1,549
Views
20
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Bodies in Motion: Narratives and Counter Narratives of Gendered Mobility in European Later Prehistory

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon &

REFERENCES

  • Ahmed, S., 2006. Queer phenomenology: orientations, objects, others. Durham: Duke University Press.
  • Alberti, B., 2012. Queer prehistory. In: D. Bolger, ed. A companion to gender prehistory. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 86–107.
  • Arnold, B., 2002. ‘Sein und Werden’: gender as a process in mortuary ritual. In: S. Milledge Nelson and M. Rosen-Ayalon, eds. In pursuit of gender: worldwide archaeological approaches. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press, 239–256.
  • Bentley, R.A., et al., 2012. Community differentiation and kinship among Europe’s first farmers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, 9326–9330. doi:10.1073/pnas.1113710109
  • Bentley, R.A., 2013. Mobility and the diversity of early neolithic lives: isotopic evidence from skeletons. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 32 (3), 303–312. doi:10.1016/j.jaa.2012.01.009
  • Berg, M., 2010. The British product revolution of the eighteenth century. In: J. Horn, L.N. Rosenband, and M.R. Smith, eds. Reconceptualizing the industrial revolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 47–66.
  • Bergerbrant, S., 2007. Bronze Age identities: costume, conflict and contact in Northern Europe 1600-1300 BC. Stockholm: Bricoleur Press.
  • Bergerbrant, S., 2014. Ordinary or extraordinary? Redressing the problem of the Bronze Age corded skirt. Current Swedish Archaeology, 22, 73–96.
  • Bergerbrant, S., 2019. Revisting the “Egtved girl”. In: R. Berge and M. Henriksen, eds. Arkeologi og kulturhistorie fra norskekysten til Østersjøen. Festskrift til professor Birgitta Berglund. VitArk, Vol. 11. Trondheim: Museumsforlaget, 18–39.
  • Bickle, P., 2019. Thinking gender differently: new approaches to identity difference in the Central European Neolithic. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 1–18. doi:10.1017/S0959774319000453
  • Binford, L., 1971. Mortuary practices: their study and potential. In: J.A. Brown, ed. Approaches to the social dimensions of mortuary practices. Memoirs of the Society for American Archaeology, Vol. 25. New York: Society for American Archaeology, 6–29.
  • Blackless, M., et al., 2000. How sexually dimorphic are we? Review and synthesis. American Journal of Human Biology, 12 (2), 151–166. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6300
  • Bourgeois, Q., and Kroon, E., 2017. The impact of male burials on the construction of corded ware identity: reconstructing networks of information in the 3rd millennium BC. Plos One, 12 (10), e0185971. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0185971
  • Brettell, C.B., 2017. Marriage and migration. Annual Review of Anthropology, 46 (1), 81–97. doi:10.1146/annurev-anthro-102116-041237
  • Brodie, N., 1997. New perspectives on the Bell Beaker culture. Oxford Journal of Archaeology, 16 (3), 297–314. doi:10.1111/ojoa.1997.16.issue-3
  • Brothwell, D.R., 1981. Digging up bones: the excavation, treatment, and study of human skeletal remains. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  • Brück, J., 2009. Women, death and social change in the British Bronze Age. Norwegian Archaeology Review, 42 (1), 1–23. doi:10.1080/00293650902907151
  • Burmeister, S., 2016. Archaeological research on migration as a multidisciplinary challenge. Medieval Worlds, 4, 42–64. doi:10.1553/medievalworlds_no4_2016s42
  • Butler, J., 1986. Sex and gender in Simone de beauvoir’s second sex. Yale French Studies, 72, 35–49. doi:10.2307/2930225
  • Cadigan, R.J., 1998. Woman-to-woman marriage: practices and benefits in Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 29 (1), 89–98. doi:10.3138/jcfs.29.1.89
  • Cameron, D., 2003. Gender issues in language change. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 23, 187–201. doi:10.1017/S0267190503000266
  • Cattan, N., 2008. Gendering mobility: insights into the construction of spatial concepts. In: T.P. Uteng and T. Cresswell, eds. Gendered mobilities. Aldershot: Ashgate, 83–97.
  • Chilton, E.S., 2008. Queer archaeology, mathematical modeling, and the peopling of the Americas. In: Paper presented at the Northeastern Anthropological Association, 48th Annual Meeting, 7–9 March 2008 Amherst, MA.
  • Clarson, G., et al., 2013. Feminism and gender. In: P. Adey, ed. The Routledge handbook of mobilities. London: Routledge, 94–102.
  • Costin, C.L., 2012. Gender and textile production in prehistory. In: D. Bolger, ed. A companion to gender prehistory. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 180–202. doi:10.1002/9781118294291.ch9
  • Cresswell, T., 2010. Towards a politics of mobility. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 28 (1), 17–31. doi:10.1068/d11407
  • Cresswell, T., and Uteng, T.P., 2008. Gendered mobilities: towards an holistic understanding. In: T.P. Uteng and T. Cresswell, eds. Gendered mobilities. Aldershot: Ashgate, 1–12.
  • Crown, P., and Wills, W.H., 1995. The origins of southwestern ceramic containers: women’s time allocation and economic intensification. Journal of Anthropological Research, 51 (2), 173–186. doi:10.1086/jar.51.2.3630253
  • Cruz García, G.S., 2006. The mother - child nexus. Knowledge and valuation of wild food plants in Wayanad, Western Ghats, India. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 2 (1), 39. doi:10.1186/1746-4269-2-39
  • de Beauvoir, S., 2009. The second sex. Translated by C. Borde and S. Malovany-Chevallier. London: Alfred A. Knopf.
  • Dowson, T.A., ed., 2000a. Special issue: queer archaeologies. World Archaeology, 32 (2).
  • Dowson, T.A., 2000b. Why queer archaeology? An introduction. World Archaeology, 32 (2), 161–165. doi:10.1080/00438240050131144
  • Dowson, T.A., 2006a. Archaeologists, feminists, and queers: sexual politics in the construction of the past. In: P.L. Geller and M.K. Stockett, eds. Feminist anthropology: past, present, and future. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 89–102.
  • Earle, T., 2004. Culture matters in the Neolithic transition and emergence of hierarchy in Thy, Denmark: distinguished lecture. American Anthropology, 106, 111–125. doi:10.1525/aa.2004.106.1.111
  • Fan, C.C., and Huang, Y., 1998. Waves of rural brides: female marriage migration in China. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 88 (2), 227–251. doi:10.1111/1467-8306.00092
  • Fowler, C., 2013. The emergent past: A relational realist archaeology of Early Bronze Age mortuary practices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Frei, K.M., et al., 2015. Tracing the dynamic life story of a Bronze Age female. Scientific Reports, 5, 10431. doi:10.1038/srep10431
  • Frei, K.M., et al., 2017a. Bronze Age wool: provenance and dye investigations of Danish textiles. Antiquity, 91 (357), 640–654. doi:10.15184/aqy.2017.64
  • Frei, K.M., et al., 2017b. A matter of months: high precision migration chronology of a Bronze Age female. Plos One, 12 (6), e0178834. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0178834
  • Frieman, C.J., 2012. Flint daggers, copper daggers and technological innovation in Late Neolithic Scandinavia. European Journal of Archaeology, 15 (3), 440–464. doi:10.1179/1461957112Y.0000000014
  • Frieman, C.J., et al., 2017. Aging well: Treherne’s ‘warrior’s beauty’ two decades later. European Journal of Archaeology, 20 (1), 36–73. doi:10.1017/eaa.2016.6
  • Frieman, C.J., and Hofmann, D., 2019. Present pasts in the archaeology of genetics, identity, and migration in Europe: a critical essay. World Archaeology, 1–18. doi:10.1080/00438243.2019.1627907
  • Furholt, M., 2014. Upending a ‘totality’: re-evaluating corded ware variability in Late Neolithic Europe. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society, 80, 67–86. doi:10.1017/ppr.2013.20
  • Furholt, M., 2018. Massive migrations? The impact of recent aDNA studies on our view of third Millennium Europe. European Journal of Archaeology, 21 (2), 159–191. doi:10.1017/eaa.2017.43
  • Geller, P.L., 2009. Bodyscapes, biology, and heteronormativity. American Anthropologist, 111 (4), 504–516. doi:10.1111/j.1548-1433.2009.01159.x
  • Geller, P.L., 2017. Brave old world: ancient DNA testing and sex determination. In: S.C. Agarwal and J.K. Wesp, eds. Exploring sex and gender in bioarchaeology. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 68–106.
  • Gorman-Murray, A., 2009. Intimate mobilities: emotional embodiment and queer migration. Social & Cultural Geography, 10 (4), 441–460. doi:10.1080/14649360902853262
  • Gosden, C., 1999. Anthropology and archaeology: a changing relationship. London: Routledge.
  • Haak, W., et al., 2008. Ancient DNA, strontium isotopes, and osteological analyses shed light on Social and Kinship Organization of the later Stone Age. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105, 18226–18231. doi:10.1073/pnas.0807592105
  • Harris, S., 2012. From the parochial to the universal: comparing cloth cultures in the Bronze Age. European Journal of Archaeology, 15 (1), 61–97. doi:10.1179/1461957112Y.0000000006
  • Haughton, M., 2018. Social relations and the local: revisiting Our approaches to finding gender and age in prehistory. A case study from Bronze Age Scotland. Norwegian Archaeological Review, 51 (1–2), 64–77. doi:10.1080/00293652.2018.1517821
  • Hofmann, D., 2016. Keep on walking: the role of migration in Linearbandkeramik life. Documenta Praehistorica, 43, 235–251. doi:10.4312/dp.43.11
  • Holst, M.K., 2013. Burials. In: H. Fokkens and A. Harding, eds. The Oxford handbook of the European Bronze Age. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 102–120.
  • Holst, M.K., Breuning-Madsen, H., and Rasmussen, M., 2001. The South Scandinavian barrows with well-preserved oak-log coffins. Antiquity, 75, 126–136. doi:10.1017/S0003598X00052820
  • Howard, P.L., 2003. Women and plants: gender relations in biodiversity management and conservation. London: Zed Books.
  • Ilcan, S.M., 1994. Marriage regulation and the rhetoric of alliance in Northwestern Turkey. Ethnology, 33 (4), 273–296. doi:10.2307/3773900
  • Jockenhövel, A., 1991. Raumliche Mobilitat vom Personen in der mittleren Bronzezeit des westlichen Mitteleuropa. Germania, 69 (1), 49–62.
  • Jolly, M., 1992. Banana leaf bundles and skirts: a pacific penelope’s web? In: J.G. Carrier, ed. History and tradition in melanesian anthropology. Berkeley: University of California Press, 38–64.
  • Jolly, M., 2017. Epilogue: sinuous objects, sensuous bodies: revaluing ‘women’s wealth’ across time and place. In: A.-K. Hermkens and K. Lepani, eds. Sinuous objects. Canberra: ANU Press, 261–292.
  • Joyce, R.A., 2000. Girling the girl and boying the boy: the production of adulthood in ancient Mesoamerica. World Archaeology, 31 (3), 473–483. doi:10.1080/00438240009696933
  • Kelly, M., 2016. Sex versus gender categorization. In: N.A. Naples, et al., ed. The Wiley Blackwell encyclopedia of gender and sexuality studies. London: Wiley-Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9781118663219.wbegss028
  • Kim, M., 2010. Gender and international marriage migration. Sociology Compass, 4 (9), 718–731. doi:10.1111/soco.2010.4.issue-9
  • Knipper, C., et al., 2017. Female exogamy and gene pool diversification at the transition from the Final Neolithic to the Early Bronze Age in central Europe. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114 (38), 10083–10088. doi:10.1073/pnas.1706355114
  • Kristiansen, K., 1987. From stone to bronze - the evolution of social complexity in northern Europe, 2300-1200 BC. In: E.M. Brumfiel and T.K. Earle, eds. Specialization, exchange, and complex societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 30–51.
  • Kristiansen, K., 1998. Europe before history, New studies in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kristiansen, K., et al., 2017. Re-theorising mobility and the formation of culture and language among the Corded Ware Culture in Europe. Antiquity, 91 (356), 334–347. doi:10.15184/aqy.2017.17
  • Kristiansen, K., and Larsson, T.B., 2005. The rise of Bronze Age society: travels, transmissions and transformations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Labov, W., 1990. The intersection of sex and social class in the course of linguistic e. Language Variation and Change, 2, 205–254. doi:10.1017/S0954394500000338
  • Law, R., 2002. Gender and daily mobility in a New Zealand city, 1920–1960. Social & Cultural Geography, 3 (4), 425–445. doi:10.1080/14649365.2002.9709633
  • Leach, E.R., 1951. The structural implications of matrilateral cross-cousin marriage. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, 81 (1/2), 23–55. doi:10.2307/2844015
  • Lévi-Strauss, C., 1969. The elementary structures of kinship. Translated by J.H. Bell, R. Von Sturmer and R. Needham. Boston: Beacon Press.
  • Love, H., 2014. Queer. TSQ: Transgender Studies Quarterly, 1 (1–2), 172–176. doi:10.1215/23289252-2399938
  • Manalansan, M.F., 2006. Queer intersections: sexuality and gender in migration studies. International Migration Review, 40 (1), 224–249. doi:10.1111/j.1747-7379.2006.00009.x
  • Mand, K., 2005. Marriage and migration through the life course: experiences of widowhood, separation and divorce amongst transnational Sikh women. Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 12 (2–3), 407–425. doi:10.1177/097152150501200211
  • Mau, S., et al., 2012. Liberal states and the freedom of movement: selective borders, unequal mobility. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Mauss, M., 1954. The gift; forms and functions of exchange in archaic societies. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
  • Merbs, C.F., and Euler, R.C., 1985. Atlanto-occipital fusion and spondylolisthesis in an Anasazi skeleton from bright angel ruin, Grand Canyon National Park, Arizona. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 67 (4), 381–391. doi:10.1002/ajpa.1330670410
  • Miller, M.J., et al., 2018. The daily grind: sex- and age-related activity patterns inferred from cross-sectional geometry of long bones in a pre-Columbian muisca population from Tibanica, Colombia. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 167 (2), 311–326. doi:10.1002/ajpa.23629
  • Mills, B.J., 2018. Intermarriage, technological diffusion, and boundary objects in the U.S. Southwest. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 25 (4), 1051–1086. doi:10.1007/s10816-018-9392-0
  • Miszkiewicz, J.J., and Mahoney, P., 2016. Ancient human bone microstructure in medieval England: comparisons between two socio-economic groups: ancient human bone microstructure and social status. The Anatomical Record, 299 (1), 42–59. doi:10.1002/ar.23285
  • Mittnik, A., et al., 2019. Kinship-based social inequality in Bronze Age Europe. Science, 366 (6466), 731–734. doi:10.1126/science.aax6219
  • Moore, H., 1994. A passion for difference. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Moser, S., 1993. Gender stereotyping in pictorial reconstructions of human origins. In: H. Du Cros and L. Smith, eds. Women in archaeology: a feminist critique. Canberra: Australian National University Press, 75–92.
  • Nash, C.J., and Gorman-Murray, A., 2014. LGBT Neighbourhoods and ‘new mobilities’: towards understanding transformations in sexual and gendered urban landscapes. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38 (3), 756–772. doi:10.1111/ijur.2014.38.issue-3
  • Njambi, W.N., and O’Brien, W.E., 2000. Revisiting “woman-woman marriage”: notes on Gĩkũyũ women. NWSA Journal, 12 (1), 1–23.
  • Nosch, M.L.B., 2015. The Wool Age: textile traditions and textile innovations. In: F. Ruppenstein and J. Weilhartner, eds. Tradition and innovation in the Mycenaean palatial polities. Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 167–201.
  • Novak, S.A., 2017. On the stories of men and the substance of women. In: S.C. Agarwal and J.K. Wesp, eds. Exploring sex and gender in bioarchaeology. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 129–164.
  • Oswin, N., et al., 2013. Queer theory. In: P. Adey, ed. The Routledge handbook of mobilities. London: Routledge, 85–93.
  • Palriwala, R., and Uberoi, P., 2008. Exploring the links: gender issues in marriage and migration. In: R. Palriwala and P. Uberoi, eds. Marriage, migration and gender. New Delhi: SAGE Publications, 23–60.
  • Parker Pearson, M., 1982. Mortuary practices, society and ideology. In: I. Hodder, ed. Symbolic and structural archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 99–113.
  • Parker Pearson, M., 1999. The archaeology of death and burial. Sutton, UK: Sutton Publishing Limited.
  • Pechenkina, E.A., and Delgado, M., 2006. Dimensions of health and social structure in the early intermediate period cemetery at Villa El Salvador, Peru. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 131 (2), 218–235. doi:10.1002/ajpa.20432
  • Peletz, M.G., 1987. The Exchange of men in 19th-century Negeri Sembilan (Malaya). American Ethnologist, 14 (3), 449–469. doi:10.1525/ae.1987.14.3.02a00030
  • Price, N., et al., 2019. Viking warrior women? Reassessing Birka chamber grave Bj.581. Antiquity, 93 (367), 181–198. doi:10.15184/aqy.2018.258
  • Randsborg, K., 2011. Bronze Age textiles: men, women and wealth. Duckworth debates in archaeology. Bristol: Bristol Classical Press.
  • Randsborg, K., and Christensen, K., 2006. Bronze Age oak-coffin graves: archaeology and dendro-dating. In: Acta archaeologica. Vol. 77. Copenhagen: Blackwell.
  • Ransley, J., 2005. Boats are for boys: queering maritime archaeology. World Archaeology, 37 (4), 621–629. doi:10.1080/00438240500404623
  • Robb, J., and Harris, O.J.T., 2018. Becoming gendered in European prehistory: was Neolithic gender fundamentally different? American Antiquity, 83 (1), 128–147. doi:10.1017/aaq.2017.54
  • Sabatini, S., et al., 2019. Approaching sheep herds origins and the emergence of the wool economy in continental Europe during the Bronze Age. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 11, 4909–4925. doi:10.1007/s12520-019-00856-x
  • Saxe, A.A., 1971. Social dimensions of mortuary practices in a Mesolithic population from Wadi Halfa, Sudan. In: J.A. Brown, ed. Approaches to the social dimensions of mortuary practices. Memoirs of the Society for American Archaeology, Vol. 25. New York: Society for American Archaeology, 39–57.
  • Schmidt, R.A., and Voss, B.L., eds., 2000. Archaeologies of sexuality. London: Routledge.
  • Sheller, M., 2008. Gendered mobilities: epilogue. In: T.P. Uteng and T. Cresswell, eds. Gendered mobilities. Aldershot: Ashgate, 257–264.
  • Sheller, M., 2016. Mobility, freedom and public space. In: S. Bergmann and T. Sager, eds. The ethics of mobilities: rethinking place, exclusion, freedom and environment. London: Routledge, 25–38.
  • Shennan, S.E., 1975. The social organization at Branč. Antiquity, 49 (196), 279–288. doi:10.1017/S0003598X00070319
  • Shennan, S.J., 1993. Settlement and social change in Central Europe 3500-1500 BC. Journal of World Prehistory, 7 (2), 121–161. doi:10.1007/BF00975449
  • Shennan, S.J., 2018. The first farmers of Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Shepherd, A., 2012. Stepping out together: men, women and their beakers in time and space. In: M.J. Allen, J. Gardiner, and A. Sheridan, eds. Is there a British Chalcolithic? People, place and polity in the later 3rd millennium. Oxford: Oxbow, 257–280.
  • Sheridan, J.A., 2010. The neolithisation of Britain and Ireland: the big picture. In: B. Finlayson and G. Warren, eds. Landscapes in transition. Oxford: Oxbow, 89–105.
  • Shilts, R., 2007. And the band played on: politics, people, and the AIDS epidemic. 20th anniversary ed. New York: St. Martin’s Griffin.
  • Sjögren, K.-G., Price, T.D., and Kristiansen, K., 2016. Diet and mobility in the corded ware of Central Europe. Plos One, 11 (5), e0155083. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0155083
  • Sofaer, J.R., 2006. The body as material culture: a theoretical osteoarchaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Solometo, J., and Moss, J., 2013. Picturing the past: gender in national geographic reconstructions of prehistoric life. American Antiquity, 78 (1), 123–146. doi:10.7183/0002-7316.78.1.123
  • Sørensen, M.L.S., 1997. Reading dress: the construction of social categories and identities in Bronze Age Europe. Journal of European Archaeology, 5 (1), 93–114. doi:10.1179/096576697800703656
  • Subramanian, S., 2008. Embodying the space between: unmapping writing about racialised and gendered mobilities. In: T.P. Uteng and T. Cresswell, eds. Gendered mobilities. Aldershot: Ashgate, 35–45.
  • Tagliamonte, S.A., and D’Arcy, A., 2009. Peaks beyond phonology: adolescence, incrementation, and language change. Language, 85 (1), 58–108. doi:10.1353/lan.0.0084
  • Teather, A., and Chamberlain, A.T., 2016. Dying embers: fire-lighting technology and mortuary practice in early Bronze Age Britain. The Archaeological Journal, 173 (2), 188–205. doi:10.1080/00665983.2016.1177258
  • Thomas, J., 2013. The birth of Neolithic Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Thomsen, E., and Andreasen, R., 2019. Agricultural lime disturbs natural strontium isotope variations: implications for provenance and migration studies. Science Advances, 5 (3), eaav8083. doi:10.1126/sciadv.aav8083
  • Thomsen, T., 1929. Egekistfundet fra Egtved fra den Aeldere Bronze Alder. Nordiske Fortidsminder, 2, 165–214.
  • Treherne, P., 1995. The warrior’s beauty: the masculine body and self-identity in Bronze-Age Europe. Journal of European Archaeology, 3 (1), 105–144. doi:10.1179/096576695800688269
  • University of Copenhagen, 2015. The Bronze Age Egtved girl was not from Denmark. Available from: http://tiny.cc/Egtved_PressRelease [Accessed 19 April 2018].
  • Voss, B.L., 2008. Sexuality studies in archaeology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 37 (1), 316–317. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.37.081407.085238
  • Wajcman, J., 2000. Reflection on gender and technology studies: in what state is the art? Social Studies of Science, 30 (3), 447–464. doi:10.1177/030631200030003005
  • Wajcman, J., 2009. Feminist theories of technology. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34 (1), 143–152. doi:10.1093/cje/ben057
  • Weeks, J., Heaphy, B., and Donovan, C., 2001. Same sex intimacies. Families of choice and other experiments. London: Routledge.
  • Weismantel, M., 2013. Towards a transgender archaeology. A queer rampage through prehistory. In: S. Stryker and A.Z. Aizura, eds. The transgender studies reader 2. London: Routledge, 319–334.
  • Wesp, J.K., 2017. Embodying sex/gender systems in bioarchaeological research. In: S.C. Agarwal and J.K. Wesp, eds. Exploring sex and gender in bioarchaeology. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Pres, 99–126.
  • Weston, K., 1995. Get thee to a big city: sexual imaginary and the great gay migration. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 2 (3), 253–277. doi:10.1215/10642684-2-3-253
  • Weston, K., 1997. Families we choose: lesbians, gays, kinship. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Whittle, A.W., Healy, F.M., and Bayliss, A., 2011. Gathering time: dating the early Neolithic enclosures of southern Britain and Ireland. Oxford: Oxbow Books.
  • Wimark, T., 2016. The impact of family ties on the mobility decisions of gay men and lesbians. Gender, Place & Culture, 23 (5), 659–676. doi:10.1080/0966369X.2015.1034246
  • Wylie, A., 2002. Thinking from things: essays in the philosophy of archaeology. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.