Styles of Revaluation: The Case of the Levelized Cost of Electricity

References

• M. CALLON and F. MUNIESA, “Peripheral Vision: Economic Markets as Calculative Collective Devices,” Organ. Stud., 26, 8, 1229 (2005); https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840605056393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. DEWEY, “Theory of Valuation,” International Encyclopedia of Unified Science, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois (1939).
   Google Scholar
• B. SARAÇ-LESAVRE, “Desire for the ‘Worst’: Extending Nuclear Attachments in Southeastern New Mexico,” Environ. Plann. D, 38, 4, 753 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775819889969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. SARAÇ-LESAVRE, “Deep Time Financing? ‘Generational’ Responsibilities and the Problem of Rendez-Vous in the US Nuclear Waste Programme,” J. Cult. Econ., 14, 435 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2020.1818601.
   Google Scholar
• F. EYMARD-DUVERNAY, L’économie des conventions, méthodes et résultats: Tome 2: Développements, La Découverte, Paris, France (2006).
   Google Scholar
• D. STARK, “What’s Valuable?” In the Worth of Goods: Valuation and Pricing in the Economy, Oxford University Press, New York (2011).
   Google Scholar
• V. A. R. ZELIZER, Pricing the Priceless Child: The Changing Social Value of Children, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey (1985).
   Google Scholar
• M. FOURCADE, “Cents and Sensibility: Economic Valuation and the Nature of ‘Nature,’” Am. J. Sociol., 116, 6, 1721 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1086/659640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Évaluer et valoriser une sociologie économique de la mesure, F. VATIN, Ed., Presses universitaires du Mirail, Toulouse, France (2013).
   Google Scholar
• A. ABBOTT, The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor (1st ed. 1988), University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Y. BARTHE, Le pouvoir d’indécision: La mise en politique des déchets nucléaires, Economica, Paris, France (2006).
   Google Scholar
• A. BARRY, “The Anti-Political Economy,” Econ. Soc., 31, 2, 268 (2002); https://doi.org/10.1080/03085140220123162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. HECHT, The Radiance of France: Nuclear Power and National Identity after World War II, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts (2009).
   Google Scholar
• S. BORENSTEIN, “Private and Public Economics of Renewable Energy Generation,” Working Paper Series, University of Berkley, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts (2011).
   Google Scholar
• T. P. HUGHES, “The Electrification of America: The System Builders,” Technol. Cult., 20, 1, 124 (1979); https://doi.org/10.2307/3103115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “Projected Costs of Generating Electricity,” Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Nuclear Energy Agency (2010).
   Google Scholar
• G. MARCUS and M. M. J. FISCHER, Anthropology as Cultural Critique: An Experimental Moment in the Human Sciences, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois (1986).
   Google Scholar
• B. LATOUR, We Have Never Been Modern, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts (1993).
   Google Scholar
• F. MUNIESA, The Provoked Economy: Economic Reality and the Performative Turn, Routledge (2014).
   Google Scholar
• G. E. MARCUS, Technoscientific Imaginaries: Conversations, Profiles, and Memoirs, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois (1995).
   Google Scholar
• “Report to the Secretary of Energy,” Blue Ribbon Commission on America’s Nuclear Future (2012).
   Google Scholar
• B. LATOUR, Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts (1987).
   Google Scholar
• M. FOURCADE, Economists and Societies: Discipline and Profession in the United States, Britain, and France, 1890s to 1990s, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jerdey (2009).
   Google Scholar
• H. GUSTERSON, “Missing the End of the Cold War in International Security,” Cultures of Insecurity: States, Communities, and the Production of Danger, pp. 319–345, J. WELDES et al., Eds., University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, Minnesota (1999).
   Google Scholar
• S. JASANOFF, Science at the Bar: Law, Science, and Technology in America, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts (1995).
   Google Scholar
• “MIT Reports to the President 2000–2001,” Massachusetts Institute of Technology Center for Environmental Initiatives.
   Google Scholar
• “Report of the Energy Research Council,” Massachusetts Institute of Technology Energy Research Council (2006).
   Google Scholar
• COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE, “Economic Aspects of Nuclear Fuel Reprocessing, Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Energy Committee on Science House of Representatives One Hundred and Ninth Congress First Session July 12, 2005,” Serial 109-22, Statement of Chairperson Biggert, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. (2006).
   Google Scholar
• M. BUNN et al., “The Economics of Reprocessing vs. Direct Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel,” DE-FG26-99FT4028, Harvard University, Belfer Center for Security and International Affairs (2003).
   Google Scholar
• “The Economic Future of Nuclear Power,” University of Chicago (2004).
   Google Scholar
• “The Future of Nuclear Power: An Interdisciplinary MIT Study,” Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2003).
   Google Scholar
• R. F. HIRSH, Power Loss: The Origins of Deregulation and Restructuring in the American Electric Utility System, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts (1999).
   Google Scholar
• D. BRESLAU, “What Do Market Designers Do When They Design Markets? Economists as Consultants to the Redesign of Wholesale Electricity Markets in the United States,” Social Knowledge in the Making, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois.
   Google Scholar
• G. DE ROO, “Economics of Nuclear Fuel Cycles: Option Valuation and Neutronics Simulation of Mixed Oxide Fuels,” PhD Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2009).
   Google Scholar
• P. H. WILSON, “Comparing Nuclear Fuel Cycle Options: Observation and Challenges,” presented to Reactor and Fuel Cycle Technology Subcommittee of the Blue Ribbon Commission on America’s Nuclear Future, Washington, D.C., 2011.
   Google Scholar
• G. DE ROO and J. E. PARSONS, “A Methodology for Calculating the Levelized Cost of Electricity in Nuclear Power Systems with Fuel Recycling,” Energy Econ., 33, 5, 826 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2011.01.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. LOUBERGÉ, S. VILLENEUVE, and M. CHESNEY, “Long-Term Risk Management of Nuclear Waste: A Real Options Approach,” J. Econ. Dyn. Control, 27, 1, 157 (2002); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1889(01)00058-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. ROTHWELL, “A Real Options Approach to Evaluating New Nuclear Power Plants,” Energy J., 27, 1, 37 (2006); https://doi.org/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol27-No1-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. SANTOS et al., “Real Options Versus Traditional Methods to Assess Renewable Energy Projects,” Renew. Energy, 68, 588 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.01.038.
   Google Scholar
• K. ÇALIŞKAN and M. CALLON, “Economization, Part 1: Shifting Attention from the Economy Towards Processes of Economization,” Econ. Soc., 38, 3, 369 (2009); https://doi.org/10.1080/03085140903020580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. LINHARDT and F. MUNIESA, “Tenir lieu de politique: Le paradoxe des ‘politiques d’économisation,’” Politix, 95, 3, 7 (2011); https://doi.org/10.3917/pox.095.0007.
   Google Scholar
• C. ALEXANDER and J. RENO, Economies of Recycling: The Global Transformation of Materials, Values and Social Relations, Zed Books (2012).
   Google Scholar
• J. RENO, “Your Trash Is Someone’s Treasure: The Politics of Value at a Michigan Landfill,” J. Mater. Cult., 14, 1, 29 (2009); https://doi.org/10.1177/1359183508100007.
   Google Scholar
• N. GREGSON, H. WATKINS, and M. CALESTANI, “Political Markets: Recycling, Economization and Marketization,” Econ. Soc., 42, 1, 1 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2012.661625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. O’HARE, “‘The Landfill Has Always Borne Fruit’: Precarity, Formalisation and Dispossession Among Uruguay’s Waste Pickers,” Dialect. Anthropol. 43, 31 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1007/s10624-018-9533-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar