The Power and Limits of Classification: Radioactive Waste Categories as Reshaped by Disposal Options

References

• M. DOUGLAS, Comment pensent les institutions? Suivi de la connaissance de soi et de Il n’y a pas de don gratuit, Poche (2004).
   Google Scholar
• S. JASANOFF, States of Knowledge: The Co-production of Science and the Social Order, Routledge (2004).
   Google Scholar
• G. C. BOWKER and S. L. STAR, Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences, MIT Press (2000).
   Google Scholar
• M. D. LOWENTHAL, “Radioactive-Waste Classification in the United States: History and Current Predicaments,” UCRL-CR–128127, 16339, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (1997); https://doi.org/10.2172/16339.
   Google Scholar
• Principes fondamentaux de sureté. Fondements de sureté, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienne (2007).
   Google Scholar
• C. PAROTTE, L’Art de gouverner les déchets hautement radioactifs, Presses Universitaires de Liège, Liège, Belgium (2018).
   Google Scholar
• C. PAROTTE, “A Nuclear Real-World Experiment: Exploring the Experimental Mindsets of Radioactive Waste Management Organisations in France, Belgium and Canada,” Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 69, 101761 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101761.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reframing Rights. Bioconstitutionalism in the Genetic Age, S. JASANOFF, Ed., MIT Press (2011).
   Google Scholar
• R. K. YIN, Case Study Research: V, SAGE Publications (2013).
   Google Scholar
• V. BRAUN and V. CLARKE, “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology,” Qual. Res. Psychol., 3, 2, 77 (2006); https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• P. LASCOUMES, “La Gouvernementalité: De la critique de l’Etat aux technologies du pouvoir,” Portique, 13–14, 1 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• T. M. PORTER, Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Classification of Radioactive Waste. A Safety Guide, p. 52, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna (1994).
   Google Scholar
• S. L. STAR, “Ceci n’est pas un objet-frontière!,” Rev. Anthropol. Connaiss., 4, 18 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• “Uranium and Nuclear Power Facts,” Canada and Natural Resources Canada (Aug. 9, 2019); www.nrcan.gc.ca (current as of Nov. 7, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• J. M. MILLER and P. C. F. WONG, “19—Canada: Experience of Radioactive Waste (RAW) Management and Contaminated Site Cleanup,” Radioactive Waste Management and Contaminated Site Clean-Up, pp. 612–635, W. E. LEE, M. I. OJOVAN, and C. M. JANTZEN, Eds., Woodhead Publishing (2013).
   Google Scholar
• “Evaluation of the Nuclear Legacy Liabilities Program (NLLP),” Canada and Natural Resources Canada (2018); https://www.nrcan.gc.ca/maps-tools-publications/publications/minerals-mining-publications/evaluation-nuclear-legacy-liabilities-program-nllp/20540 ( current as of Nov. 7, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• B. DESSUS, Déchets nucléaires stockés à Bure? Une faille majeure dans le projet, le 24 octobre 2013, Reporterre, France (2014).
   Google Scholar
• Classification of Radioactive Waste, p. 78, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna (2009).
   Google Scholar
• M. MARTELL and G. FERRARO, Radioactive Waste Management Stakeholders Map in the European Union, p. 82, European Commission Joint Research Centre Institute for Energy and Transport, Luxembourg (2014).
   Google Scholar
• “Standardization of Radioactive Waste Categories,” Technical Reports Series 101, p. 24, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna (1970).
   Google Scholar
• Policies and Strategies for Radioactive Waste Management, p. 81, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienne (2009).
   Google Scholar
• C. PAROTTE and P. DELVENNE, “Taming Uncertainty: Towards a New Governance Approach for Nuclear Waste Management in Belgium,” Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag., 27, 986 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2015.1044429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “National Programme for the Management of Spent Fuel and Radioactive Waste. Document Drafted by the National Programme Committee Pursuant to the Law of 3 June 2014 Transposing European Directive 2011/70/Euratom of 19 July 2011,” Courtesy translation, Alberto Fernandez Fernandez, FPS Economy, S.M.E.s, Self-Employed and Energy, p. 78, Directorate General for Energy, Nuclear Energy Division, Belgium (2015).
   Google Scholar
• Nuclear Fuel Waste Act, “Consolidated Acts, in S.C. 2002,” p. c.23, Canada (2002).
   Google Scholar
• J. VAN VLIET, A. MICHEL, and L. BINDLER, “Belgonucléaire 1990–2005,” Histoire du nucléaire en Belgique 1990–2005, P. LANG, Ed., pp. 185–200, Peter Lang, Bruxelles (2007).
   Google Scholar
• S. BENSON et al., Reset of America’s Nuclear Waste Management. Strategy and Policy 2018, p. 126, Stanford University, George Washington University (2018).
   Google Scholar
• “Bilan du débat public. Projet de centre de stockage réversible profond de déchets radioactifs en Meuse/Haute Marne (Cigéo) 15 mai- décembre 2013,” p. 20, CNDP (2014).
   Google Scholar
• B. D. SOLOMON, M. ANDRÈN, and U. STRANDBERG, “Three Decades of Social Science Research on High-Level Nuclear Waste: Achievements and Future Challenges,” Risk Hazards Crisis Public Policy, 1, 4, 12 (2010); https://doi.org/10.2202/1944-4079.1036.
   Google Scholar
• P. C. LEVERD et al., “Cigeo—Proposed Operations Master Plan (PDE),” CG-TE-D-NTE-AMOA-SDR-0000-15-0063/A, p. 99, ANDRA (2016).
   Google Scholar