A Realm of Virtual Knowledge: Exploring the Capacities of Norwegian Metal-detected Assemblages

REFERENCES

• Amundsen, M.D., 2021. Glimrende gull: en utforskende studie av gull fra folkevandringstid i Rogaland, Vestfold og Østfold. Thesis (PhD). University of Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Antczak, K.A., and Beaudry, M.C., 2019. Assemblages of practice. Archaeological Dialogues, 26 (2), 87–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Axelsen, I., 2021. What’s the deal with old things? An exploratory study of attitudes and practices towards certain old things among archaeologists and metal detectorists in Norway. Thesis (PhD). University of Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Axelsen, I., 2022. Collaboration and communication between hobby metal detectorists and archaeologists in Norway. Advances in Archaeological Practice, 10 (3), 295–310. doi:10.1017/aap.2022.14
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Axelsen, I., and Fredriksen, C., In prep. Organically homegrown archaeological databases and their inherent ‘messiness’: the curious case of hobby metal detecting in Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, A.S., 2018. Revisiting the Trelleborg House: a discussion of house types and assemblages. Norwegian Archaeological Review, 51 (1–2), 142–161. doi:10.1080/00293652.2018.1503324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg, H.L., 2021. Mechanisms of security. Locks, keys, and ordered life in Iron Age Norway (c. 0–1050 AD). (Volume I and II). Bergen: University of Bergen.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M., 1986. Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In: J. Law, ed. Power, action and belief: a new sociology of knowledge? London: Routledge, 196–223. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.1990.tb03351.x
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M., 1990. Techno-economic Networks and Irreversibility. The Sociological Review, 38 (1), 132–161. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.1990.tb03351.x
   Google Scholar
• Christiansen, T.T., 2019. Metal-detected Late Iron Age and early medieval brooches from the Limfjord Region, Northern Jutland: production, use, and loss. Journal of Archaeology and Ancient History, 2, 3–41. http://uu.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A1297079&dswid=4103. Accessed 21 04 2022.
   Google Scholar
• DeLanda, M., 2006. A new philosophy of society: assemblage theory and social complexity. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• DeLanda, M., 2016. Assemblage theory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., and Guattari, F., 1994. What is philosophy? New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., and Guattari, F., 2009. Anti-Oedipus: capitalism and schizophrenia. New York: Penguin Group.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., and Guattari, F., 2013. A thousand plateaus. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Dobat, A.S., et al., 2020. Towards a cooperative approach to hobby metal detecting: the European Public Finds Recording Network (EPFRN) vision statement. European Journal of Archaeology, 23 (2), 272–292. doi:10.1017/eaa.2020.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobat, A.S., and Jensen, A.T., 2016. “Professional amateurs”: metal detecting and metal detectorists in Denmark. Open Archaeology, 2 (1), 70–84. doi:10.1515/opar-2016-0005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler, C., 2013a. The emergent past: a relational realist archaeology of early bronze age mortuary practices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fowler, C., 2013b. Dynamic assemblages, or the past is what endures: change and the duration of relations. In: B. Alberti, A.M. Jones, and J. Pollard, eds. Archaeology after interpretation: returning materials to archaeological theory. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press, 235–256.
   Google Scholar
• Fowler, C., 2017. Relational typologies, assemblage theory and early bronze age burials. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 27 (1), 95–109. doi:10.1017/S0959774316000615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredriksen, C., In prep. «Funnet med metallsøker i dyrket mark»: en relasjonell studie av norsk praksis overfor privat metallsøking og pløyelagsfunn som vitenskapelig kildemateriale. Thesis (PhD). Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Fredriksen, C., 2019. Pløyelagsfunn i skjæringspunktet mellom forskningspotensial ogforvaltningsprioriteringer: fokus og holdninger i diskusjonen omprivat metallsøking i Norge. Primitive tider, 21 (1), 63–79. doi:10.5617/pt.7536
   Google Scholar
• Fredriksen, C., 2021. Pløyelagsfunn som automatisk fredete kulturminner: kunnskapsdrevet forvaltning eller forvaltningsdrevet kunnskap? Heimen, 58 (2), 136–151. doi:10.18261/.1894-3195-2021-02-03
   Google Scholar
• Fredriksen, C., and Stamnes, A.A., 2019. Geofysiske undersøkelser og sosialt metallsøk på Løykja, Gnr. 41/6, Sunndal kommune, Møre og Romsdal. Trondheim: NTNU University Museum, Report 2019-23.
   Google Scholar
• Gullbekk, S.H., et al., 2019. Kildekritiske refleksjoner omkring metallsøking og myntfunn: må mynthistorien skrives om? Viking, 82, 173–182. doi:10.5617/viking.7121
   Google Scholar
• Gundersen, J., 2019. No room for good intentions? Private metal detecting and archaeological sites in the plow layer in Norway. In: S. Campbell, L. White, and S. Thomas, eds. Competing values in archaeological heritage. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 125–138.
   Google Scholar
• Gundersen, J., Rasmussen, J.M., and Lie, R.O., 2016. Private metal detecting and archaeology in Norway. Open Archaeology, 2 (1), 160–170. doi:10.1515/opar-2016-0012
   Google Scholar
• Gustavsen, L., et al., 2019. Sem: a Viking Age metalworking site in the southeast of Norway? Archaeological Prospection, 26 (1), 13–20. doi:10.1002/arp.1726
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadley, D., and Richards, J.D., 2018. In search of the Viking Great Army: beyond the winter camps. Medieval Settlement Research, 33, 1–17. doi:10.5284/1017430
   Google Scholar
• Haldenby, D., and Richards, J.D., 2010. Charting the effects of plough damage using metal-detected assemblages. Antiquity, 84 (326), 1151–1162. doi:10.1017/S0003598X00067144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilakis, Y., and Jones, A.M., 2017. Archaeology and assemblage. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 27 (1), 77–84. doi:10.1017/S0959774316000688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, O.J.T., 2017. Assemblages and scale in archaeology. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 27 (1), 127–139. doi:10.1017/S0959774316000597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, O.J.T., 2018. Towards virtual typologies. Norwegian Archaeological Review, 51 (1–2), 162–165. doi:10.1080/00293652.2018.1531917
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jervis, B., 2019. Assemblage thought and archaeology. Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, A.M., and Alberti, B., 2013. Archaeology after interpretation. In: B. Alberti, A.M. Jones, and J. Pollard, eds. Archaeology after interpretation: returning materials to archaeological theory. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press, 15–35.
   Google Scholar
• Karl, R., 2016. Archaeological responses to 5 decades of metal detecting in Austria. Open Archaeology, 2 (1), 278–289. doi:10.1515/opar-2016-0020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B., 1987. Science in action: how to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B., 1999. Pandora’s hope: essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B., 2005. Reassembling the social: an introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Law, J., 2009. Actor-network theory and material semiotics. In: B. Turner, ed. The new Blackwell companion to social theory. Oxford: Blackwell, 141–158.
   Google Scholar
• Law, J., and Hassard, J., eds., 1999. Actor network theory and after. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lecroere, T., 2016. “There is none so blind as those who won’t See”: metal detecting and archaeology in France. Open Archaeology, 2 (1), 182–193. doi:10.1515/opar-2016-0014
   Google Scholar
• Leskovar, T., and Bosiljkov, V., 2016. Laboratory research on the effects of heavy equipment compaction on the in situ preserved archaeological remains. Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites, 18 (1–3), 40–58. doi:10.1080/13505033.2016.1181932
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, M., 2016. A detectorist’s utopia? Archaeology and metal-detecting in England and Wales. Open Archaeology, 2 (1), 127–139. doi:10.1515/opar-2016-0009
   Google Scholar
• Lov om kulturminner 1978 [Act Concerning the Cultural Heritage], (LOV-1978-06-09-50)
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, G., 2012. Understanding the archaeological record. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, G., 2013. Afterword: archaeology and the science of new objects. In: B. Alberti, A.M. Jones, and J. Pollard, eds. Archaeology after interpretation: returning materials to archaeological theory. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press, 369–380.
   Google Scholar
• Maixner, B., 2015. Én lov – ulik forvaltningspolitikk. Fornvännen, 110 (3), 201–213.
   Google Scholar
• Maixner, B., 2020. Connected by water, no matter how far: viking Age central farms at the Trondheimsfjorden, Norway, as gateways between waterscapes and landscapes. Archäologische Informationen, 43, 289–308. doi:10.11588/ai.2020.1.81416
   Google Scholar
• Martens, J., and Ravn, M., eds., 2016. Pløyejord som kontekst. Nye utfordringer for forskning, forvaltning og formidling. Artikkelsamling. Kristiansand: Portal forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, M., and Schurr, C., 2016. Assemblage thinking and actor-network theory: conjunctions, disjunctions, cross-fertilisations. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 41 (3), 217–229. doi:10.1111/tran.12117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettersen, A.M.H., 2022. Farin Vestir and back: social and itinerary perspectives on insular objects in Viking-Age Norway. Thesis (PhD). Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, J.M., 2014. Securing cultural heritage objects and fencing stolen goods? A case study on museums and metal detecting in Norway. Norwegian Archaeological Review, 47 (1), 83–107. doi:10.1080/00293652.2014.899616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riksantikvaren, 2017. Retningslinjer. Privat bruk av metallsøker. Available from: https://ra.brage.unit.no/ra-xmlui/bitstream/handle/11250/2479072/Guidelines_metal_detectors.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y [Accessed 25 April 2022
   Google Scholar
• Riksantikvaren, 2019. Retningslinjer. Fastsettelse av finnerlønn. Available from: https://ra.brage.unit.no/ra-xmlui/bitstream/handle/11250/2582716/Fastsettelse_finnerl%c3%b8nn.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y [Accessed 25 April 2022
   Google Scholar
• Røstad, I.M., 2021. The language of jewellery: dress-accessories and negotiations of identity in Scandinavia, c. AD 400–650/700. Oslo: Cappelen Damm akademisk.
   Google Scholar
• Sand-Eriksen, A., Skre, D., and Stamnes, A.A., 2020. Hvordan har metallgjenstander funnet veien til pløyelaget? Resultater fra et metodisk prøveprosjekt på Storhov i Elverum. Primitive tider, 22 (1), 75–94. doi:10.5617/pt.8395
   Google Scholar
• Schiffer, M.B., 1983. Toward the identification of formation processes. American Antiquity, 48 (4), 675–706. doi:10.2307/279771
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørensen, M.L.S., 1997. Material culture and typology. Current Swedish Archaeology, 5 (1), 179–192. doi:10.37718/CSA.1997.12
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, M.L.S., 2015. Paradigm lost – on the state of typology within archaeological theory. In: K. Kristiansen, L. Sejnda, and J. Turek, eds. Paradigm found. Archaeological theory past, present and future. Essays in honour of Evzen Neustupny. Oxford: Oxbow Books, 84–94.
   Google Scholar
• Stamnes, A.A., 2017. Georadarundersøkelse på Storhov i Heradsbygd, Elverum kommune i Hedmark fylke. Trondheim: NTNU University Museum, Report 2017-2.
   Google Scholar
• Temiño, I.R., 2016. Rational grounds for dialogue between archaeologists and metal detectorists in Spain. Open Archaeology, 2 (1), 150–159. doi:10.1515/opar-2016-0011
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, S., 2016. The future of studying hobbyist metal detecting in Europe: a call for a transnational approach. Open Archaeology, 2 (1), 140–149. doi:10.1515/opar-2016-0010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonning, C., et al., 2017. Er de alle løsfunn? Metallsøkfunn og potensialet for bevart kontekst under pløyelaget. Viking, 80, 223–243. doi:10.5617/viking.5481
   Google Scholar
• Trigger, B.G., 2006. A history of archaeological thought. 2nd. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wessman, A., Thomas, S., and Rohiola, V., 2019. Digital archaeology and citizen science: introducing the goals of Findsampo and the SUALT Project. SKAS Suomen keskiajan arkeologian seura – Sällskapet för medeltidsarkeologi i Finland, 2–17. http://hdl.handle.net/10138/304879. Accessed 15 03 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Yáñez, A., 2016. Illegal detectorism and archaeological heritage: criminal and administrative punitive systems in Spain. Open Archaeology, 2 (1), 417–425. doi:10.1515/opar-2016-0030
   Google Scholar