References
- G. HECHT and M. CALLON, The Radiance of France: Nuclear Power and National Identity after World War II, Vol. 290, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts (1998).
- G. HECHT, Being Nuclear: Africans and the Global Uranium Trade, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts (2014).
- S. D. SCHMID, Producing Power: The Pre-Chernobyl History of the Soviet Nuclear Industry, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts (2015).
- M. M. RUBIO-VARAS and J. DE LA TORRE, The Economic History of Nuclear Energy in Spain: Governance, Business and Finance, Springer (2017).
- R. COWAN, “Nuclear Power Reactors: A Study in Technological Lock-In,” J. Econ. Hist., 50, 3, 541 (1990); https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022050700037153.
- T. R. LaPORTE and P. M. CONSOLINI, “Working in Practice But Not in Theory: Theoretical Challenges of ‘High-Reliability Organizations,’ J. Public Adm. Res. Theory J.-PART, 1, 1, 19 (1991).
- T. R. LA PORTE, “High Reliability Organizations: Unlikely, Demanding and at Risk,” J. Contingencies Crisis Manag., 4, 2, 60 (1996); https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5973.1996.tb00078.x.
- S. S. SILBEY, “Taming Prometheus: Talk about Safety and Culture,” Annu. Rev. Sociol., 35, 341 (2009); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.34.040507.134707.
- A. VERMA, “What Can Nuclear Engineers Learn from Design Research? A Review of the Theory and Evidence from Contemporary American and French Nuclear Reactor Design Projects,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 379, 111114 (Aug. 2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2021.111114.
- W. E. BIJKER, T. P. HUGHES, and T. PINCH, The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts (2012).
- L. BLESSING, “What Is This Thing Called Design Research?” DS 31: Proc. ICED 03 14th Int. Conf. Eng. Design, Stockholm, Sweden, p. 9 (2003).
- C. L. DYM et al., “Engineering Design Thinking, Teaching, and Learning,” J. Eng. Educ., 94, 1, 103 (2005); https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00832.x.
- S. TILLEMENT and F. GARCIAS, “ASTRID, Back to the Future: Bridging Scales in the Development of Nuclear Infrastructures,” Nucl. Technol., 207, 9, 1291 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2020.1868892.
- S. D. SCHMID, “From ‘Inherently Safe’ to ‘Proliferation Resistant’: New Perspectives on Reactor Designs,” Nucl. Technol., 207, 9, 1312 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2020.1837584.
- B. GODIN, “The Linear Model of Innovation: The Historical Construction of an Analytical Framework,” Sci. Technol. Hum. Values, 31, 6, 639 (2006); https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243906291865.
- M. LEHTONEN, “NEA Framing Nuclear Megaproject ‘Pathologies’: Vices of the Modern Western Society?” Nucl. Technol., 207, 9, 1329 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2021.1885952.
- M. IAKOVLEVA, J. RAYNER, and K. COATES, “Breaking Out of a Niche: Lessons for SMRs from Sustainability Transitions Studies,” Nucl. Technol., 207, 9, 1351 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2020.1855947.
- B. FLYVBJERG, N. BRUZELIUS, and W. ROTHENGATTER, Megaprojects and Risk: An Anatomy of Ambition, Cambridge University Press (2003).
- M. LEHTONEN, “Evaluating Megaprojects: From the ‘Iron Triangle’ to Network Mapping,” Evaluation, 20, 3, 278 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389014539868.
- T. M. PORTER, Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life, Princeton University Press (2020).
- B. SARAÇ-LESAVRE, “Styles of Revaluation: The Case of the Levelized Cost of Electricity,” Nucl. Technol., 207, 9, 1366 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2021.1884492.
- V. IALENTI, “Mankala Chronicles: Nuclear Energy Financing and Cooperative Corporate Form in Finland,” Nucl. Technol., 207, 9, 1377 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2020.1868890.
- S. JASANOFF, “Technologies of Humility: Citizen Participation in Governing Science,” Wozu Experten? Ambivalenzen der Beziehung von Wissenschaft und Politik, A. BOGNER and H. TORGERSEN, Eds., pp. 370–389, VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden (2005); https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-80692-5_17.
- T. R. WELLOCK, “Social Scientists in an Adversarial Environment: The Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Organizational Factors Research,” Nucl. Technol., 207, 9, 1394 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2020.1826273.
- E. GISQUET, S. BEAUQUIER, and E. POULAIN, “Revisiting Safety Culture: The Benefits of a New Cultural Analysis Framework for Safety Management,” Nucl. Technol., 207, 9, 1410 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2020.1868891.
- A. VERMA, “Accidents, Paradoxes and the Epistemic Future of Nuclear Policy,” Inkstick, Mar. 11, 2021; https://inkstickmedia.com/accidents-paradoxes-and-the-epistemic-future-of-nuclear-policy/ (accessed June 3, 2021).
- P. GALISON, “An Accident of History,” Atmospheric Flight in the Twentieth Century, pp. 3–43, Springer (2000).
- S. G. KNOWLES, “Learning from Disaster? The History of Technology and the Future of Disaster Research,” Technol. Cult., 55, 4, 773 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2014.0110.
- A. AHMAD, A. VERMA, and F. GIOVANNINI, “Ten Years After Fukushima: The Experts Examine Lessons Learned and Forgotten,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Mar. 11, 2021; https://thebulletin.org/2021/03/ten-years-after-fukushima-the-experts-examine-lessons-learned-and-forgotten/ (accessed June 3, 2021).
- K. JURAKU and S.-E. SUGAWARA, “Structural Ignorance of Expertise in Nuclear Safety Controversies: Case Analysis of Post-Fukushima Japan,” Nucl. Technol., 207, 9, 1423 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2021.1908075.
- E. KANAMORI, “‘Economizing’ TEPCO’s Responsibility for the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident,” Nucl. Technol., 207, 9, 1442 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2020.1865028.
- K. KUROKAWA and A. R. NINOMIYA, “Examining Regulatory Capture: Looking Back at the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant Disaster, Seven Years Later,” Univ. Pa. Asian Law Rev., 13, 2, 2 (2018).
- T. KAISERFELD and A. KAIJSER, “Changing the System Culture: Mobilizing the Social Sciences in the Swedish Nuclear Waste System,” Nucl. Technol., 207, 9, 1456 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2020.1832815.
- C. PAROTTE, “The Power and Limits of Classification: Radioactive Waste Categories as Reshaped by Disposal Options,” Nucl. Technol., 207, 9, 1469 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2021.1888618.
- H. W. J. RITTEL and M. M. WEBBER, “Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning,” Policy Sci., 4, 2, 155 (June 1973); https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730.
- L. MARSHALL, “Geographies of Energy—A Course in Sociotechnical Decision Making,” Nucl. Technol., 207, 9, 1483 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2021.1895408.
- A. VERMA and D. DJOKIĆ, “Reimagining Nuclear Engineering,” Issues in Science and Technology, May 7, 2021; https://issues.org/reimagining-nuclear-engineering-verma-djokic/ (accessed June 3, 2021).
- A. VISEU, “Integration of Social Science into Research Is Crucial,” Nature, 525, 291 (Sep. 2015); https://doi.org/10.1038/525291a.
- A. VERMA, A. AHMAD, and F. GIOVANNINI, “Nuclear Energy, Ten Years After Fukushima,” Nature, 591, 199 (Mar. 2021); https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-00580-4.