From “Inherently Safe” to “Proliferation Resistant”: New Perspectives on Reactor Designs

References

• S. JASANOFF and S. KIM, “Containing the Atom: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and Nuclear Power in the United States and South Korea,” Minerva, 47, 2, 119 (2009); https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-009-9124-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power, S. JASANOFF and S. KIM, Eds, University of Chicago Press (2015).
   Google Scholar
• G. HECHT, The Radiance of France: Nuclear Power and National Identity after World War II, MIT Press (1998).
   Google Scholar
• V. V. GONCHAROV, “Pervyi period razvitiia atomnoi energetiki v SSSR,” Istoriia atomnoi energetiki Sovetskogo Soiuza i Rossii, V. A. SIDORENKO, Ed., pp. 16–70, IzdAt, Moscow (2001).
   Google Scholar
• I. V. KURCHATOV, “Rech’ tovarishcha I. V. Kurchatova,” Pravda, 53, 7 (Feb. 22, 1956).
   Google Scholar
• S. D. SCHMID, Producing Power: The Pre-Chernobyl History of the Soviet Nuclear Industry, MIT Press (2015).
   Google Scholar
• V. A. SIDORENKO, “Nuclear Power in the Soviet Union and in Russia,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 173, 1–3, 3 (1997); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-5493(97)00084-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Social Construction of Technological Systems, W. E. BIJKER, T. P. HUGHES, and T. J. PINCH, Eds., MIT Press (1987).
   Google Scholar
• T. P. HUGHES, “The Evolution of Large Technological Systems,” The Social Construction of Technological Systems, W. E. BIJKER, T. P. HUGHES, and T. J. PINCH, Eds., pp. 51–82, MIT Press (1987).
   Google Scholar
• A. VERMA, “The Invention-Regulation Gap: Nuclear Reactor Design Strategies in the Absence of Codified Regulations,” presented at the 3rd AGORAS Conf., Nantes, France, October 23–25, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• R. ADAMS, “Bechtel and BWXT Quietly Terminate mPower Reactor Project,” Forbes (Mar. 13, 2017); https://www.forbes.com/sites/rodadams/2017/03/13/bechtel-and-bwxt-quietly-terminate-mpower-reactor-project/ (current as of Mar. 26, 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Ministerstvo Rossiiskoi Federatsii po atomnoi energii, Strategiia razvitiia atomnoi energetiki Rossii v pervoi polovine XXI veka, FGUP “TsNIIatominform,” Moscow (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Natsional’nyi issledovatel’skii tsentr “Kurchatovskii institut,” O strategii iadernoi energetiki Rossii do 2050 goda, NITs “Kurchatovskii institut,” Moscow (2012).
   Google Scholar
• I. KOUDRIK and A. NIKITIN, “Second Life: The Questionable Safety of Life Extensions for Russian Nuclear Power Plants,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists (Dec. 13, 2011); https://thebulletin.org/2011/12/second-life-the-questionable-safety-of-life-extensions-for-russian-nuclear-power-plants/ (accessed Jan. 15, 2020).
   Google Scholar
• D. NELKIN, “The Political Impact of Technical Expertise,” Social Studies of Science, 5, 1, 35 (1975); https://doi.org/10.1177/030631277500500103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. HILGARTNER, R. C. BELL, and R. O’CONNOR, Nukespeak: The Selling of Nuclear Technology in America, Random House (1982).
   Google Scholar
• I. BENNETT and D. SAREWITZ, “Too Little, Too Late? Research Policies on the Societal Implications of Nanotechnology in the United States,” Sci. Cult., 15, 4, 309 (2006); https://doi.org/10.1080/09505430601022635.
   Google Scholar
• B. V. LEWENSTEIN, “Nanotechnology and the Public,” Sci. Commun., 27, 2, 169 (2005); https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547005281532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. DAVISON, I. BARNS, and R. SCHIBECI, “Problematic Publics: A Critical Review of Surveys of Public Attitudes to Biotechnology,” Sci. Technol. Human Values, 22, 3, 317 (1997); https://doi.org/10.1177/016224399702200303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. GOTTWEIS, Governing Molecules: The Discursive Politics of Genetic Engineering in Europe and in the United States, MIT Press (1998).
   Google Scholar
• H. GUSTERSON, Nuclear Rites: A Weapons Laboratory at the End of the Cold War, University of California Press (1996).
   Google Scholar
• M. BHADRA HAINES, “Contested Credibility Economies of Nuclear Power in India,” Social Studies of Science, 49, 1, 29 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312719827114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. BHADRA, “Fighting Nuclear Energy, Fighting for India’s Democracy,” Sci. Cult., 22, 2, 238 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2013.786986.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. D. SCHMID, “Nuclear Colonization? Soviet Technopolitics in the Second World,” Entangled Geographies: Empire and Technopolitics in the Global Cold War, G. HECHT, Ed., pp. 125–154, MIT Press (2011).
   Google Scholar
• S. J. WALKER, “A Short History of Nuclear Regulation, 1946-1990,” U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (1993).
   Google Scholar
• I. SPIEWAK and A. M. WEINBERG, “Inherently Safe Reactors,” Annu. Rev. Energy, 10, 1, 431 (1985); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.eg.10.110185.002243.
   Google Scholar
• T. R. WELLOCK, “Engineering Uncertainty and Bureaucratic Crisis at the Atomic Energy Commission, 1964-1973,” Technol. Cult., 53, 4, 846 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2012.0144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. W. FORSBERG, “Passive and Inherent Safety Technologies for Light-Water Nuclear Reactors,” presented at the Summer National Mtg., American Institute of Chemical Engineers, San Diego, California, August 19–22, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• S. D. SCHMID, “What If There’s a Next Time? Preparedness After Chernobyl and Fukushima,” Bull. At. Sci., Global Forum, 72, 4, 260 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1080/00963402.2016.1194623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “Conditions of Licenses,” 10 CFR 50.54, Especially Section (x), U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (2019).
   Google Scholar
• L. WEISS, “Atoms for Peace,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, November/December, 34–41 and 44 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• G. BUNN, Arms Control by Committee: Managing Negotiations with the Russians, Stanford University Press, Redwood City, Californina (1992).
   Google Scholar
• M. FUHRMANN, Atomic Assistance: How “Atoms for Peace” Programs Cause Nuclear Insecurity, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York (2012).
   Google Scholar
• G. PERKOVICH, India’s Nuclear Bomb, University of California Press, Berkeley (1999).
   Google Scholar
• “Technical Features to Enhance Proliferation Resistance of Nuclear Energy Systems,” IAEA Nuclear Energy Series NF-T-4.5, International Atomic Energy Agency, (2010).
   Google Scholar
• J. SIEGEL et al., “An Expert Elicitation of the Proliferation Resistance of Using Small Modular Reactors (SMR) for the Expansion of Civilian Nuclear Systems,” Risk Anal., 38, 2, 242 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12861.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. BUNN, N. ROTH, and W. H. TOBEY, “Revitalizing Nuclear Security in an Era of Uncertainty,” Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Cambridge, Massachusetts (2019).
   Google Scholar
• S. D. SCHMID, “A New ‘Nuclear Normalcy’?” J. Int. Political Theory, 15, 3, 297 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1177/1755088218796674.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. PELOPIDAS, “The Oracles of Proliferation: How Experts Maintain a Biased Historical Reading that Limits Policy Innovation,” Nonproliferation Rev., 18, 1, 297 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1080/10736700.2011.549185.
   Google Scholar
• R. W. MOIR and E. TELLER, “Thorium-Fueled Underground Power Plant Based on Molten Salt Technology,” Nucl. Technol., 151, 3, 334 (2004); https://doi.org/10.13182/NT05-A3655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. YUDIN, “Multilateralization of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle: Assessing the Existing Proposals,” United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research, United Nations, Geneva, Switzerland (2009).
   Google Scholar
• T. RAUF and F. SIMPSON, “The Nuclear Fuel Cycle: Is It Time for a Multilateral Approach?” Arms Control Today, 34 (Dec. 2004); https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2004-12/features/nuclear-fuel-cycle-time-multilateral-approach.
   Google Scholar
• Uncertainty Underground: Yucca Mountain and the Nation’s High-level Nuclear Waste, A. MacFARLANE and R. EWING, Eds., MIT Press (2006).
   Google Scholar
• M. W. ROSENTHAL, “An Account of Oak Ridge National Laboratory’s Thirteen Nuclear Reactors,” ORNL/TM-2009/181, Office of Scientific and Technical Information, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (2009).
   Google Scholar
• J. M. HYLKO and R. PELTIER, “The Evolution of the ESBWR,” Power, October 31 (2010); https://www.powermag.com/the-evolution-of-the-esbwr/ ( current as of Mar. 26, 2020).
   Google Scholar
• “AP1000,” Wikipedia Entry; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AP1000 ( accessed July 6, 2020).
   Google Scholar
• “Status Report 78: The Evolutionary Power Reactor (EPR),” Advanced Reactors Information System (2011), International Atomic Energy Agency; https://aris.iaea.org/PDF/EPR.pdf ( current as of Mar. 26, 2020).
   Google Scholar
• “Innovative Small and Medium Sized Reactors: Design Features, Safety Approaches and R&D Trends,” Final Report of a Technical Meeting Held in Vienna June 7–11, 2004, IAEA-TECDOC-1451, International Atomic Energy Agency (2005).
   Google Scholar
• “Generation IV Nuclear Reactors,” World Nuclear Association (updated May 2019); https://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/nuclear-fuel-cycle/nuclear-power-reactors/generation-iv-nuclear-reactors.aspx (accessed Jan. 15, 2020).
   Google Scholar
• A. J. WOLFE, Freedom’s Laboratory: The Cold War Struggle for the Soul of Science, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland (2018).
   Google Scholar
• J. KRIGE, “Atoms for Peace, Scientific Internationalism, and Scientific Intelligence,” Osiris, 21, 1, 161 (2006); https://doi.org/10.1086/507140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. M. PETROSYIANTS, “Tret’ia mezhdunarodnaia zhenevskaia konferentsiia atomnikov,” Atomnaia Energiia, 17, 5, 323 (1964).
   Google Scholar
• V. K. ULASEVICH, Sozdano pod rukovodstvom N.A. Dollezhalia... O iadernykh reaktorakh i ikh tvortsakh (K 100-letiiu N.A. Dollezhalia), GUP NIKIET, Moscow (2002).
   Google Scholar
• V. G. ASMOLOV et al., Atomnaia energetika: otsenki proshlogo, realii nastoiashchego, ozhidaniia budushchego, IzdAt, Moscow (2004).
   Google Scholar
• S. D. SCHMID, “Defining (Scientific) Direction: Soviet Nuclear Physics and Reactor Engineering during the Cold War,” Science and Technology in the Global Cold War, N. ORESKES and J. KRIGE, Eds., pp. 317–342, MIT Press (2014).
   Google Scholar
• V. A. SIDORENKO, Ob atomnoi energetike, atomnykh stantsiiakh, uchiteliakh, kollegakh i o sebe, IzdAt, Moscow (2003).
   Google Scholar
• B. A. FAIN, Aktivanaia zona: povest’ ob atomnom institute, IIF Skripto, Moscow (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Trip Report of the U.S. Atomic Energy Delegation: Atomic Energy in the Soviet Union, United States Atomic Energy Commission (1963).
   Google Scholar
• A. N. RUMIANTSEV, “Chernobyl’ V 2009 Godu,” ProAtom (2011); http://proatom.ru/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=2842 (accessed Jan. 15, 2020).
   Google Scholar
• P. DELEON, Development and Diffusion of the Nuclear Power Reactor: A Comparatice Analysis, Ballinger, Cambridge, Massachusetts (1979).
   Google Scholar
• G. A. SHASHARIN, “Chernobyl’skaia tragediia,” Chernobyl’ desiat’ let spustia: neizbezhnost’ ili sluchainost’?, A. N. SEMENOV, Ed., pp. 75–132, Energoatomizdat, Moscow (1995).
   Google Scholar
• I. I. KORIAKIN, Okrestnosti iadernoi energetiki Rossii: novye vyzovy, GUP NIKIET, Moscow (2002).
   Google Scholar
• P. S. NEOROZHNII, Energetika strany glazami ministra: dnevniki 1935-1985 gg., Energoatomizdat, Moscow (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Sovremennye problemy energetiki, D. G. ZHIMERIN, Ed., Energoatomizdat, Moscow (1984).
   Google Scholar
• J. COOPERSMITH, The Electrification of Russia, 1880-1926, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York (1992).
   Google Scholar
• A. GLASER, L. B. HOPKINS, and M. V. RAMANA, “Resource Requirements and Proliferation Risks Associated with SMR,” Nucl. Technol., 184, 1, 121 (2013); https://doi.org/10.13182/NT13-A19873.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. ROSNER and S. GOLDBERG, “SMRs—Key to Future Nuclear Power Generation in the United States,” Energy Policy Institute at Chicago White Paper (July 14, 2011); https://epic.uchicago.edu ( accessed Jan. 15, 2020).
   Google Scholar
• J. WHITLOCK and J. SPRINKLE, “Proliferation Resistance Considerations for Remote Small Modular Reactors,” Nucl Rev., 1, 2, 9 (2012); https://doi.org/10.12943/ANR.2012.00013.
   Google Scholar
• A. ABDULLAH, I. L. AZVEDO, and M. G. MORGAN, “Expert Assessments of the Cost of Light Water Small Modular Reactors,” Proc. National Acad. Sci., 110, 24, 9686 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1300195110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “About Us: History,” NuScale Power LLC; https://www.nuscalepower.com/about-us/history ( accessed July 6, 2020).
   Google Scholar
• J. CONCA, “NuScale’s Small Modular Nuclear Reactor Passes Biggest Hurdle Yet,” Forbes (May 15, 2018); https://www.forbes.com/sites/jamesconca/2018/05/15/nuscales-small-modular-nuclear-reactor-passes-biggest-hurdle-yet/#731f838c5bb5 (accessed Jan. 15, 2020).
   Google Scholar
• “Technology Overview: How the NuScale Module Works,” NuScale Power LLC; https://www.nuscalepower.com/technology/technology-overview ( accessed Jan. 15, 2020).
   Google Scholar
• “Design Innovations: Advanced Nuclear Technology,” NuScale Power LLC; https://www.nuscalepower.com/technology/design-innovations ( accessed Jan. 15, 2020).
   Google Scholar
• “Fabrication and Assembly: Factory Built,” NuSclae Power LLC; https://www.nuscalepower.com/technology/fabrication-and-assembly ( accessed Jan. 15, 2020).
   Google Scholar
• “Technology Validation: Validation by Customers and Industry Experts,” NuSclae Power LLC; https://www.nuscalepower.com/technology/technology-validation ( accessed Jan. 15, 2020).
   Google Scholar
• “NuScale SMR Receives US Design Certification Approval,” WNN, September 1, 2020; https://www.world-nuclear-news.org/Articles/NuScale-SMR-receives-US-design-certification-appro (accessed Sep. 21, 2020).
   Google Scholar
• “NuScale Power Homepage,” NuSclae Power LLC; https://www.nuscalepower.com/( accessed Jan. 15, 2020).
   Google Scholar
• C. PERROW, Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies, Basic Books (1984).
   Google Scholar
• A. CHO, “Smaller, Safer, Cheaper: One Company Aims to Reinvent the Nuclear Reactor and Save a Warming Planet,” Science (Feb. 21, 2019); https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax0771.
   Google Scholar
• R. CARPER and S. SCHMID, “The Little Reactor that Could? The Role of Small Modular Reactors in the World’s Energy Future,” Issues Sci. Technol., 27, 4, 82 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. J. TAYLOR, K. E. STAHLKOPF, and J. C. DEVINE, JR, “Advanced Light-Water Reactor Development in the United States,” IAEA Bull., 3, 13 (1989).
   Google Scholar
• J. E. JONES and W. FUKERSON, “Global Warming and Nuclear Power,” Oak Ridge Rev., 4, 124 (1989).
   Google Scholar
• J. DOUGLAS, “Reopening the Nuclear Option,” EPRI J., 8, 6 (1994).
   Google Scholar
• J. DOYLE et al., “Highly Reliable Nuclear Power for Mission-Critical Applications,” Proc. ICAPP 2016, San Francisco, California, April 17–20, 2016; https://www.nuscalepower.com/-/media/Nuscale/Files/Technology/Technical-Publications/highly-reliable-nuclear-power-for-mission-critical-application.ashx?la=en&hash=7C0E691C7DC3ADA92493C2066CD28FCA991A90C0 (accessed Jan. 15, 2020).
   Google Scholar
• P. HEYZLAR et al., “TerraPower, LLC Traveling Wave Reactor Development Program Overview,” Nucl. Eng. Technol., 45, 6, 731 (2013); https://doi.org/10.5516/NET.02.2013.520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “Breeder Reactor,” Wikipedia Entry; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breeder_reactor ( accessed Jan. 15, 2020).
   Google Scholar
• S. GUTH, “Oasis of the Future: The Nuclear City of Shevchenko/ Aqtau, 1959–2019,” Jahrbücher für Geschichte Osteuropas, 66, 1, 93 (2018); https://doi.org/10.25162/jgo-2018-0005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “Terrapower” Wikipedia Entry; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TerraPower ( accessed Jan. 15, 2020).
   Google Scholar
• “The Physics,” TerraPower, LLC; https://terrapower.com/productservices/physics ( accessed Jan. 15, 2020).
   Google Scholar
• D. YURMAN, “TerraPower to Leave China, but Bill Gates Is Still in the Game,” Neutronbytes January 6, 2019; https://neutronbytes.com/2019/01/06/terrapower-to-leave-china-but-bill-gates-is-still-in-the-game/ (accessed Jan. 15, 2020).
   Google Scholar
• A. HARDER, “Bill Gates Shelves Nuclear Reactor in China, Citing U.S. Policy,” Axios, December 30, 2018; https://www.axios.com/bill-gates-nuclear-reactor-china-terrapower-be4c792c-6f76-4723-bf63-d8f9fb527dc1.html (accessed Jan. 15, 2020).
   Google Scholar
• D. GROSSMAN, “Bill Gates’s Experimental Nuclear Power Plant Halts Construction in China,” Popular Mechanics, January 2, 2019; https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/energy/a25728221/terrapower-china-bill-gates-trump/ (accessed Jan. 15, 2020).
   Google Scholar
• M. KOZIOL, “TerraPower’s Nuclear Reactor Could Power the 21st Century: The Traveling-Wave Reactor and Other Advanced Reactor Designs Could Solve Our Fossil Fuel Dependency,” IEEE Spectrum, June 1, 2018; https://spectrum.ieee.org/energy/nuclear/terrapowers-nuclear-reactor-could-power-the-21st-century (lst accessed Jan. 15, 2020).
   Google Scholar
• C. LEVESQUE, “Hearing on Advanced Nuclear Technology: Protecting U.S. Leadership and Expanding Opportunities for Licensing New Nuclear Energy Technologies,” United States Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, Washington, District of Columbia (June 4, 2019), NuScale Power LLC, “Small Emergency Planning Zone”; https://www.nuscalepower.com/benefits/safety-features/emergency-planning-zone (accessed Mar. 24, 2020).
   Google Scholar
• A. IRWIN, “The Politics of Talk: Coming to Terms with the “New” Scientific Governance,” Social Studies of Science, 36, 2, 299 (2006); https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312706053350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. LEZAUN, N. MARRES, and M. TIRONI, “Experiments in Participation,” The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, 4th ed., U. FELT et al. Eds., pp. 195–221, MIT Press (2017).
   Google Scholar
• B. LAURENT, “Technologies of Democracy: Experiments and Demonstrations,” Sci. Eng. Ethics, 17, 4, 649 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-011-9303-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. BANDYK, “Oklo Submits First Advanced Reactor License Application in US as NRC Moves to Streamline Reviews,” Utility Dive (Mar. 18, 2020); https://www.utilitydive.com/news/oklo-sumits-first-advanced-reactor-license-application-in-us-as-nrc-moves-t/574329/ (accessed July 6, 2020).
   Google Scholar
• States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order, S. JASANOFF, ed., Routledge (2004).
   Google Scholar