References
- I. PUIKKONEN, “Cooperative Mankala-Companies: The Acceptability of the Company Form in EC Competition Law,” Helsinki Law Rev., 4, 1, 139 (2010).
- K. IWAI, “Persons, Things and Corporations: The Corporate Personality Controversy and Comparative Corporate Governance,” Am. J. Comp. Law, 47, 4, 583 (1999); https://doi.org/10.2307/841070.
- A. RILES, “Too Big to Fail,” Recasting Anthropological Knowledge: Inspiration and Social Science, M. STRATHERN, J. EDWARDS, and M. PETROVIC-ŠTEGER, Eds., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom (2011).
- G. TEUBNER, “Enterprise Corporatism: New Industrial Policy and the “Essence” of the Legal Person,” Am. J. Comp. Law, 36, 1, 130 (1988); https://doi.org/10.2307/840187.
- U. BECK, “The Anthropological Shock: Chernobyl and the Contours of the Risk Society,” Berkeley J. Soc., 32, 153 (1987).
- B. WYNNE, Risk Management and Hazardous Waste: Implementation and the Dialectics of Credibility, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1992).
- C. PERROW, Normal Accidents: Living with High-risk Technologies, Basic Books, New York (1984).
- V. IALENTI, “Adjudicating Deep Time: Revisiting the United States’ High-Level Nuclear Waste Repository Project at Yucca Mountain,” Sci. Technol. Stud., 27, 2 (2014).
- M. KOJO, “The Revival of Nuclear Power in a Strong Administrative State,” The Renewal of Nuclear Power in Finland, M. KOJO and T. LITMANEN, Eds., Palgrave Macmillan, New York (2009).
- T. LITMANEN, “The Temporary Nature of Societal Risk Evaluation: Understanding the Finnish Nuclear Decisions,” The Renewal of Nuclear Power in Finland, M. KOJO and T. LITMANEN, Eds., Palgrave Macmillan, New York (2009).
- K. SHRADER-FRECHETTE, “Mortgaging the Future: Dumping Ethics with Nuclear Waste,” Sci. Eng. Ethics, 11, 4, 518 (2005); https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-005-0023-2.
- L. HYTTINEN and N. RINTALA, “The Role of Tacit Knowledge & the Challenges in Transferring It: A Case Study at the Finnish NPPs,” Int. J. Nucl. Knowl. Manage., 1, 4, 328 (2005); https://doi.org/10.1504/IJNKM.2005.008141.
- G. HECHT, The Radiance of France: Nuclear Power and National Identity After World War II, MIT Press, Boston (1998).
- L. WINNER, The Whale and the Reactor: A Search for Limits in an Age of High Technology, University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1986).
- S. JASANOFF and S.-H. KIM, “Containing the Atom: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and Nuclear Power in the United States and South Korea,” Minerva, 47, 2, 119 (2009); https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-009-9124-4.
- T. TERÄVÄINEN, M. LEHTONEN, and M. MARTISKAINEN, Climate Change, Energy Security, and Risk—Debating Nuclear New Build in Finland, France and the UK. Energy Policy, Vol. 39 (2000).
- M. WELKER, J. PARTRIDGE DAMANI, and H. REBECCA, “Corporate Lives: New Perspectives on the Social Life of the Corporate Form,” Curr. Anthropol., 52, S3, S3 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1086/657907.
- C. GEERTZ, The Interpretation of Cultures, Basic Books, New York (1973).
- B. MALINOWSKI, Argonauts of the Western Pacific: An Account of Native Enterprise and Adventure in the Archipelagoes of Melanesian New Guinea, Routledge & Sons, London (1922).
- V. IALENTI, “Spectres of Seppo: The Afterlives of Finland’s Nuclear Waste Experts,” J. R. Anthropol. Inst., 26, 2, 251 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.13247.
- J. TOBIN and D. DAVIDSON, “The Ethics of Polyvocal Ethnography: Empowering vs. Textualizing Children and Teachers,” J. Int. J. Qual. Stud. Educ., 3, 3 (1990); https://doi.org/10.1080/0951839900030305.
- J. CLIFFORD and G. MARCUS, Writing Culture: The Poetics & Politics of Ethnography, University of California Press, Berkeley (1986).
- D. HARAWAY, “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective,” Feminist Stud., 14, 3, 575 (1988); https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066.
- J. ROBBINS, “Where in the World Are Values? Exemplarity and Moral Motivation,” Moral Engines: Exploring the Ethical Drives in Human Life, C. MATTINGLY et al., Ed., pp. 174–192, Berghahn Books, New York (2017).
- M. L. SMALL, “How Many Cases Do I Need?’ on Science and the Logic of Case Selection in Field-Based Research,” Ethnography, 10, 1, 5 (2009); https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138108099586.
- J. MAXWELL, “Understanding and Validity in Qualitative Research,” Harvard Educ. Rev., 62, 3, 279 (1992); https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.62.3.8323320856251826.
- C. AHMANN, “Waste to Energy: Garbage Prospects and Subjunctive Politics in Late Industrial Baltimore,” Am. Ethnologist, 46, 3, 328 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.12792.
- H. MIYAZAKI, “Saving TEPCO: Debt, Credit and the ‘End’ of Finance in Post-Fukushima Japan,” Corporations & Citizenship, G. URBAN, Ed., University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia (2014).
- V. IALENTI, Deep Time Reckoning: How Future Thinking Can Help Earth Now, The MIT Press (2020).
- B. C. TAYLOR, “Make Bomb, Save World: Reflections on Dialogic Nuclear Ethnography,” J. Contemp. Ethnography, 25, 1, 120 (1996); https://doi.org/10.1177/089124196025001007.
- A. BROOKS, “Radiating Knowledge: The Public Anthropology of Nuclear Energy,” Am. Anthropol., 114, 1, 137 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1433.2011.01402.x.
- H. GUSTERSON, Nuclear Rites, University of California Press, Berkeley, California (1996).
- J. MASCO, The Nuclear Borderlands: The Manhattan Project in Post-Cold War New Mexico, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey (2006).
- M. POLLERI, “Post-Political Uncertainties: Governing Nuclear Controversies in post-Fukushima Japan,” Soc. Stud.Sci., 50, 4, 567 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312719889405.
- A. WEICHSELBRAUN, “Of Broken Seals and Broken Promises: Attributing Intention at the IAEA,” Cult. Anthropol., 34, 4, 503 (2019); https://doi.org/10.14506/ca34.4.02.
- G. URBAN and K. N. KOH, “Ethnographic Research on Modern Business Corporations,” Annu. Rev. Anthropol., 42, 1, 139 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-092412-155506.
- R. FOSTER, “Corporate Oxymorons and the Anthropology of Corporations,” Dialectical Anthropol., 34, 1, 95 (2009); https://doi.org/10.1007/s10624-009-9126-5.
- A. RILES, “Market Collaboration: Finance, Culture, and Ethnography After Neoliberalism,” Am. Anthropol., 115, 4, 555 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1111/aman.12052.
- J. DEWEY, “The Historical Background of Corporate Legal Personality,” Yale Law J., 35, 6, 655 (1926); https://doi.org/10.2307/788782.
- M. RADIN, “The Endless Problem of Corporate Personality,” Columbia Law Rev., 32, 4, 643 (1932); https://doi.org/10.2307/1114707.
- A. SUPIOT, Homo Juridicus: On the Anthropological Function of the Law, Verso, London (2007).
- M. DOUGLAS, “The Cloud God and the Shadow Self,” Soc. Anthropol., 3, 2, 83 (1995); https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8676.1995.tb00295.x.
- M. MAUSS (translation W.D. Halls), A Category of the Human Mind: The Notion of Person; the Notion of Self,” The Category of the Person: Anthropology, Philosophy, History, M. CARRITHERS, S. COLLINS, and S. LUKES, Eds., Cambridge University Press (1985).
- A. POTTAGE and M. MUNDY, Law, Anthropology, and the Constitution of the Social: Making Persons and Things, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004).
- H. TUOMISTO, “Finland and Nuclear Renaissance,” presented at World Innovation Days: Energy for Sustainable Development, Poznan, Poland, September 24, 2012 (2012).
- P. TREIALT, “The Finnish Mankala Model: A Banker’s View,” Nordea Bank (2009); http://www.ben.ee/public/Tuumakonverentsi%20ettekanded%202009/Peter%20S.%20Treialt%20-%20Mankala%20principles.pdf ( current as of Mar. 9, 2020).
- Social Capital in Finland: Statistical Review, Statistics Finland: Living Conditions, L. IISAKKA, Ed. (2006); https://www.stat.fi/tup/julkaisut/tiedostot/isbn_950-467-602-2_en.pdf ( current as of Mar. 9, 2020).
- E. KAIN, “The Finland Phenomenon: Inside the World’s Most Surprising School System,” Forbes (2011); http://www.forbes.com/sites/erikkain/2011/05/02/the-finland-phenomenon-inside-the-worlds-most-surprising-school-system/ (accessed May 2, 2011).
- B. MARKOVA, “Finland Welcomes Disaster Risk Review,” The United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (2014); http://www.unisdr.org/archive/38562(accessed January 29, 2021).
- N. SANANDAJI, “The Surprising Ingredients of Swedish Success: Free Markets and Social Cohesion,” Institute of Economic Affairs Discussion Paper 41 (2012); http://www.iea.org.uk/sites/default/files/publications/files/Sweden%20Paper.pdf (current as of Mar. 9, 2020).
- E. BOGDANOV, “The Principle of Trust,” Helsinki Times (2012) ; http://www.helsinkitimes.fi/columns/columns/expat-view/4825-the-principle-of-trust.html (accessed January 29, 2021).
- O. KHAZAN, “The Secret to Finland’s Success with Schools, Moms, Kids—and Everything,” The Atlantic (2013); http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2013/07/the-secret-to-finlands-success-with-schools-moms-kids-and-everything/277699/ (accessed January 29, 2021).
- E. KETTUNEN, “Work Ethics and the Finnish Grindstone,” Helsingin Sanomat (2012); http://www.hs.fi/english/article/Work±ethics±and±the±Finnish±grindstone/1329103821571 (accessed January 29, 2021).
- H. TOIVONEN, “Finland’s Low-Profile Rich,” Helsingin Sanomat (International Edition) (2011); http://www.hs.fi/english/article/%20COMMENTARY±Finland’s+low-profile+rich/1135270128491 ( current as of Mar. 9, 2020).
- I. RUOSTETSAARI, “Changing Regulation and Governance of Finnish Energy Policy Making: New Rules but Old Elites?,” Rev. Policy Res., 27, 3, 273 (2010); https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2010.00442.x.
- G. JOHNSON, “The Discourse of Democracy in Canadian Nuclear Waste Management Policy,” Policy Sci., 40, 2, 79 (2007); https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-007-9032-0.
- J. CHILVERS and J. BURGESS, “Power Relations: The Politics of Risk and Procedure in Nuclear Waste Governance,” Environ. Plann. A, 40, 8, 1881 (2008); https://doi.org/10.1068/a40334.
- M. LEHTONEN, “Deliberative Decision-Making on Radioactive Waste Management in Finland, France and the UK: Influence of Mixed Forms of Deliberation in the Macro Discursive Context,” J. Integr. Environ. Sci., 7, 3, 175 (2010); https://doi.org/10.1080/1943815X.2010.506487.
- M.-F. FAN, “Nuclear Waste Facilities on Tribal Land: The Yami’s Struggles for Environmental Justice,” Local Environ., 11, 4, 433 (2006); https://doi.org/10.1080/13549830600785589.
- M. CALLON, P. LASCOUMES, and Y. BARTHE, Acting in an Uncertain World, MIT Press, Boston, Massachusetts (2009).
- S. JASANOFF, “Transparency in Public Science: Purposes, Reasons, Limits,” Law Contemp. Probl., 69, 1–2, 7 (2006).
- K. WHITNEY, “It’s Bbout Time: Adaptive Resource Management, Environmental Governance, and Science Studies,” Sci. Techno. Human Values, 44, 2, 263 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243918794035.
- A. STENQVIST and J. LINDSTROM, “RatingsDirect: Teollisuuden Voima Oyj,” Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services; http://www.tvo.fi/uploads/files/Sijoittajat/Luottoluokitusanalyysit/TVO_SP_2013-05-29.pdf (accessed May 29, 2013).
- “Electric Utilities Defend Right to Extend Discounts to Large Shareholders,” Helsingin Sanomat (International Edition), June 22, 2010.
- H. MIYAZAKI and S. RAFFNSØE, “Gift-Giving and Power Between Trust and Hope,” Anthropology and Philosophy: Dialogues on Trust and Hope, S. LIISBERG, E. O. PEDERSEN, and A. L. DALSGÅRD, Eds., Berghahn Books, Oxford (2015).
- S. SCHMID, Producing Power: The Pre-Chernobyl History of the Soviet Nuclear Industry, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts (2015).
- A. JOBERT and C. RENARD, “Framing Prototypes: The Fast Breeder Reactor in France,” Sci. Technol. Stud., 27, 2, 7 (2014); https://doi.org/10.23987/sts.55322.
- M. STRATHERN, “One Man, Many Men,” Big Men and Great Men: The Personifications of Power, M. GODELIER and M. STRATHERN, Eds., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom (1991).
- A. LAMPINEN, “An Analysis of the Justification Arguments in the Application for the New Nuclear Reactor in Finland,” The Renewal of Nuclear Power in Finland, M. KOJO and T. LITMANEN, Eds., Palgrave Macmillan, New York (2009).
- N. JENSEN-ERIKSEN et al., Kansallinen Kapitalismi, Kansainvälinen Talous, Kustannusosakeyhtiö Siltala, Helsinki (2012).
- R. ABRAHAMS, A Place of Their Own: Family Farming in Eastern Finland, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1991).
- The Pellervo Story: A Century of Finnish Cooperation, 1899-1999, M. KUISMA, Ed., Pellervo Confederation of Finnish Cooperatives and Kirjayhtymä, Helsinki (1999).
- A. CHANDLER, Scale and Scope, Belknap Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts (1990).
- P. HALL, Cities of Tomorrow: An Intellectual History of Urban Planning and Design Since 1880, Blackwell, Oxford, United Kingdom (1988).
- YLE, “Horse-Trading Behind Planned Fortum-Fennovoima Deal,” Finnish Broadcasting Company (2012); http://yle.fi/uutiset/researcher_horse-trading_behind_planned_fortum-fennovoima_deal/7665234 (accessed January 29, 2021).
- A. POTTAGE, “From Theory to Inquiry?” J. R. Anthropol. Inst., 20, 2, 362 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.12109.
- M. STRATHERN, “Currencies of Collaboration,” Collaborators Collaborating: Counterparts in Anthropological Knowledge and International Research Relations, M. KONRAD, Ed., Berghahn Books, New York (2012).
- M. LYNCH, “Against Reflexivity as an Academic Virtue and Source of Privileged Knowledge,” Theory Cult. Soc., 17, 3, 26 (2000); https://doi.org/10.1177/02632760022051202.