Extension of a Level 2 PSA Event Tree Based on Results of a Probabilistic Dynamic Safety Analysis of Induced Steam Generator Tube Rupture

References

• A. K. VERMA, S. AJIT, and D. R. KARANKI, “Dynamic PSA,” Reliability and Safety Engineering, Chap. 11, p. 373, Springer-Verlag, London (2016).
   Google Scholar
• M. KLOOS et al., “MCDET, A Tool for Integrated Deterministic Probabilistic Safety Analyses,” Advanced Concepts in Nuclear Energy Risk Assessment and Management, T. ALDEMIR, Ed., World Scientific Publishing Company (2018).
   Google Scholar
• M. KLOOS and J. PESCHKE, “Results of an IDPSA Aimed to Assess the Potential of a Thermally Induced Steam Generator Tube Rupture,” Proc. 14th Int. Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management Conf. (PSAM14), Los Angeles, California, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• H. AUSTREGESILO et al., “ATHLET-CD 3.1A User’s Manual,” Gesellschaft für Anlagen- und Reaktorsicherheit (GRS), Garching, Germany (2018).
   Google Scholar
• M. HAGE et al., “Ergänzung der bestehenden PSA der Stufe 2 um Ereignisbaumstruktur, -quantifizierung und mitigative menschliche Handlungen,” GRS 489, Gesellschaft für Anlagen- und Reaktorsicherheit (2018) (in German).
   Google Scholar
• “Bewertung des Unfallrisikos fortschrittlicher Druckwasserreaktoren in Deutschland,” GRS-175, Gesellschaft für Anlagen- und Reaktorsicherheit (2001) (in German).
   Google Scholar
• C. ACOSTA and N. SIU, “Dynamic Event Trees in Accident Sequence Analysis: Application to Steam Generator Tube Rupture,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 41, 135 (1993); https://doi.org/10.1016/0951-8320(93)90027-V.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.-J. CHANG et al., “Development of Dynamic Event Tree for Steam Generator Tube Rupture of a PWR,” Proc. Int. Conf. Nuclear Engineering, San Diego, California, 1998, American Society of Mechanical Engineers (1998).
   Google Scholar
• D. M. OSBORN et al., “Seamless Level 2/Level 3 Dynamic Probabilistic Risk Assessment Clustering,” Proc. Int. Topl. Mtg. Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Analysis (PSA 2013), Columbia, South Carolina, September 22–27, 2013, American Nuclear Society (2013).
   Google Scholar
• M. PRASAD et al., “Simulation Based Dynamic Event Tree Analysis,” Proc. Int. Topl. Mtg. Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Analysis (PSA 2019), Charleston, South Carolina, April 28–May 3, 2019, American Nuclear Society (2019).
   Google Scholar
• J. PESCHKE, et al., “Methodische Weiterentwicklungen und Anwendungen zur probabilistischen Dynamikanalyse,” GRS-520, Gesellschaft für Anlagen- und Reaktorsicherheit (2018) (in German).
   Google Scholar
• D. MANDELLI et al., “Mutual Integration of Classical and Dynamic PRA,” Proc. Int. Topl. Mtg. Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Analysis (PSA 2019), Charleston, South Carolina, April 28–May 3, 2019, American Nuclear Society (2019).
   Google Scholar
• C. PICOCO et al., “Integration of Recoveries into Dynamic Event Trees: A Case Study,” Proc. Int. Topl. Mtg. Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Analysis (PSA 2019), Charleston, South Carolina, April 28–May 3, 2019, American Nuclear Society (2019).
   Google Scholar
• K. S. HSUEH and A. MOSLEH, “The Development and Application of the Accident Dynamic Simulator for Dynamic Probabilistic Risk Assessment of Nuclear Power Plants,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 52, 297 (1996); https://doi.org/10.1016/0951-8320(95)00140-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. HAKOBYAN et al., “Dynamic Generation of Accident Progression Event Trees,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 238, 3457 (2008); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2008.08.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. H. J. CHANG and A. MOSLEH, “Cognitive Modeling and Dynamic Probabilistic Simulation of Operating Crew Response to Complex System Accidents Part 1–5: Dynamic Probabilistic Simulation of the IDAC Model,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 92, 997 (2007); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2006.05.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EMRALD website, Idaho National Laboratory; https://emrald.inl.gov/SitePages/Overview.aspx ( current as of Apr. 4, 2020).
   Google Scholar
• C. L. SMITH et al., “India-United States Collaboration on Advanced Dynamic Reliability Modeling,” Proc. Int. Topl. Mtg. Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Analysis (PSA 2019), Charleston, South Carolina, April 28–May 3, 2019, American Nuclear Society (2019).
   Google Scholar
• D. ANDERS et al., “RELAP-7 Level 2 Milestone Report: Demonstration of a Steady State Single Phase PWR Simulation with RELAP-7,” INL/EXT-12-25924, Idaho National Laboratory (2012).
   Google Scholar
• C. RABITI et al., “RAVEN, A New Software for Dynamic Risk Analysis,” Proc. 12th Int. Conf. Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management (PSAM12), Honolulu, Hawaii, June 22–27, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• M. KLOOS and J. PESCHKE, “MCDET: A Probabilistic Dynamics Method Combining Monte Carlo Simulation with the Discrete Dynamic Event Tree Approach,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 153, 137 (2006); https://doi.org/10.13182/NSE06-A2601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. M. GRIESMEYER and L. N. SMITH, “A Reference Manual for the EVENT Progression Analysis Code (EVNTRE),” NUREG/CR-5174, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (1989).
   Google Scholar