Method of Characteristics for 3D, Full-Core Neutron Transport on Unstructured Mesh

References

• T. DOWNAR et al., PARCS V3. 0 US NRC Core Neutronic Simulator USER MANUAL, University of Michigan (2012).
   Google Scholar
• T. BAHADIR and S.-Ö. LINDAHL, “Studsvik’s Next Generation Nodal Code SIMULATE-5,” Proc. ANFM-2009 Conf. Advances in Nuclear Fuel Management IV, Hilton Head Island, South Carolina, April 12–15, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• M. B. IWAMOTO and M. TAMITANI, “Methods, Benchmarking, and Applications of the BWR Core Simulator Code AETNA,” Proc. Int. Conf. Advances in Nuclear Fuel Management III, Hilton Head Island, South Carolina, October 5–7, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• K. SMITH, “CASMO-4 Characteristics Methods for Two-Dimensional PWR and BWR Core Calculations,” Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc., 83, 322 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• R. SANCHEZ et al., “APOLLO II: A User-Oriented, Portable, Modular Code for Multigroup Transport Assembly Calculations,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 100, 3, 352 (1988); https://doi.org/10.13182/NSE88-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. CASAL, “HELIOS: Geometric Capabilities of a New Fuel-Assembly Program,” Proc. Int. Topl. Mtg. Advances in Mathematics, Computations and Reactor Physics, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, April 28–May 2, 1991, Vol. 2, 10.2.1 1 (1991); https://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/10016744853/en/ ( current as of July 30, 2020).
   Google Scholar
• D. KNOTT and E. WEHLAGE, “Description of the LANCER02 Lattice Physics Code for Single-Assembly and Multibundle Analysis,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 155, 3, 331 (2007); https://doi.org/10.13182/NSE155-331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. FONTAINE et al., “Description and Preliminary Results of PHENIX Core Flowering Test,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 241, 10, 4143 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2011.08.041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. GUNOW, “Full Core 3D Neutron Transport Simulation Using the Method of Characteristics with Linear Sources,” PhD Thesis, Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2018).
   Google Scholar
• G. GUNOW, B. FORGET, and K. SMITH, “Full Core 3D Simulation of the BEAVRS Benchmark with OpenMOC,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 134, 299 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2019.05.050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. GIUDICELLI, “A Novel Equivalence Method for High Fidelity Hybrid Stochastic-Deterministic Neutron Transport Simulations,” PhD Thesis, Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2020).
   Google Scholar
• S. SANTANDREA, L. GRAZIANO, and D. SCIANNANDRONE, “Accelerated Polynomial Axial Expansions for Full 3D Neutron Transport MOC in the APOLLO3 Code System as Applied to the ASTRID Fast Breeder Reactor,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 113, 194 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2017.11.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. LINDLEY et al., “Developments Within the WIMS Reactor Physics Code for Whole Core Calculations,” presented at the Int. Conf. on Mathematics & Computational Methods Applied to Nuclear Science & Engineering, Jeju, Korea, April 16–20, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• P. ARCHIER et al., “Validation of the Newly Implemented 3D TDT-MOC Solver of APOLLO3 Code on a Whole 3D SFR Heterogeneous Assembly,” presented at PHYSOR, Sun Valley, Idaho, May 1–5, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• J. R. TRAMM et al., “ARRC: A Random Ray Neutron Transport Code for Nuclear Reactor Simulation,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 112, 693 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2017.10.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. GASTON et al., “MOOSE: A Parallel Computational Framework for Coupled Systems of Nonlinear Equations,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 239, 10, 1768 (2009); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2009.05.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. J. PERMANN et al., “MOOSE: Enabling Massively Parallel Multiphysics Simulation,” SoftwareX, 11, 100430 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2020.100430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. ASKEW, “A Characteristics Formulation of the Neutron Transport Equation in Complicated Geometries,” United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority (1972).
   Google Scholar
• D. KNOTT and A. YAMAMOTO, “Lattice Physics Computations,” Handbook of Nuclear Engineering, pp. 913–1239, D. G. CACUCI, Ed., Springer (2010); https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-98149-9.
   Google Scholar
• W. BOYD et al., “The OpenMOC Method of Characteristics Neutral Particle Transport Code,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 68, 43 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2013.12.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. KOCHUNAS et al., “Overview of Development and Design of MPACT: Michigan Parallel Characteristics Transport Code,” Proc. 2013 Int. Conf. Mathematics and Computational Methods Applied to Nuclear Science and Engineering (M and C 2013), Sun Valley, Idaho, May 5–9, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• K. S. SMITH, “Nodal Method Storage Reduction by Nonlinear Iteration,” Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc., 44, 265 (1983).
   Google Scholar
• R. E. ALCOUFFE, “Diffusion Synthetic Acceleration Methods for the Diamond-Differenced Discrete-Ordinates Equations,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 64, 2, 344 (1977); https://doi.org/10.13182/NSE77-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. RABITI et al., “Parallel Method of Characteristics on Unstructured Meshes for the UNIC Code,” Proc. Int. Conf. Physics of Reactors, Interlaken, Switzerland, September 14–19, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• K. S. SMITH and J. D. RHODES, “Full-Core, 2-D, LWR Core Calculations with CASMO-4E,” presented at PHYSOR 2002, Seoul, Korea, October 7–10, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• T. M. EVANS et al., “Denovo: A New Three-Dimensional Parallel Discrete Ordinates Code in SCALE,” Nucl. Technol., 171, 2, 171 (2010); https://doi.org/10.13182/NT171-171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. ZHU et al., “Transient Methods for Pin-Resolved Whole Core Transport Using the 2D-1D Methodology in MPACT,” Proc. M&C 2015, Nashville, Tennessee, April 19–23, 2015, p. 19 (2015).
   Google Scholar
• M. W. REED, “The “Virtual Density” Theory of Neutronics,” Thesis, PhD Thesis, Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2014); https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/87497 (current as of July 30, 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Y. WANG, “Nonlinear Diffusion Acceleration for the Multigroup Transport Equation Discretized with S N and Continuous FEM with Rattlesnake,” Proc. 2013 Int. Conf. Mathematics and Computational Methods Applied to Nuclear Science Engineering (M and C 2013), Sun Valley, Idaho, May 5–9, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• M. L. ADAMS and E. W. LARSEN, “Fast Iterative Methods for Discrete-Ordinates Particle Transport Calculations,” Prog. Nucl. Energy, 40, 1, 3 (2002); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-1970(01)00023-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. SANTANDREA et al., “A Neutron Transport Characteristics Method for 3D Axially Extruded Geometries Coupled with a Fine Group Self-Shielding Environment,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 186, 3, 239 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2016.1273634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. MARIN-LAFLECHE, M. SMITH, and C. LEE, “Proteus-MOC: A 3D Deterministic Solver Incorporating 2D Method of Characteristics,” Proc. 2013 Int. Conf. Mathematics and Computational Methods Applied to Nuclear Science Engineering (M and C 2013), Sun Valley, Idaho, May 5–9, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• M. SMITH et al., “Method of Characteristics Development Targeting the High Performance Blue Gene/P Computer at Argonne National Laboratory,” Int. Conf. Mathematics and Computational Methods Applied to Nuclear Science Engineering (M&C 2011), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, May 8–12, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• N. CHO, G. LEE, and C. PARK, “Fusion Method of Characteristics and Nodal Method for 3D Whole Core Transport Calculation,” Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc., 86, 322 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• B. COLLINS et al., “Stability and Accuracy of 3D Neutron Transport Simulations Using the 2D/1D Method in MPACT,” J. Comput. Phys., 326, 612 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2016.08.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. LEE et al., “Simulation of TREAT Cores Using High-Fidelity Neutronics Code PROTEUS,” Proc. M&C 2017, Jeju, Korea, April 16–20, 2017, p. 16 (2017).
   Google Scholar
• X. YANG and N. SATVAT, “MOCUM: A Two-Dimensional Method of Characteristics Code Based on Constructive Solid Geometry and Unstructured Meshing for General Geometries,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 46, 20 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2012.03.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. COSGROVE and E. SHWAGERAUS, “Development of MoCha-Foam: A New Method of Characteristics Neutron Transport Solver for OpenFOAM,” presented at the Int. Conf. Mathematics & Computational Methods Applied to Nuclear Science Engineering (M&C 2017), Jeju, Korea, April 16–20, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• T. MAZUMDAR and S. DEGWEKER, “Solution of the Neutron Transport Equation by the Method of Characteristics Using a Linear Representation of the Source Within a Mesh,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 108, 132 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2017.04.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. SHANER et al., “Theoretical Analysis of Track Generation in 3D Method of Characteristics,” presented at the Joint Int. Conf. Mathematics and Computation (M&C), Nashville, Tennessee, April 19–23, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• M. FORUM, “MPI: A Message-Passing Interface Standard. Version 3.0” (2015): https://www.mpi-forum.org/docs/mpi-3.1/mpi31-report.pdf (accessed Aug. 23, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• W. WU et al., “Improvements of the CMFD Acceleration Capability of OpenMOC,” Nucl. Eng. Technol., 52, 10, 2162 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2020.04.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. M. KOCHUNAS, “A Hybrid Parallel Algorithm for the 3-D Method of Characteristics Solution of the Boltzmann Transport Equation on High Performance Compute Clusters.” PhD Thesis, Nuclear Engineering and Radiological Sciences, University of Michigan (2013).
   Google Scholar
• G. COLOMER et al., “Parallel Algorithms for Sn Transport Sweeps on Unstructured Meshes,” J. Comput. Phys., 232, 1, 118 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2012.07.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. I. VERMAAK et al., “Massively Parallel Transport Sweeps on Meshes with Cyclic Dependencies,” J. Comput. Phys., 425, 109892 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2020.109892.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. BOYD, “Reactor Agnostic Multi-Group Cross Section Generation for Fine-Mesh Deterministic Neutron Transport Simulations,” PhD Thesis, Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2017).
   Google Scholar
• G. I. BELL and S. GLASSTONE, “Nuclear Reactor Theory,” U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, Washington, District of Columbia (1970).
   Google Scholar
• A. HÉBERT, Applied Reactor Physics, 2nd ed., Presses Internationales Polytechnique (2009).
   Google Scholar
• S. STIMPSON, B. COLLINS, and B. KOCHUNAS, “Improvement of Transport-Corrected Scattering Stability and Performance Using a Jacobi Inscatter Algorithm for 2D-MOC,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 105, 1 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2017.02.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. VLADIMIROV, “Numerical Solution of the Kinetic Equation for the Sphere,” Vycisl. Mat., 3, 3 (1958).
   Google Scholar
• V. DAVIDENKO and V. TSIBULSKY, “The Method of Characteristics with Angle Directions Stochastic Choice,” Math. Mod., 15, 8, 75 (2003); http://www.mathnet.ru/php/archive.phtml?wshow=paper&jrnid=mm&paperid=411&option_lang=rus (accessed July 14, 2020).
   Google Scholar
• J. RHODES, K. SMITH, and D. LEE, “CASMO-5 Development and Applications,” Proc. Int. Conf. Physics of Reactors (PHYSOR2006), Vancouver, Canada, September 10–14, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• B. LINDLEY et al., “Developments Within the WIMS Reactor Physics Code for Whole Core Calculations,” Proc. M&C, Jeju, Korea, April 16–20, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• J. R. TRAMM et al., “The Random Ray Method for Neutral Particle Transport,” J. Comput. Phys., 342, 229 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2017.04.038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. LEWIS et al., “Benchmark Specification for Deterministic 2-D/3-D MOX Fuel Assembly Transport Calculations without Spatial Homogenization (C5G7 MOX), Nuclear Energy Agency / Nuclear Science Committee (2001).
   Google Scholar
• G. GUNOW, B. FORGET, and K. SMITH, “Stabilization of Multi-Group Neutron Transport with Transport-Corrected Cross-sections,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 126, 211 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2018.10.036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. LIU et al., “Cumulative Migration Method for Computing Rigorous Diffusion Coefficients and Transport Cross Sections from Monte Carlo,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 112, 507 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2017.10.039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. DAGUM and R. MENON, “OpenMP: An Industry Standard API for Shared-Memory Programming,” IEEE Comput. Sci. Eng., 5, 1, 46 (1998); https://doi.org/10.1109/99.660313.
   Google Scholar
• B. NICHOLS, D. BUTTLAR, and J. FARRELL, PThreads Programming: A POSIX Standard for Better Multiprocessing, O’Reilly Media, Inc. (1996).
   Google Scholar
• W. GROPP et al., “A High-Performance, Portable Implementation of the MPI Message Passing Interface Standard,” Parallel Comput., 22, 6, 789 (1996); https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8191(96)00024-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. KELLEY et al., “CMFD Acceleration of Spatial Domain-Decomposition Neutron Transport Problems,” Proc. Int. Conf. Physics of Reactors (PHYSOR2012), Knoxville, Tennessee, April 15–20, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• N. HORELIK et al., “Benchmark for Evaluation and Validation of Reactor Simulations (BEAVRS), V1. 0.1,” Proc. Int. Conf. Mathematics and Computational Methods Applied to Nuclear Science & Engineering, Sun Valley, Idaho, May 5–9, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• “Benchmark on Deterministic Transport Calculations Without Spatial Homogenisation, MOX Fuel Assembly 3D Extension Case,” Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development/Nuclear Energy Agency (2005).
   Google Scholar
• G. GIUDICELLI et al., “Adding a Third Level of Parallelism to OpenMOC, an Open Source Deterministic Neutron Transport Solver,” presented at the Int. Conf. Mathematics and Computational Methods Applied to Nuclear Science and Engineering, Portland, Oregon, August 25–29, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• R. M. FERRER and J. D. RHODES III, “A Linear Source Approximation Scheme for the Method of Characteristics,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 182, 2, 151 (2016); https://doi.org/10.13182/NSE15-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X. YANG, R. BORSE, and N. SATVAT, “{MOCUM} Solutions and Sensitivity Study for {C5G7} Benchmark,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 96, 242 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2016.05.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. YAMAMOTO et al., “Derivation of Optimum Polar Angle Quadrature Set for the Method of Characteristics Based on Approximation Error for the Bickley Function,” J. Nucl. Sci. Technol., 44, 2, 129 (2007); https://doi.org/10.1080/18811248.2007.9711266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. D. BLACKER, W. J. BOHNHOFF, and T. L. EDWARDS, “CUBIT Mesh Generation Environment. Volume 1: Users Manual,” Sandia National Labs (1994).
   Google Scholar
• “PWR Benchmarks” (2019); https://github.com/mit-crpg/PWR_benchmarks ( current as of July 30, 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Z. LIU et al., “Conservation of Migration Area by Transport Cross Sections Using Cumulative Migration Method in Deterministic Heterogeneous Reactor Transport Analysis,” Prog. Nucl. Energy, 127, 103447 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2020.103447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. GIUDICELLI, K. SMITH, and B. FORGET, “Generalized Equivalence Methods for 3D Multi-Group Neutron Transport,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 112, 9 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2017.09.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. PARK and H. G. JOO, “Practical Resolution of Angle Dependency of Multigroup Resonance Cross Sections Using Parametrized Spectral Superhomogenization Factors,” Nucl. Eng. Technol., 49, 6, 1287 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2017.07.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. GIUDICELLI, K. SMITH, and B. FORGET, “Generalized Equivalence Theory Used with Spatially Linear Sources in the Method of Characteristics for Neutron Transport,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 194, 1044 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2020.1765606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. TRAMM, “Development of the Random Ray Method of Neutral Particle Transport for High-Fidelity Nuclear Reactor Simulation,” PhD Thesis, Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2018).
   Google Scholar
• J. LEPPÄNEN, R. MATTILA, and M. PUSA, “Validation of the Serpent-ARES Code Sequence Using the MIT BEAVRS benchmark—Initial Core at HZP Conditions,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 69, 212 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2014.02.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. RYU et al., “Solution of the BEAVRS Benchmark Using the nTRACER Direct Whole Core Calculation Code,” J. Nucl. Sci. Technol., 52, 7–8, 961 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1080/00223131.2015.1038664.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. J. KELLY et al., “Analysis of Select BEAVRS PWR Benchmark Cycle 1 Results Using MC21 and OpenMC,” Proc. Int. Conf. Physics of Reactors (PHYSOR2014), Kyoto, Japan, September 28–October 3, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• H. J. PARK et al., “Real Variance Analysis of Monte Carlo Eigenvalue Calculation by McCARD for BEAVRS Benchmark,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 90, 205 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2015.12.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. WANG et al., “Analysis of BEAVRS Two-Cycle Benchmark Using RMC Based on Full Core Detailed Model,” Prog. Nucl. Energy, 98, 301 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2017.04.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. WANG et al., “Validation of SuperMC with BEAVRS Benchmark at Hot Zero Power Condition,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 111, 709 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2017.09.045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. ELLIS et al., “Initial Rattlesnake Calculations of the Hot Zero Power BEAVRS,” Idaho National Laboratory (2014).
   Google Scholar