References
- M. KURATA, “Research and Development Methodology for Practical Use of Accident Tolerant Fuel in Light Water Reactors,” Nucl. Eng. Technol., 48, 1, 26 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2015.12.004.
- “NUREG/CR-1150: Severe Accident Risks: An Assessment for Five U.S. Nuclear Power Plants Final Summary Report,” U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (2005).
- J. DEVOOGHT, “Dynamic Reliability,” in Advances in Nuclear Science and Technology, Vol. 25, p. 215 (1997).
- J. DEVOOGHT and C. SMIDTS, “Probabilistic Reactor Dynamics—I: The Theory of Continuous Event Trees,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 111, 229 (1992); https://doi.org/10.13182/NSE92-A23937.
- D. MANDELLI et al., “BWR Station Blackout: A RISMC Analysis Using RAVEN and RELAP5-3D,” Nucl. Technol., 193, 1, 161 (2016); https://doi.org/10.13182/NT14-142.
- D. MALJOVEC et al., “Analyzing Simulation-Based PRA Data Through Traditional and Topological Clustering: A BWR Station Blackout Case Study,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 145, 1, 262 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2015.07.001.
- D. MANDELLI et al., “Modeling of a Flooding Induced Station Blackout for a Pressurized Water Reactor Using the RISMC Toolkit,” Proc. PSA 2015 Int. Tol. Mtg. Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Analysis, Sun Valley, Idaho, April 26–30, 2015.
- R. L. BORING et al., “Simulation and Non-Simulation Based Human Reliability Analysis Approaches,” Technical Report: INL/EXT-14-33903, Idaho National Laboratory (2014).
- H. S. ABDEL-KHALIK et al., “Reduced Order Modeling for Nonlinear Multi-Component Models,” Int. J. Uncertainty Quantif., 2-4, 341 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1615/Int.J.UncertaintyQuantification.2012003523.
- RELAP5-3D CODE DEVELOPMENT TEAM, “RELAP5-3D Code Manual,” Technical Report, Idaho National Laboratory (2005).
- R. O. GAUNTT, “MELCOR Computer Code Manual, Version 1.8.5, Vol. 2, Rev. 2,” NUREG/CR-6119, Sandia National Laboratories (2000).
- B. RUTT et al., “Distributed Dynamic Event Tree Generation for Reliability and Risk Assessment,” in IEEE—Challenges of Large Applications in Distributed Environments, Paris, France, June 19–23, 2006, p. 61 (2006).
- E. HOFER et al., “An Approximate Epistemic Uncertainty Analysis Approach in the Presence of Epistemic and Aleatory Uncertainties,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 77, 3, 229 (2002); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8320(02)00056-X.
- K. S. HSUEH and A. MOSLEH, “The Development and Application of the Accident Dynamic Simulator for Dynamic Probabilistic Risk Assessment of Nuclear Power Plants,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 52, 297 (1996); https://doi.org/10.1016/0951-8320(95)00140-9.
- G. COJAZZI, “The DYLAM Approach for the Dynamic Reliability Analysis of Systems,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 52, 3, 279 (1996); https://doi.org/10.1016/0951-8320(95)00139-5.
- A. ALFONSI et al., “RAVEN and Dynamic Probabilistic Risk Assessment: Software Overview,” Proc. European Safety and Reliability Conf. (ESREL 2014), Wroclaw, Poland, September 14–18, 2014.
- S. GUARRO, M. YAU, and M. MOTAMED, “Development of Tools for Safety Analysis of Control Software in Advanced Reactors,” NUREG/CR-6465, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (1996).
- T. ALDEMIR, “Utilization of the Cell to Cell Mapping Technique to Construct Markov Failure Models for Process Control Systems,” Proc. Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management (PSAM) 3, Los Angeles, California, April 1991.
- E. ZIO et al., “A Concept Paper on Dynamic Reliability via Monte Carlo Simulation,” Math. Comput. Simul, 47, 371 (1998); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4754(98)00112-8.
- D. MANDELLI and C. SMITH, “Adaptive Sampling Using Support Vector Machines,” Proc. Am. Nucl. Soc., 107, 736 (2012).
- “State-of-the-Art Reactor Consequence Analyses Project Volume 2: Surry Integrated Analysis,” NUREG/CR-6753, Sandia National Laboratories, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (2012).
- “10 CFR Part 50—Definitions,” U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission; https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/cfr/part050/part050-0002.html (current as of Feb. 28, 2020).
- L. SIEFKEN, G. A. BERNA, and V. N. SHAH, “FRAP-T6: A Computer Code for the Transient Analysis of Oxide Fuel Rods,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 88, 3, 341 (1985); https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5493(85)90169-4.
- C. RABITI et al., “RAVEN, A New Software for Dynamic Risk Analysis,” Proc. Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management (PSAM) 12, Honolulu, Hawaii, June 22–27, 2014.
- “Diverse and Flexible Coping Strategies (FLEX) Implementation Guide (Rev 4),” NEI 12-06, Nuclear Energy Institute (2012).
- H. S. AYBAR and P. ORTEGO, “A Review of Nuclear Fuel Performance Codes,” Prog. Nucl. Energy, 46, 2, 127 (2005); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2005.01.004.
- A. KIUREGHIAN and O. DITLEVSEN, “Aleatory or Epistemic? Does It Matter?” Struct. Saf., 31, 105 (2009); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.020.
- C. CORTES and V. VAPNIK, “Support-Vector Networks,” Mach. Learn. J., 20, 237 (1995); https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00994018.
- J. GOLDBERGER et al., “Neighbourhood Components Analysis,” Proc. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 17 (NIPS 2004), p. 513 (2005).