Separating Nuclear Reactors from the Power Block with Heat Storage to Improve Economics with Dispatchable Heat and Electricity

References

• C. FORSBERG et al., “Light Water Reactor Heat Storage for Peak Power and Increased Revenue: Focused Workshop on Near-Term Options,” MIT-ANP-TR-170, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (July 2017); http://energy.mit.edu/publication/light-water-reactor-heat-storage-peak-power-increased-revenue/ ( current as of Jan. 1, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• C. W. FORSBERG, “Variable and Assured Peak Electricity from Base-Load Light-Water Reactors with Heat Storage and Auxiliary Combustible Fuels,” Nucl. Technol., 205, 3, 377 (2019); https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2018.1518555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. W. FORSBERG et al., “Heat Storage Coupled to Generation IV Reactors for Variable Electricity from Base-Load Reactors: Workshop Proceedings. Changing Markets, Technology, Nuclear-Renewables Integration and Synergisms with Solar Thermal Power Systems,” MIT-ANP-TR-185, Center for Advanced Nuclear Energy, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, INL/EXT-19-54909, Idaho National Laboratory (2019); https://osti.gov/biblio/1575201 ( 2019) (current as of Jan. 1, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• C. FORSBERG, P. SABBARWALL, and A. SOWDER, “Separating Nuclear Reactors from the Power Block with Heat Storage: A New Power Plant Design Paradigm,” MIT-ANP-TR-189, Center for Advanced Nuclear Energy, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1768046 (Nov. 2020) (current as of Jan. 1, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• J. BUONGIORNO et al., “Future of Nuclear Power in a Carbon Constrained World,” Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2018); http://energy.mit.edu/research/future-nuclear-energy-carbon-constrained-world/ ( current as of Jan. 1, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• P. EASH-GATES et al., “Sources of Cost Overrun in Nuclear Power Plant Construction Call for a New Approach to Engineering Design,” Joule, 4, 11, 2348 (Nov. 2020).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. HEZJLAR, “Traveling Wave Reactor (TWR),” Encyclopedia of Nuclear Energy, pp. 643–656 (2021); https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-409548-9.12213-4; https://www.terrapower.com/ ( current as of Jan. 1, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• NATRIUM website; https://natriumpower.com/ (2020) ( current as of Jan. 1, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Moltex Energy website; https://www.moltexenergy.com/ (2020) (current as of Jan. 1, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• R. SCHMALENSEE et al., “The Future of Solar Energy—An Interdisciplinary MIT Study,” Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2015); http://energy.mit.edu/research/future-solar-energy/ ( current as of Jan. 1, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• V. SIVARAM and S. KANN, “Solar Power Needs a More Ambitious Cost Target,” Nat. Energy, 1, 16036 (Apr. 2016); https://www.nature.com/articles/nenergy201636.pdf ( current as of Jan. 1, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• J. BUSHNELL and K. NOVAN, “Setting with the Sun: The Impacts of Renewable Energy on Wholesale Power Markets,” UC Davis Energy Economics Program, DEEP WP 020 (May 2018); http://deep.ucdavis.edu/uploads/5/6/8/7/56877229/deep_wp020.pdf ( current as of Jan. 1, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• A. D. MILLS et al., “Impact of Wind, Solar, and Other Factors on Wholesale Power Prices: An Historical Analysis—2008 Through 2017,” Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Nov. 2019); https://emp.lbl.gov/publications/impact-wind-solar-and-other-factors ( current as of Jan. 1, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• N. A. SEPULVEDA et al., “The Role of Firm Low-Carbon Electricity Resources in Deep Decarbonization of Power Generation,” Joule, 2, 11, 2403 (Nov. 2018); https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2018.08.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “Energy Flow Charts,” Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory; https://flowcharts.llnl.gov/content/assets/images/energy/us/Energy_US_2019.png ( current as of Jan. 1, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• C. FORSBERG and S. BRAGG-SITTON, “Maximizing Clean Energy Utilization: Integrating Nuclear and Renewable Technologies to Support Variable Electricity, Heat and Hydrogen Demands,” The Bridge, U.S. National Academy of Engineering (Fall 2020).
   Google Scholar
• C. FORSBERG, “Massachusetts Institute of Technology: Coupling Heat Storage to Base Load Nuclear Reactors,” Chap. 7, in “Flexible Nuclear Energy for Clean Energy Systems,” NREL/TP-6A50-77088, National Renewable Energy Laboratory; (Sep. 2020) https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy20osti/77088.pdf ( current as of Jan. 1, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• “Electricity Explained—Factors Affecting Electricity Prices,” U.S. Energy Information Agency; https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/electricity/prices-and-factors-affecting-prices.php ( current as of Jan. 1, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• SolarPACES website; https://www.solarpaces.org/ ( current as ofJan. 1, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• “Concentrating Solar Power Projects,” U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy; https://solarpaces.nrel.gov/ ( current as of June 30, 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Proc. 2nd Int. Workshop on Carnot Batteries 2020, University Stuttart, September 15–16, 2020; https://iwcb2020.besl-eventservice.de/ ( current as of June 30, 2020).
   Google Scholar
• MALTA website; https://www.maltainc.com/ (2020) ( current as of Jan. 1, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• W. D. STEINMANN, “Thermo-Mechanical Concepts for Bulk Energy Storage,” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 75, 205 (Aug. 2017); https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.10.065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. B. LAUGHLIN, “Pump Thermal Grid Storage with Heat Exchangers,” J. Renewable and Sustainable Energy, 9, 4, 044103 (2017); https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4994054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. D. STEINMANN, H. JOCKENHOFER, and D. BAUER, “Thermodynamic Analysis of High-Temperature Carnot Battery Concepts,” Energy Technology (2019); https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/ente.201900895.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. S. MALLAPRAGADA et al., “Can Industrial-Scale Solar Hydrogen Supplied from Commodity Technologies Be Cost Competitive by 2030?” Cell Reports Phys. Sci., 1, 9, 100174 (2020); https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xcrp.2020.100174.
   Google Scholar
• “Missing Link to a Livable Climate: How Hydrogen-Enabled Synthetic Fuels Can Help Deliver the Paris Goals,” Lucid Catalyst (2020); https://www.lucidcatalyst.com/hydrogen-report ( current as of Jan. 1, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• M. F. RUTH et al., “The Technical and Economic Potential for the H2@Scale Concept Within the United States,” NREL/TP-6A20-77610, National Renewable Energy Laboratory (Oct. 2020); https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy21osti/77610.pdf ( current as of Jan. 1, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• C. FORSBERG et al., “Replacing Liquid Fossil Fuels and Hydrocarbon Chemical Feeds406tocks with Liquid Biofuels from Large-Scale Nuclear Biorefineries,” Appl. Energy, 298, 117525, (Sep. 15, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• P. JOSKOW and D. R. JONES, “The Simple Economics of Industrial Cogeneration,” Energy J., 4, 1, 1 (1983); https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5547/0195-6574-EJ-Vol4-No1-1.
   Google Scholar
• “Energy Storage Grand Challenge: Energy Storage Market Report,” NREL/TP-5400-78461; DOE/GO-102020-5497, U.S. Deparment of Energy (Dec. 2020) ( current as of Jan. 1, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• C. FORSBERG, S. BRICK, and G. HARATYK, “Coupling Heat Storage to Nuclear Reactors for Variable Electricity Output with Base-Load Reactor Operation,” Electricity J., 31, 3, 23 (2018); https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tej.2018.03.008.
   Google Scholar
• “Energy Storage Cost Analysis: 2017 Methods and Results,” Electric Power Research Institute (2017); https://www.epri.com/research/products/000000003002012046 ( current as of Jan. 1, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• “2020 Grid Energy Storage Technology Cost and Performance Assessment,” DOE/PA-0204, U.S. Department of Energy (Dec. 2020).
   Google Scholar
• “Energy Storage Grand Challenge Roadmap,” DOE/PA-0022, U.S. Department of Energy (Dec. 2020).
   Google Scholar
• “Raccoon Mountain,” Tennesse Valley Authority; https://www.tva.com/energy/our-power-system/hydroelectric/raccoon-mountain (current as of Jan. 1, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• M. CHAANAOUI, S. VAUDREUIL, and T. BOUAHMIDI, “Benchmark of Concentrating Solar Power Plants: Historical, Current, and Future Technical and Economic Development,” Procedia Computer Sci., 83, 782 (2016); https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.04.167.
   Google Scholar
• A. BONK et al., “Thermal Stability of Solar Salt at 650°C—A Deep Dive into Molten Nitrate Salt Chemistry,” Proc. Int. Conf. SolarPACES, Albuquerque, New Mexico, September 29–October 2, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• A. BONK et al., “Solar Salt—Pushing an Old Material for Energy Storage to a New Limit,” Appl. Energy, 262, 114535 (2020); https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. NUNES et al., “Molten Salts as Engineering Fluids – A Review: Part I. Molten Alkali Nitrates,” Appl. Energy, 183, 603 (2016).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. BLANDFORD et al., “Kairos Power Thermal Hydraulics Research and Development,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 364, 110636 (2020); https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2020.110636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. FORSBERG et al., “Fusion Blankets and Fluoride-Salt-Cooled High-Temperature Reactors with Flibe Salt Coolant: Common Challenges, Tritium Control, and Opportunities for Synergistic Development Strategies Between Fission, Fusion and Solar Salt Technologies,” Nucl. Technol., 206, 11, 1778 ( 2020); https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2019.1691400.
   Google Scholar
• M. MEHOS et al., “Concentrated Solar Power Gen3 Demonstration Roadmap,” NREL/TP-5500-67464, National Renewable Energy Laboratory (Jan. 2017); https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy17osti/67464.pdf ( current as of Jan. 1, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Y. ZHAO and J. VIDAL, “Potential Scalability of a Cost Effective Purification Method for MgCl2-Containing Salts for Next Generation Concentrating Solar Power Technologies,” Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells, 215, 110663 (2020); https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2020.110663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. DING, A. BONK, and T. BAUER, “Corrosion Behavior of Metallic Alloys in Molten Chloride Salts for Thermal Energy Storage in Concentrated Solar Power Plants: A Review,” Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 12, 3, 564 (Mar. 2018); https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-018-1720-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. C. CALDWELL, G. ITSKOS, and K. H. SANDHAGE, “Air-Stable Molten Salts and Corrosion-Resistance Containment for High-Temperature Thermal Energy Storage,” Proc. Int. Conf. SolarPACES, Albuquerque, New Mexico, September 29–October 2, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• K. F. AMUDA and R. M. FIELD, “Proposed Heat Storage and Recovery Facility Designs for Korean Nuclear Power Plants Using Ultra Large Floating Barge,” Transactions of the Korean Nuclear Society Autumn Meeting, Goyang, Korea, October 23–25, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• C. ODENTHAL et al., “Experimental and Numerical Investigation of a 4 MWh High Temperature Molten Salt Thermocline Storage System with Filler,” Proc. Int. Conf. SolarPACES, Daegu, Korea, October 1–4, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• C. FORSBERG and A. S. ALJEFRI, “100-Gigawatt-Hour Crushed-Rock Heat Storage for CSP and Nuclear,” Proc. Int. Conf. SolarPACES, Albuquerque, New Mexico, September 29–October 2, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• P. McDANIEL and C. FORSBERG, “A Sodium-cooled Thermal Spectrum Fission Battery,” 28th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering, ICONE2021-65765, (Virtual) August 4-6, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• C. S. TURCHI et al., “Molten Salt Versus Liquid Sodium Receiver Selection Using Analytic Hierarchy Process,” Proc. Int. Conf. SolarPACES, Albuquerque, New Mexico, September 29–October 2, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• C. W. FORSBERG, P. J. McDANIEL, and B. ZOHURI, “Nuclear Air-Brayton Power Cycles with Thermodynamic Topping Cycles, Assured Peaking Capacity and Heat Storage for Variable Electricity and Heat,” Nucl. Technol., 207, 4, 543 (2021); https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2020.1785793.
   Google Scholar
• T. WETZEL et al., “Liquid Metal Technology for Concentrated Solar Power Systems: Contributions by the German Research Program (Review),” AIMS Energy, 2, 1, 89 (Mar. 2014); https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3934/energy.2014.1.89.
   Google Scholar
• K. NIEDERMEIER et al., “Assessment of Thermal Energy Storage Options in Sodium-Based CSP Plant,” Appl. Thermal Eng., 107, 386 (2016); https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.06.152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. D.POMEROY and R. M.SALEMME, “Alternative Configurations for Sodium-Cooled Solar Thermal Power Plants,” IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, Vol. PAS-99, No. 5, p. 2012, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (1980); https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAS.1980.319829.
   Google Scholar
• C. FORSBERG, “Sodium-Steel Heat Storage for Variable Energy Output from Nuclear and Solar Power Systems,” Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc., 119, 935 (2018).
   Google Scholar
• C. FORSBERG and P. SABHARWALL, “Heat Storage Options for Sodium, Salt and Helium Cooled Reactors to Enable Variable Electricity to the Grid and Heat to Industry with Base-Load Operations,” ANP-TR-181, Center for Advanced Nuclear Energy, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, INL/EXT-18-51329, Idaho National Laboratory (2018).
   Google Scholar
• W. M. CONLON and M. J. VENETOS, “Another Gas Turbine Decarbonization Path: Adding Energy Storage to the Combined Cycle,” Mech. Eng., 143, 1, 64 (Dec./Jan. 2020/2021); https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2021-JAN10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. CONLON, “Decarbonizing with Energy Storage Combined Cycles,” POWER Magazine, 36 (Dec. 2019).
   Google Scholar
• W. CONLON, “Dispatchable Combined Cycle Power Plant,” U.S. Patent 10,113,535 (2018).
   Google Scholar
• D. STACK, “Development of High-Temperature Firebrick Resistance Heated Energy Storage (FIRES) Using Doped Ceramic Heating System,” PhD Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (Dec. 2020).
   Google Scholar
• “Grid Resilience in Regional Transmission Organizations and Independent System Operators,” Docket No. AD18-7-000, 162 FERC, 61,012, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Jan. 8, 2018) ( “Grid Resilience Order”).
   Google Scholar
• S. R. GREENE, “Are Current U.S. Nuclear Power Plants Grid Resilience Assets?” Nucl. Technol., 202, 1, 1 (2018); https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2018.1432966.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. R. GREENE, “Nuclear Power: Black Sky Liability or Black Sky Asset?” Int. J. Nucl. Secur., 2, 3, 3 (2016); https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7290/V78913SR.
   Google Scholar
• S. R. GREENE, “The Key Attributes, Functional Requirements, and Design Features of Resilient Nuclear Power Plants (rNPPs),” Nucl. Technol., 204, 2, 131 (2018); https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2018.1480213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. R. GREENE, “Enhancing Electric Grid, Critical Infrastructure, and Societal Resilience with Resilient Nuclear Power Plants (rNPPs),” Nucl. Technol., 205, 3, 397 (2018); https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2018.1505357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regulatory Guide 1.233, “Guidance for Technology Inclusive, Risk Informed, and Performance Based Methodology to Inform the Licensing Basis and Content of Applications for Licenses, Certifications and Approvals for Non-Light-Water Reactors,” U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (June 2020).
   Google Scholar
• “Risk-Informed Performance-Based Technology Inclusive Guidance for Non-Light Water Reactor Licensing Basis Development,” Technical Report 18-04, Nuclear Energy Institute (Aug. 2019).
   Google Scholar
• R. A. MESERVE, “Regulatory Innovation to Support Advanced Reactors,” Bridge, 50, 3 ( Fall 2020).
   Google Scholar
• “High Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactor Projected Markets and Preliminary Economics,” INL/EXT-10-19037, Rev. 1, Idaho National Laboratory (Aug. 2011); https://inldigitallibrary.inl.gov/sites/sti/sti/4633195.pdf (current as of Jan. 1, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• J. CONEFAL and D. RACKIEWICZ, “Survey of HTGR Process Energy Applications,” MPR-3181, MPR Associates, Inc. (May 2008); https://art.inl.gov/NGNP/NEAC%202010/INL_NGNP%20References/MPR-3181%20Survey%20of%20HTGR%20Proc%20Energy%20Appl.pdf ( current as of Jan. 1, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• “Integration of High Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactors into Industrial Process Applications,” INL/EXT-09-16942, Rev. 3, Idaho National Laboratory (Oct. 2011); https://inldigitallibrary.inl.gov/sites/sti/sti/4374066.pdf ( current as of Jan. 1, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• “Next Generation Nuclear Plant Project Evaluation of Siting an HTGR Co-Generation Plant on an Operating Commercial Nuclear Plant Site,” INL/EXT-11-23282, Idaho National Laboratory (Oct. 2011); https://inldigitallibrary.inl.gov/sites/sti/sti/5144371.pdf ( current as of Jan. 1, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• G. GIBBS and S. ASGARPOUR, “Integration of High Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactor Technology with Oil Sands Processes,” INL/EXT-11-23239, Idaho National Laboratory (Oct. 2011); https://inldigitallibrary.inl.gov/sites/sti/sti/5144366.pdf (current as of Jan. 1, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• “Overview of Energy Development Opportunities for Wyoming,” INL/EXT-12-27626, Idaho National Laboratory, University of Wyoming (Nov. 2012); https://inldigitallibrary.inl.gov/sites/sti/sti/5581208.pdf ( current as of Jan. 1, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• E. INGERSOLL et al., “Cost and Performance Requirements for Flexible Advanced Nuclear Plants in Future U.S. Power Markets,” Lucid Catalyst (July 2020); https://www.lucidcatalyst.com/arpa-e-report-nuclear-costs ( current as of Jan. 1, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• D. J. C. MacKAY, “Solar Energy in the Context of Energy Use, Energy Transportation and Energy Storage,” Philos. Transact. Royal Soc. A, 371, 20110431 (2013); https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2011.0431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Q. JIANG et al., “Review of Thermal Recovery Technologies for the Clearwater and Lower Grand Rapids Formations in the Cold Lake Area of Alberta,” Osum Oil Sands Corporation (2009); http://www.osumcorp.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/CIPC_Review-of-Thermal-Recovery-Technologies-for-the-Clearwater-and-Lower-Grand-Rapids-Formations-in-the-Cold-Lake-Area-of-Alberta.pdf ( current as of Jan. 1, 2021).
   Google Scholar