Advanced search
Publication Cover
Norwegian Archaeological Review Volume 53, 2020 - Issue 1
Submit an article Journal homepage
281
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Brief Report

Collaborative, Public, Participatory: Pros and Cons of an Open Archaeology

Þóra PétursdóttirDepartment of Archaeology, Conservation and History, University of Oslo, Oslo, NorwayCorrespondence[email protected]
Pages 1-4 | Published online: 02 Jul 2020

REFERENCES

  • Damm, C., 2018. Norwegian archaeological review 1968–2018: looking ahead. Norwegian Archaeological Review, 51 (1–2), 1–5. doi:10.1080/00293652.2018.1551926
  • Domanska, E., 2018. Is this stone alive? Prefiguring the future role of archaeology. Norwegian Archaeological Review, 51 (1–2), 22–35. doi:10.1080/00293652.2018.1553060
  • Fredheim, H.L., 2020. Decoupling ‘open’ and ‘ethical’ archaeologies: rethinking deficits and expertise for ethical public participation in archaeology and heritage. Norwegian Archaeological Review, 53 (1).
  • González-Ruibal, A., 2018. Beyond the anthropocene: defining the age of destruction. Norwegian Archaeological Review, 51 (1–2), 10–21. doi:10.1080/00293652.2018.1544169
  • González-Ruibal, A., González, P.A., and Criado-Boado, F., 2018. Against reactionary populism: towards a new public archaeology. Antiquity, 92 (362), 507–515. doi:10.15184/aqy.2017.227
  • Halperin, C.T., 2017. Anthropological archaeology in 2016: cooperation and collaborations in archaeological research and practice. American Anthropologist, 119 (2), 284–297. doi:10.1111/aman.12860
  • Kiddey, R., 2020. I’ll tell you what I want, what I really, really want! Open archaeology that is collaborative, participatory, public, and feminist. Norwegian Archaeological Review, 53 (1).
  • Milek, K., 2018. Transdisciplinary archaeology and the future of archaeological practice: citizen science, portable science, ethical science. Norwegian Archaeological Review, 51 (1–2), 36–47. doi:10.1080/00293652.2018.1552312
  • Nilsson Stutz, L., 2018. A future for archaeology: in defense of an intellectually engaged, collaborative and confident archaeology. Norwegian Archaeological Review, 51 (1–2), 48–56. doi:10.1080/00293652.2018.1544168
  • Perry, S., 2019. The enchantment of the archaeological record. Antiquity, 22 (3), 354–371.
  • Tringham, R., 2018. A plea for a richer, fuller and more complex future archaeology. Norwegian Archaeological Review, 51 (1–2), 57–63. doi:10.1080/00293652.2018.1547920
  • Van Dyke, R.M., 2020. Indigenous archaeology in a settler-colonist state: a view from the North American Southwest. Norwegian Archaeological Review, 53 (1).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.