Anthropocentricity and the Archaeological Record: Towards a Sociology of Things

REFERENCES

• Appadurai, A. 1986. Introduction: commodities and the politics of value. In A.Appadurai, A. (ed.). The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective, pp. 3–63. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, G.N. 2007. Time perspectives, palimpsests and archaeology of Time. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 26, 198–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bintliff, J. (ed.). 1991. The Annales School and Archaeology. New York University Press, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Braudel, F. 1980. History and the social sciences. The Longue Durée. In Braudel, F. (ed.). On History, pp. 25–54. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, B. 2001. Thing theory. Critical Inquiry 28, 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrant, L.R. 2011. The ontic principle: outline of an object-oriented ontology. In Bryant L.,Srnicek N. & Harman, G. (eds). The Speculative Turn: Continental Materialism and Realism, pp. 261–278. Re.press, Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Bryant, L., Srnicek, N. & Harman, G. 2011. Towards a speculative philosophy. In Bryant, L., Srnicek, N. & Harman,G. (eds). The Speculative Turn: Continental Materialism and Realism, pp. 1–18. Re.press, Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, D.L. 1978 [1968]. Analytical Archaeology (2nd ed.). Methuen & Co Ltd, London.
   Google Scholar
• Deetz, J. 1977. In Small Things Forgotten: The Archaeology of Early American Life. Doubleday, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Dethlefsen, E. & Deetz, J. 1966. Death’s heads, cherubs, and willow trees: experimental archaeology in colonial cemeteries. American Antiquity 31, 502–510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, C. 1998. Historicism, chronology and straw men: situating Hawkes’ ‘Ladder of inference’. Antiquity 72, 398–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fahlander, F. & Oestigaard, T. (eds). 2008. The Materiality of Death. Bodies, Burials, Beliefs (BAR International Series 1768). Archeopress, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, D.H. 1976. The braided narrative: substance and form in social history. In Fletcher, A. (ed.). The Literature of Fact: Selected Papers from the English Institute, pp. 109–134. Columbia University Press, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Fowles, S. 2010. People without things. In Bille, M., Hastrup, F. & Sørensen, T.F. (eds). An Anthropology of Absence: Materializations of Transcendence and Loss, pp. 23–41. Springer, London.
   Google Scholar
• Geertz, C. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures. Basic Books, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Gell, A. 1998. Art and Agency: An Anthropological Theory. Calderon Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Gosden, C. 2005. What do objects want? Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 12, 193–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosselain, O.P. 2000. Materializing identities: an African perspective. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 7, 187–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harman, G. 2010. I am also of the opinion that materialism must be destroyed. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 28, 772–790.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkes, C. 1954. Archaeological theory and method: some suggestions from the old world. American Anthropologist 56, 155–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodder, I. 1982. Symbols in Action: Ethnoarchaeological Studies of Material Culture. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Hodder, I. 2011. Human-thing entanglement: towards an integrated archaeological perspective. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 17, 154–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodder, I. 2012. Entangled: An Archaeology of the Relationships between Humans and Things. Wiley-Blackwell, Malden, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Knappet, C. & Malafouris, L. 2008. Material and nonhuman agency: an introduction. In Knappet, C. & Malafouris, L. (eds). Material agency: Towards a Non-Anthropocentric Approach, pp. ix–xix. Springer, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Komter, A. 2001. Heirlooms, nikes and bribes: towards a sociology of things. Sociology 35, 59–75.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T.S. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolution. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1992. Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artifacts. In Bijker, W.E. & Law, J. (eds). Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change, pp. 225–258. MIT Press, Cambridge MA.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1993. We have Never been Modern. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2000. When things strike back: a possible contribution of ‘science studies’ to the social sciences. British Journal of Sociology 51, 107–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2002. Morality and technology: the end of the means. Theory, Culture & Society 19, 247–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law, J. 1986. On the methods of long distance control: vessels, navigation, and the Portuguese route to India. In Law, J. (ed.). Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? (Sociological Review Monographs 32), pp. 234–263. Routledge, Henley.
   Google Scholar
• Law, J. 2009. Actor network theory and material semiotics. In Turner, B.S. (ed.). The New Blackwell Companion to Social Theory, pp. 141–158. Blackwell, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, G. 2005. The Archaeology of Time. Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, G. 2012. Understanding the Archaeological Record. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• McGlade, J. & van der Leeuw, S.E. 1997. Introduction: archaeology and non-linear dynamics – new approaches to long-term change. In van der Leeuw, S.E. & McGlade, J. (eds). Time, Process and Structured Transformation in Archaeology, pp. 1–31. Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D. 2005. Materiality: an introduction. In Miller, D. (ed.). Materiality, pp. 1–50. Duke University Press, Durham, NC.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, T. (ed.). 1999. Time and Archaeology (One World Archaeology Series). Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, T. & Walker, M.J. 1988. Like WHAT? A practical question of analogical inference and archaeological meaningfulness. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 7, 248–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nativ, A. 2014. Prioritizing Death and Society: The Archaeology of Chalcolithic and Contemporary Cemeteries in the Southern Levant (Approaches to anthropological archaeology). Acumen, Durham.
   Google Scholar
• Nativ, A., Gopher, A. & Goren, Y. 2012. Pottery production at Nahal Zehora II. In Gopher, A. (ed.). Village Communities of the Pottery Neolithic Period in the Menasheh Hills, Israel: Archaeological Investigations at the Sites of Nahal Zehora (Tel Aviv Institute of Archaeology Monograph Series 29), pp. 657–696. Emery and Claire Yass Publications on Archaeology, Tel Aviv.
   Google Scholar
• Olivier, L. 1999. The Hochdorf ‘princely’ grave and the question of the nature of archaeological funerary assemblages. In Murray, T. (ed.). Time and Archaeology, pp. 109–138. Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, B. 2003. Material culture after text. Re-membering things. Norwegian Archaeological Review 36, 87–104.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, B. 2007. Keeping things at arm’s length: a genealogy of asymmetry. World Archaeology 39, 579–588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen, B., Shanks, M., Webmoor, T. & Witmore, C. 2012. Archaeology: The Discipline of Things. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Parker Pearson, M. 1999. The Archaeology of Death and Burial. Sutton, Stroud.
   Google Scholar
• Pinney, C. 2005. Things happen: or, from which moment does that object come? In Miller, D. (ed.). Materiality, pp. 256–272. Duke University Press, Durham, NC.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, M. 1958. Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Rakita, G.F.M., Buikstra, J.E., Beck, L.A. & Williams, S.R. (eds). 2005. Interacting with the Dead: Perspectives on Mortuary Archaeology for the New Millennium. University Press of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Rice, P.M. 1987. Pottery Analysis: A Sourcebook. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Robb, J. 2013. Material culture, landscapes of action, and emergent causation: a new model for the origins of the European Neolithic. Current Anthropology 54, 657–673.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rye, O.S. 1981. Pottery Technology: Principles and Reconstruction. Taraxacum, Washington.
   Google Scholar
• Shanks, M. 2007. Symmetrical archaeology. World Archaeology 39, 589–596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shennan, S. 2002. Genes, Memes and Human history: Darwinian Archaeology and Cultural Evolution. Thames & Hudson, London.
   Google Scholar
• Tarlow, S. & Stutz, L.N. (eds). 2013. The Oxford Handbook of the Archaeology of Death and Burial. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Tilley, C. 2006. Objectification. In Tilley, C., Keane, W., Küchler, S., Rowlands, M. & Spyer, P. (eds). Handbook of Material Culture, pp. 60–73. Sage Publications, London.
   Google Scholar
• Webmoor, T. 2007. What about ‘one more turn after the social’ in archaeological reasoning? Taking things seriously. World Archaeology 39, 563–578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webmoor, T. & Witmore, C.L. 2008. Things are us! A commentary on human/things relations under the banner of a ‘social’ archaeology. Norwegian Archaeological Review 41, 53–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, L.A. 1959. The concept of culture. American Anthropologist 61, 227–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witmore, C.L. 2007. Symmetrical archaeology: excerpts of a manifesto. World Archaeology 39, 546–562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar