Demonstration of the Advanced Dynamic System Modeling Tool TRANSFORM in a Molten Salt Reactor Application via a Model of the Molten Salt Demonstration Reactor

References

• B. D. YACOBUCCI, “Energy Policy: 114th Congress Issues,” p. 11, Congressional Research Service (2016).
   Google Scholar
• M. W. ROSENTHAL, P. R. KASTEN, and R. B. BRIGGS, “Molten-Salt Reactors. History, Status, and Potential,” Nucl. Appl. Technol., 8, 107 (1970); https://doi.org/10.13182/NT70-A28619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. KRAHN et al., “Why Reconsider a Molten Salt Reactor?,” Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc., 111, 399 (2014).
   Google Scholar
• D. T. INGERSOLL and C. W. FORSBERG, “Status of Preconceptual Design of the Advanced High-Temperature Reactor (AHTR),” Oak Ridge National Laboratory (2004).
   Google Scholar
• D. T. INGERSOLL, “Status of Physics and Safety Analyses for the Liquid-Salt-Cooled Very High-Temperature Reactor (LS-VHTR),” Oak Ridge National Laboratory (2005).
   Google Scholar
• D. T. INGERSOLL, C. W. FORSBERG, and P. E. MacDONALD, “Trade Studies for the Liquid-Salt-Cooled Very High-Temperature Reactor: Fiscal Year 2006 Progress Report,” Oak Ridge National Laboratory (2007).
   Google Scholar
• A. L. QUALLS et al., “Fluoride Salt-Cooled High-Temperature Demonstration Reactor Point Design,” Oak Ridge National Laboratory (2016); https://doi.org/10.2172/1245361.
   Google Scholar
• A. L. QUALLS et al., “Preconceptual Design of a Fluoride High Temperature Salt-Cooled Engineering Demonstration Reactor: Motivation and Overview,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 107, 144 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2016.11.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. R. BROWN et al., “Preconceptual Design of a Fluoride High Temperature Salt-Cooled Engineering Demonstration Reactor: Core Design and Safety Analysis,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 103, 49 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2017.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT CENTER COST ANALYSIS GROUP, “Software Development Cost Estimating Guidebook,” p. 254, Price Systems, LLC (2009).
   Google Scholar
• “NEAMS: The Nuclear Energy Advanced Modeling and Simulation Program,” U.S. Department of Energy (2013).
   Google Scholar
• G. L. MESINA, “A History of RELAP Computer Codes,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 182, v (2016); https://doi.org/10.13182/NSE16-A38253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. S. GREENWOOD, B. R. BETZLER, and A. L. QUALLS, “Dynamic System Models for Informing Licensing and Safeguards Investigations of Molten Salt Reactors,” Oak Ridge National Laboratory (2018); https://doi.org/10.2172/1456790.
   Google Scholar
• “Nuclear Power Plant Licensing Process Fact Sheet,” U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (2010).
   Google Scholar
• S. BAJOREK and D. J. DIAMOND, “Thermal-Hydraulics Phenomena Important in Modeling and Simulation of Liquid-Fuel Molten Salt Reactors,” Brookhaven National Laboratory (2018).
   Google Scholar
• B. R. BETZLER et al., “Molten Salt Reactor Campaign Modeling and Simulation Program Plan,” Oak Ridge National Laboratory (2018); https://doi.org/10.2172/1480625.
   Google Scholar
• “The Structure and Content of Agreements Between the Agency and States Required in Connection with the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons,” International Atomic Energy Agency (1972).
   Google Scholar
• “Manifesto for Agile Software Development,” Agile Alliance (2001); http://agilemanifesto.org/ (current as of Apr. 18, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• “Principles Behind the Agile Manifesto,” Agile Alliance (2001); http://agilemanifesto.org/principles.html (current as of Apr. 18, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• D. J. DIAMOND et al., “Phenomena Important in Molten Salt Reactor Simulations,” Brookhaven National Laboratory (2018); https://doi.org/10.2172/1436452.
   Google Scholar
• D. J. DIAMOND, “Neutronics Phenomena Important in Modeling and Simulation of Liquid-Fuel Molten Salt Reactors,” Brookhaven National Laboratory (2018).
   Google Scholar
• S. BRINTON, “The Advanced Nuclear Industry,” Third Way (2015).
   Google Scholar
• “TRANSFORM-Library: A Modelica Library of Multi-Physics Components,” ORNL-TRANSFORM, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (2017); https://github.com/ORNL-TRANSFORM/TRANSFORM-Library (current as of Aug. 22, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• “Dymola Systems Engineering,” Dassault Systemes; https://www.3ds.com/products-services/catia/products/dymola/ (current as of Aug. 16, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• “Modelica Language Specification Version 3.4,” Modelica Association (2017).
   Google Scholar
• R. HALE et al., “Update on ORNL TRANSFORM Tool: Preliminary Architecture/Modules for High-Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactor Concepts and Update on ALMR Control,” Oak Ridge National Laboratory (2015).
   Google Scholar
• M. S. GREENWOOD, “Component Development for Nuclear Hybrid Energy Systems,” Proc. 12th Int. Modelica Conf., Prague, Czech Republic, May 15–17, 2017, p. 839 (2017); https://doi.org/10.3384/ecp17132839.
   Google Scholar
• C. RABITI et al., “Status Report on Modelling and Simulation Capabilities for Nuclear-Renewable Hybrid Energy Systems,” Idaho National Laboratory (2017).
   Google Scholar
• J. D. RADER et al., “SMR-160 Primary Flow Stability,” Oak Ridge National Laboratory (2018).
   Google Scholar
• J. D. RADER et al. “Nuclear Thermal Propulsion Dynamic Modeling with Modelica,” Proc. Nuclear and Emerging Technologies for Space (NETS), Richland, Washington, February 25–28, 2019, American Nuclear Society (2019).
   Google Scholar
• “Modelica and the Modelica Association,” Modelica Association; https://www.modelica.org/ (current as of Aug. 16, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Functional Mock-Up Interface website; http://fmi-standard.org/ (current as of Feb. 23, 2018).
   Google Scholar
• A. POP et al., “A New OpenModelica Compiler High Performance Frontend,” Proc. 13th Int. Modelica Conf., Regensburg, Germany, March 4–6, 2019, p. 689 (2019); https://doi.org/10.3384/ecp19157689.
   Google Scholar
• “Modelica Standard Library,” Modelica Association (2018).
   Google Scholar
• F. CASELLA et al., “The Modelica Fluid and Media Library for Modeling of Incompressible and Compressible Thermo-Fluid Pipe Networks,” Modelica Association (2006).
   Google Scholar
• M. S. GREENWOOD and B. R. BETZLER, “Modified Point-Kinetics Model for Neutron Precursors and Fission Product Behavior for Fluid-Fueled Molten Salt Reactors,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 193, 417 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2018.1531619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. S. BETTIS, L. G. ALEXANDER, and H. L. WATTS, “Design Studies of a Molten-Salt Reactor Demonstration Plant,” ORNL-TM-3832, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (1972).
   Google Scholar
• R. C. ROBERTSON, “Conceptual Design Study of a Single-Fluid Molten-Salt Breeder Reactor,” ORNL-4541, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (1971).
   Google Scholar
• B. R. BETZLER, J. J. POWERS, and A. WORRALL, “Molten Salt Reactor Neutronics and Fuel Cycle Modeling and Simulation with SCALE,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 101, 489 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2016.11.040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. B. CHADWICK et al., “ENDF/B-VII.1 Nuclear Data for Science and Technology: Cross Sections, Covariances, Fission Product Yields and Decay Data,” Nucl. Data Sheets, 112, 2887 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2011.11.002.
   Google Scholar
• J. D. STEMPIEN, “Tritium Transport, Corrosion, and Fuel Performance Modeling in the Fluoride Salt-Cooled High-Temperature Reactor (FHR),” Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2015).
   Google Scholar
• G. T. MAYS, A. N. SMITH, and J. R. ENGEL, “Distribution and Behavior of Tritium in the Coolant-Salt Technology Facility,” Oak Ridge National Laboratory (1977).
   Google Scholar
• J. D. RADER, M. S. GREENWOOD, and P. W. HUMRICKHOUSE, “Verification of Modelica-Based Models with Analytical Solutions for Tritium Diffusion,” Nucl. Technol., 203, 58 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2018.1431505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. OLANDER, “Redox Condition in Molten Fluoride Salts,” J. Nucl. Mater., 300, 270 (2002); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3115(01)00742-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. ZENG et al., “Development of the Tritium Transport Analysis Code for the Thorium-Based Molten Salt Reactor,” Nucl. Technol., 203, 48 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2018.1433408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. L. SUN et al., “Dynamic Adsorption Properties of Kr and Xe Isotopes in Charcoal,” J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 181, 291 (1994); https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02037635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. McMURRAY  et al., “Multi-Physics Simulations for Molten Salt Reactor Evaluation: Chemistry Modeling and Database Development,” Oak Ridge National Laboratory (2018).
   Google Scholar
• C. RABITI, “RAVEN: Risk Analysis Virtual Environment,” Idaho National Laboratory (2018).
   Google Scholar
• C. R. RAO, Linear Statistical Inference and Its Applications, Wiley (2002).
   Google Scholar
• A. ALFONSI et al., “RAVEN Theory Manual,” Idaho National Laboratory (2016); https://doi.org/10.2172/1260312.
   Google Scholar
• S. J. BALL and T. W. KERLIN, “Stability Analysis of the Molten-Salt Reactor Experiment,” Oak Ridge National Laboratory (1965).
   Google Scholar