Fusion Blankets and Fluoride-Salt-Cooled High-Temperature Reactors with Flibe Salt Coolant: Common Challenges, Tritium Control, and Opportunities for Synergistic Development Strategies Between Fission, Fusion, and Solar Salt Technologies

References

• B. N. SORBOM et al., “ARC: A Compact, High-Field, Fusion Nuclear Science Facility and Demonstration Power Plant with Demountable Magnets,” Fusion Eng. Des., 100, 378 (Nov. 2015); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2015.07.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Q. KUANG et al., “Conceptual Design Study for Heat Exhaust Management in the ARC Fusion Pilot Plant,” Fusion Eng. Des., 137, 221 (Dec. 2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2018.09.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. J. BARTON and R. A. STRELOW, “Blankets for Thermonuclear Reactors,” ORNL-3258, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (1962).
   Google Scholar
• W. R. GRIMES and S. CANTOR, “Molten Salts as Blanket Fluids in Controlled Fusion Reactors,” ORNL-TM-4047, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (1972).
   Google Scholar
• J. A. BLINK et al., “The High-Yield Lithium-Injection Fusion-Energy (HYLIFE) Reactor,” Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (1985); https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/6124368 (current as of Sep. 12, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• R. W. MOIR et al., “HYLIFE-II: A Molten-Salt Inertial Fusion Energy Power Plant Design—Final Report,” Fusion Technol., 25, 1, 5 (1994); https://doi.org/10.13182/FST94-A30234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. SAGARA et al., “Blanket and Divertor Design for Force Free Helical Reactor (FFHR),” Fusion Eng. Des., 29, 51 (1995); https://doi.org/10.1016/0920-3796(95)80005-I.
   Google Scholar
• L. C. CADWALLADER and G. R. LONGHURST, “Flibe Use in Fusion Reactors: An Initial Safety Assessment,” INEEL/EXT-99-00331, Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory (Mar. 1999); https://doi.org/.
   Google Scholar
• R. W. MOIR, “Flibe Coolant Cleanup and Processing in the HYLIFE-II Inertial Fusion Energy Power Plant,” UCRL-ID-143228, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (2001).
   Google Scholar
• A. SAGARA et al., “Conceptual Design Activities and Key Issues on LHD-Type Reactor FFHR,” Fusion Eng. Des., 81, 23–24, 2703 (Nov. 2006); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2006.07.057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molten Salt Reactors and Thorium Energy, T. J. DOLAN, Ed., Woodhead Publishing Series in Energy, Elsevier Ltd (2017).
   Google Scholar
• E. MERLE, “Concept of European Molten Salt Fast Reactor (MSFR),” CNRS-IN2P3-LPSC/Grenoble Institute of Technology/UGA—France (May 23, 2017); https://www.gen-4.org/gif/upload/docs/application/pdf/2017-05/emerle_gif-final23may2017.pdf (current as of Sep. 12, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• M. MEHOS et al., “Concentrated Solar Power Gen3 Demonstration Roadmap,” NREL/TP-5500-67464, National Renewable Energy Laboratory (Jan. 2017); https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy17osti/67464.pdf (current as of Sep. 12, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• M. ABDOU et al., “Blanket/First Wall Challenges and Required R&D on the Pathway to DEMO,” Fusion Eng. Des., 100, 2 (Nov. 2015); https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920379615302465 (current as of Sep. 12, 2019).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. E. SAWAN et al., “Neutronics Assessment of Molten Salt Breeding Blanket Design Options,” presented at 16th Topl. Mtg. Fusion Energy, Madison Wisconsin, September 14–16, 2004; UWFDM-1234, University of Wisconsin (Sep. 2004); http://fti.neep.wisc.edu/pdf/fdm1234.pdf (current as of Sep. 12, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• M. GREENWALD et al., “Parameter Sensitivities and Physics Optimization for SPARC-V1C, APS-DPP,” (Oct. 21, 2019); https://www.aps.org/units/dpp/meetings/annual/ (current as of Sep. 12, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• D. BRUNNER, “Overview of SPARC on the High-Field Path to Fusion Energy, APS-DPP,” (Oct. 21, 2019); https://www.aps.org/units/dpp/meetings/annual/ (current as of Sep. 12, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• C. W. FORSBERG and P. F. PETERSON, “Basis for Fluoride Salt-Cooled High-Temperature Reactors with Nuclear Air-Brayton Combined Cycles and Firebrick Resistance Heated Energy Storage,” Nucl. Technol., 196, 13 (Oct. 2016); https://doi.org/10.13182/NT16-28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. W. FORSBERG et al., “Integrated FHR Technology Development: Tritium Management, Materials Testing, Salt Chemistry Control, Thermal Hydraulics and Neutronics, Associated Benchmarking and Commercial Basis,” MIT-ANP-TR-180, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, (Oct. 2018); https://www.osti.gov/search/semantic:1485415 (current as of Sep. 12, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• C. ANDREADES et al., “Design Summary of the Mark-I Pebble-Bed Fluoride Salt-Cooled, High-Temperature Reactor Commercial Power Plant,” Nucl. Technol., 195, 223 (Sep. 2016); https://doi.org/10.13182/NT16-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. R. ROMATOSKI and L. W. HU, “Fluoride Salt Coolant Properties for Nuclear Reactor Applications: A Review,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 109, 635 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2017.05.036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. R. ROMATOSKI and L. W. HU, “Fluoride-Salt-Cooled High-Temperature Test Reactor Thermal-Hydraulic Licensing and Uncertainty Propagation Analysis,” Nucl. Technol., 205, 1495 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2019.1610686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “Oak Ridge Molten Salt Workshop,” Oak Ridge National Laboratory (2019); https://msrworkshop.ornl.gov/ (current as of Sep. 12, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Y. ZENG et al., “Tritium Transport Analysis in a 2-MW Liquid-Fueled Molten Salt Experimental Reactor with the Code TMSR-TTAC,” Nucl. Technol., 205, 4, 582 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2018.1507200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. FENG et al., “Core and Fuel Cycle Performance of a Molten Salt Fast Reactor,” Int. Congress on Advances in Nuclear Power Plants (ICAPP 2019), Juan les Pins, France, May 12–15, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• C. FORSBERG et al., “Flibe Fusion Blankets and Flibe Fluoride-Salt-Cooled High-Temperature Reactors: Opportunities for Synergistic Development Strategies,” Proc. American Nuclear Society Winter Meeting, Washington, District of Columbia, November 17–21, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• C. W. FORSBERG, H. GOUGAR, and P. SABHARWALL, “Heat Storage Coupled to Generation IV Reactors for Variable Electricity from Base-Load Reactors: Workshop Proceedings,” Proc. ANP-TR-185, Center for Advanced Nuclear Energy Systems, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, July 23–24, 2019; INL/EXT-19-54909, Idaho National Laboratory (2019).
   Google Scholar
• S. SMOLENTSEV et al., “MHD Thermohydraulics Analysis and Supporting R&D for DCLL Blanket in the FNSF,” Fusion Eng. Des., 135, 314 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2017.06.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. SMOLENTSEV et al., “An Approach to Verification and Validation of MHD Codes for Fusion Applications,” Fusion Eng. Des., 100, 65 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2014.04.049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. COYLE, E. BAGLIETTO, and C. FORSBERG, “Advancing Radiative Heat Transfer Modelling in High-Temperature Liquid Salts,” 18th Int. Topl. Mtg. Nuclear Reactor Thermal Hydraulics (NURETH-18), Portland, Oregon, August 18–23, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• N. ZWEIBAUM, “Experimental Validation of Passive Safety System Models: Application to Design and Optimization of Fluoride-Salt-Cooled, High-Temperature Reactors,” PhD Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley (2015); https://escholarship.org/uc/item/744882bt (current as of Sep. 12, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• C. W. FORSBERG et al., “Tritium Control and Capture in Salt-Cooled Fission and Fusion Reactors: Status, Challenges, and Path Forward,” Nucl. Technol., 197, 119 (Feb. 2017); https://doi.org/10.13182/NT16-101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. ZHANG et al., “Redox Potential Control in Molten Salt Systems for Corrosion Mitigation,” Corros. Sci., 144, 44 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2018.08.035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. T. CHENG, H. J. MERRIL, and D.-K. SZE, “Nuclear Aspects of Molten Salt Blankets,” Fusion Eng. Des., 69, 205 (2003); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0920-3796(03)00339-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. MORIYAMA et al., “Molten Salts in Fusion Nuclear Technology,” Fusion Eng. Des., 39-40, 627 (1998); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0920-3796(98)00202-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. R. BRITSCH and M. ANDERSON, “A Critical Review of Fluoride Salt Heat Transfer,” Nucl. Technol., 206, 1625 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2019.1682418.
   Google Scholar
• S. FUKADA et al., “Reaction Rates of Beryllium with Fluorine Ion for Flibe Redox Control,” J. Nucl. Mater., 367-370, Part B, 1190 (Aug. 1, 2007); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.03.218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. J. RILEY et al., “Molten Salt Reactor Waste and Effluent Management Strategies: A Review,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 345, 94 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2019.02.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. TANABE et al., “Hydrogen Transport in Stainless Steels,” J. Nucl. Mater., 123, 1568 (1984); https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3115(84)90304-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. NAKAMURA, S. FUKADA, and R. NISHIUMI, “Hydrogen Isotopes Permeation in a Fluoride Molten Salt for Nuclear Fusion Blanket,” J. Plasma Fusion Res., 11, 25 (2015); https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/4d8c/d2273bd3e3a99129105ea7e1bc5d6edcaecb.pdf (current as of Sep. 12, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• R. A. CAUSEY, R. A. KARNESKY, and C. SAN MARCHI, “4.16—Tritium Barriers and Tritium Diffusion in Fusion Reactors,” Comprehensive Nuclear Materials, R. J. M. KONINGS, Ed., pp. 511–549, Elsevier, Oxford (2012).
   Google Scholar
• J. TROUVE and G. LAFLANCHE, “Hydrogen Diffusion and Permeation in Sodium,” presented at Int. Conf. Liquid Metal Engineering and Technology in Energy Production (CEA-CONF-7645), Oxford, United Kingdom, April 9–13, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• S. T. LAM, R. BALLINGER, and C. FORSBERG, “Modeling and Predicting Total Hydrogen Adsorption on Porous Carbon Materials,” J. Nucl. Mater., 511, 328 (Dec. 1, 2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2018.09.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. ATSUMI and M. MIYAKE, “Absorption and Desorption of Deuterium on Graphite at Elevated Temperatures,” J. Nucl. Mater., 155–157, Part 1, 241 (1988); https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3115(88)90247-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. DOLAN, G. R. LONGHURST, and E. G. OTERO, “A Vacuum Disengager for Tritium Removal for HYLIFE-II Reactor Flibe,” Fusion Technol., 21, 3P2B, 1949 (May 1992); https://doi.org/10.13182/FST21-1949.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. LAM et al., “Weak and Strong Hydrogen Interactions on Porous Carbons Materials in High-Temperature Systems,” J. Nucl. Mater., 519, 173 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2019.03.036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. W. FORSBERG and P. F. PETERSON, “FHR, HTGR, and MSR Pebble-Bed Reactors with Multiple Pebble Sizes for Fuel Management and Coolant Cleanup,” Nucl. Technol., 205, 5, 748 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2019.1573619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X. WU et al., “Mass Transport Analysis for Tritium Removal in FHRs,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 121, 250 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2018.07.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X. WU et al., “Primary Design of a Tritium Control System for Fluoride-Salt-Cooled High-Temperature Reactor Systems,” Tritium, Charleston, South Carolina, April 17–22, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• S. ZHANG et al., “A Coupled Heat Transfer and Tritium Mass Transport Model for a Double-Wall Heat Exchanger Design for FHRs,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 122, 328 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2018.08.039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. ZHANG et al., “Double-Wall Natural Draft Heat Exchanger Design for Tritium Control in FHRs,” Proc. 2017 25th Int. Conf. Nuclear Engineering (ICONE25), Shanghai, China, July 2–6, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• C. FORSBERG et al., “Fluoride-Salt-Cooled High-Temperature Reactor (FHR) Using British Advanced Gas-Cooled Reactor (AGR) Refueling Technology and Decay-Heat Removal Systems that Prevent Salt Freezing,” Nucl. Technol., 205, 9, 1127 (Apr. 2019); https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2019.1586372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. ZOHURI et al., “Heat-Pipe Heat Exchangers for Salt-Cooled Fission and Fusion Reactors to Avoid Salt Freezing and Control Tritium: A Review,” Nucl. Technol., 206, 1642 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2019.1681222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. D. STEMPIEN, “Tritium Transport and Corrosion Modeling in the Fluoride Salt-Cooled High-Temperature Reactor,” PhD Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2015).
   Google Scholar
• S. T. LAM, “Managing Tritium Inventory and Release with Carbon Materials in a Fluoride Salt-Cooled High-Temperature Reactor,” SM Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2017).
   Google Scholar
• S. T. LAM et al., “Tritium Management and Control Using Carbon in a Fluoride-Salt-Cooled High-Temperature Reactor,” Fusion Sci. Technol., 71, 4, 644 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1080/15361055.2017.1290945.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. FORSBERG, J. STEMPIEN, and R. BALLINGER, “Tritium Removal from Salt-Cooled Reactors Using Carbon,” Proc. American Nuclear Society Winter Meeting, Washington, District of Columbia, November 8–12, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• C. W. FORSBERG, P. J. McDANIEL, and B. ZOHURI, “Base-Load Nuclear and Concentrated Solar Power (CSP) Air-Brayton Power Cycles with Thermodynamic Topping Cycles and Heat Storage for Variable Electricity and Heat,” Proc. ICAPP 2020, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, March 15–19, 2020.
   Google Scholar