Applications for Thorium in Multistage Fuel Cycles with Heavy Water Reactors

References

• “Perspectives on the Use of Thorium in the Nuclear Fuel Cycle: Extended Summary,” NEA Report No. 7228, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development/ Nuclear Energy Agency (2015).
   Google Scholar
• J. TYAGI et al., “Thermal Hydraulic Analysis of the AHWR—The Indian Thorium Fuelled Innovative Nuclear Reactor,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 262, 21 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2013.03.032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. PERMANA, N. TAKAKI, and H. SEKIMOTO, “Breeding and Void Reactivity Analysis on Heavy Metal Closed-Cycle Water Cooled Thorium Reactor,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 38, 337 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2010.10.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. GRENECHE et al., “Rethinking the Thorium Fuel Cycle: An Industrial Point of View,” Proc. Int. Congress Advances in Nuclear Power Plants (ICAPP 2007), Nice, France, 2007; https://doi.org/10.1051/rgn/20074077.
   Google Scholar
• S. KRAHN et al., “Why Reconsider the Thorium Fuel Cycle?” Proc. Global 2013, Salt Lake City, Utah, September 29–October 3, 2013, American Nuclear Society (2013).
   Google Scholar
• V. SEARS, “Neutron Scattering Lengths and Cross Sections,” Neutron News, 3, 3, 26 (1992); https://doi.org/10.1080/10448639208218770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. CREMER, “Reduction of Gamma Noise in Moderated Fast Neutron Sources of Thermal Neutrons,” Advances in Imaging and Electron Physics, Vol. 173, Chap. 6, p. 516, Elsevier (2012).
   Google Scholar
• H. McINTYRE, “Natural-Uranium Heavy-Water Reactors,” Sci. Am., 233, 4, 17 (1975); https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican1075-17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. GOLESORKHI, B. BROMLEY, and M. KAYE, “Simulations of a Pressure-Tube Heavy Water Reactor Operating on Near-Breeding Thorium Cycles,” Nucl. Technol., 194, 178 (2016); https://doi.org/10.13182/NT15-30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “Shippingport Operations with the Light Water Breeder Reactor Core,” WAPD-TM-1542, Bettis Atomic Power Laboratory (1986).
   Google Scholar
• B. BROMLEY, “High-Utilization Lattices for Thorium-Based Fuels in Heavy Water Reactors,” Nucl. Technol., 186, 17 (2014); https://doi.org/10.13182/NT13-86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “Heavy Water Reactors: Status and Projected Development,” Technical Reports Series No. 407, International Atomic Energy Agency (2002).
   Google Scholar
• B. BROMLEY and B. HYLAND, “Heterogeneous Cores for Implementation of Thorium-Based Fuels in Heavy Water Reactors,” Nucl. Technol., 186, 317 (2014); https://doi.org/10.13182/NT13-85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proc. Advances in Heavy Water Reactors Mtg., Toronto, Canada, June 7–10, 1993, IAEA-TECDOC-738, International Atomic Energy Agency (1993).
   Google Scholar
• S. KRAHN and A. WORRALL, “The Reemergence of the Thorium Fuel Cycle: A Special Issue of Nuclear Technology,” Nucl. Technol., 194, 2, iii–iv (2016); https://doi.org/10.13182/NT16-A38390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. AULT, S. KRAHN, and A. CROFF, “Thorium Fuel Cycle Research and Literature: Trends and Insights from Eight Decades of Diverse Projects and Evolving Priorities,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 110, 726 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2017.06.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. DRERA, K. BJORK, and M. SOBIESKA, “Ceria-Thoria Pellet Manufacturing in Preparation for Plutonia-Thoria LWR Fuel Production,” J. Nucl. Mater., 479, 184 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2016.07.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. DRERA, K. BJORK, and J. KELLY, “Thorium Fuel Production and Results from Beginning of Life Irradiation,” Prog. Nucl. Energy, 72, 5 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2013.08.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. CRITOPH et al., “Prospects for Self-Sufficient Equilibrium Thorium Cycles in CANDU Reactors,” Proc. ANS Winter Mtg., San Francisco, California, American Nuclear Society (1975).
   Google Scholar
• S. CORBETT et al., “DME-221 Thoria Fuel: Fabrication, Irradiation Testing, and Post-Irradiation Examination,” Proc. 12th Int. Conf. CANDU Fuel, Kingston, Ontario, Canada, September 15–18, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• M. FLOYD, B. BROMLEY, and J. PENCER, “A Canadian Perspective on Progress in Thoria Fuel Science and Technology,” CNL Nucl. Rev., 1 (2016); https://doi.org/10.12943/CNR.2016.00016.
   Google Scholar
• J. YU et al., “Thorium Fuel Cycle of a Thorium-Based Advanced Nuclear Energy System,” Prog. Nucl. Energy, 45, 1, 71 (2004); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnueene.2004.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. CHEN et al., “CANDU Flexible and Economical Fuel Technology in China,” Proc. 19th Pacific Basin Nuclear Conf., Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 2014, Canadian Nuclear Society (2014).
   Google Scholar
• A. KUMAR, R. SRIVENKATESAN, and R. K. SINHA, “On the Physics Design of Advanced Heavy Water Reactor (AHWR),” Proc. Int. Conf. Opportunities and Challenges for Water Cooled Reactors in the 21st Century, Vienna, Austria, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• R. BUCHER, “India’s Baseline Plan for Nuclear Energy Self-Sufficiency,” ANL/NE-09/03, Argonne National Laboratory (2009).
   Google Scholar
• V. VAZE et al., “Thorium Based Fuel for AHWR,” Proc. Int. Thorium Energy Conf. 2015, Mumbai, India, October 11–18, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• A. BACHCHAN et al., “Evolution of Actinides in ThO2 Blanket of Prototype Fast Breeder Reactor,” Proc. Int. Thorium Energy Conf. 2015, Mumbai, India, October 11–18, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• R. WIGELAND et al., “Nuclear Fuel Cycle Evaluation and Screening—Final Report,” INL/EXT-14-31465, U.S. Department of Energy (2014).
   Google Scholar
• “Sandia Connect—Nuclear Fuel Cycle Options Catalog,” Sandia National Laboratories; https://connect.sandia.gov/sites/NuclearFuelCycleOptionCatalog/SitePages/a/homepage.aspx (current as of Feb. 2017).
   Google Scholar
• S. KRAHN et al., “The Context, Structure, and Objectives of the Thorium Fuel Cycle Technical Track,” Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc., 111, 183 (2014).
   Google Scholar
• S. BOWMAN, “SCALE 6: Comprehensive Nuclear Safety Analysis Code System,” Nucl. Technol., 174, 2, 126 (2011); https://doi.org/10.13182/NT10-163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “Introduction of Thorium in the Nuclear Fuel Cycle: Short- to Long-Term Considerations,” NEA Report No. 7224, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development/ Nuclear Energy Agency (2015).
   Google Scholar
• J. MANKINS, Technology Readiness Levels: A White Paper, NASA, Office of Space Access and Technology, Advanced Concepts Office (Apr. 1995).
   Google Scholar
• S. KRAHN et al., “Use of Technology Readiness Levels to Facilitate Nuclear Fuel Cycle Research, Development, and Deployment,” Proc. 19th Pacific Basin Nuclear Conf., Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 2014, Canadian Nuclear Society (2014).
   Google Scholar
• “Technology Readiness Assessment Guide,” DOE G 413.3-4, U.S. Department of Energy (2009).
   Google Scholar
• B. BERGELSON, A. GERASIMOV, and G. TIKHOMIROV, “Operation of CANDU Power Reactor in Thorium Self-Sufficient Fuel Cycle,” Pramana, 68, 2, 143 (2007); https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-007-0018-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. HAAS, M. HUGON, and M. VERWERFT, “Overview of European Experience with Thorium Fuels,” Nuclear Back-End and Transmutation Technology for Waste Disposal, K. NAKAJIMA, Ed., p. 197, Springer (2015).
   Google Scholar
• W. KO, H. CHOI, and M. YANG, “Economic Analysis on Direct Use of Spent Pressurized Water Reactor Fuel in CANDU Reactors—IV: DUPIC Fuel Cycle Cost,” Nucl. Technol., 134, 2, 167 (2001); https://doi.org/10.13182/NT01-A3193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. ELLIS, “Prospects of Using Reprocessed Uranium in CANDU Reactors, in the US GNEP Program,” Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc., 97, 107 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• S. SAHIN, H. SAHIN, and A. ACIR, “Reduction of Weapon Grade Plutonium Inventories in a Thorium Burner,” Fusion Sci. Technol., 61, 250 (2012); https://doi.org/10.13182/FST12-A13428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. FLOYD, “Extended-Burnup CANDU Fuel Performance,” Proc. 7th Int. CNS CANDU Fuel Conf., Kingston, Ontario, Canada, 2001, Canadian Nuclear Society (2001).
   Google Scholar
• M. DEHART, “SCALE-4 Analysis of Pressurized Water Reactor Critical Configurations: Volume 1—Summary,” ORNL/TM-12294/V1, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (1995).
   Google Scholar
• M. OVANES et al., “Enhanced CANDU 6: Reactor Core Design & Fuel Cycle Flexibility,” Proc. Int. Symp. Nuclear Energy (SIEN) 2011, Bucharest, Romania, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• A. GALPERIN et al., “A Thorium-Based Seed-Blanket Fuel Assembly Concept to Enhance PWR Proliferation Resistance,” Proc. Int. Conf. Global 99, Jackson Hole, Wyoming, August 29–September 3, 1999, American Nuclear Society (1999).
   Google Scholar
• N. HYATT, “Plutonium Management Policy in the United Kingdom: The Need for a Dual Track Strategy,” Energy Pol., 101, 303 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.08.033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “Plutonium Management in the Medium Term: A Review by the OECD/NEA Working Party on the Physics of Plutonium Fuels and Innovative Fuel Cycles (WPPR),” NEA Report No. 4451, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development/Nuclear Energy Agency (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Proc. Fissile Material Management Strategies for Sustainable Nuclear Energy Mtg., Vienna, Austria, September 12–15, 2005, STI/PUB/1288, International Atomic Energy Agency (2007).
   Google Scholar
• “Two Technology Conceptual Designs for Disposal of GTCC LLW,” Sandia National Laboratories (2007).
   Google Scholar
• L. LAKEY, “Management of Transuranic Wastes Throughout the World,” Nucl. Chem. Waste Manag., 4, 1, 35 (1983); https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-815X(83)90036-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “Homogeneous Versus Heterogeneous Recycling of Transuranics in Fast Nuclear Reactors,” NEA Report No. 7077, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development/Nuclear Energy Agency (2012).
   Google Scholar
• G. KIRCHNER, “A New Hazard Index for the Determination of Risk Potentials of Disposed Radioactive Wastes,” J. Environ. Radioact., 11, 1, 71 (1990); https://doi.org/10.1016/0265-931X(90)90044-V.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. CROFF and S. KRAHN, “A Simple Improved Measure of Risk from a Geologic Repository,” Proc. Int. Conf. High Level Radioactive Waste Management, Charleston, South Carolina, April 12–16, 2015, American Nuclear Society (2015).
   Google Scholar
• V. NECAS et al., “Radiotoxicity and Risk Reduction of TRU Elements from Spent Fuel by Transmutation in the Light Water Reactor,” Proc. Int. Conf. Nuclear Data for Science and Technology, Santa Fe, New Mexico, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• R. EWING, “Safe Management of Actinides in the Nuclear Fuel Cycle: Role of Mineralogy,” Compt. Rend. Geosci., 343, 2–3, 219 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crte.2010.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. KUIJPER et al., “Plutonium and Minor Actinide Management in Thermal High-Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactors: Publishable Final Activity Report,” European Commission Community Research (2010).
   Google Scholar
• L. KOCH, “Minor Actinide Transmutation—A Waste Management Option,” J. Less Common Met., 122, 371 (1986); https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5088(86)90432-7.
   Google Scholar
• B. HYLAND and B. GIHM, “Scenarios for the Transmutation of Actinides in CANDU Reactors,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 241, 12, 4794 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2011.03.039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. SHWAGERAUS, P. HEJZLAR, and M. KAZIMI, “Use of Thorium for Transmutation of Plutonium and Minor Actinides in PWRs,” Nucl. Technol., 147, 1, 53 (2004); https://doi.org/10.13182/NT04-A3514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. SAHIN et al., “Criticality Investigations for the Fixed Bed Nuclear Reactor Using Thorium Fuel Mixed with Plutonium or Minor Actinides,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 36, 8, 1032 (2009); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2009.06.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. DEL CUL et al., “Analysis of the Reuse of Uranium Recovered from the Reprocessing of Commercial LWR Spent Fuel,” ORNL/TM-2007/207, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Proc. Technical and Economic Limits to Fuel Burnup Extension Mtg., San Carlos De Bariloche, Argentina, November 15–19, 1999, IAEA-TECDOC-1299, International Atomic Energy Agency (2002).
   Google Scholar
• H. VISWANATHAN et al., “A Reactive Transport Model of Neptunium Migration from the Potential Repository at Yucca Mountain,” J. Hydrol., 209, 1–4, 251 (1998); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(98)00122-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. AULT et al., “Transuranic Management Using Thorium and Uranium-233 Recycle in Heavy Water Reactors,” Proc. 16th Int. High-Level Radioactive Waste Management Conf., Charlotte, North Carolina, April 9–13, 2017, American Nuclear Society (2017).
   Google Scholar
• T. WODDI and K. RICCI, “Parametric Core Analysis and Economic Feasibility of a Thorium Heavy Water Breeder Reactor,” Nucl. Technol., 184, 156 (2013); https://doi.org/10.13182/NT13-22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. TAKAKI and D. MARDIANSAH, “Core Design and Deployment Strategy of Heavy Water Cooled Sustainable Thorium Reactor,” Sustainability, 4, 1933 (2012); https://doi.org/10.3390/su4081933.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. BESS and N. FUJIMOTO, “Evaluation of the Start-Up Core Physics Tests at Japan’s High Temperature Engineering Test Reactor (Fully-Loaded Core),” INL/EXT-08-14767, Rev. 0, Idaho National Laboratory (2009).
   Google Scholar
• C. LAMB et al., “THOREX Solvent Extraction Studies with Irradiated HTGR Fuel: Series I,” ORNL-TM-7108, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (1980).
   Google Scholar
• E. MERZ, “Reprocessing of Thorium-Containing Nuclear Fuels: Activities Report for the Second Half Year 1970,” GERHTR-43, Kernforschungsanlage Jülich (1971).
   Google Scholar
• F. OWEN, “Beta-Gamma Dose Rates from U232 in U233,” HW-81964, General Electric Hanford Atomic Products Operation (1964).
   Google Scholar