress in Human Geography 35(3), 328–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florida, R. 2002. The Rise of the Creative Class. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. 2006. Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry 12(2), 219–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freire, P. 1970. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Melbourne: Penguin Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Fritsch, M. & Wyrwich, M. 2021. Is innovation (increasingly) concentrated in large cities? An international comparison. Research Policy 50(6): Article 104237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gluckler, J. 2014. How controversial innovation succeeds in the periphery? A network perspective of BASF Argentina. Journal of Economic Geography 14(5), 903–927.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gluckler, J., Shearmur, R. & Martinus, K. 2022. From Liability to Opportunity: Reconceptualizing the Role of Periphery in Innovation. Working paper. SPACES online. http://www.spaces-online.com/index_2022.php (accessed 6 December 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Grabher, G. 2018. Marginality as strategy: Leveraging peripherality for creativity. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 50(8), 1785–1794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hautala, J. 2015. Interaction in the artistic knowledge creation process: The case of artists in Finnish Lapland. Geoforum 65, 351–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hautala, J. & Ibert, O. 2018. Creativity in arts and sciences: Collective processes from a spatial perspective. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 50(8), 1688–1696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hautala, J. & Jauhiainen, J. 2018. Creativity-related mobilities of peripheral artists and scientists. GeoJournal 84, 381–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ifö Center. n.d.,a. Ifö Center utlyser AIR2 - sök ett fritt arbetsstipendium! https://www.ifocenter.com/ (accessed 10 January 2023).
   Google Scholar
• Ifö Center. n.d.,b. Ifö Center är ett konstnärsdrivet kulturhus beläget på anrika Iföverken vid Ivösjön i Bromölla. https://www.ifocenter.com/ifouml-center-och-ifoumlverken.html (accessed 11 January 2023).
   Google Scholar
• Jakobsen, S., Fløysand, A. & Overton, J. 2019. Expanding the field of Responsible Research and Innovaton (RRI) – from responsible research to responsible innovation. European Planning Studies 27(12), 2329–2343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koops, B. 2015. The concepts, approaches, and applications of responsible innovation: An introduction. Koops, B.-J., Oosterlaken, I., Romijn, H., Swierstra, T. & van den Hoven, J. (eds.) Responsible Innovation 2: Concepts, Approaches, and Applications, 1–15. Cham: Springer International.
   Google Scholar
• Kreuger, R. & Casey, M. 2009. Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Kühn, M. 2015. Peripheralization: Theoretical concepts explaining socio-spatial inequalities. European Planning Studies 23(2), 367–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leichenko, R. & O’Brien, K. 2019. Climate and Society: Transforming the Future. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lemons, G. 2005. When the horse drinks: Enhancing everyday creativity using elements of improvisation. Creativity Research Journal 17(1), 25–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ley, D. 2003. Artists, aestheticisation and the field of gentrification. Urban Studies 40(12), 2527–2544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makkonen, T. & Kahila, P. 2021. Vitality policy as a tool for rural development in peripheral Finland. Growth and Change 52(2), 706–726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marques, P., Morgan, K. & Richardson, R. 2018. Social innovation in question: The theoretical and practical implications of a contested concept. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 36(3), 496–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massey, D. 2005. For Space. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Mathews, V. 2010. Aestheticizing space: Art, gentrification and the city. Geography Compass 4(6), 660–675.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzucato, M., Kattel, R. & Ryan-Collins, J. 2020. Challenge-driven innovation policy: Towards a new policy toolkit. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade 20(2), 42–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, K. 2004. Sustainable regions: Governance, innovation and scale. European Planning Studies 12(6), 871–889.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, K. & Henderson, D. In press. Everyday innovation in the periphery: The foundational economy in a less developed region. Teles, F., Ramos, F. & Rodrigues, A. (eds.) Territorial Innovation in Less Developed Regions: Communities, Technologies and Impact. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Moulaert, F. 2009. Social innovation: Institutionally embedded, territorially (re)produced. MacCallum, D., Vicari, H.S., Hillier, J. & Moulaert, F. (eds.) Social Innovation and Territorial Development, 11–23. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mouleart, F. & Sekia, F. 2003. Territorial innovation models: A critical survey. Regional Studies 37(3), 289–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moulaert, F., MacCallum, D., Mehmood, A. & Hamdouch, A. (eds.) 2014. The International Handbook on Social Innovation: Collective Action, Social Learning and Transdisciplinary Research. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Mulgan, G. 2021. Social Innovation Foresight #1 on Social Imagination. https://socialinnovation.se/event/social-innovation-foresight-social-imagination/ (accessed 6 December 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Owen, R. & Pansera, M. 2019. Responsible innovation and responsible research and innovation. Simon, D., Kuhlmann, S., Stamm, J. & Canzler, W. (eds.) Handbook on Science and Public Policy, 26–48. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Pink, S., Hubbard, P., O’Neill, M. & Radley, A. 2010. Walking across disciplines: From ethnography to arts practice. Visual Studies 25(1), 1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pugh, R. & Dubois, A. 2021. Peripheries within economic geography: Four ‘problems’ and the road ahead of us. Journal of Rural Studies 87(7), 267–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A. 2018. The revenge of the places that don’t matter (and what to do about it). Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 11(1), 189–209.
   Google Scholar
• Schot, J. & Steinmueller, W.E. 2018. Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change. Research Policy 47(9), 1554–1567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, A.J. 2006. Creative cities: Conceptual issues and policy questions. Journal of Urban Affairs 28(1), 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, A.J. 2010. Cultural economy and the creative field of the city. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, 92(2), 115–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shearmur, R. 2012. Not being there: Why local innovation is not (always) related to local factors. Westeren, K.I. (ed.) Foundations of the Knowledge Economy, 117–138. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Shearmur, R. 2017. Urban bias in innovation studies. Bathelt, H., Cohendet, P., Henn, S. & Simon, L. (eds.) The Elgar Companion to Innovation and Knowledge Creation, 440–456. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Shearmur, R., Carrincazeaux, C. & Doloreux, D. 2016. The geographies of innovations: Beyond one-size-fits-all. Shearmur, R., Carrincazeaux, C. & Doloreux, D. (eds) Handbook on the Geographies of Innovation, 1–16. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Smiers, J. 2005. Arts Under Pressure, Promoting Cultural Diversity in the Age of Globalization. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Sörlin, S. 1999. The articulation of territory: Landscape and the constitution of regional and national identity. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift 53(2-3), 103–111.
   Google Scholar
• Solheim, M.C.W. 2017. Innovation, Space, and Diversity. PhD Thesis. Stavanger: University of Stavanger.
   Google Scholar
• Stenbacka, S. & Heldt Cassel, S. 2020. Introduktion – periferier och periferialisering. Heldt Cassel, S. & Stenbacka, S. (eds.) Periferi som process, 7–24. Årsboken Ymer. Ödeshög: Svenska sällskapet för Antropologi och Geografi.
   Google Scholar
• Stilgoe, J., Owen, R. & Macnaghten 2013. Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Research Policy 42(9), 1568–1580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tinn kommune. 2021. Om Tinn kommune. https://www.tinn.kommune.no/artikkel/om-kommunen(accessed 11 January 2023).
   Google Scholar
• Törnqvist, G. 2004. Creativity in time and space. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography 86(4), 227–243.
   Google Scholar
• Toivanen, T., Halkilahti, L. & Ruismäki, H. 2013. Creative pedagogy – supporting children’s creativity through drama. European Journal of Social & Behavioural Sciences 7(4), 1168–1179.
   Google Scholar
• Trembley, D.-G. & Pilati, T. 2014. Social innovation through arts and creativity. Moulaert, F., MacCallum, D., Mehmood, A. & Hamdouch, A. (eds.) The International Handbook on Social Innovation: Collective Action, Social Learning and Transdisciplinary Research, 67–79. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Uyarra, E., Ribeiro, B. & Dale-Clough, L. 2019. Exploring the normative turn in regional innovation policy: Responsibility and the quest for public value. European Planning Studies 27(12), 2359–2375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dyck, B. & van den Broeck, P. 2014. Social innovation: A territorial process. Moulaert, F., MacCallum, D., Mehmood, A. & Hamdouch, A. (eds.) The International Handbook on Social Innovation: Collective Action, Social Learning and Transdisciplinary Research, 131–141. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• von Schomberg, R. 2012. Prospects for technology assessment in a framework of responsible research and innovation. Dusseldorp, M. & Beecroft, R. (eds.) Technikfolgen abschätzen lehren, 39–61. Wiesbaden: VS.
   Google Scholar
• Westley, F. 2008. The social innovation dynamic. https://www.torontomu.ca/content/dam/cpipe/documents/Why/Frances%20Westley%2C%20Social%20Innovation%20Dynamic.pdf (accessed 10 January 2023).
   Google Scholar
• Woods, M. n.d. Creative ruralities. Paper presented to the ‘Creativity on the Edge’. Symposium, Moore Institute, National University of Ireland Galway in 2012. https://www.global-rural.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Creative-Ruralities.pdf (accessed 10 January 2023).
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R.K. 2018. Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. 6th ed. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar